BABIP Driven Starting Pitcher BB/9 Changers

by
June 11, 2013

Yesterday, I unveiled another use of a pitcher’s BABIP, besides quickly identifying who has benefited from some good fortune and whose luck should improve. I focused on the K/9 rate and how a low or inflated BABIP could dramatically affect it as it increases or reduces the number of hitters a pitcher will face each inning, giving him additional or fewer opportunities to strike batters out.

Some commenters rightly noted that a pitcher who walks more batters will also have additional opportunities to strike hitters out. This is true, but since walk rate is one of a pitcher’s primary skills, we assume that his BB% will remain fairly consistent. I wanted to isolate the luck component of K/9 and therefore chose to only control for BABIP.

Today I follow the same process, but this time will look at a pitcher’s BB/9. Once again, a low BABIP will reduce the number of batters a pitcher faces in an inning, limiting his chances of issuing a free pass. The opposite would be true with an inflated BABIP.

Like yesterday, I looked at all starting pitchers with at least 50 innings pitched in a season from 2003-2012 (n = 1,770) to formulate a regression equation to turn a pitcher’s walk percentage into an expected BB/9 (xBB/9). That equation is:

xBB/9 = -0.2404 + (BB% * 42.0950)
R-squared = 0.984

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The future walk percentage increasers group includes those whose current BB/9 is below his xBB/9. We would expect that this group has a BABIP well below the league average, and it does, with an unweighted average of .274. This is essentially the same as the K/9 increaser group that averaged a .275 BABIP. The decliner group averaged an unweighted BABIP of .319, just a hair below the .323 mark posted by the K/9 decliner group.

Since I am looking at the same population of pitchers with the same BABIP metric, the decliners and increasers list should look similar to the K/9 lists.





 

Mike Podhorzer is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
supgreg
12 years ago

Basically the premise is, the more batters a pitcher faces, the more chances to strikeout/walk hitters.

Let me play devil’s advocate for a second. If a pitcher gives up less hits, doesn’t that increase the chances for additional innings pitched, with a cap of 9 in most instances?

In either instance, gaining additional batters either thru giving up hits or pitching more innings, still comes out to facing the same amount of batters in a game. (unscientifically calculated)

Since I’ve written this out, it makes more sense to me why K/9 or BB/9 can be misleading. Facing 30 batters in 5 IP with a K% of 20% is 6K in 5IP and a K/9 of 10.8. Facing 30 batters in 9 IP with a K% of 20% is 6K in 9IP and a K/9 of 6.

1