A Dominating Quartet of Young Starting Pitchers
The top 12 of the last 30 day starting pitcher strikeout rate leaders is littered with the usual names. But of course as with any metric over an arbitrary time frame, there are a few surprising ones. Let’s discuss the four, who all happen to be 25 and under.
| Name | K% | BB% | ERA | SIERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| German Marquez | 33.7% | 5.5% | 2.16 | 2.62 |
| Tyler Glasnow | 31.7% | 8.7% | 3.25 | 3.28 |
| Jack Flaherty | 31.0% | 11.2% | 1.45 | 3.62 |
| Walker Buehler | 30.8% | 10.3% | 1.19 | 3.46 |
So I kind of knew that German Marquez was on some sort of a roll, but given that he calls Coors Field home, I didn’t bother to pay attention or dive deeper into his advanced metrics. Oops. It absolutely shocks me to learn that he has struck out a whopping 33.7% of the batters he has faced over the last 30 days. That rate ranks fifth among qualified starters! Not only has he been featuring strikeout stuff, he has also been displaying sterling control, holding a sub-6% walk rate. These strong skills have resulted in a 2.62 SIERA, a level you rarely see from a Rockies starter.
His last 30 days comprises his last six starts. A look at his velocity doesn’t yield any difference. However, a peek at his pitch mix does. He has thrown his fastball 10% less often, almost entirely exchanging those four-seamers for his slider. Why is that a good idea? Because it has been his whiffiest pitch this year, generating a superb 19.6% SwStk%. As we seem to see often, pitcher reduces fastball usage in favor of more deadly breaking pitch, strikeout rate surges. Seems so easy! I still always remain leery of Rockies pitchers, but Marquez, armed with big fastball velocity, looks like what we hoped Jon Gray would be.
I’m sure you noticed, but if not, Tyler Glasnow is good now. His last 30 days nearly comprises his entire time with the Rays, and if I remember correctly, he’s been used as part of their “opener and relievers” plan early on after his arrival. Perhaps surprisingly given his skills surge, his pitch selection and velocity have remained identical to his time with the Pirates. The big difference is an improvement in what has plagued Glasnow up until now — control. His strike percentage with the Pirates was a sad 59.4% (league average is around 63%), but it has spiked to 63% with the Rays. That’s still nothing special, but when a guy whose control was terrifying suddenly becomes league average, and already possesses big strikeout potential, that’s the recipe for a major breakout.
I should also note that Glasnow has become a fly ball pitcher with the Rays. I haven’t dug into pitch locations, but I’m guessing this was a concerted effort to throw higher in the zone for even more strikeouts. Though I prefer pitchers pitching in the NL than AL, I’m buying here.
Jack Flaherty has been rather dominant all year, so there’s nothing special about this particular stretch. His 13.3% SwStk% supports the over 30% strikeout rate, which itself is supported by a wicked slider, which has induced a 23.5% SwStk%. He also sports two other non-fastballs with double digit SwStk% marks, so he owns a true four pitch mix (fix if you separate the four-seamer from the sinker). For as long as he continues throwing that slider at least 30% of the time, he’ll keep something close to this up (though ERA in low-to-mid 3.00s, not sub-3.00).
Walker Buehler has been up and down with the Dodgers, but this last 30 day period he has turned it up a notch with the strikeouts. His velocity hasn’t moved, but he has ratcheted up the usage of his four-seamer at the expense of his sinker and essentially ditched his changeup. Four-seamers are preferable to sinkers for strikeouts, and Buehler’s owns an 11.2% SwStk% mark, which is elite for that pitch. His changeup deserved to disappear from his arsenal, as it generated a laughable 1.8% SwStk%.
However, what does worry me about Buehler is the fact that he doesn’t really have a standout pitch, aside from the four-seamer. Only two of his pitches have generated double digit SwStk% marks, the other of which is his cutter. But a 13.5% SwStk% as your best whiff pitch just isn’t very good. So far, Bueheler has managed such a strong strikeout rate because lots of foul strikes and an above average rate of called strikes. It’s not necessarily unsustainable doing it this way, but I like to see a high strikeout rate driven by more swinging strikes. As a result, he’s possibly the least intriguing of the bunch, though factoring in Coors means he’s likely above Marquez.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
Alternate title: The Hazards of Writing the Day Before
Doesn’t invalidate anything you said, it’s just funny when a Glasnow completely implodes between the time you finish writing and the time the post goes live. It’s why I always publish within a couple hours of writing during the season.
It’s hilarious because I checked scores before heading to bed and laughed at that line. So typical!
Glasnow looked like he was trying to hit barrels. Not that I could do any better, but yeesh
Nice writeup. I shared your confusion over Buehler’s middling swinging strike % and contact %. I looked at leaderboards from the past 15 years or so and there have been a few SPs who can succeed wildly with contact rates above 80% (and low swinging strike rates). All of these guys, like Buehler, get a lot of looking strikes (28.5 % of buehler’s strikes are looking strikes compared to the 26.4% mlb average) and foul strikes. Here’s the group of higher contact SPs (above 80% usually) that were still basically aces, with solid K %s to boot: Cliff Lee, Adam Wainwright, Chris Carpenter, and Roy Halladay.
Now I ended up trading Buehler a few months ago, despite this analysis, for Austin Meadows, for much the same reason you are cautious about him. However, I’m indeed regretting it now. It looks like Buehler can succeed and get a bunch of ks with an average swinging strikes and contact profile bc of his other strengths. Siera, fip, and xfip support his success, his minor league and major league numbers support his success, and steamer, zips, and the bat all project for a 3.61 era or better, with 10+ k/9. Swinging strike % is obviously a very useful short hand proxy for ks, but in Buehler’s case it appears to be a misleading simplification.
One additional thing (to save you the trouble of using your human xk calculator powers): your xstats equation fully supports his 27% and 7% k and bb percentages.
and I know you still like Buehler, but if you buy his steamer/zips/the bat projections, as well as his xfip and sieras, you’d value him above the other three (also promising) dudes–except for maybe flaherty. His k% and bb% rates are also way way past 50% stabilization points.
Yup, I ran the xK% and was surprised to see it sitting right where his actual mark was. Anyway, all his xERA metrics, xFIP, SIERA, etc, are using his actual strikeout percentage. The question isn’t whether he deserves his ERA given his underlying skills, it’s whether his strikeout rate is sustainable given the middling swinging strike rate. I say it could be, but I’m less confident than if his strikeout rate was driven by a high swinging strike rate.
Ok cool, that’s fair given Wainwright, lee, halladay, and Wainwright are definitely not the norm — most guys with 79%+ contact and average or worse swinging strike rates are not front end starters. I don’t know if I missed any other exceptions besides these guys — I probably did, but there certainly aren’t too many like this.
German Marquez may be my Fantasy MVP this year considering I grabbed him off waivers.
Funny enough I was just saying the other day to a buddy I think Marquez is becoming what we all hoped Gray would be!
oh man i own all of these pitchers. but glasnow, man that was rough last night. still confident in him going forward
Interesting to see this. Thanks for sharing your research. One small correction: Glasnow is the only non-Snell SP in the Rays’ rotation. He has started all 7 of his games with them. They must see something special in him too.
Yeah, Glasnow has been used as a traditional starter and not an “opener” since coming over. His first 2 starts were short only because the Rays were stretching him out after he had been used entirely in relief by the Pirates.
Just for fun, xwOBA numbers for all 4 (full year so not last 30d and will include Glasnow’s beating last night since I’m doing it as of now):
Buehler .276
Flaherty .279
Marquez .294
Glasnow .313
Pretty good group of starters. I swore years ago that I would never roster a Rockies starter and I’m not about to change that, but Marquez has been awfully impressive this year.
Glasnow’s control issues would worry me long term – the other 3 guys have never had sustained control issues at any level but Glasnow has never quite figured that out. Even this year he’s walking an awful lot of guys. If he can keep striking out 30+% I suppose he can make it work but lots of BBs is no way to be a great pitcher. Glasnow has also posted better peripheral numbers since moving out of the bullpen (higher K%, lower BB%) which would also worry me since most guys’ numbers get worse as a starter, not better. He’s also throwing essentially just as hard as a starter (96.8 as a starter, 96.6 as a reliever) which most guys can’t sustain and it seems more likely that over time he falls back into the 94-95 range where he was as a starter previously. His starting stats seem a little like small sample size flukiness.
Maybe Glasnow was tipping his pitches last night. While his pitch mix and velocity hasn’t changed, his results have and he seems to throw a good amount of strikes in the starts i have seen. From what I can gather, it looks like the Rays may have moved him on the rubber every so slightly the the 1st base side, and it appears that his follow through is much less pronounced as before he was falling off the mound with his leg kick follow through up around his head. He now seems more balanced up and down and the follow through is not as violent, perhaps allowing him to control his release point better? Seems like the Rays may have made a few suggestions…I could be wrong though, it’s hard to look at GIFs full speed and pick this stuff up.
Apparently he just had no feel for his breaking pitches and the hitters were sitting dead red the entire time knowing this.