Draft season is almost over and the regular season is just over the horizon. I’m sure there are a few leagues drafting at the last possible moment before Opening Day on Thursday, but I figured we could do a little auction analysis to see which players have gained or lost value during the preseason.

First, I pulled some data on players auctioned since February 1 in all FG points leagues. Then I pulled some data from the Average Salaries page to use as a baseline. Obviously, the average salary listed on that page will include players auctioned during this draft season, so it’s not a perfect comparison, but it’ll do. I’ve also compared the 2023 auction data against the listed “Last 10” value from the Average Salaries page to give a sense of how auction values have changed recently. The tables below will show the top 10 value gainers and losers for both of those measures.

Value up

This list is mostly populated with youngsters who were likely kept at very reasonable values but auctioned closer to their true talent level. For the most part, the average values from this draft season fall pretty close to where I had ranked them earlier this offseason; The outliers are Julio Rodríguez and Bobby Witt Jr. Rodríguez’s helium makes sense after a phenomenal rookie campaign and an offseason where he’s been positioned as the face of the future of baseball. I picked him up in a first-year league for $45 this year, which now seems like a bargain considering where his average value lies.

Witt’s rise in value is a little tougher to parse. He didn’t have as sterling a rookie year as Rodríguez, but the talent is undeniable. I ranked him in the $15-$19 tier but he’s being auctioned closer in value to Marcus Semien, Wander Franco, and Xander Bogaerts. The projections see him improving over his 99 wRC+ he posted in 2022, but not to the level of those other three. His positional versatility probably helps boost his value a tiny bit, but I’m not sure I’d be comfortable paying more than $20 for him right now.

More recently, we’ve seen some spring standouts gain value with WBC MVP and all-world superstar Shohei Ohtani seeing the biggest leap. And with good reason too. With the change in how Ottoneu handles two-way players this season, managers will be able to earn both hitting and pitching points on days where the player is accumulating both. Ohtani was already incredibly valuable in this format and this adjustment will only help managers squeeze every single point out of his two-way eligibility.

Another spring standout who has seen a recent rise in value is Matt Olson. He launched his eighth spring training home run on Monday and looks poised to have a monster season. He struggled a bit during his first year in Atlanta, suffering through a 35 point drop in wOBA fueled by deteriorating plate discipline metrics. If he’s able to get his strikeout and walk rates back in line with where they were during his 2021 breakout while also benefiting from the shift ban, he should be able to blow past his current value.

Kwan is another interesting riser. I wrote about the risks associated with him in my outfield rankings article, but the TL;DR version is that he’s overly reliant on good outcomes on all of his batted balls to truly be an elite points league accumulator. Just look at what happened during his first two months in the league where he posted a .259 BABIP and a 105 wRC+. An $18 salary puts him around guys like Cedric Mullins, Nick Castellanos, and Taylor Ward, all of whom I view as having a higher ceiling due to their potential power output.

Value down

The list of players whose values have fallen is unsurprisingly headlined by a bunch of injured players or players with significant injury risk. The surprise here is Xander Bogaerts. I wrote about why I like him more than the market in my shortstop rankings article and my thoughts haven’t changed. He’s been extremely consistent over the last five years and has a fantastic lineup surrounding him in his new home in San Diego. I get that there’s a bit of concern with both his barrel and hard hit rates falling last year, but I’m betting he’ll be just fine. Bogaerts was auctioned for just $17 in the FanGraphs Staff League and I’m confident that’s going to look like a steal by the end of this season.

Again, the list of recent value losers is populated with guys who have picked up spring injuries. Altuve, Hoskins, Iglesias, Polanco, Díaz, and Severino are all on track to start the season on the Injured List and two of those guys were lost for the season. The drops for Kershaw and Darvish appear to be connected to age-related risk; the former looks healthy and ready for another strong season and the latter was slow to ramp up due to the WBC, but looks poised to join the Padres rotation as the fourth or fifth starter.

I can’t really figure out the drop for Starling Marte. He’s enjoyed a solid spring, with a .344/.361/.563 slash line in 36 plate appearances. Over the last two years, he’s posted a 135 wRC+ with solid peripherals. He did post his highest strikeout rate since 2016 last year and his barrel rate didn’t exactly support his .176 ISO, so I suppose there’s a bit of concern there. Still, his recent average salary feels like a pretty decent bargain on an excellent veteran contributor.

The draft for League 32 – Fantasy Field of Dreams is scheduled for this Sunday and I’m facing a dilemma. If you’ve been following along with this series, I’ve been detailing my journey through rebuilding this team that began last season. In my last entry, I wrote about some general draft strategy for rebuilding clubs, but as I sit just a few days away from actually entering the draft room, I’m having trouble deciding which direction to take my team.

Here’s where my roster currently stands:
Hitters:

Pitchers:

I’m spending $249 on 30 players leaving me $151 to spend on my 10 remaining roster spots. I don’t have the highest total available cash in the draft — five other teams have more to spend — but I do have the highest available cash per roster spot by a pretty wide margin, giving me some nice spending power to fill the holes on my roster.

Before we really dive into the available paths forward, I want to take a step back and talk about my approach to draft prep. I’m a big believer in budgeting per position and creating tiered lists of players to give me a pretty easy path towards ensuring I’m wisely allocating my resources across my roster. I really don’t want to head into a draft without some sort of plan in place and a decent idea of how much money I want to spend on each roster spot I need to fill. Here’s what my ideal budget would look like for the roster spots I need to fill:

If I start out the draft by winning, say, Bryce Harper for $40, based on my budget, I know I’ve got an extra $10 to either allocate to another position or bank for the waiver wire during the regular season. And if I end up splurging on, say, Mike Trout for $60, I know I’m going to have to reallocate some resources from another position to account for the overage.

The way I see it, I need two first basemen, a starting outfielder, a second catcher, a couple of starting pitchers, and a couple of relief pitchers. Those last two roster spots can be pretty flexible and that’s potentially the source of my dilemma. Currently, I’ve got Jorge Polanco and Max Muncy penciled in at second base and third base but the ongoing injury issues of the former give me some pause. For the latter, Muncy’s dual eligibility at second and third give me some options with how to proceed, though he’s probably better deployed at second from a value perspective.

Of course, the available talent pool at second is a lot deeper than it is at third which just adds another compilation. The keystone has players like Mookie Betts, Brandon Lowe, Ozzie Albies, Ketel Marte, Gleyber Torres, and Jonathan India all available while the best third baseman in the pool is either Anthony Rendon or Matt Chapman with very few options after that. Spending a bit on a second baseman and playing Muncy at third is probably the best course of action, all things considered.

At first base, I had a solid plan in place until yesterday when Rhys Hoskins tore his ACL. He was clearly the top available option at the position and the rest of the available players are a pretty significant step-down. Spencer Torkelson seems like the best fit for my roster and where it is in the competitive cycle. Beyond him, the options are down to veterans like C.J. Cron and Wil Myers or utility players like Brandon Drury and J.D. Davis. Luckily, most of the money I thought I was going to be spending on Hoskins can now be spent elsewhere because no other first baseman is going to command the kind of salary he would have if he was healthy.

Because I have a lot of cash to spend per roster spot, I can play around in the top tiers of the available outfielders, picking from Mike Trout, Bryce Harper, Betts, George Springer or Masataka Yoshida. But the amount of money I spend on this position will have some pretty significant downstream effects on the kinds of players I can afford later on in the draft. I could go big and grab Trout and spend a lot less on my other roster spots or try and pick up Harper for a discount because of his elbow injury.

On the pitching side of things, there are relatively few top-tier options in the player pool right now; Max Scherzer and Blake Snell are the best available starters and I’m definitely not going to pay top dollar for any relievers at this point in my rebuild. I’m perfectly comfortable picking from the wide range of mid-tier starters that are available and then picking the best $1 relievers with upside I can find at the end of the draft.

I have three paths in front of me depending on how I want to allocate my resources, and I’m asking you, dear reader, to help me decide which way to go.

In this scenario, I’d split the majority of my cash between Betts and Harper while picking up a few solid depth pieces elsewhere. I have a lot of money budgeted for Harper, and while his recovery process has been better than expected, I still expect to get a pretty big discount on him since he’s still projected to miss a large chunk of the season. Targeting him is more about trying to acquire him for a reasonable salary so I can keep him next year, a little further into my rebuild. Betts is clearly the top 2B available, and depending on his salary and position eligibility, could be keepable next year too. He’ll also make a really enticing trade chip this summer if I’m looking to continue building my team for the future.

The problem with this plan is the lack of planned salary room at the end of the draft. I’ve budgeted nearly every available dollar, and while I expect some of those players to come in under budget, I probably won’t have much cap space to play on the waiver wire during the season.

If I’m going to budget that much money for an outfielder, I might as well go all the way and spend on the best option available. Like Betts, Trout could be a keeper next year if his salary is reasonable, but he’s almost certainly going to be used as a trade chip at the trade deadline. India is a solid bounce-back target who is still super young, and with the depth at the position, I could spend a little more on someone like Marte or Torres if I had some extra cash available. I also allocated a few more resources for my starting pitchers in this scenario, but I could save money there too by sticking with my mid-tier plan from the first scenario.

This scenario is all about spreading my resources out as widely as possible across my roster. Rather than targeting one of the top options at any given position, I’m looking to pick up solid contributors at every position. The other benefit of this approach would be a larger amount of cash left over to use during the season. I think if I weren’t rebuilding, this would be the way I’d want to go. It gives me a ton of points across the board, lowering my risk in case one of these players doesn’t work out as expected.

If you want to try and craft another approach with other available players, here’s a list of free agents in the league.

So, which approach should I go with?

I’ll wrap up my 2023 positional rankings with a look at the relief pitching market. You can find links to the rest of my rankings as well as Chad’s below. And a reminder, if you want a big picture view, you can see our ordinal Ottoneu rankings on the FanGraphs Fantasy Rankings Board.

Jake Mailhot’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP
Chad Young’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP

I really like the format of Chad’s ranking so I’ll try and emulate them a bit here. Here are few more notes about my process:

1. Tiers > Ranks. While these players will all be technically ranked ordinally, the tier they’re placed in really matters. The order within the tiers doesn’t matter as much, though that isn’t to imply that the players within each tier are interchangeable either.
2. Projected points. I’ve been building my own homebrewed projections for the past decade plus, ever since I started playing Ottoneu, and they form the basis for the rankings below. They’re nothing overly complicated; essentially just a MARCEL-esque projection using three years of historical data filtered through a rough aging curve and adjusted for the current run environment. I also include a collection of three public projection systems (ZiPS, Steamer, and PECOTA) to provide some additional context. That gives each player six data sources that form their projection.
3. P/IP is the basis. Points per innings pitched is the gold standard by which you should be evaluating pitchers in Ottoneu but there are plenty of factors that will affect a player’s ranking outside of their raw projection. Injury risk, projected playing time and role, age, and future value are all things that need to be taken into account when evaluating pitchers.
4. Dollar amounts are pre-inflation. The dollar amounts assigned to each tier are pre-inflation but are easily adjusted for your league context.

Rather than give notes on every player like Chad, I’ll give my general thoughts on the position below and discuss a handful of players I like more or less than his rankings. Let’s get into it.

NOTE: For the P/IP projection you see below, I’ve subtracted out points for saves and holds. Those two categories are notoriously fickle and extremely difficult to project. Evaluating relief pitchers based on their raw skills alone has usually worked out for me; teams generally give their highest leverage opportunities to their best bullpen arms, so the saves and holds should flow from those pitchers with the best skills. I’ve also included a column for each pitcher’s projected role based on the Roster Resource Depth Charts. Between those two factors, you should have a pretty solid grasp of how any given reliever should be valued.

Rather than pick a handful of guys to write up like in my previous rankings articles, I’m just going to give some general thoughts about building a bullpen in Ottoneu. There are two competing considerations when building your strategy: relievers are the most volatile part of your roster and they’re the most fungible players in the format. That means even if you invest heavily to build an elite bullpen, a team who spends $10 total on 5 or 6 relievers could outperform your team if they find the right mix of breakouts and sleepers. Be ready to churn through a bunch of relievers throughout the season as pitchers get hurt or lose their effectiveness. That process is so much easier if you’re not invested into a bunch of high priced closers.

While I’m not as extreme as Chad in my devaluation of relief pitchers, I’ve rarely rostered any of the elite closers in my time playing Ottoneu. Generally, I’ll allocate around $25-$30 of my salary cap to fill out my bullpen and that’s usually accomplished by picking a couple of guys from the middle tiers and then a bunch of $1-$3 fliers that I can churn through during the season.

Like I said above, skills really matter because teams will generally use their most skilled relievers in the highest leverage situations. That means Ottoneu Points and 4×4 owners can ignore the closer carousel game that 5×5 players are tied to. A pitcher’s place in the bullpen pecking order matters, but it should be a secondary consideration when you’re looking for potential breakouts on the waiver wire.

With the rankings for position players complete, I’ll turn my attention to the mound, starting with my rankings for starting pitchers.

Jake Mailhot’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP
Chad Young’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP

I really like the format of Chad’s ranking so I’ll try and emulate them a bit here. Here are few more notes about my process:

1. Tiers > Ranks. While these players will all be technically ranked ordinally, the tier they’re placed in really matters. The order within the tiers doesn’t matter as much, though that isn’t to imply that the players within each tier are interchangeable either.
2. Projected points. I’ve been building my own homebrewed projections for the past decade plus, ever since I started playing Ottoneu, and they form the basis for the rankings below. They’re nothing overly complicated; essentially just a MARCEL-esque projection using three years of historical data filtered through a rough aging curve and adjusted for the current run environment. I also include a collection of three public projection systems (ZiPS, Steamer, and PECOTA) to provide some additional context. That gives each player six data sources that form their projection.
3. P/IP is the basis. Points per innings pitched is the gold standard by which you should be evaluating pitchers in Ottoneu but there are plenty of factors that will affect a player’s ranking outside of their raw projection. Injury risk, projected playing time and role, age, and future value are all things that need to be taken into account when evaluating pitchers.
4. Dollar amounts are pre-inflation. The dollar amounts assigned to each tier are pre-inflation but are easily adjusted for your league context.

Rather than give notes on every player like Chad, I’ll give my general thoughts on the position below and discuss a handful of players I like more or less than his rankings. Let’s get into it.

Pitching is always tricky to evaluate. It seems like there are always breakout pitchers who made a tweak to their arsenal or are suddenly throwing 95 after an offseason trip to Driveline. There are always the established options who can be reliable, but pitchers break down more often than any other position. That means investing a large portion of your salary cap into your pitching staff will always carry some amount of risk.

To be fair, there’s great reward if you choose to pay up for the best pitchers on the market. There’s about 25-30 guys who are projected to cross the 5 P/IP threshold and a handful who might even get up to 6 P/IP. The risk is so much greater in these higher tiers; the best pitcher on the planet has thrown just 156.1 innings over the last two years. They were extremely high quality innings, but it’s an open question whether those few innings were worth the high market price deGrom commanded.

Luckily, if you choose to pass on the best pitchers on the market, there’s a large middle tier that you can build a perfectly productive pitching staff with. There’s probably 40-50 guys in this group that have good projections but won’t break the bank to roster. Some of them even have the upside to push into the higher tiers if things go right in 2023. This is where I like to build the bulk of my staff.

Once you’re past those top 70-80 pitchers, you’re getting into the lower tiers where all sorts of warts and question marks abound. Here, you’re simply searching for potential breakouts and bounce backs. There are a bunch of pitchers in these lower tiers who will give you bulk innings without good ratios. These guys will provide consistent points but their ceilings are usually capped pretty low; they’re good options if you need to mitigate some of the risk you might have taken on with some of your higher priced pitchers.

The other nice thing about playing in these lower tiers is that you can churn through pitchers pretty quickly if they’re not working out. Chasing after the newest breakout or surprising rookie is much easier if you don’t have to jettison a higher priced player to open up a roster spot. There are always guys on the waiver wire who will be useful for your team during the season, the trick is to quickly determine which ones to pursue because they’re actually productive and which ones to pass on because they’re getting lucky or on a hot streak.

Three Guys I Like More than Chad
Cristian Javier – Javier finally received the opportunity to pitch out of the rotation on a full-time basis and he produced a breakout season for the Astros. He struck out nearly a third of the batters he faced in the regular season and was nearly unhittable in the postseason. He excels at generating whiffs with an elite fastball that he regularly locates at the top of the zone. But unlike some pitchers who suffer from a home run problem when they try to elevate their fastballs, Javier manages to avoid barrels too. Just a third of the balls put in play against him were hard hit and just 7.2% of them were barreled up last year. That’s a pretty incredible pair of skills and now he doesn’t have to worry about his role moving forward.

Garrett Whitlock – Like Javier, Whitlock’s usage in 2023 should be much clearer; all signs indicate he’ll spend the entire season in the rotation after getting bounced to the bullpen after suffering a hip injury. I wrote about Whitlock’s potential as a starter last spring but here’s the tl;dr version of it: he possesses three pitches that generate elite results and developed a changeup as a third pitch last year to help him work through lineups multiple times. There is some injury risk here — his hip still isn’t right and he might miss Opening Day as a result — but if he’s healthy and spends the entire season as a starter, he should produce fantastic results for your squad.

Patrick Sandoval – Sandoval’s fastball has been the one thing holding him back from truly ascending to join the game’s elite pitchers. He possesses one of the best changeups in baseball and pairs that with a devastating slider. On July 2, he started throwing his sinker more often and reduced his usage of his four-seamer. His strikeout rate ticked up, his walk rate fell, and his ERA and FIP both improved. You can read more about this shift in pitch mix in my deep dive from last summer.

Three Guys I Don’t Like as Much as Chad
Gerrit Cole – For Cole, everything comes down to his alarming home run rates. He’s still running fantastic strikeout-to-walk ratios and possesses one of the most dominant pitch arsenals in the game. Unfortunately, he’s been increasingly prone to allowing a few too many dingers since joining the Yankees. His HR/FB% over the last three years is 15.8%, the third highest in baseball among qualified starters. It’s a big reason why his xFIP is nearly 40 points lower than his actual FIP during that period and why it was 70 points lower in 2022. Home runs are pitcher killers in Ottoneu and I’m pretty weary of Cole for that reason alone.

Sandy Alcantara – Alcantara turned in a phenomenal season last year to rightfully earn the NL Cy Young award. Unfortunately, a lot of his value in Ottoneu last year came from his league leading 228.2 innings pitched. That kind of workload is nearly unheard of in the modern era and it really helped him outpace his peers in raw points. But when you look at his peripherals, specifically his strikeout rate, he’s clearly a step behind the best pitchers in the league. You can pay for his bulk innings in the hope that he pushes past 200 IP again, but that seems like a risky bet considering how often pitchers breakdown. On a pure rate basis, Alcantara sits behind the pitchers in the highest tier.

Robbie Ray – Ray’s issues mirror Cole’s; he was one of the two pitchers who ran a higher HR/FB% than Cole over the last three seasons. To make matters worse, he dealt with a drop in fastball velocity last year which affected his entire repertoire. The good news was that he maintained the gains in control that allowed him to win the Cy Young in 2021, but his overall performance took a dip after joining the Mariners. Like Cole, it really all comes down to his home run rate and the significant damage it will do to his ability to produce consistently in the format.

We’ll wrap up my position player rankings with a look at the outfield.

Jake Mailhot’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP
Chad Young’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP

I really like the format of Chad’s ranking so I’ll try and emulate them a bit here. Here are few more notes about my process:

1. Tiers > Ranks. While these players will all be technically ranked ordinally, the tier they’re placed in really matters. The order within the tiers doesn’t matter as much, though that isn’t to imply that the players within each tier are interchangeable either.
2. Projected points. I’ve been building my own homebrewed projections for the past decade plus, ever since I started playing Ottoneu, and they form the basis for the rankings below. They’re nothing overly complicated; essentially just a MARCEL-esque projection using three years of historical data filtered through a rough aging curve and adjusted for the current run environment. I also include a collection of three public projection systems (ZiPS, Steamer, and PECOTA) to provide some additional context. That gives each player six data sources that form their projection.
3. P/G vs P/PA. Points per game played is the gold standard by which you should be evaluating players in Ottoneu. I won’t argue with that. That measure does have some drawbacks, particularly for players who pinch hit, pinch run, or are used as defensive substitutions often. Those limited appearances can skew a player’s P/G lower than what they’re producing when they’re getting full-time playing time. To provide a little more context for these kinds of players, I’ve also included points per plate appearance below. That measure should give us a better idea of how a player produces no matter how he’s used by his team.
4. Dollar amounts are pre-inflation. The dollar amounts assigned to each tier are pre-inflation but are easily adjusted for your league context.

Rather than give notes on every player like Chad, I’ll give my general thoughts on the position below and discuss a handful of players I like more or less than his rankings. Let’s get into it.

NOTE: I’ve included Util-only players in my OF rankings. In general, they’ll be listed at the bottom of whatever tier they’re placed in because of the lack of positional flexibility. In addition, Shohei Ohtani is listed in a tier as if he were only a batter — obviously he provides a ton of value as a pitcher as well and he would be my top ranked player in Ottoneu if I listed his combined value.

In Ottoneu, you’re afforded five starting spots for your outfielders. That creates a situation where the position is simultaneously deep and shallow. The top of the position is filled with superstars but you’ll be able to find solid production all the way down into the middle tiers. There does seem to be a pretty significant drop off once you get 40 deep which means you’ll likely be filling out the last couple of spots in your outfield with flawed players.

Having deep rosters and daily lineups are definitely benefits as you try and find five viable outfielders to start. I’ve found that platoons work especially well at this position. Players like Jesse Winker, Joc Pederson, and Josh Naylor all have much higher value in Ottoneu because you can really squeeze out as much value out of them when they’re facing the platoon advantage. Personally, I like to try and fill at least three of my OF spots with full-time, consistent contributors, and then grab a handful of players I can platoon.

Three Guys I Like More than Chad
Michael Harris II – I understand the trepidation surrounding Harris. He only played in 43 games above High-A before making the leap up to the big leagues, he really struggled against left-handed pitching, and his surface level plate discipline metrics looked pretty poor in his rookie season. Despite those nits to pick, Harris was a genuine revelation last year. His power surpassed anything he was able to do in the minor leagues and his underlying batted ball peripherals support his newfound power profile. A mid-season swing change after being called up helped him unlock that tool. And the approach at the plate? It too improved as the season went on and he became more settled in at the game’s highest level; he cut his chase rate from around 50% in late-June to just over 35% by the end of the season and improved his in-zone contact rate correspondingly. Those adjustments on the fly as a 21-year-old really speak to his talent, coachability, and drive to succeed.

Teoscar Hernández – It feels like a lot of the concerns surrounding Hernández involve his move to Seattle where he’ll play his home games in the pitcher’s paradise that is T-Mobile Park. Just comparing the park factors, his new home isn’t nearly as bad as its reputation for right-handed batters; Rogers Centre has a factor of 106 for right-handed home runs to 102 for T-Mobile Park. The real issue for batters in Seattle is finding hits that don’t fly over the fences. Hernández certainly has the power to overcome whatever ballpark he calls home anyway. His exit velocities and hard hit and barrel rates all sit in the top 5% of baseball and have for the last three seasons. Perhaps you’re looking at his 129 wRC+, a three-year low since his breakout in 2020. Hernández strained an oblique early in the season and missed about a month on the IL, but he didn’t really get right until a few weeks after being activated. From June 1 onwards, he posted a 146 wRC+ with 23 of his 25 home runs. That beat his career-best mark he posted in 2020 and indicates he was just as productive last year once he got healthy.

Hunter Renfroe – At this point in his career, Renfroe’s power should be unquestioned. He’s blasted 153 home runs over the last six seasons and possesses a career isolated power of .247. The reason I’m so high on him is because he’s seemingly figured out the swing-and-miss issues that plagued him earlier in his career. Over the last two seasons, he’s cut his strikeout rate from 28% during his first five seasons to just under 23%. The biggest difference has been a significant improvement to his overall contact rate. He’s also gotten a little more swing happy with that change in approach, which has helped him put more balls in play with his better bat-to-ball skills. With his power, that’s definitely a good thing and it’s a big reason why his wRC+ jumped up to a career-high 124 last year.

Three Guys I Don’t Like as Much as Chad
Randy Arozarena – Arozarena is almost certainly a better 4×4 or 5×5 player than he is an Ottoneu contributor. His power and speed combo is perfectly suited for those formats that reward stolen bases. In the FanGraphs points format, his speed isn’t nearly as valuable a tool and his power actually isn’t all that impressive. For one, more than half of his batted balls were put on the ground last year. Second, when he does elevate, his hard hit and barrel rates are merely average; he outperformed his expected slugging by 63 points in 2022. Third, he’s notoriously streaky, with significant periods of abysmal production throughout a season. If I’m paying more than $20 for an outfielder, I want a little more consistency and a higher ceiling than Arozarena can provide.

Steven Kwan – The argument against Kwan is somewhat similar to Arozarena; he’s a better 4×4 or 5×5 player than he is a points league accumulator. Granted, Kwan (5.28 P/G) just outproduced Arozarena (5.22 P/G) in his rookie season, but leagues that value runs, average, and stolen bases are where Kwan shines. In Ottoneu, Kwan’s contact-heavy approach leaves too much to chance on all those balls he puts in play. That was the story over his first two months in the big leagues where he put up a .259 BABIP and a 105 wRC+. Without any power to speak of, he’s just too reliant on getting hits to fall to produce points consistently when his batted balls are falling into gloves instead.

Oscar Gonzalez – Gonzalez came out of nowhere to post a 122 wRC+ in 91 games last year and was a postseason hero for the Guardians. The power was just a continuation of a breakout season in 2021 where he blasted 31 home runs across two minor league levels. But the plate discipline leaves so much to be desired. His 48.4% chase rate ranked third-highest among all batters with at least 300 plate appearances. It’s a testament to his bat-to-ball ability in two-strike counts that his strikeout rate sat below 20%. But such an aggressive approach means that he’s walking a knife’s edge, and if all those swings start coming up empty, he could find himself cratering.

We’ll finish up the infield rankings with a look at third base.

Jake Mailhot’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP
Chad Young’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP

I really like the format of Chad’s ranking so I’ll try and emulate them a bit here. Here are few more notes about my process:

1. Tiers > Ranks. While these players will all be technically ranked ordinally, the tier they’re placed in really matters. The order within the tiers doesn’t matter as much, though that isn’t to imply that the players within each tier are interchangeable either.
2. Projected points. I’ve been building my own homebrewed projections for the past decade plus, ever since I started playing Ottoneu, and they form the basis for the rankings below. They’re nothing overly complicated; essentially just a MARCEL-esque projection using three years of historical data filtered through a rough aging curve and adjusted for the current run environment. I also include a collection of three public projection systems (ZiPS, Steamer, and PECOTA) to provide some additional context. That gives each player six data sources that form their projection.
3. P/G vs P/PA. Points per game played is the gold standard by which you should be evaluating players in Ottoneu. I won’t argue with that. That measure does have some drawbacks, particularly for players who pinch hit, pinch run, or are used as defensive substitutions often. Those limited appearances can skew a player’s P/G lower than what they’re producing when they’re getting full-time playing time. To provide a little more context for these kinds of players, I’ve also included points per plate appearance below. That measure should give us a better idea of how a player produces no matter how he’s used by his team.
4. Dollar amounts are pre-inflation. The dollar amounts assigned to each tier are pre-inflation but are easily adjusted for your league context.

Rather than give notes on every player like Chad, I’ll give my general thoughts on the position below and discuss a handful of players I like more or less than his rankings. Let’s get into it.

The contours of third base are pretty similar to second base: a group of really strong contributors at the top of the position with a pretty significant drop off after the first eight names. If you’re looking for a player to provide consistent production throughout the year, targeting one of those top names has to be a priority. There are a few other guys who are also eligible at one of the middle infield positions who aren’t listed above who would fit into the top tiers at this position (Gunnar Henderson, Max Muncy, etc.), but you’re probably better off using them at 2B or SS unless you have multiple options at that respective position.

Behind the top guys at the position, there is a small group of mid-tier third baseman made up of older veterans and younger prospects. Once you get past the top 14 or so players, you’ll get your standard mix of young prospects, older veterans, and part-time players. Because the cliff comes so quickly, if you miss out on one of the top options, you’ll want to try and get a handful of lower tier guys to ensure you have contingency plans in case of emergency.

One Guy I Like More than Chad
Matt Chapman – Chapman bounced back a bit in his first season in Toronto after a dismal season in 2021. His overall line was still well below his two outstanding seasons in 2018–19, but there are signs he’s working his way back towards that elite production again. Most importantly, his plate discipline improved significantly in 2022. He cut his overall swing rate by three points back to where it was earlier in his career, and enjoyed corresponding improvements to his chase rate, swinging strike rate, and contact rate. None of these changes to his approach affected his excellent contact quality; in fact, he improved his hard hit rate by nine points. All these metrics moving in the right direction are definitely a positive sign and the changes to the fences at Rogers Centre should help even more.

Two Guys I Don’t Like as Much as Chad
Jose Miranda – Miranda had a lot of positive things go his way during his big league debut last year. From June onwards, he posted a 130 wRC+ with some decent power. The issue I see is with his aggressive approach at the plate. He has good bat-to-ball skills, but he swings far too often at bad pitches he can’t do any damage on. His chase rate was over 33% but his contact rate on those pitches out of the zone wasn’t nearly at the level of someone like Luis Arraez or Steven Kwan. This aggression has led to a pretty low walk rate throughout his professional career and a major league strikeout rate much higher than what he ran in the minor leagues. There is some risk that big league pitchers will exploit this weakness if he doesn’t make a corresponding adjustment to his approach.

Alec Bohm – In many ways, Bohm’s issues are similar to Miranda’s. He has a good contact rate but too much of his contact is simply too weak to do much damage. He did increase his launch angle last year which helped him improve his results on contact and his actual slugging percentage lagged well behind his expected slugging by nearly 40 points. But he also sacrificed some contact quality to achieve that elevated contact, seeing his hard hit rate fall by nearly seven points. Getting the ball up in the air more often is a good sign, but it won’t do him much good if too many of those fly balls wind up in gloves because they aren’t hit hard enough.

After running through the second base rankings, we turn our attention to the other up-the-middle position: shortstop.

Jake Mailhot’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP
Chad Young’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP

I really like the format of Chad’s ranking so I’ll try and emulate them a bit here. Here are few more notes about my process:

1. Tiers > Ranks. While these players will all be technically ranked ordinally, the tier they’re placed in really matters. The order within the tiers doesn’t matter as much, though that isn’t to imply that the players within each tier are interchangeable either.
2. Projected points. I’ve been building my own homebrewed projections for the past decade plus, ever since I started playing Ottoneu, and they form the basis for the rankings below. They’re nothing overly complicated; essentially just a MARCEL-esque projection using three years of historical data filtered through a rough aging curve and adjusted for the current run environment. I also include a collection of three public projection systems (ZiPS, Steamer, and PECOTA) to provide some additional context. That gives each player six data sources that form their projection.
3. P/G vs P/PA. Points per game played is the gold standard by which you should be evaluating players in Ottoneu. I won’t argue with that. That measure does have some drawbacks, particularly for players who pinch hit, pinch run, or are used as defensive substitutions often. Those limited appearances can skew a player’s P/G lower than what they’re producing when they’re getting full-time playing time. To provide a little more context for these kinds of players, I’ve also included points per plate appearance below. That measure should give us a better idea of how a player produces no matter how he’s used by his team.
4. Dollar amounts are pre-inflation. The dollar amounts assigned to each tier are pre-inflation but are easily adjusted for your league context.

Rather than give notes on every player like Chad, I’ll give my general thoughts on the position below and discuss a handful of players I like more or less than his rankings. Let’s get into it.

The talent level at shortstop feels deeper than it has in a long time. The top of the rankings are filled with established superstars and you’d do well to pick any one of those seven. Some of that depth is due to the group of young prospects who are on the verge of really establishing themselves in the big leagues. Betting on a big breakout from Gunnar Henderson, Wander Franco, Oneil Cruz, or Ezequiel Tovar presents some risk, but the rewards could be astronomical.

Once you get past the top 20 or so options, there’s a steep cliff down to the lower tiers. Like second base, these lower tiers are filled with youngsters with potential upside and flexible options eligible at multiple positions. The depth at shortstop likely means you’re filling your middle infield position with a second shortstop, unless you really want to pay for another top second baseman. However you choose to fill these three positions, you’ll want plenty of bench depth to ensure you’re hitting your games played cap for all three spots.

Two Guys I Like More than Chad
Xander Bogaerts – I have Bogaerts a tier higher than Chad and I think it all comes down to consistency. Over the last five seasons, he’s posted a 134 wRC+ with no individual season that’s diverged more than a handful of points from that five-year average. Combine that with an exemplary health history, and he’s as sure a bet to post a solid offensive season again in his new home in San Diego. He did post the lowest power output in this five-year stretch last year; his fly ball rate fell by more than five points and his barrel and hard hit rates both dropped a bit too. Despite blasting just 15 home runs, his wOBA fell by just five points from what he had posted over the last two seasons.

Dansby Swanson – There are plenty of reasons to doubt Swanson’s ability to repeat his career-year. On the surface, it looks like his success at the plate is tied to his BABIP with all the ups-and-downs that come with batted ball luck. To a certain extent, that’s true; he strikes out a bit too much making him more reliant on good outcomes when he puts the ball in play. He was able to improve his contact quality last year, posting a career-high hard hit rate while maintaining his elite barrel rate. That gives me a bit more hope that he can maintain his high BABIP while continuing to hit for power.

For the most part, Chad and I agreed on the general contours of the position so I could only find two guys who I liked enough to merit a blurb.

Three Guys I Don’t Like as Much as Chad
Oneil Cruz – I’m fully aware that I could regret putting Cruz here by the end of the season if everything works out for him. The tools are there and they’re loud. The problem for him is generating enough contact to do enough damage to buoy his high ceiling. And when he is putting the ball in play, it’s on the ground far too often for someone with his kind of power. He’s a few adjustments away from really breaking through which means there’s a ton of risk in paying up to make him your primary shortstop.

Vaughn Grissom – The Braves are set to give Grissom a long look at shortstop this year, hoping he’s the future at that position. He impressed in his initial callup to the majors last year, posting a 121 wRC+ in just over 150 plate appearances. The problem is that a lot of his success was BABIP driven with some serious red flags in his contact quality metrics. His average exit velocity and hard hit rate were both well below league average and nearly half of his batted balls were put on the ground. That’s not a great combination and indicates he could struggle to find as many hits in his first full season in the big leagues. His plate discipline looks to be in good shape — critically important for a player who skipped Triple-A altogether — so there’s a solid foundation to build from, just don’t expect a repeat of his rookie success.

Jeremy Peña – Peña had an up-and-down rookie season that ended on one hell of a high note, earning MVP honors in the ALCS and the World Series. The problem for him is his plate discipline; he has an extremely aggressive approach at the plate. When he’s making contact regularly, he’s able to put together hot streaks like he had in the playoffs, but if he’s not seeing the ball as well, he’s racking up too many strikeouts to really be all that effective. It’s a profile reminiscent of peak Javier Báez. But where Báez had enough power to offset all those strikeouts, Peña hasn’t consistently shown that level of power yet.

We continue our tour of the infield with my second base rankings. I’m hoping to wrap up these rankings pretty quickly with the two up-the-middle positions this week and finish the rest next week.

Jake Mailhot’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP
Chad Young’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP

I really like the format of Chad’s ranking so I’ll try and emulate them a bit here. Here are few more notes about my process:

1. Tiers > Ranks. While these players will all be technically ranked ordinally, the tier they’re placed in really matters. The order within the tiers doesn’t matter as much, though that isn’t to imply that the players within each tier are interchangeable either.
2. Projected points. I’ve been building my own homebrewed projections for the past decade plus, ever since I started playing Ottoneu, and they form the basis for the rankings below. They’re nothing overly complicated; essentially just a MARCEL-esque projection using three years of historical data filtered through a rough aging curve and adjusted for the current run environment. I also include a collection of three public projection systems (ZiPS, Steamer, and PECOTA) to provide some additional context. That gives each player six data sources that form their projection.
3. P/G vs P/PA. Points per game played is the gold standard by which you should be evaluating players in Ottoneu. I won’t argue with that. That measure does have some drawbacks, particularly for players who pinch hit, pinch run, or are used as defensive substitutions often. Those limited appearances can skew a player’s P/G lower than what they’re producing when they’re getting full-time playing time. To provide a little more context for these kinds of players, I’ve also included points per plate appearance below. That measure should give us a better idea of how a player produces no matter how he’s used by his team.
4. Dollar amounts are pre-inflation. The dollar amounts assigned to each tier are pre-inflation but are easily adjusted for your league context.

Rather than give notes on every player like Chad, I’ll give my general thoughts on the position below and discuss a handful of players I like more or less than his rankings. Let’s get into it.

Traditionally, shortstop has been the lowest non-catcher position in the scarcity hierarchy but second base is really pushing it this year. Mookie Betts stands alone on top of the rankings but he’s bound to lose his eligibility after this season. There are some solid options after him but once you get to 10 or 11 players deep, there’s a group of players with big questions surrounding their production and then a significant drop off. Trevor Story’s injury certainly didn’t help either. Because Ottoneu requires you to start a middle infielder in addition to the two standard positions, the scarcity at second base makes planning your strategy for these three positions pretty tricky.

There are a number of bottom-tier options that do have some potential upside if you’re open to taking on a bit of risk. If you’re stuck with a mid-tier player, one of these youngsters could be a nice partner to give you a bit more ceiling at the position if that sleeper does break out. The other nice thing about the mid- and lower-tier options is that so many of them are eligible at multiple positions. Hitting your games played caps is incredibly important in Ottoneu and these flexible players give you plenty of options when you’re filling out your daily lineups.

Three Guys I Like More than Chad
Brandon Lowe – I think the big difference here is a belief that Lowe’s struggles last year were all injury related. A back injury hampered him all season long and he ended up missing large portions of the year because of it. His ailment obviously sapped a lot of his power last season — his isolated power dropped over 100 points to a career-low of .162 — but he did show some improvement in other areas of his approach. His strikeout rate was a career-best 22.9% and most of that was due to a significant improvement in two-strike counts. His overall swinging strike rate and contact rates were within the realm of his career norms, but when the at-bat was on the line, he was able to reduce his whiff rate leading to a lower strikeout rate. Assuming his back is fully healed this year and his two-strike approach sticks, he’s poised to be one of the most potent bats at a very shallow position.

Ryan McMahon – It’s always tricky rostering Rockies players since their home/road splits often require a platoon mate to pair with them when they’re playing outside of Coors Field. McMahon isn’t necessarily an exception to that suggestion — his away split is a decidedly not-nice 69 point difference in wOBA — but he made some key improvements under-the-hood that could indicate a higher ceiling for him. He reduced his overall swing rate by more than three points and increased his zone contact rate up to 83%. Those two changes led to some higher contact quality and a career-low swinging strike rate. It didn’t necessarily show up in his results — his strikeout rate was still a bit elevated and his power output actually fell from his previous three-year norms — but the adjustments indicate a better approach at the plate.

Brandon Drury – When a journeyman enjoys a mid-career breakout, it’s always important to ask if it’s sustainable. You can read more about my thoughts on Drury’s career-year last season in my deep dive from December but it essentially boils down to this: he made significant improvements to his batted ball quality while also honing his approach at the plate to make contact a lot more often. And with eligibility at three positions, he’s a flexible piece of depth for any Ottoneu team.

Three Guys I Don’t Like as Much as Chad
Jazz Chisholm Jr. – It breaks my heart to put Chisholm down here because he’s an extremely fun player to watch. His combination of power and speed make him one of the most dynamic young players in baseball. Unfortunately, only one of those tools will be useful in Ottoneu making him a much more valuable player in 4×4 or 5×5 formats. Then, there’s the added complication of a position move, as the Marlins have decided to try him out in centerfield this year. Maybe he takes to the transition without a hitch, but it also presents some uncertainty that, combined with his back injury last year, makes me hesitate to rank him any higher. I really hope I have to eat my words at the end of the year.

Luis Arraez – I like Arraez and Chad and I have him in the same tier, but I think I’m a little lower on him. Arraez’s old school, contact-heavy approach is pretty unique in this day and age and his move to Miami’s pitcher’s paradise shouldn’t hurt him as much since he wasn’t hitting for power anyway. But with an offensive foundation so heavily reliant on good outcomes on all his batted balls, he’s more susceptible to bad luck than most. His career BABIP is .336 and none of his individual seasons look like extreme outliers, but any dip in that metric will have significant effects on his results.

Isaac Paredes – Paredes finally got a chance at near-full-time at-bats in Tampa Bay last season and produced a pretty good 116 wRC+ in just under 400 plate appearances. His excellent plate discipline provides him with a solid foundation but I’m not sure he’ll be able to replicate his power output without some significant changes to his batted ball profile. He blasted 20 home runs last year and his isolated power was .230, the highest it’s been at any level in his professional career. Despite all those extra-base hits, his barrel and hard hit rates were just 6.4% and 37.6%, respectively. Both marks are below league average wouldn’t normally indicate such a high ISO. He was able to hit so many homers because he optimizes his batted balls for pulled contact in the air. Still, without improving his batted ball quality, there’s some risk that he won’t produce as much power this year.

After going through the catching position last week, I’m turning my attention to ranking the rest of the infield this week, beginning with first basemen. Do you need a big thumper to power your offense? Do you like strategic draft decisions at a deep position with plenty of mid-tier talent? Look no further.

Jake Mailhot’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP
Chad Young’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP

I really like the format of Chad’s ranking so I’ll try and emulate them a bit here. Here are few more notes about my process:

1. Tiers > Ranks. While these players will all be technically ranked ordinally, the tier they’re placed in really matters. The order within the tiers doesn’t matter as much, though that isn’t to imply that the players within each tier are interchangeable either.
2. Projected points. I’ve been building my own homebrewed projections for the past decade plus, ever since I started playing Ottoneu, and they form the basis for the rankings below. They’re nothing overly complicated; essentially just a MARCEL-esque projection using three years of historical data filtered through a rough aging curve and adjusted for the current run environment. I also include a collection of three public projection systems (ZiPS, Steamer, and PECOTA) to provide some additional context. That gives each player six data sources that form their projection.
3. P/G vs P/PA. Points per game played is the gold standard by which you should be evaluating players in Ottoneu. I won’t argue with that. That measure does have some drawbacks, particularly for players who pinch hit, pinch run, or are used as defensive substitutions often. Those limited appearances can skew a player’s P/G lower than what they’re producing when they’re getting full-time playing time. To provide a little more context for these kinds of players, I’ve also included points per plate appearance below. That measure should give us a better idea of how a player produces no matter how he’s used by his team.
4. Dollar amounts are pre-inflation. The dollar amounts assigned to each tier are pre-inflation but are easily adjusted for your league context.

Rather than give notes on every player like Chad, I’ll give my general thoughts on the position below and discuss a handful of players I like more or less than his rankings. Let’s get into it.

First base is always a deep position and this year is no different. If you miss out on one of the top guys, I count up to 20 or so secondary options that could provide solid production for your team. That’s not to say you should ignore those guys in the top tier and just wait to grab a mid-tier option. If you have the opportunity to pick one of Freddy Freeman, Vladimir Guerrero Jr., or Paul Goldschmidt, you won’t regret it. They’ll carry a large portion of your offense on their own — if you pay for that kind of production.

There’s a group of young first basemen who have either just established themselves or are on the verge of debuting, led by Vinnie Pasquantino. If you miss out on the Italian Breakfast, Nathaniel Lowe, Triston Casas, Jose Miranda, and hopefully Spencer Torkelson all bring a bit of youth to a position that has traditionally skewed pretty veteran heavy.

There are a bunch of bounce back candidates that can be found for really cheap to pair with a mid-tier option if you want to go that way. Brandon Belt’s projections are off the charts, but the health of his knees will always dictate how much he’s able to produce. Jared Walsh, Trey Mancini, and Dominic Smith also fit this bill. If any of those guys are healthy and producing, they could return some excellent value for just a buck or two, and because the position is so deep, they can be jettisoned pretty easily if they’re not hitting well early in the season.

Three Guys I Like More than Chad
Vinnie Pasquantino – I’m expecting pretty big things from Pasquantino in his sophomore campaign. In his first taste of the major leagues, he showed phenomenal plate discipline with a walk rate a few decimal points above his strikeout rate; he didn’t chase and made contact at an elite rate. With that kind of foundation, he’s already a step ahead of most young prospects. And when he puts the ball in play, he does it very hard and in the air. All of the skills he showed are exactly what you’d want to see from a young hitter and already make him one of the better hitters in the league at just 25-years-old.

Yandy Díaz – Díaz possesses all the same skills that make Pasquantino an elite presence at the plate — low chase, high contact, and high hard hit rates. The only thing that’s lacking is an ability to elevate the ball regularly. That didn’t hold him back from posting a career-high 146 wRC+ last year. The projection systems believe in this new ceiling he showed last year and even project a bit of power growth for him this year. I’m not sure if that’ll happen without a significant change in his batted ball profile, but he’s already proved he can be productive without a higher fly ball rate. Buy the elite skills, and if he does make the launch angle adjustment, reap even greater rewards.

Joey Meneses – Anyone who bought into Frank Schwindel’s “breakout” in 2021 can tell you to stay away from Meneses. Late career breakouts like these are just so hard to predict and rarely last long. There are a few reasons why I believe Meneses’s leap will stick this year. His hard hit rate was significantly higher than Schwindel’s, giving him a higher power ceiling. His plate approach isn’t great; the combination of low strikeout and low walk rates make him pretty dependent on batted ball outcomes. Even if his BABIP regresses back toward league average, his ability to impact the ball gives him a solid foundation to be an above average hitter.

Three Guys I Don’t Like as Much as Chad
Christian Walker – Walker posted a career-year in 2022, setting career-highs in all sorts of offensive categories. I’m not necessarily down on him because of that — though he’s likely to regress back towards his career norms. The biggest adjustment he made was to swing a lot less aggressively, reducing his overall swing rate to just under 45%. His batted ball peripherals all looked fairly similar to his breakout season in 2019. Without any significant changes to his underlying ability to hit for power, the likelihood that he repeats his career-year in 2023 comes down to whether or not his new plate approach is sticky.

Andrew Vaughn – Last season, Vaughn increased his hard hit rate four points, up from 46.4% to 48.4%, putting him in the top ten percent of the league. Even though he was able to impact the ball with authority more often, his barrel rate fell by three points and his isolated power fell by two points. Therein lies the problem. Despite hitting the ball extremely hard, it’s too often put on the ground instead of in the air. To make matters worse, his plate discipline slipped a bit as well, with his walk rate falling to 5.6%. Despite these issues, his wRC+ was still decent at 113. If you’re drafting him and expecting a breakout, there are a lot of things that will need to change first to get there.

Matt Mervis – Mervis had a ton of helium after posting a fantastic 156 wRC+ across three different minor league levels last year. He slashed .309/.379/.605 and blasted 36 home runs as he moved from High-A all the way up to Triple-A in the span of a single season. It’s certainly possible he’ll make his major league debut this year but I’m pumping the brakes on picking him as a breakout candidate. Last year was just his second professional season after going undrafted in the abbreviated, five-round 2020 draft. In 2021, he posted just an 85 wRC+ while spending most of his time in Single-A. The Cubs were obviously not ready to hand the reins over to him this year either; they signed both Eric Hosmer and Trey Mancini to play first. Neither of those two veterans will block Mervis if he continues smashing the ball in the minor leagues, but he has to prove that last year wasn’t a fluke first.

I’m taking a break from my rebuilding series this week to start my Ottoneu rankings for 2023. It’s a little late — the cut deadline has already come and gone — but I’ll try and get them done quickly so they’re available before draft season starts in earnest. Between these and Chad’s rankings (found below), hopefully you’ll have everything you need to prepare for your drafts this year.

Jake Mailhot’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP
Chad Young’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP

I really like the format of Chad’s ranking so I’ll try and emulate them a bit here. Here are few more notes about my process:

1. Tiers > Ranks. While these players will all be technically ranked ordinally, the tier they’re placed in really matters. The order within the tiers doesn’t matter as much, though that isn’t to imply that the players within each tier are interchangeable either.
2. Projected points. I’ve been building my own homebrewed projections for the past decade plus, ever since I started playing Ottoneu, and they form the basis for the rankings below. They’re nothing overly complicated; essentially just a MARCEL-esque projection using three years of historical data filtered through a rough aging curve and adjusted for the current run environment. I also include a collection of three public projection systems (ZiPS, Steamer, and PECOTA) to provide some additional context. That gives each player six data sources that form their projection.
3. P/G vs P/PA. Points per game played is the gold standard by which you should be evaluating players in Ottoneu. I won’t argue with that. That measure does have some drawbacks, particularly for players who pinch hit, pinch run, or are used as defensive substitutions often. Those limited appearances can skew a player’s P/G lower than what they’re producing when they’re getting full-time playing time. To provide a little more context for these kinds of players, I’ve also included points per plate appearance below. That measure should give us a better idea of how a player produces no matter how he’s used by his team.
4. Dollar amounts are pre-inflation. The dollar amounts assigned to each tier are pre-inflation but are easily adjusted for your league context.

Rather than give notes on every player like Chad, I’ll give my general thoughts on the position below and discuss a handful of players I like more or less than his rankings. Let’s get into it.

Playing a catcher is a necessary evil in fantasy baseball, and in Ottoneu, you have the opportunity to play two at a time (though be careful with your position games played cap). The top players at the position will give you legitimate production but things drop off quickly from the top two tiers. If you can’t (or don’t want to) grab one of the top seven or eight players at the position, you’re probably better off picking two of the mid- or low-tier options and hoping to find some kind of production out of that combination. If you really wanted to, you could grab a couple of catchers for $1 at the auction and then just churn through the position in season until you find something that works.

There’s a pretty large group of young backstops who are either just getting established in the big leagues or are on the verge of being called up. The leap from the minors to the majors is always hard for youngsters, but it’s particularly difficult for catchers. I don’t recommend relying on one of these prospects unless you pair them with an established veteran to mitigate some of the risk.

One note about Daulton Varsho: based on playing time alone, he should probably be included in the top tier since he’ll be playing nearly everyday, but I would be shocked if he held onto his catcher eligibility next year. You could draft him as your primary catcher alongside some of the top options at the position, but next year, you’re going to have to choose whether or not to keep him as an outfielder only. Weigh his salary accordingly.

Three Guys I Like More than Chad
Will Smith – Technically, we both ranked Smith in the top tier so we don’t actually diverge all that much on his position, but I considered ranking Smith in a tier of his own above any other player at the position. His combination of elite plate discipline and good power for the position is unrivaled as a catcher. Both his projected points per game and points per plate appearance stand apart from any other backstop.

Danny Jansen – This ranking comes down to how much you think he’s going to play behind Alejandro Kirk; his projected production is fantastic. Those two were paired up as the starting catcher and designated hitter last year once Jansen returned from his early season injury. The Blue Jays brought in Brandon Belt this offseason and he might take away a portion of the playing time at designated hitter against right-handed pitching, but do you really think his knees (or lack thereof) are going to hold up for a whole season? I’m expecting Jansen to get plenty of playing time as the primary backup to Kirk and at DH, just like last year.

Mitch Garver – This one also comes down to playing time. In his first season in Texas, Garver spent nearly half the season on the Injured List and he was just okay when he was on the field. Still, he put up a 136 wRC+ over his previous three seasons before last year and that includes a 43 wRC+ in 2020. The Rangers don’t really have a great option at designated hitter and Garver could slot in there which is what he did for most of last year.

Three Guys I Don’t Like as Much as Chad
Francisco Álvarez, Bo Naylor, Shea Langeliers, etc. – This goes back to that note I had above about young catchers. They’re full of risk and I wouldn’t count on them to carry your production at the position. If you want to grab one as a future investment, that’s fine, but if you’re competing for a top spot in your league, I’d be more inclined to find some more consistent production from a different mid-tier option. Álvarez in particular seems like a significant risk. The talent with the bat is evident, but the Mets clearly don’t trust him behind the plate yet. New York signed Omar Narváez and extended Tomás Nido to pair at the position, pushing Álvarez back to the minors as he continues to develop his defensive skills. It’s possible he’ll get an opportunity at designated hitter, which certainly changes some of the calculus, but that’s no guarantee yet.