Juiced Baseball: Pitcher Evaluation Changes
I’ve screwed up. A lot. A few years back, I created a pitching metric called pERA which took each individual pitch’s results (swinging-strike and groundball rate) and combined them into one metric. The problem was that I wrote the article in 2016 and used a formula I created back in 2015 with 2002-2015 data. The juiced ball arrived and I never adjusted the formula for the change. Oopsy.
I felt a little sick when it finally dawned on me that the formula needed updating and ma initial findings are available in this Twitter thread.
I've invested too much time this morning looking into GB%, ERA, and ERA estimators. Two conclusions:
1. Happy Fun Ball has everything messed up. Don't assume any previous assumptions are true.
2. Groundball pitchers are ruling the day.1/6
— Jeff Zimmerman (@jeffwzimmerman) August 16, 2019
It finally dawned on me that the formula I was using to evaluate pitchers was off. With strikeouts and walks being equal, groundball pitchers outperform flyball pitchers. With a deadened ball, a high flyball rate meant most flyballs would go for easy outs. Not any more. Now those flyballs go for home runs. It’s time for a little math to show the change.
Read the rest of this entry »