Blind Résumés: Cheap Stolen Bases
Let’s cut straight to the chase. Take a look at the statistical snapshots below:
| Name | PA | HR | R | RBI | SB | CS | K% | BB% | AVG | OBP | SLG | ISO | BABIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player 1 | 97 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 11.3 % | 11.3 % | .306 | .392 | .376 | .071 | .351 |
| Player 2 | 91 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 15.4 % | 5.5 % | .235 | .278 | .318 | .082 | .271 |
Obviously, Player 1 is benefiting from a higher batting average on balls in play while Player 2 is getting burned a bit by his. Still, take away their triple-slash lines (but leave the isolated power) and you have two players with almost identical numbers, down to the six steals on eight attempts and the meager isolated powers (ISOs). Where they differ a bit is in plate discipline: Player 1 has a much healthier walk rate than Player 2 and a couple fewer strikeouts. So while Player 1 is benefiting from the a higher BABIP, he can also reasonably be expected to post a marginally higher batting average and noticeably higher on-base percentage. Most importantly, the two hitters are eligible at the same position and are, thus, substitutable.