Jake Mailhot’s 2023 Ottoneu Shortstop Rankings

After running through the second base rankings, we turn our attention to the other up-the-middle position: shortstop.

Jake Mailhot’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP
Chad Young’s Ottoneu Position Rankings: C | 1B | 2B | SS | 3B | OF | SP | RP

I really like the format of Chad’s ranking so I’ll try and emulate them a bit here. Here are few more notes about my process:

1. Tiers > Ranks. While these players will all be technically ranked ordinally, the tier they’re placed in really matters. The order within the tiers doesn’t matter as much, though that isn’t to imply that the players within each tier are interchangeable either.
2. Projected points. I’ve been building my own homebrewed projections for the past decade plus, ever since I started playing Ottoneu, and they form the basis for the rankings below. They’re nothing overly complicated; essentially just a MARCEL-esque projection using three years of historical data filtered through a rough aging curve and adjusted for the current run environment. I also include a collection of three public projection systems (ZiPS, Steamer, and PECOTA) to provide some additional context. That gives each player six data sources that form their projection.
3. P/G vs P/PA. Points per game played is the gold standard by which you should be evaluating players in Ottoneu. I won’t argue with that. That measure does have some drawbacks, particularly for players who pinch hit, pinch run, or are used as defensive substitutions often. Those limited appearances can skew a player’s P/G lower than what they’re producing when they’re getting full-time playing time. To provide a little more context for these kinds of players, I’ve also included points per plate appearance below. That measure should give us a better idea of how a player produces no matter how he’s used by his team.
4. Dollar amounts are pre-inflation. The dollar amounts assigned to each tier are pre-inflation but are easily adjusted for your league context.

Rather than give notes on every player like Chad, I’ll give my general thoughts on the position below and discuss a handful of players I like more or less than his rankings. Let’s get into it.

The talent level at shortstop feels deeper than it has in a long time. The top of the rankings are filled with established superstars and you’d do well to pick any one of those seven. Some of that depth is due to the group of young prospects who are on the verge of really establishing themselves in the big leagues. Betting on a big breakout from Gunnar Henderson, Wander Franco, Oneil Cruz, or Ezequiel Tovar presents some risk, but the rewards could be astronomical.

Once you get past the top 20 or so options, there’s a steep cliff down to the lower tiers. Like second base, these lower tiers are filled with youngsters with potential upside and flexible options eligible at multiple positions. The depth at shortstop likely means you’re filling your middle infield position with a second shortstop, unless you really want to pay for another top second baseman. However you choose to fill these three positions, you’ll want plenty of bench depth to ensure you’re hitting your games played cap for all three spots.

Two Guys I Like More than Chad
Xander Bogaerts – I have Bogaerts a tier higher than Chad and I think it all comes down to consistency. Over the last five seasons, he’s posted a 134 wRC+ with no individual season that’s diverged more than a handful of points from that five-year average. Combine that with an exemplary health history, and he’s as sure a bet to post a solid offensive season again in his new home in San Diego. He did post the lowest power output in this five-year stretch last year; his fly ball rate fell by more than five points and his barrel and hard hit rates both dropped a bit too. Despite blasting just 15 home runs, his wOBA fell by just five points from what he had posted over the last two seasons.

Dansby Swanson – There are plenty of reasons to doubt Swanson’s ability to repeat his career-year. On the surface, it looks like his success at the plate is tied to his BABIP with all the ups-and-downs that come with batted ball luck. To a certain extent, that’s true; he strikes out a bit too much making him more reliant on good outcomes when he puts the ball in play. He was able to improve his contact quality last year, posting a career-high hard hit rate while maintaining his elite barrel rate. That gives me a bit more hope that he can maintain his high BABIP while continuing to hit for power.

For the most part, Chad and I agreed on the general contours of the position so I could only find two guys who I liked enough to merit a blurb.

Three Guys I Don’t Like as Much as Chad
Oneil Cruz – I’m fully aware that I could regret putting Cruz here by the end of the season if everything works out for him. The tools are there and they’re loud. The problem for him is generating enough contact to do enough damage to buoy his high ceiling. And when he is putting the ball in play, it’s on the ground far too often for someone with his kind of power. He’s a few adjustments away from really breaking through which means there’s a ton of risk in paying up to make him your primary shortstop.

Vaughn Grissom – The Braves are set to give Grissom a long look at shortstop this year, hoping he’s the future at that position. He impressed in his initial callup to the majors last year, posting a 121 wRC+ in just over 150 plate appearances. The problem is that a lot of his success was BABIP driven with some serious red flags in his contact quality metrics. His average exit velocity and hard hit rate were both well below league average and nearly half of his batted balls were put on the ground. That’s not a great combination and indicates he could struggle to find as many hits in his first full season in the big leagues. His plate discipline looks to be in good shape — critically important for a player who skipped Triple-A altogether — so there’s a solid foundation to build from, just don’t expect a repeat of his rookie success.

Jeremy Peña – Peña had an up-and-down rookie season that ended on one hell of a high note, earning MVP honors in the ALCS and the World Series. The problem for him is his plate discipline; he has an extremely aggressive approach at the plate. When he’s making contact regularly, he’s able to put together hot streaks like he had in the playoffs, but if he’s not seeing the ball as well, he’s racking up too many strikeouts to really be all that effective. It’s a profile reminiscent of peak Javier Báez. But where Báez had enough power to offset all those strikeouts, Peña hasn’t consistently shown that level of power yet.