NFBC ADP vs Auction Calculator: Correa, Buxton, & Rendon
With the ATC projection data is now available on the website, it’s time to examine where the auction values from the projections and the NFBC ADP disagree. For these comparisons, I used the normal NFBC league settings.
Carlos Correa (10th Hitter by his ADP, 19th by ATC values in auction calculator)
I did not expect to see him on this list but here he is. Correa’s going seven picks ahead of Francisco Lindor while Lindor has the better projection.
The difference comes down to two factors. First, Lindor is expected to steal around 5 to 10 more bases than Correa which is quite a difference. With all other stats being equal, which they are close for this pairing, a stolen base is equal to two home runs in a roto league. They can’t be ignored.
The other factor is the at-bats difference. Correa is projected for 557 (632 PA) and Lindor is up at 616 (684 PA). Here is a comparison of the projected at-bats from several sources to make sure our projections aren’t the exception.
| Source | Correa | Lindor |
|---|---|---|
| ATC | 557 | 616 |
| Depth Charts | 569 | 594 |
| Fans | 561 | 624 |
| Pub. 1 | 567 | 588 |
| Pub. 2 | 595 | 611 |
| Pub. 3 | 525 | 620 |
| Pub. 4 | 581 | 613 |
| Average | 565 | 609 |
The overall average plate appearances is a bit higher than the ATC estimates. Still, a difference of 44 PA exists. They should be off with Correa likely batting 4th and Lindor leading off. The final average is close to the expected difference as each spot down a lineup costs a hitter 18 PA over the course of a season (18*3 = 54).
While I usually find middle infielders go too high in drafts, Correa may be going especially high. Both are being picked around the first turn. Owners who feel they need to fill their shortstop could pass on Correa and pick up a better value a round later in Lindor.
Byron Buxton (ADP: 34. Auction Calculator: 61)
Buxton’s value comes down to how someone values his stolen bases. Here are some various projections.
| Source | AB | SB |
|---|---|---|
| ATC | 529 | 29 |
| Depth Charts | 669 | 23 |
| Fans | 568 | 34 |
| Pub. 1 | 525 | 22 |
| Pub. 2 | 521 | 30 |
| Pub. 3 | 497 | 26 |
| Pub. 4 | 533 | 26 |
| Average | 549 | 27 |
It just takes one person to push is stolen base number into the 35 to 40 range for his value to take off. I’d stay away from paying for the upside. Some owner is going to pay up though.
Buxton’s 20 HR/40 SB potential will catch some owner’s eye but it is the rest of his stats which hurt his overall value. His near .250 AVG isn’t great and limits his Run and RBI chances. Additionally, he’ll be leading off (low RBI chances) for an offensively challenged [I was wrong -JZ] above average offensive team creating some floor.
It seems like owners are paying for the best case with Buxton. There is a decent chance he underperforms his projections and is worse (see 2016 and 2017).
Anthony Rendon (40 ADP, Auction Calculator: 59)
I not sure why the big difference. Here’s a quick comparison of his various projections and 2017 stats.
| Source | AB | Runs | HR | RBI | SB | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 508 | 81 | 25 | 100 | 7 | 0.301 |
| ATC | 523 | 82 | 23 | 90 | 5 | 0.286 |
| Depth Charts | 528 | 84 | 22 | 82 | 7 | 0.283 |
| Fans | 537 | 85 | 24 | 103 | 7 | 0.289 |
| Pub. 1 | 556 | 90 | 23 | 81 | 8 | 0.274 |
| Pub. 2 | 524 | 81 | 25 | 88 | 7 | 0.285 |
| Pub. 3 | 488 | 84 | 21 | 90 | 7 | 0.285 |
| Pub. 4 | 520 | 82 | 22 | 90 | 7 | 0.287 |
| Average | 525 | 84.0 | 22.9 | 89.1 | 6.9 | 0.284 |
It seems like all the projections have him regressing except the Fans expect him to improve. Maybe owners are latching onto his 2017 season too much. I’m not sure. For comparison, here are the projected (ATC) stats from a few other third basemen going after him.
| Name | AB | R | HR | RBI | SB | AVG | ADP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Rendon | 523 | 82 | 23 | 90 | 8 | 0.286 | 59.1 |
| Justin Turner | 528 | 80 | 24 | 86 | 6 | 0.297 | 86.8 |
| Travis Shaw | 544 | 78 | 27 | 91 | 7 | 0.263 | 93.5 |
| Nick Castellanos | 583 | 71 | 27 | 94 | 3 | 0.274 | 103.6 |
If an owner believes in the projections, they should be able to wait for Turner who may be the better value based on his AVG.
I wonder if ranking vice values are being used. Owners may just be going down a rankings list instead of diving in and giving each player a value. There seems to be a third baseman going every 12 picks or so. They should be bunched more together in places.
Overall with Rendon, don’t buy him at his current ADP. Similar or better values can be found later in the draft.
Jeff, one of the authors of the fantasy baseball guide,The Process, writes for RotoGraphs, The Hardball Times, Rotowire, Baseball America, and BaseballHQ. He has been nominated for two SABR Analytics Research Award for Contemporary Analysis and won it in 2013 in tandem with Bill Petti. He has won four FSWA Awards including on for his Mining the News series. He's won Tout Wars three times, LABR twice, and got his first NFBC Main Event win in 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jeffwzimmerman.


Good read. I have to disagree that the Twins are an offensively challenged team. This is a team that scored the 7th most runs in baseball last year and they have several young guys that are still progressing and should improve (Sano, Rosario, Kepler, Polanco, Buxton himself). If they take advantage of the slow FA market and grab themselves a LoMo to help out at 1B/DH, they could go from a good to a great offense.
If Buxton can’t get the K% under control this is all a moot point, but I don’t think we’ve seen anything close to his “best case”. First round upside, IMO
You’re right. Sorry. I’m living too much in the past.
I think we found the person in this league that is going to push the value higher….”first round upside.” Glad i have him as a $5 keeper.
Trying to find where you are getting the NFBC adp from…sorry. Maybe I am looking at the wrong links? I keep getting linked to auction…
Column on the far right is ADP
http://www.fangraphs.com/projections.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&type=steamer&team=0&lg=all&players=0
Turner is 33 to Rendon’s 27. Maybe people think that Rendon has 10+ SB seasons still in him, whereas Turner could stop running.
He also hit mostly out of the 6 hole last year – would expect he’ll probably hit at top this year unless Dusty…
I don’t know if it’s just me but I see Correa as having more upside than Lindor. I don’t see Lindor being able to hit .300 with 30+ HR, his batted ball profile changed so much it looks like to get back to a .300 hitter he needs to hit less FB which make him more of a 20-25HR guy. Correa on the other hand looks like he could be a 40HR guy while still being a .300 or better hitter. I watched them each 12-15 times last year so this is purely an “eye test”.
To contradict myself a bit, I did just look at Lindors splits based on where he is hitting in the order and the projections could definitely be underselling his SB potential if he hits leadoff all season. Batting 1st in 64 games Lindor had 11 SA (9 successful) whereas hitting 2nd in 93 games he had 7 SA (6 successful). Based on last years stolen base rate when hitting leadoff, in 150 games as leadoff hitter he would have 26 SA (21 successful) projections only call for 14-15 SB. Hitting leadoff all year would also affect his R/RBI production but i don’t know to what extent.
ahh, yes. I didn’t see this before responding.
this feels wrong to me due to steals. They’re just so valuable and scarce these days, and Correa only had 2 last year. Even if Lindor only has 15, Correa would have to do so much in the other categories to even that out.
If Correa put the ball in the air like Lindor did last year or even somewhere in between, he’d crack 40HR – agreed. Though I do think his approach is pretty well locked in at his current batted ball profile.
I’m 100% agreed that Lindor can’t both have 30+ HR AND a .300 average.
I’d take Correa for the HR upside even on a HR/FB spike because he hits the ball hard in the air to all fields.
Rendon at 40 is closer to his peak than his midpoint, but I’ll chime in as someone who paid close to this price in a shuffling of expiring dynasty assets:
2015 FB% 33.3%
2016: 43.8%
2017: 47.2%
His 89.6 avg EV (tied with Freeman, Trumbo & Bellinger) is enough to support more FB, and he’s a certified FODM (friend of Daniel Murphy).
It’s not hard to dream on that info and pay up because you think he has an extra gear.