My Biggest Concern with Adalberto Mondesi
Have you guys heard of Adalberto Mondesi? No one’s been talking about him the last few months, so I figured it was my duty to discuss him. He’s obviously been surging up early draft boards after a remarkable close to the season. He went 73rd on average in the #2EarlyMocks and then Top 50 in both my AFL draft the PitchersList Mock.
It’s not hard to see why everyone is excited. The 23-year old former prospect had 14 HR and 32 SB in just 75 games and no matter how many times we suggest not taking brilliant numbers like that and extrapolating, we all do it. Even if it’s just to get drunk on the insane numbers for a little bit. Just for the record, his 162-game pace was 31 HR and 70 SB… annnddd now I’m wasted.
The Steamer projections (and virtually all projection systems) are known for their sober, conservative outlook on players and they gave Mondesi 21 HR and 42 SB in 150 games. Those numbers came with a very modest .252 AVG and .292 OBP, too. But how realistic is it that he can net that many SBs while getting on base at a sub-.300 clip? My biggest issue with getting overly excited about Mondesi’s 75-game sample is that it included a completely unsustainable SB opportunity rate.
Looking at SBO% rates over the last 10 years, Mondesi’s 68% is the 2nd to only Rajai Davis posting a 71% in 2011 when he swiped 34 bases in 338 PA. Only two other seasons cracked 60%: Davis again in 2013 (45 PA in 360 PA) and Billy Hamilton in 2015 (57 in 454) both at 61%. Only one season saw an SBO% over 50% for 500+ PA: Hamilton in 2014 (56 in 611). Hamilton’s 2015 was also the only season in the last decade to net more than 34 SB with a sub-.300 OBP.
Only four others topped 30: Davis’s 2011 (.273 OBP, he also had 4 SB in 5 PR appearances), Dee Gordon twice in 2012 and 2018 (32 with a .280 in ’12, 30 last year with a .288), and Drew Stubbs in 2012 (30 with a .277). There is going to be a burden on Mondesi to run regularly and be really successful to push 40+ SB with a sub-.300 OBP. I don’t worry so much about the success.
He had an 83% success rate in 152 minor league attempts and he’s at 82% in 56 MLB attempts. I do wonder if teams will be key in on stopping him now that he’s a known commodity, but teams also know Davis and Hamilton (and other prominent base stealers) are going all the time and still can’t stop them, so I’m not too worried about that aspect.
Will the Royals stay committed to him if the offense is just anemic, though? They should because he’s 23 and part of their future, but it’s not an out of bounds concern. He’s not going to maintain a 68% SBO over a full season or anything close to it. Steamer gives him a 47% rate to get those 42 SB, which is perfectly fine, but it’s in 597 PA.
One thing Mondesi has over all the other rabbits mentioned throughout this piece is that he offers pop where they are drains on the power category. He probably won’t replicate the .222 ISO and 20% HR/FB we saw in 2018, but even if he just matched his 14 HR spread out over a full season, it’d be a boon to pair with his SB upside. I’m just worried about projecting for 40+ SB when we’re granting that he’s got a terrible plate approach (29% K, 4% BB in 500 MLB PA; 25%, 6% in 2299 MiLB PA) and thus, a godawful AVG/OBP combo.
That said, if Mondesi is more of a mid-teens HR then he’s just Jonathan Villar. In fact, Villar is a popular comp for Mondesi and his availability 4-6 rounds later is why I’ll likely just pass on Mondesi. Villar went .260/.325/.384 with 14 HR and 35 SB in 515 PA. I understand Mondesi’s upside, but Villar has it, too.
We’ve actually seen it when he hit 19 HR with 62 SB in 2016. If I’m drafting a speed demon with some pop as early as Mondesi, why not just take teammate Whit Merrifield and get 40+ points of AVG? Or take Starling Marte, who is less likely to go off for 50+ SB (Mondesi’s upside), but has a much more stable floor?
As I’ve said repeatedly since the buzz really kicked into high gear in September, I love Mondesi and I’m really excited to see him for all of 2019, but it’s all about price in fantasy baseball and his is just too high when reasonable alternatives exist around his current draft slot and even later. I have a keeper share to project my hopes and dreams onto, but I can’t really see getting many draft shares throughout this winter and spring when I’m paying a top 50 pick for something that could go really sideways if he continues to get on base at a sub-.300 clip.
By the way, I just want to thank my friend Nick Pollack for an early Christmas gift. He got me a mechanical keyboard and this is my first piece written using it. I absolutely love it. He’d been recommending one to me for a while and I had used my girlfriend’s a bit here and there, but hadn’t gotten around to scooping one so he nabbed my address yesterday morning and it was here last night (Amazon Prime ftw!). Thanks Nick, you’re the best!
Which keyboard model did you get?
I’ll buy? Was this a rhetorical question. What’s your biggest concern?
Wait, seriously?
As for PT concerns. Mondesi is an above average defensive SS. While Villar is not. Villar is actually the greater threat to lose PT despite having a better OBP approach. Tim Anderson and Alcides Escobar usually got 600 PAs no matter the batting line. While Villar has done it once i believe?
Oh I get it. It was an ad for a keyboard? Which keyboard should I buy?
We’re dying to know, Paul. Out with it
I think it’s the GIGABYTE cherry blue mechanical keyboard
Wait, how the f did you know that?
Oh sorry (not a stalker). Nick has been talking that model up on the PitcherList discord channel
Marte lacks Mondesi’s upside assuredly. If you read some of the reports, their coaches spoke on how Mondesi has far and away the most raw power (when Moustakas was still there) on the team. I get that obp is the concern, but I think playing time is not.
Does he really, though? Marte swiped 47 bases in 129 games 2 years ago and has shown 20 HR pop. If we’re just talking about nebulous hypothetical upside, you can definitely make a case for Marte’s being 20-50 with an actual good AVG and OBP.
a minor thing, but you really can only make the case for a 20-40 season from Marte. Only 4 players since 2000 have stolen 50 bases after the age of 30: Juan Pierre, Tom Goodwin, Eric Young, Eric Byrnes. Fourteen additional players had seasons with SB totals between 40-49.
I mean, he stole 47 in 129 games, you can absolutely make the case for 50 if you’re talking about pure upside. His speed hasn’t appreciably declined since then so I get your point about the rarity of it, but the case is absolutely there for his raw, best-case-scenario upside.
Is having the most raw power on the Royals significant?
A bit late to the party here…but I’m in an auction keeper with an option on Mondesi for $11 for up to 5 years. Gonna be tough to assign that contract….with so much risk, yet the potential for so much reward.
Anyhow, they one thing I don’t see anyone considering is that a 23 year old could potentially improve his plate discipline / BB% after his first full year in MLB. Dude is still young and I just don’t like accepting the notion a player is simply who they are at 23 years old. Not to say he may never improve either number….but I’d like to think he’s still learning and adapting and even small improvements to both numbers certainly increase his likelihood of sustained success in MLB.