Manny Machado, Marked Down?
If it doesn’t seem all that long ago that Manny Machado was the darling of prospect hounds and fantasy dreamers, well, that’s because it hasn’t been; the 2010 first round draft pick made his debut just two seasons ago, broke out as an all-star last year and was barely drinking age on opening day back in April.
Of course, he’s also had two seasons cut short by major knee operations, the first one to repair a full tear of his medial patellofemoral ligament in his left knee last year, and the second to fix a partial tear of the same ligament in his right knee back in August. Both injuries bookended what was a limited 2014 campaign for Machado, who played in just 82 games, and cost him dearly in Zach Sanders’ end-of-the-year rankings, where he finished 28th among hot-cornermen.
In the roughly three-and-a-half months in which he did play, however, a glance at his final numbers might suggest Machado didn’t take all that much of a step forward from his breakout 2013 season:
| YEAR | PA | HR | R | RBI | SB | BB% | K% | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 710 | 14 | 88 | 71 | 6 | 4.1 | 15.9 | .283 | .314 | .432 | 102 |
| 2014 | 354 | 12 | 38 | 32 | 2 | 5.6 | 19.2 | .278 | .324 | .431 | 111 |
The home runs are there, sure, but they benefited from a 15% HR/FB rate that doesn’t seem justified by the meager increase in his batted ball distance. Moreover, his GB/FB rate increased, as did his strikeout rate, while his slash line stayed mostly flat.
But if we split up Machado’s season just a little bit — in this case, removing his terrible first month back, which we’ll blame on him being cold and coming off major surgery — we see that he did, in fact, put together a prolonged period of positive production:
| PERIOD | PA | HR | R | RBI | SB | BB% | K% | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/1-8/11 | 235 | 10 | 25 | 27 | 2 | 5.1 | 21.3 | .307 | .350 | .505 | 139 |
Now that’s more like it!
In May, Machado was simply overpowered by major league fastballs, producing a puny .059 ISO against them. That coincided with a surge in his ground balls and a pop-up rate of nearly 20 percent. For nearly the next two and a half months, however, a warmed-up Machado began crushing hard stuff to the tune of a .221 ISO. Once he was able to get around on the heaters, the rest of his batted ball distribution, not surprisingly, clicked back into place, as he began hitting line drives at a healthy clip and the fly balls — and fly ball distance, the key ingredient behind his 16.9% HR/FB rate during this span — fell back into line.
To be fair, these are small sample sizes with which we’re dealing, but still, a more than two-month hot streak to conclude his year doesn’t deserve to be dismissed out of hand. Those positive indicators are especially pertinent when discussing a player like Machado, who, after all, is still just a pup who won’t turn 23 until next July; as Dave Cameron pointed out, he’s six months younger than Kris Bryant and 10 months younger than Gregory Polanco. Depending on one’s point of view, that’s either a good thing or a bad thing; he has several more years to go before he reaches his presumable prime, or, considering the taste he’s already given fantasy owners, he may have several more all-star-quality seasons in him before he really begins to make good on his potential.
The hold-up, of course, is the injury risk. I’m not a doctor or a soothsayer, and even if I were, it’s premature to speculate on how Machado will be feeling five months from now. What we can say is that Machado reported having full range of motion in his right knee earlier this month, and, for what it’s worth, was able to play every day after returning from his left knee injury, which was more severe than August’s breakdown.
The better question, perhaps, is how much fantasy owners will be scared off by the perception of an injury-prone Machado, and whether some might be disappointed that he hasn’t displayed the instant fantasy magic along the likes of Mike Trout or Yasiel Puig. Let’s hope so, because as it stands right now, Machado is projected to be fully available for spring training, and until we hear otherwise, might as well be considered good to go for 2015.
At full price, Machado, a former top prospect who a) had a strong finish in 2014, b) plays a position that’s felt awfully shallow lately and c) has the capability of finishing among the top five third basemen would still deserve to be considered a draft day bargain. At a likely discount, however, it’s not too early for savvy owners to already mark him down as a top target come March.
Karl, a journalist living in Washington, D.C., learned about life's disappointments by following the Mets beginning at a young age. His work has appeared in numerous publications, and he has contributed to the 2014 and 2015 editions of The Hardball Times Annual. Follow/harass him on Twitter @Karl_de_Vries.
So much of Machado’s real life value is his defense which isn’t captured in fantasy. So he will probably always be a guy that is more valuable in real life than he is in fantasy. The real hit on his fantasy value may be the Orioles’ re-signing of JJ Hardy which will keep Machado at third for the next couple of seasons. A move back to his more natural SS position would boost his value considerably but that is likely three years away from happening now, assuming it will happen at all.
I agree with all these points. Only thing I see that gets me excited as a fantasy owner is the power potential here. He has gotten bigger and stronger over the past 2 years and his home run rate has improved significantly from 2013 to 2014 in the few games he played. Power is typically the last tool to fully develop and I see his league leading 51 doubles in 2013 turning into at least 25-30 home run power over the next year or two so long as he can remain relatively healthy. He is still so young at 22 right now that I think there is a lot of development left in this guy. I think he can be a top 3 3b in the near future
So now both knees have been “fixed.” Are they stronger now for it, or are they just as likely to tear again? I hear TJ surgeries described as making the elbow stronger, and yet there are pitchers who have needed 2 or 3.
Once it happens, its more prone to happen again every time the knee gives out. This will be something that will follow him the rest of his career.
The number 1 predictor of future injuries is injury history. As Dr. Andrews himself said, no surgery makes the human body stronger then it was before.
No mention of maturity issues? Maturity has a huge impact on skill development and injury rehabilitation.
Bobby,
I considered mentioning the bat incident, though I don’t know if one outburst (I don’t know of other tantrums, though admittedly, I don’t follow the Orioles all that closely) qualifies him as “immature.” Again, we’re talking about a guy — kid, really — who is the age of a college senior, and just as I’m not ready to label him as injury-prone, I’m not ready to bite down too hard on the maturity issues. But sure, it’s something worth keeping an eye on and, perhaps, could eventually offset his performance on the field; perhaps my leash / optimism in this regard is too long.
Karl
After being a model citizen and gaining countless compliments for his mature behavior before and after the incident, I think we can lay off the talks of maturity issues, no matter how bad that one incident was, for a 22 year old kid.
That’s a nifty little narrative you’ve spun. You should write for Yahoo
Dynasty Dilemma:
I own a $3 Machado. I can extend him for the next two seasons at +$10 a season ($13 annual salary) or the next three seasons at +15 dollars a season ($18 annually). If I don’t extend him, I lose him after next season. If I cut him after signing an extension, I’m still on the hook for half his salary. Is it worth the risk extending him?
I’d need to know how much your total budget is, and compare that to the going rates of other top 3B, and probably the depth of your roster and a whole lot of other variables. Broadly speaking, however, I’d probably say it’s worth the risk; I’m no prospect expert, but I believe in Machado’s bat and his park will only help him. It’s fair to wonder how long it will take him to reach his peak given his age, but 3B is shallow enough, and Machado’s ceiling is high enough, that I’d probably take the plunge.
Karl
Yeah, these are tricky. $3 for 1 year, $13 per for 2 years, or $18 per for 3 years.
I make these decisions based on my team’s win cycle. If I think I can win right now, I might keep him at $3 for the 1 year and free up the cash for better players in the auction, thereby increasing my odds of winning right now. If your team happens to suck or fall apart, you can probably still trade Machado for a good prospect part way through the year, meaning not a total loss of an asset for nothing.
What are you talking about Bobby?
Attempting to throw a bat at the opposing pitcher during a game?
Great Article Karl,
Got a question for you– I have machado right now in a dynasty keeper league with a 300 dollar salary cap. I’ve had considerable trade interest in him but want to keep him. Question is, how long would you sign him for? how it works in this league is every year you sign him his contract goes up 5 dollars. I get him for one more year at 10 and then it would go up every season by 5 dollars and you cant get out of the contract without a significant penalty. what do you think? Thanks!
-Jim
I don’t blame you for not wanting to trade him right now; not because he’s untouchable (who is, really), but because his value has probably dipped a bit for the reasons mentioned above. The knee injuries make signing him for a super long period a risky venture, but at those prices, I think you could probably extend him for at least another couple of years; if all else fails, you could try to unload him to another owner in, say, 2017, with him still being at least a year or two away from reaching his prime — surely someone will still hold Machado, once considered among the very best MLB prospects, in a high regard.
Karl