Help Needed: 2023 Initial Closer Roles

Every season, I try to determine how much closer turnover there is from the last drafts to the season’s end. For example, here is last season’s report.

I decided to verify the beginning of the season section before every manager disappears. For most of the selections, I used our Opening Weekend Bullpen Report. Here are the values I think are right but I don’t feel good about the ones in Yellow. Could people spend a minute looking over the Yellows and verify the names on their favorite team(s)? Thanks.

Changes:

  • Angels to Committee
  • A’s to Committee
  • Mariners to Committee
  • Rangers to Committee
  • White Sox to Lopez

 

2023 Initial Closer Roles
Team Eventual First Top Closer Going into season NFBC ME ADP
Angels Carlos Estévez Committee 276
Astros Ryan Pressly One Guy 57
Athletics Trevor May Committee 342
Blue Jays Jordan Romano One Guy 49
Braves A.J. Minter Closer Hurt 302
Brewers Devin Williams One Guy 52
Cardinals Ryan Helsley One Guy 58
Cubs Michael Fulmer Competition 221
Diamondbacks Scott McGough Committee 301
Dodgers Evan Phillips Committee 219
Giants Camilo Doval One Guy 80
Guardians Emmanuel Clase One Guy 28
Mariners Paul Sewald Committee 171
Marlins A.J. Puk One Guy 328
Mets David Robertson One Guy 177
Nationals Kyle Finnegan One Guy 234
Orioles Félix Bautista One Guy 62
Padres Josh Hader One Guy 38
Phillies Jose Alvardo Competition 270
Pirates David Bednar One Guy 100
Rangers Will Smith Committee 429
Rays Pete Fairbanks One Guy 129
Red Sox Kenley Jansen One Guy 82
Reds Alexis Díaz One Guy 113
Rockies Pierce Johnson One Guy Not Drafted
Royals Scott Barlow One Guy 132
Tigers Alex Lange One Guy 222
Twins Jhoan Duran One Guy 121
White Sox Reynaldo Lopez Closer Hurt 336
Yankees Clay Holmes One Guy 85

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Jeff, one of the authors of the fantasy baseball guide,The Process, writes for RotoGraphs, The Hardball Times, Rotowire, Baseball America, and BaseballHQ. He has been nominated for two SABR Analytics Research Award for Contemporary Analysis and won it in 2013 in tandem with Bill Petti. He has won four FSWA Awards including on for his Mining the News series. He's won Tout Wars three times, LABR twice, and got his first NFBC Main Event win in 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jeffwzimmerman.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Pat GMember since 2020
2 years ago

As a White Sox fan, I took shots at Reynaldo Lopez. A fill-in for Liam Hendriks hadn’t been named and it seemed like Graveman struggled in the 9th. Lopez didn’t fair any better, unfortunately.

bersmrMember since 2018
2 years ago

Rangers were expected to be just LeClerc before quickly (within days of opening day) moving toward a LeClerc/Smith committee. Obviously it moved on from there to pretty much just Smith.

ismailadiemeMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Zimmerman

Also there might have been a sense that Barlow would pair with Leclerc for saves? I personally was surprised by Will Smith getting the gig, but in retrospect it makes sense given his past with Bochy

GreggMember since 2020
2 years ago

Angels were sort of a committee between Estevez and Quijada although the popular sentiment in spring training was that it was going to be just Estevez. In spring training games, Estevez was walking everyone so people got nervous. When the season started, Estevez was being saved for save opps but there were very few in the first couple of weeks. After Estevez was used in a couple non-save opps, Quijada got some save opps and excelled at it. It looked like Estevez pretty much lost his job (despite never blowing a save) until Quijada went on the IL.

A.J. Minter was definitely the sole closer for ATL when Iglesias was hurt. He sort of conveniently lost the job just as Iglesias was ready to come back.

Like others said, Reynaldo was the sole guy for the first few weeks until he lost the job due to bad performance.

I don’t have perfect recollection on this, but I would call Alvarado the “first closer” that emerged out of PHI committee. He then got hurt and they pivoted to Kimbrel.

ncbMember since 2020
2 years ago

Not sure if SEA should of been considered one guy at the start of the year based on Munoz and usage last year.

ncbMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  ncb

Just to back this up, Sewald appeared in the 7th on opening day with Munoz getting the save.

Jonathan BeilfussMember since 2020
2 years ago

May didn’t get a save til June. Of course the whole team only had 4 saves before then I think (Jimenez 1/Familia 2/Jackson 1).

sgtjuniorMember since 2016
2 years ago

Lopez got the opening day save in Minn and took 4 out of the first 10 saves looking like a split role

Rutuger47Member since 2021
2 years ago

For the Cubs, Fulmer and Boxberger were the favourites to close before the year started. Boxberger had more all-time saves but Fulmer signed for more money (both 1 year deals). Before Fulmer signed, Heuer was in the mix.

As for first top closer, it was Fulmer but short lived. He got his only save on April 7 and then blew his next two chances. Boxberger got the next shot in mid-April and picked up 2 saves in April, none in May before he went on the IL.

For Philly, I think you have it right. Alvarado started to separate himself early in the year. He led the team in saves (5) on April 28th and was on the IL by May 10th. Philly only had 1 save opportunity in that span (May 7 – Stahm, Alvarado had a hold). At the start of the year Dominguez, Kimbrel and Soto were all in the mix (and all had a higher ADP than Alvarado), so definitely a committee.

plasmaj
2 years ago

For the Mets, they refused to name a closer at the start. Robertson was the favorite, but it was seen as likely that Ottavino could share the duty with Raley possibly getting some chances as well.

GreggMember since 2020
2 years ago

The Rockies situation was sort of complicated to begin the season. Bard was assumed to be the closer after such a great year last year but he went on the IL with anxiety right as the season began.