2022 Sporer Breakouts Vol. 2
FYI: I won’t be chatting on Wednesday, February 23rd. There will be a Top 100 Prospects chat in that timeslot!
First things first, what’s the difference between a breakout and sleeper? Breakouts are about a new level of performance while sleepers are about where a player is drafted. I started my Sleeper series (Vol. 1) and identified the 21st round as the beginning of the sleeper pool. That first edition focused on 15-teamers so I started at pick-300 (I’ll have 10- and 12-team iterations coming, too). A breakout can come from the 2nd round if they ascend to a top 3-5 player, but I am looking for breakouts outside of the first 4 rounds so pick-60 in 15-teamers, 48 in 12s (which will be today’s focus), and 40 in 10s.
Daulton Varsho | Arizona Diamondbacks, C/OF | 94 ADP
A catcher who runs and doesn’t always have to play behind the dish to get on the field is what fantasy darlings are made of and Varsho certainly has many proponents. A sharp second half (.879 OPS, 10 HR, 5 SB in 219 PA) has his biggest fans buying in completely while also bringing aboard some new fans. The real beauty with Varsho is the fact that he will likely spend most of his time in the outfield which gives him a potentially huge edge in volume over many other star catchers. That hasn’t been reflected in the projections with a high of 112 games, but if Carson Kelly stays healthy and holds the full-time catcher role, then Varsho could log north of 125 games with 100+ coming in the outfield. He has a great shot to deliver double-digit stolen bases, too, something that has been done just four times by a catcher since 2010 (J.T. Realmuto 2x in ’16 and ’21, Yadier Molina in ’12, and Jason Kendall in ’10).
Tyler Stephenson | Cincinnati Reds, C/1B | 142 ADP
It’s a catcher-heavy installation of Breakouts with a pair of ’em among today’s trio, though Stephenson is definitely offering something much different than Varsho. There is no speed component and the trade of Tucker Barnhart clears the path for Stephenson to become the primary guy in Cincinnati. The extra catching work and some off days out of the tools of ignorance spent at 1B or DH could push his volume closer to 450 PA. His strong plate skills (career 20% K, 10% BB, 7% SwStr) paired with budding power have me excited about his upside. His size (6’4, 225) and scouted raw power (65) set the foundation for power growth as I understand a .146 ISO doesn’t exactly scream improvement. There isn’t always an obvious metric to point to for a breakout, though. Plus, even a repeat (.286 AVG, 10 HR, 45 RBI, 56 R in 402 PA) wouldn’t be a miss for those who draft him somewhere in the 7-10 range among catchers, but I can see a 20-HR season with continued strong AVG and improved counting categories.
Lourdes Gurriel Jr. | Toronto Blue Jays, OF | 147 ADP
I’m back on the Gurriel Jr. train! I was big on him last year and feel like he was essentially a bad month from delivering what I was thinking he could do. Alas, those first 33 games did happen, so he wound up with a 107 wRC+, 21 HR, and 84 RBI in 541 PA. I still think there’s a 30-100 season in this bat with batting average upside that could push into the .300s and he will be just 28 years old this year. With the departure of Marcus Semien, he is due for a lineup move, too. He is currently slotted in the 5-spot on Roster Resource after spending the bulk of 2021 in the 6- and 7-spots. A firm floor with some real upside in the heart of a premium lineup is the stuff breakouts are made of and I’m not sold we have seen the best of Gurriel Jr. yet.
I like Gurriel Jr. too. Similar to how J. Polanco was limited by bothering and nagging health concerns makes me warry. However, at the right price, I’m very interested.
Varsho’s value may depend in large part on if the Diamondbacks add a few more MLB-caliber hitters once transactions resume. The appeal of a catcher-eligible guy who plays everyday in the outfield is huge, but his mediocre 98 wRC+ last year (which looked very deserved according to his underlying numbers) doesn’t exactly scream “everyday outfielder.” There’s so little competition in Arizona right now that I think he plays anyway, but if they add a couple pieces, his stock could go way down.
I totally hear you, but I just think it’d be SO foolish of them to do that. If they don’t just turn him loose and really see what they have, I think they’re messing up.
Regarding Gurriel, his modest season wasn’t the result of a bad month—he was terrible for the first half of the season (.259/.278/.416, 9 hr, 30 r, 33 rbi).and was still at just a .706 OPS entering August.
It was only in the final two months that he really hit—.308/.369/.568, 10 hr/42 rbi—and looked like the guy I was hoping he’d be all season.
No, it was really just the bad month of games. 33 to be exact.
First 33 gms: .195/.215/.276, 2 HR in 130 PA. Rest of 1H: .310/.341/.526, 8 HR in 183 PA. It’s just that the 33 gms held down the 1st half. From game 34 on: .302/.351/.528, 19 HR in 411 PA.
His month of May was pretty bad, too—..678 OPS, 2 hr—and was mirrored almost exactly in July—.683 OPS, 2hr; so that’s three bad full months in the first four.
If you had him in your fantasy lineup going into the month of August you had a guy hitting with a sub-.300 OBP, 8 homers and 42 rbi. His one good month to that point, in June, doesn’t negate the reality of overall poor first-half production.
His season line (and your last split) was greatly buoyed by a red-hot September: an OPS just shy of 1.000 with literally 1/3 of his entire season’s production in HR/RBI+R.
You’re trying so hard to complicate this and it’s so weird, lol. He had an excellent season outside of those first 33 gms and none of the silly gymnastics you’re trying to perform negate that. No matter how hard you try to make it the first half or all but September (lol), it absolutely comes down to those first 33 gms when he hit .195/.215/.276. That is far & away the worst part of his season.
You suggested his run from game 34 through the end of the year was greatly buoyed by September, but he hit .303/.349/.493 from gm 34-Aug. and it went to .302/.351/.528 w/the Sept. so not exactly buoyed by it.