To distract ourselves from the relentless midpackness of our NFBC Main Event Team, we have been ruminating about loftier matters. What, we wonder, should be the stat categories and rules of the ideal full-season roto-style Fantasy Baseball League, which let’s call the Universal Baseball Association? We invite you to play along at home, or, as is more likely the case, at work.
First, let’s consider categories. There are five criteria by which we judge our choices of categories. These are:
Fidelity. We’ve often said that, in Fantasy Baseball, you’re not drafting “players” or “teams,” but rather proper names that represent collections of stats. That’s too facile, though. What you’re drafting (or claiming or FAABing) is a bunch of stat collections that, in the aggregate, are supposed to look something like a Reality Baseball team’s aggregate stats do. For one thing, you want your league to reward player performance that corresponds to performance that succeeds on the field. For another, you don’t want your teams to lack the balance that successful Reality Baseball teams have. You don’t want to leave out anything important, except to the extent that Reality teams do, and you don’t want to overemphasize any stats. For example, you don’t want categories that encourage you to do without relief pitchers, or (important point) relief pitchers who happen not to be closers, or players who can run.
Read the rest of this entry »