Winning
At this point in the season, we all know our team’s strengths and weaknesses. But it isn’t enough to simply know that your team is third to last in home runs and could possibly benefit from additional power, or fourth in steals with potentially no need to add a speedster. Knowing only your place in the categorial standings isn’t actually all that useful. So here’s an exercise for you to perform on your league’s categorical standings to give you a good idea about how you should set your roster moving forward.
We still have about 7 1/2 weeks left in the season, which is more than enough time to make some significant point gains. To determine what categories to focus on, start by opening Excel or just a blank word document. Type the 10 categories in the first column. Then, look at where you stand in each individual category and estimate how many points you could realistically gain or lose. Type the number you can gain in the second column and the number you can lose in the third. Do this for each category. You can add up all the potential points gained and compare it to the potential points lost and if you’re not in first, then the optimal result would be more (hopefully many more!) points to gain than lose.
You’re not done yet. In fact, that was just the first step. Now you should have numbers like 1 and 3 next to each category and you have to figure out what to do with them. The categories with both minimal gain and loss potential are the candidates to punt. Since most categories are related in some way, steals would probably be the best to get this result in. If you cannot gain or lose much in the category, it’s time to jettison the Cameron Maybins of the world or look to trade someone like Alejandro de Aza for someone who will contribute more to your team during the stretch run. Batting average is also another good result for this scenario. Adam Dunn, here we come!
The next set of numbers that require action are the categories with high figures in both the potential gain and potential loss columns. These are your ultimate focus categories as you need to be on the offensive here, which will provide the side benefit of staying defensive so you don’t lose any precious points.
Last, you will see several categories that you cannot gain much, but can lose a lot, and vice versa. There is no easy answer here for what exactly you should do. If you have high potential gain with minimal loss potential, it wouldn’t hurt to do nothing and focus more on the categories with high figures in both. However, the high loss with minimal gain potential scenario presents a problem. You’ll have to be defensive and consider adding that category simply so you don’t lose points, but with no hope to gain anything, it might feel like there is little benefit to your team.
After going through this exercise and analyzing your players, you might reach some surprising conclusions on who may be best to keep active. All set in steals, but need home runs and RBI? To the bench you go Shane Victorino. Clearly, this is something you would never do early in the season. But right now, a hitter’s overall projected value for the rest of the season isn’t very meaningful, as their actual value to your team currently may be drastically different. Don’t need home runs, but are in the thick of things in both batting average and steals? Corey Hart might be better off on your bench.
Of course, as I alluded to earlier, most of the categories are interrelated. It is rare to find a player who only contributes positively in one category, so you’ll have to compare options and estimate how many points you could potentially gain by making a switch. Although I only used offensive categories for my examples, this obviously applies to pitching as well. However, between having two ratio categories and both closers and starters, the exercise isn’t as beneficial. Basically, you want your starters to pitch well, and if you still need saves, keep your closers active. That’s what you were doing all season anyway, so nothing changes.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
Summed up:
Put more effort into categories where the potential roto point swing is highest. Put less effort into categories where potential roto point swing is lowest. Most categories are interrelated so this advice is only of limited practical usefulness.
Mike – like this idea a lot. Can you say something about how strategy is affected in a league that counts QS and W and has a starts limit. As it stands, these two cats and HRs are the ones where I have the fewest Roto points. For instance: some of my opponents are way ahead in these cats but are close to or have used up all their starts. I tried to target QS by trading for Haren and Cliff Lee pre-ASB, and it obviously hasn’t worked out.
Also – what would you consider reasonably “overcomeable” margins in the counting and avg categories and this point? Love the idea here!
When you play in a league with an innings or starts limit, you need to value pitchers on a per start/inning basis, rather than their overall stat line. I don’t think you should change your pitching targets for QS, basically the better pitchers will get more of them. I’ve played in Yahoo leagues before and see teams going over the limit early, and you end up catching up, so don’t worry about that. Just remember you don’t need to start everyone and it’s okay to play matchups.
Each counting category is different, but at this point, I think around 30 RBI and runs is about the most I’d consider being able to catch up. in HRs, maybe 10. steals is different, because one big steals guy could make a huge difference. I would say in batting average, something like .002, meaning .275 to .277. anything bigger is going to be difficult
i like this approach and practice it every year, albeit somewhat more crudely in my head instead of in excel. it is certainly the most systematic way of figuring out who to trade for, bench, etc, during the stretch.
there is one additional thing that could be done, but which requires quite a bit more work. this would be figuring out the same as above but for your nearest competitors. where do they stand the most to lose and gain? will they be trading for the same categories as you, or can you throw them off base by trading them somebody with name value but who won’t hurt you to lose and might not help them too much either?
yeah, I sometimes look at that as well, but then I just think to myself, bottom line is my team needs to play well and any teams ahead of me have to play poorly!