Who Closes in St. Louis?
After word that an MRI revealed a torn ligament in Jason Motte’s elbow, fantasy owners should be assuming the worst. If Motte will indeed succumb to Tommy John> surgery, then someone is going to have to close the rest of the season for the Cardinals. But who will that be? The team opened the season with Mitchell Boggs in that ninth inning role, while Trevor Rosenthal waited patiently in the wings as the setup man. But after recent performances, the pecking order may have shifted.
Since moving to the bullpen full time, Boggs has been a pretty solid reliever for St. Louis. He has featured a mid-90s fastball to go along with a slider and induces ground balls at a 50%+ rate. In all, his SIERA has hovered around the mid-3.00 range, which is acceptable, though hardly spectacular for a reliever a team is placing its trust in to hold the lead in the ninth. Given his pure stuff, I always wondered why he didn’t generate more swings and misses and strike out more opposing batters. His strikeout and walk rates are both rather averagish for a reliever. Also, as you might suspect from a fastball/slider guy, Boggs has major issues with left-handed hitters. Throughout his career, he has allowed a .369 wOBA and 5.12 xFIP. So really, he should be best utilized as a ROOGY or RTOGY (if he has to come in to face two right-handers).
So far this season, he hasn’t done anything to keep Mike Matheny’s faith that he’s the right choice to close games in Motte’s absence. He blew his opportunity during his second outing of the year, imploded a week ago while allowing six runs over a third of an inning and was then yanked yesterday in a save opportunity after allowing two hits to start the inning. Whether we think Boggs has the skills to rebound or not is irrelevant. After yesterday’s performance and resulting departure before having the chance to record an out, I would be shocked if Matheny allowed Boggs to handle the next save opportunity.
Next in line was thought to be Trevor Rosenthal, the fire-balling rookie who lost out on the fifth starter job and returned to the relief role he pitched in last season. Including yesterday’s game, he has now pitched 8 innings, while striking out 10 and walking just 1. That’s all fine and dandy, but he also has two blown saves on his ledger and allowed a two-run homer to Ryan Braun to allow the game to get within one run yesterday. Although his ERA stands at 4.50, he has actually pitched quite well. But managers don’t care about SIERA or xFIP, so I would be surprised if he was given the next save opportunity. In fact, the Cardinals broadcasters were even talking about Rosenthal as a closer and that he hasn’t even proven he could handle the 8th inning yet.
Who is left in the Cardinals bullpen? A pair of LOOGYs, Edward Mujica, Fernando Salas and Joe Kelly. We could immediately eliminate the LOOGYs from consideration, unless Matheny decides to pull a Jim Leyland and ignore the splits. Salas was good in 2011, but saw his control regress last season and he allowed the game-winning home run to Jonathan LuCroy yesterday, so he’s probably out. And Joe Kelly was originally a rotation candidate and has thrown just 3.2 innings in relief, while he hasn’t been used in any high leverage situations.
Say hello to your new Cardinals closer, Edward Mujica. The 28-year-old was fantastic for them after coming over from the Marlins last year and has been a pretty reliable reliever since 2010. Of course, he has no real closer experience and has tallied just four saves over his career. He also doesn’t sport the prototypical closer skill set or repertoire. He has typically relied on a three-pitch mix, mainly leaning on his fastball and splitter, while throwing his slider almost 10% of the time. This season, he has yet to throw the latter pitch. Relying on just a fastball and splitter is fine, and over his career he has no platoon split issues whatsoever. His control is fantastic and strikeout rate acceptable. Even better would be if he continued to induce ground balls at the rate he has over the past two years.
So by process of elimination, it seems likely that Mujica will be given the next save opportunity. He didn’t screw up yesterday, has had a history of success and owns a solid skill set that may very well keep him in the role all season. While I do believe that Rosenthal will prove to be the best reliever in the bullpen, that’s moot right now. Mujica is plenty good enough to get the job done if Matheny does indeed give him a try.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
Mujica has been so solid since coming over last season. Rosenthal probably should have just been sent to AAA to work on his complimentary stuff so we could develop him into a starter – for Post Jake Westbrook. Of course, I’m making this statement in hindsight. But, still think the better move is to get Rosenthal out of the bullpen and into a position where he has a lot more value.
Free Eduardo Sanchez!!
should i be thinking about dropping jim henderson for mujica? seems like henderson could be more of a short-term option (if his control issues show up and/or axford gets his shizz together) on a worse team.
It is probably too early for that. This is speculation that Mujica may be given a shot next, and I still wouldn’t expect it to be long term–maybe a week or so until Boggs rights the ship.
I’d be shocked if Mujica closed for the Cardinals for more than 2 weeks.
Don’t worry about an Axford rebound, he’s done.
Matheny just said Mujica could get a look in the 9th. If he succeeds, they almost have to keep him there, right? Remember that he was in the conversation in MIA last year when Heath Bell blew up.
Rosenthal’s the obvious choice. Wait, he gave up a two run shot to RYAN BRAUN???? Wow, he must really suck. It’s just silly. Rosenthal has the best stuff and has actually pitched better than his results so far.
I own Boggs and Rosenthal; which should I drop to pick up Mujica? I can’t hold on to all three.
What are your categories? Standard 5×5?
My personal ratings, each on a scale of 1-5:
Wins: n/a
K/9: Rosenthal 5, Boggs 3, Mujica 2
SV (near term): Rosenthal 3, Boggs 3, Mujica 4
SV (long term): Rosenthal 3, Boggs 3, Mujica 2
ERA: Rosenthal 4, Boggs 3, Mujica 3
WHIP: Rosenthal 4, Boggs 2, Mujica 4
IMO, I’d go Rosenthal and Mujica, dropping Boggs. Boggs’ only real value is in saves if he remains the closer long-term. His rate stats are going to be iffy. Mujica’s WHIP will be a little better, K/9 maybe slightly worse.
Thanks Ian, 8 team league but 5×5 categories. Closers are at a premium in our league, just trying to secure who ever ends up as ROS replace for Motte.
Looking ROS, I’d handicap the liklihood as something like this for which Cardinal RP will save the most games:
Rosenthal 40%
Boggs 30%
Mujica 10%
Motte 10%
Somebody else 10%
Just my gut feel, as a Cardinal fan. I think Mujica will get a short-term look, but nothing long-term. He generally does good work, but also generally has a very short leash working in the 7th–any tough spots, a LOOGY or Boggs has come in to put out the fire. That pads the stats when you don’t have to work out of your own jams.
Rosenthal has the best stuff, and the cream usually rises to the top.
I would have to believe that if Mujica pitches well, he would keep the job. With Boggs’ platoon splits, he’s just not cut out to be a closer. And Rosenthal has the ability to go multiple innings and should eventually be a starter. So even if he proves to be more effective, that all counts against him.
Thanks guys, much appreciated
The key to that statement being “if Mujica pitches well”. As I noted, while his stats have been good, that is mostly in a 7th and 8th inning role, and particularly in St. Louis as the 7th inning guy. There is a huge difference between pitching the 7th and pitching the 9th, due to the safety nets in place if he has an “off” night (LOOGY’s, etc.).
If Rosenthal remains a reliever this year, as I believe he will, I think he’ll be the eventual solution to the closer problem.
I guess we’ll disagree about the notion that there is a huge difference between pitching the middle innings and the 9th. It’s insulting to a pitcher to claim he is unable to get 3 outs in the final inning of a game, but perform effectively in earlier innings.
I’d love to see proof using a large enough sample size that suggests there is truly a difference. I have yet to see such research.
I’m not attempting to insult a pitcher by saying it is a psychological thing, that he’s not mentally capable of pitching the 9th vs. the 8th or 7th. It is simply how we look at the rate stats compiled in each inning, because of how managers handle their bullpen usage.
If a closer struggles, generally he is left out there to sink or swim. Usually the LOOGY’s have been used. Many times the other good relievers have been used. He’s the last line of defense, and sometimes the result is a blown save.
By contrast, if an 8th inning guy struggles, sometimes he can be bailed out by a LOOGY, and sometimes the closer. If a 7th inning guy struggles, the manager is very willing to go to a different reliever to finish the inning.
I’d have to think about how to quantify this, to pick out which games a reliever “struggles”, and how often he is replaced. Looking at game logs for Mujica in 2012, he had 13 net negative WPA games. 6 times he did not complete the inning. He was never pulled before finishing a 7th inning, only blowing 1 save. He was pulled 6 different times before completing the 8th, out of 28 times pitching in the 8th.
Comparing to Motte in 2012, Motte had 10 net negative WPA games, pulled just once after blowing a save. He only had one other time he was pulled, mopping up in a blowout loss.
Again, not saying it is psychological. There’s just a difference in stats you can compile in the 7th vs. the 9th, because of how a manager deploys his bullpen resources. 7th inning guys don’t face many tough lefties in tight games while closers do, etc.
That’s a really good point Ian. Never thought about that before.
You’re missing a “no” in “and over his career he has platoon split issues whatsoever”.
Fixed, thanks
What the heck happened to Eduardo Sanchez? Wasn’t it in 2011 where he got injured? I don’t remember if he got called back up after that.
Read a cardnials beat writers blog last week and he showed mujicas splits by inning. He was great when not in the ninth and terrible in the ninth.
Same is true of Boggs, I’m pretty sure. His ERA goes up with every every inning later in the game.
couldve just read matheny’s comment and saved the trouble of reading this.
Crap! This is such a s**t show. I am in a 10-team NL-only roto and I had Motte. I picked up Boggs and just dropped Motte for Rosenthal. And now Mujica is in the mix??!! So I have to now drop Boggs for Mujica?
Precisely! Shocked that he hasn’t been added yet in an NL-Only after Matheny’s comments. Given Boggs’ platoon splits and failures, I just cannot imagine him getting another shot.
Yikes! Thanks Mike. Next year I need to draft Kimbrel and be done with this madness!
This situation is an example of why you don’t take closers early in the draft. Too much instability and implied risk just because of the position.
Well you certainly don’t draft closers with a bum elbow early
Just like this year when you took Motte as the 3rd closer off the board. Picking the top guys completely eliminates this problem!