The Players I Roster Most In Ottoneu Reviewed

Some years just aren’t your year. Sometimes that is because you don’t get the breaks you need. Sometimes you just run into better teams in a bunch of leagues. And sometimes you load your rosters up with unproductive players and pay the price.

Each year, I take a moment before the season to review the players I roster most. And now, looking back that article…uh…yikes.

To start, I focused that article on two players – JP Sears and Chase DeLauter, who were six and five of my rosters, respectively. They were the only two players on more than four of my seven Ottoneu rosters. And they did not help. I expected DeLauter to debut, but injuries again interrupted his season. He’s back in the Arizona Fall League and I still expect him to be a good Major Leaguer and I still think that happens sooner rather than later, but it did not happen in 2024.

Sears, meanwhile, had some good appearances here and there but simply couldn’t put together consistently strong performances. I saw his impressive minor league numbers and thought we would see some of that translate into MLB performance. We didn’t.

I also listed 10 other players on four of my rosters and many of them disappointed, as well.

  • Isaac Paredes – Was exactly who I hoped through July 28 with 5.3 P/G and then went to the Cubs and flipped that to 3.5 P/G. So was that just a cold streak or is playing in Chicago really that bad a fit for him?
  • Kerry Carpenter – He was great! In the half of the season he played.
  • Spencer Steer – Like Paredes, he was strong for the first half and then fell off.
  • Tylor Megill – He had a weird season and while it ended up quite solid, by the time he was performing most of my teams were already dead.
  • Drew Thorpe – Unhealthy and ungood.
  • Kyle Bradish – My comment on him in March was: “Please be healthy please be healthy please be healthy please be healthy please be….” He wasn’t healthy.
  • Luke Little – I worried about the walks but thought the K’s would make up for it. They did not. And he was hurt.
  • Max Kepler – I really thought he would repeat his 2023.
  • Pablo López – Very weird season for López, who had the K’s, reduced the walks, but didn’t get the results.
  • Yennier Cano – Finally, one guy who didn’t actively hurt me. Yay?

What’s the takeaway? A couple of things. First, injuries really caused me issues. I know I am not alone in that, but as bad as that list looks, it would be totally different if Carpenter played a full season, Megill started healthy enough to help out, and Bradish stayed on the field. They didn’t, and that can’t be ignored, but it really hurt.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

Secondly, this list is often made up of players who are guys I view as underrated. And that can lead to a higher bust rate. But I think my teams were too reliant on these guys this year, especially on the pitching side. Having Sears, Megill, Bradish, Thorpe, and Lopez all on multiple rosters and all either struggle or get hurt really put me in a bad spot. I needed to either have a quicker cut finger to move on and find guys who were going to help, or I needed to find more reliable arms before the season. Or both.

 





A long-time fantasy baseball veteran and one of the creators of ottoneu, Chad Young's is the Managing Editor for RotoGraphs, and can be heard on the Keep or Kut Podcast. You can follow him on Bluesky @chadyoung.bsky.social.

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
EonADSMember since 2024
2 years ago

Paredes’ batted balls changed dramatically in Chicago; he dropped nearly fourteen percentage points of fly balls in exchange for line drives. And while for most hitters that would be fine, beneficial even, Paredes has no natural power to take advantage of line drives with and isn’t fast either. His entire strategy is to pull his fly balls down the left field line with abandon. His ground ball rate also spiked due to a much lower launch angle (24.2 degrees vs. 18.8).

My thought is the Cubs hitting coaches tried to change him to a more traditional batted ball distribution without changing his pull-heavy ways, not realizing that his power, and essentially his entire value, is entirely dependent on his fly ball percentage.

Last edited 2 years ago by EonADS
CC AFCMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

That would be a shockingly poor job on the part of both the Cubs and Paredes, if true. It’s been very well known among the analytically inclined lay people here and other baseball sites that Paredes succeeds by hitting a ton of pulled fly balls despite not having much raw power. If the Cubs didn’t realize what was making him good and tried to change him, it would be shockingly poor player acquisition strategy. If Paredes also didn’t realize it or didn’t have the conviction to push back, it would be similarly surprising. I suspect that it was more of a matter of small samples and maybe the player pressing/being a bit off in a new environment than some hastily arranged and poorly thought out changes.

EonADSMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

To be fair, absolutely no one does it to the same degree that Paredes does. It might have been the idea that they could change it somewhat to add to what he does, rather than effectively subtracting. It was 52 games and 212 PA; that’s not that small of a sample anymore. It did increase his Hard Hit rate meaningfully from the career-low he was sitting at in Tampa Bay, so it’s not like it was a terrible idea from a base standpoint. It’s just that it didn’t develop properly because Paredes lacks the physical tools to actually take advantage, something that is truly bizarre for an athlete of his caliber.

hahigginsMember since 2018
2 years ago

A few of my most-rostered:

  • Judge — yes, duh. (2/4)
  • Freeman — fell off a bit, will only keep the cheaper one (2/4)
  • Happ — Delivered, one of the few upper-middle-class outfielders I like rostering in the teens (3/4)
  • Carpenter — feel great about this pick and hanging in for him. However, traded him away in two leagues. (3/4->1/4)
  • Schwarber — fantastic (2/4)
  • O’Hoppe — Real disappointment here as he was pretty good for the first half and tailed off, losing starts along the way. I had been trying to move one of them but may have been too precious and now the window is gone and he is likely a cut at $6 with Contreras and Yainer as well. I think the process was good and he may have simply tired: 522 PA at catcher for the second or third most depressing team in the league. Still plenty of hope long-term, and the final line was anything but bad: 101 wRC+, 337 xwOBA. But with catchers you may want to save the money or have more certainty. (2/4)
  • Rosario — mostly clear-eyed about his upside, was using for eligibility, but probably not worth it (2/4)
  • B. Lowe — psyched about this, I jumped on him when he was hurt and bad midseason and now have 4/4 at prices much more palatable than the $20ish it was taking at auction last year
  • LaMonte Wade — I thought he was helpign me more than he was. He is a great hitter v. RHP but something about how I was using him didn’t lead to a great PPG — maybe he was getting pinch hit mid-game? Finished with an OBP near 400, which seems Otto bait, but when I look at the production tab I’m disappointed. (2/4)
  • Soderstrom — The results were only there for a brief stretch but I am still in. xWOBA was great, headed to a hitters’ park, and he will keep C at least one more year. (3/4)
  • Danny Jansen — Had him on 2 teams at beginning of year. It’s zero now.
  • Larnach — very excited about him, but maybe should tamp down. Similar to Soderstrom in terms of a strong xwOBA, except that his wRC+ for the year was also fantastic. Platooned him and received only 3.9 PPG. Like with Wade, the problem may be a low PA/GS. Not sure what to do about this, as he was bad against LHP. Needs to hammer RHP while he’s in there, and probably hit higher in the lineup, a la Joc, but there’s a path. (2/4)
  • Marsh — Great low $ OF over 4 ppg. At $1-3 that’s useful. (2/4)
  • Bleday — Often lurked around OF5/6 in my teams, meaning he probably produced a lot of points sitting, but I had him for $1-3 and will definitely be keeping. I think he set Oakland’s doubles record and headed to Sacramento many of those could turn into dingers. (2/4)
  • Snell — It was rocky but man he came through. What else could I have expected? (2/4)
  • Webb — RELIABLE. I pay $30 for him in H2H and there, he is worth it. (2/4)
  • Fried — Not quite ace level and I’m nervous about him leaving Atlanta, just because changes of scenery aren’t always good for mid-career SPs. I am going to keep under $25 or so. (2/4)
  • Skubal — No need to brag. (2/4)
  • Gil — this was a very deliberate target on my part and it worked out. I did sit him a good bit in the second half as I don’t think the endurance is there yet, but for the $1-5 in FGPTs formats this was a win. (2/4)
  • Strahm — the volume was the key. (2/4)
  • Hudson — rode him for the first half (as I did Treinen) and cut bait when it was time, replacing him in two leagues with Ginkel who was pretty good in the second half.
  • Fairbanks — tough situation as injury risk shaded into reduced effectiveness. I still have him in one league where I won back after halving his price with a cut but have cut bait in two others. (3–>1/4)

Late-season pickups I’m excited about but will have to temper enthusiasm given SSS: Peterson, Tylor Megill, Bido, Boyd, Bradford, Brown