The HR/FB Rate Surgers

Last week, I discussed the early Brls/BBE (barrels per batted ball event) leaders and laggards from the Statcast leaderboard. Let’s continue our look at the metric, this time using my new Statcast fueled xHR/FB rate equation to identify the hitters whose xHR/FB rates are significantly higher than their actual HR/FB rates. The gap suggests these hitters could enjoy an imminent surge in home run power.

Please note that I introduced two versions of my xHR/FB rate equation — one ignoring batter handedness and park effects, and one accounting for both. Because the data is not easily accessible, I’m going to be using the version that ignores both factors. Because we’re looking at the extreme differences here, it won’t matter much. But you could mentally make minor adjustments for home park and handedness.

I’ve only included the fantasy relevant hitters, as usual.

HR/FB Rate Surgers
Name Pull% + Oppo% Brls/BBE  HR/FB xHR/FB HR/FB – xHR/FB
Howie Kendrick 75.0% 10.0% 0.0% 16.8% -16.8%
Nick Castellanos 71.4% 16.3% 8.6% 24.5% -15.9%
Lonnie Chisenhall 74.1% 14.0% 7.4% 21.8% -14.4%
Mitch Moreland 71.9% 11.7% 6.3% 18.8% -12.5%
C.J. Cron 70.6% 6.1% 0.0% 11.7% -11.7%
Justin Turner 51.2% 8.3% 2.3% 13.1% -10.8%
Randal Grichuk 58.3% 14.9% 11.1% 21.8% -10.7%
Jace Peterson 60.0% 5.9% 0.0% 10.7% -10.7%
Gregory Bird 68.2% 7.9% 4.5% 13.8% -9.3%
Matt Davidson 81.5% 21.3% 22.2% 31.4% -9.2%
Yoenis Cespedes 66.7% 20.0% 20.0% 28.8% -8.8%

Nick Castellanos. Not only does he own a pristine batted ball profile that should allow him to sustain an inflated BABIP, but his power is blossoming. A drop in fly ball rate and increase in strikeout rate has hidden his gains, along with a single digit HR/FB rate. The swings and misses are certainly an issue and J.D. Martinez’s return means he could be dropped in the order soon. But there’s enormous offensive upside here and it shouldn’t cost you much to acquire him.

Is Lonnie Chisenhall another launch angle increaser? His FB% sits at a career high and his Brls/BBE has jumped by more than four times since last year. But his results haven’t differed much. Perhaps a nice AL-Only target if in need of an OFer.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Mitch Moreland has performed as well as hoped in Boston except for a lack of home run power. His Brls/BBE, though, suggests that the homers are coming. He’s also nearly doubled his walk rate, so he shouldn’t worry about losing his job to Sam Travis anytime soon, who owns just a .315 wOBA at Triple-A.

After enjoying a power surge in 2015 and a further spike in 2016, it might be easy to believe that Justin Turner’s slow start in the power department proves the last two seasons have been rather fluky. But his Brls/BBE is perfectly healthy and right in line with his average the last two seasons. His batted ball profile is pristine (though obviously his .400+ BABIP is going to decline), while he has cut down on his strikeouts. He’s an excellent acquisition target from an owner hoping for more than just an empty batting average.

Yes, the ankle most likely hampered Gregory Bird’s swing, power, and performance. But even with the injury, he still barreled the ball up at a respectable rate that equates to a double digit HR/FB rate. He should be back soon and if he was dropped in your league, I’d absolutely scoop him up. He’s perfectly suited for Yankee Stadium.

Well gosh darn, Matt Davidson is almost literally Joey Gallo, but without the fanfare. Sure, he’s sporting a worse walk rate, but the strikeout rate is better (though not terribly difficult given Gallo’s trouble making contact). Like Gallo, Davidson also hits a ton of fly balls, making the most of the times he does make contact. Even batting .227, he’s still got an acceptable .340 wOBA. While his Brls/BBE level is unsustainable, it does support the fact that he owns serious power and should continuing as a 1 1/2 category contributor.

Yoenis Cespedes‘ HR/FB rate is right where he has been the last couple of years, so it’s more likely his Brls/BBE declines than his HR/FB rises. But he’s at literally double his Brls/BBE mark as last year, so even at 31, his power remains as strong as ever.





Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MustBunique
9 years ago

Pod, claimed Castellanos a couple weeks ago and held, waiting on that exit velo to turn into results. Just recently dropped him to grab a potential closer, but looked at his numbers before doing so. As you say, great LD rate. When are the FBs going to come? I think your xHR/FB is right on, but he has to elevate for that rate to matter.

chrisbowyer
9 years ago
Reply to  MustBunique

Yeah, I’m wondering if this is one of those things where a normally good metric is missing something (swing plane, whatever). I’ve had a tough time hanging onto him lately with a lot of guys on the DL, but I keep passing up promising stashes based on that batted ball profile. Gotta give at some point, though.

Frederic Kass
9 years ago

Do you see Castellanos as having greater overall value than Lamb and Rendon ROS?

King Donko of Punchstania
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Do you think Lamb ever gets to a point where he’s at least serviceable against LHPs?

Jericho
9 years ago

I keep seeing Castellanos out there and I want to join him in his hit parade. But…I have too many mediocre 3B. Not Bad players. But not elite guys either, unless things break just right for them. Jake Lamb is my starter and I have room for one back-up between Castellanos, Moustakas, and Suarez. I’m basically debating between Castellanos and Suarez and leaning towards Suarez actually

seymour114
9 years ago

Bird is going oppo way more this year and his line drive rate is way down. Am I wrong to think that’s an indicator he’s not going to flash the power everybody thought? Seems like a guy to wait on.

Aaron Judge's Gavel
9 years ago
Reply to  seymour114

Honestly I’d almost ignore Bird’s #s from this year so far. He clearly wasn’t right and I would guess his ankle had at least something to do with it. I’m not expecting him to be what he was in spring training, but there was just so much swing and miss (15.7%) this year that was never really there before (11.1% in 2015). I believe that a healthy Bird is much closer to his 2015 line of .261/.343/.529 than his outlandish spring training or his awful 2017. I just don’t see a healthy Bird to continue a 72% contact rate on pitches in the zone. Anecdotally, he looked to be flailing and off balance more than normal.

That said, Cash was quoted yesterday that Bird could still be “weeks” away from returning, so I wouldn’t count on anything from him for at least a month.

CharlesMember since 2024
9 years ago

If I have a free bench spot and want to speculate on upside for a CI, Moreland or Bird?

Choos on first
9 years ago

Mike, I’m looking for someone to boost my offense while several key contributors are slumping. Davidson is a FA, and I can drop one of Grossman, Saunders, or Jett Bandy to get him. Would you grab him, and who would you drop to get him?

Choos on first
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

I have Garry Sanchez, swapped between Bandy and Pina while he was on the DL, and when Sanchez was activated, another player of mine got hurt allowing me to keep both.

Choos on first
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Daily transaction: Yes. Max games played: No. Also, super deep 20 team mixed keeper, if that makes a difference.

Choos on first
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Cool, thanks Mike!

Choos on first
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Just traded him for Duvall, probably a better pick up than Davidson, especially since LF has been a weak spot for me all season.

Wasn’t sure that I’d be able to get much value for him until you suggested I try trading him. Thanks again Mike!

jjezioraMember since 2022
9 years ago

Hey Mike, great article. I’m curious what your thoughts are on Howie Kendrick, although I’m guessing not much considering you touched on guys you deemed fantasy relevant. He was smoking liners/flies with a 99.6 exit velo and his launch angle looks up as well with a higher fly ball rate than years past. Tiny sample of course, but this article validates what I was seeing to a degree before he went down at least. Thanks!

jjezioraMember since 2022
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Thanks!