Starting Pitcher GB% Surgers — Apr 21, 2021, A Review

Today, let’s move over to review early starting pitcher metrics and whether the surges or declines stuck around over the rest of the season. Unlike for hitters where depending on the type of hitter they are, the optimal batted ball profile is easier to determine, it’s not as straightforward for pitchers. So this isn’t necessarily a “good” list to be on, but it could change the shape of the pitcher’s performance. More grounders should result in fewer homers, but likely more hits allowed and a higher BABIP. So let’s get to the names of those that had increased their GB% by at least 10% through Apr 19 and see whether their GB% spikes were sustained.

GB% Surgers
Name 2020 GB% 2021 GB% – Through Apr 19 2021 GB% – RoS Diff
Casey Mize 38.6% 57.1% 46.9% -10.2%
Steven Matz 32.6% 48.8% 45.1% -3.7%
Anthony DeSclafani 38.9% 53.1% 43.3% -9.8%
German Marquez 50.6% 61.3% 50.2% -11.1%
Nathan Eovaldi 48.9% 59.4% 39.6% -19.8%
Corbin Burnes 46.4% 56.7% 48.1% -8.6%

Since I only listed six pitchers, this was more a mixed bag than the previous hitter lists, where the majority reverted right back to their historical levels. Here, two pitchers (Diff column highlighted) sustained enough of their early GB% spikes over the rest of the season to establish a new higher level. Another did maintain some of his increased GB% over the rest of the season, but not enough for me to get out the highlighter. Two more actually posted lower GB% marks than 2020 over the rest of the season, even after the early surge. And finally, another posted a minor increase the rest of the way versus 2020 and could essentially be called no change. So it was a true mixed bag and results in the same conclusion as for the hitters — early season metric changes over a small sample should be treated with a grain of salt. While the changes do stick for some, it’s likely impossible to tell which ones ahead of time.

An early season velocity surge (that didn’t last), along with this GB% spike, got me really intrigued by Casey Mize. He did end up holding onto a portion of those early season GB% gains and ended up posting the highest GB% of his professional career. Unfortunately, he’ll need to greatly improve his underlying skills, particularly his strikeout rate, to avoid serious luck regression as he handily outperformed his SIERA.

Steven Matz was the other pitcher on the list that held onto enough gains to experience a GB% spike all season long. However, this was more due to the career low mark he posted in 2020, which was the first time it dropped below 45.5%. It was a massive drop too, but it proved to be a small sample size fluke, as it happened over just 30.2 innings. Moving to St. Louis should be good for his ratios, though he’ll have to improve his underlying skills enough to avoid an ERA rise toward his less impressive SIERA.

Anthony DeSclafani was in a similar boat as Matz with 2020’s small sample resulting in a sub-40% GB%. He had done that once before, again over a small sample during his 2014 debut. DeSclafani dramatically outperformed his SIERA, though perhaps some of that will continue given his home park. Still, I ain’t paying for a low-3.00 ERA with a mediocre strikeout rate!

Germán Márquez failed to hold onto any of his gains and posted a GB% almost identical to his 2020 mark over the rest of the season. For a Rockies pitcher, more grounders are a good thing given the high rate of fly balls that leave the yard. Yes, it will hurt BABIP, but a single or double is still better than a home run. It would be quite exciting if he ever got out of Colorado.

Nathan Eovaldi was the only pitcher on this list that posted a GB% over the rest of the season that was significantly below his 2020 mark. As a result, he posted his lowest GB% since his 2011 debut. Instead, most of those former grounders became line drives, which is why he allowed a BABIP well above .300 once again. Luckily, his HR/FB rate slipped into single digits, so he ended up barely underperforming his SIERA. Can you believe that he had increased his strikeout rate for five straight seasons before a small decline this year?!

Did Corbin Burnes really need to limit his fly balls? He easily led baseball with the lowest HR/FB rate allowed among qualified pitchers, so his GB% this year didn’t matter a whole lot.





Mike Podhorzer is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year. He produces player projections using his own forecasting system and is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. His projections helped him win the inaugural 2013 Tout Wars mixed draft league. Follow Mike on Twitter @MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Baller McCheesemember
2 years ago

While I agree, it’s always fun to imagine how _____ pitcher will do if they get traded off the Rockies, Germán Márquez actually pitched better at home than away last year. He was pretty reliable in Denver. (Interestingly to me, and maybe me alone, his road numbers against right-handed batter are right in line with his home numbers against both left- and right-handed batters. It was left-handed batters on the road that gave him trouble, which, might be a thing?)

Baller McCheesemember
2 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

My point was that in 2021 Márquez was a better pitcher at home than on the road. I didn’t mention his ERA, but yes, the results caught up to that last year.

Using FIP, he went from being a better pitcher on the road (2017 & 2018), which should be expected for a Rockies pitcher, to not really having a split (2019), to now being a better pitcher at Coors (2020 lol & 2021) – and that’s with keeping home runs in the equation.

And really, the driver of this FIP splits trend seems to be those home runs:

2017: +0.6 HR/9 and +9% HR/FB at home compared to on the road
2018: +0.4 HR/9 and +9% HR/FB
2019: +0.2 HR/9 and +3% HR/FB
2020 lol: -0.3 HR/9 and -4% HR/FB
2021: -0.6 HR/9 and -2% HR/FB

That’s a trend if I’ve ever seen one.

It feels weird to say someone would be a worse pitcher away from Coors, but that seems to be the case here. If we take it that Coors inflates everyone’s BABIP and HR/FB, and that leads to an inflated ERA – the best version of Germán Márquez is still going to be at Coors.

(Also, It seems weird to use xFIP to compare a Rockies pitcher’s home/away splits – i.e., using the same expected home run rate for when specifically at Coors and as for when specifically everywhere other than Coors. But yes, xFIP consistently says he’s a better pitcher at home than away.)

rainmaker42
2 years ago

Same thing for Jon Gray and the reason is simple. The air is different in Coors and their breakers behave differently. If they weren’t specifically preparing for Coors, then they would pitch better on the road.

Baller McCheesemember
2 years ago
Reply to  rainmaker42

Yes, the air is different in Coors and breaking balls behave differently. But to say someone would pitch better on the road if they just prepared better is, well, just a guess. There’s really no reason to believe that unless you just want want to believe it.

Rotoholicmember
2 years ago

“It feels weird to say someone would be a worse pitcher away from Coors, but that seems to be the case here.”

I hope you don’t truly think Marquez is better at Coors Field. The way you described his data as a trend that somehow supersedes park factors is a sign that you don’t know what you’re doing. It’s best to leave projections to the pros. Mike knows what he’s doing, but Steamer also does, and they have projection splits. Here they are for Marquez in 2022: 4.53 ERA with Coors Field as his home park, and 3.94 ERA with a neutral home park.

As you say, players with Coors Field as their home park affects their ability on the road. This is true and it’s due to VMI. But it doesn’t negate the park factors. Not even close. Over the past 5 years Rockies pitchers have a 5.23 ERA at home, and 4.51 ERA on the road. And you think this is all moot because of 1.3 seasons of home/road splits for a single pitcher.

Baller McCheesemember
2 years ago
Reply to  Rotoholic

Nah. That’s a whole lot of things I never said.

I never said Márquez’s *results* would be better at Coors than on the road.

And I never said that having Coors as a pitcher’s home park would affect their *ability* on the road. That’s a wild causation.

I also never said anything about any other Rockies’ pitcher. No, no, no, no, no. I was very much only talking about Germán Márquez.

Projections of what Márquez will do in the future aside – we’ll get to that – what he’s actually done in the real world is find a way to give up less home runs as Coors than on the road. There’s a trend showing that he’s steadily made improvements at this every year for the past five years, so the skill isn’t really a fluke at this point. I have no idea how or why he’s doing it, but it’s what he’s actually done.

As for projections; yes, how the projections are created is over my head, which is why I pay money for Mike’s Pod’s Picks every year. (Everyone that appreciates what they do should try to support them as well.) But without putting words in anyone’s mouth specifically, people making projections have constantly said that factoring in Coors is difficult and wonky. And because of that, there should be a grain of salt taken with those projection – and that’s all been known and out front. (Mike mentioning that Márquez’s xFIPS are better at home than away every year is an example of this wonkiness.)

It’s not that Márquez’s results are going to be better at Coors – I doubt anyone’s are! – it’s that he pitches to the best of his abilities at Coors, which is something that other pitchers can’t/don’t do. The underlying metrics back this up. Very imperfectly, you can think about it this way: if pitchers are, say, 20% worse at Coors, but Márquez is only 10% worse at Coors, then relative to other pitchers he is more valuable at Coors than away. Again, the best version of Márquez is going to be at Coors.

Joe Wilkeymember
2 years ago

“It was left-handed batters on the road that gave him trouble, which, might be a thing?”

Narrator: It was not a thing.

He only faced 176 LHB on the road. That’s like looking at his 153 batter June where he posted a 2.41 ERA with a .195 wOBA allowed and saying that’s a thing. His BABIP for LHB on the road was .376, compared to .293 overall for the season and .307 overall for his career. His HR/FB was 18.8%, compared to 15.9% for the season and 16.1% for his career, which includes Coors numbers. When you start parsing numbers down this far, weird stuff happens. Two years ago, he posted a .296 wOBA against lefties on the road against 204 batters. I don’t think that’s his true talent against LHB either. It’s just small sample weirdness.

Baller McCheesemember
2 years ago
Reply to  Joe Wilkey

But I love when weird stuff happens in baseball.