Selling Danny Duffy

As you may recall, I jumped onto the Danny Duffy bandwagon rather early on, diving into his ability to sustain his relief velocity as a starter through his fifth start of the season. Since those first five starts, he has continued to pitch spectacularly, posting a 2.43 ERA (3.43 SIERA) and 21.5% K-BB%. But the good times eventually come to an end. And I think Duffy’s value has peaked and is in danger of experiencing a sharp decline.

Let’s break up his performance as a starter into several different periods. Though this might be a controversial decision, I decided to exclude his absolutely dominant August 1st game against the Rays in which he racked up 16 strikeouts and allowed just one hit. The game was such an outlier for all his underlying peripherals that it would have distorted his overall line during the time period. So out it went.

As a result, I broke up Duffy’s starts into three periods — before his velocity loss and then after his velocity loss, with the Rays game separating the post-velocity loss period into two (five games and then three games started).

Let’s look at the process first:

Danny Duffy as a Starter
Date Range GS FB% FBv SL% SLv CH% CHv LD% GB% FB% IFFB%
5/15 – 6/27 9 60.7% 95.4 22.0% 84.5 17.3% 85.6 19.0% 29.3% 51.7% 11.7%
7/2 – 7/27 5 58.0% 94.4 15.9% 83.2 16.2% 84.4 18.1% 44.7% 37.2% 11.4%
8/6 – 8/16 3 61.3% 94.0 23.5% 82.8 15.2% 84.5 19.7% 28.8% 51.5% 2.9%

Immediately, we see the loss of velocity. The most exciting thing about Duffy was that he had managed to sustain the vast majority of his fastball velocity as a reliever while starting. But that all changed in his 10th start as his velocity dropped and hasn’t recovered. This chart is ugly:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Danny Duffy Velocity Trend

Sure, we didn’t expect him to maintain his velocity as a reliever. But initially, at least over his first nine starts, he did. And that’s what made him so exciting. You see that for the most part, aside from the odd middle period, he’s been an extreme fly ball pitcher. If any pitcher ever hopes to succeed as an extreme fly baller, then doing so in Kansas City is the best possible place to do so. Unfortunately, his ability to induce pop-ups vanished over his last three starts. The sample size is tiny, of course, so perhaps this is just a fluke and not a sign of impending doom.

But hey, he’s still pitching well, right? Let’s check in on the rest of his metrics:

Danny Duffy as a Starter
Date Range GS Hard% SwStk% K% BB% BABIP LOB% HR/FB ERA SIERA
5/15 – 6/27 9 37.5% 14.5% 30.2% 5.7% 0.264 89.7% 16.7% 3.33 3.19
7/2 – 7/27 5 34.7% 8.4% 22.3% 4.3% 0.302 75.9% 5.7% 3.18 3.69
8/6 – 8/16 3 37.9% 9.3% 19.5% 4.6% 0.203 92.6% 5.9% 1.54 4.44

For a pitcher who throws in the mid-to-high 90s and has posted a high strikeout rate, it’s pretty crazy to see those inflated Hard% marks over each period. But let’s move off that metric and focus on a more telling one — SwStk%. Duffy was absurd over his first nine starts, making batters swing and miss at an elite clip. Since his velocity has declined, he has been just ordinary and his strikeout rate has plummeted. The one sliver of good news is that he has been able to sustain his significant control gains throughout.

To the far right, you will notice that his SIERA has been on the rise. However, he’s relying on some magic to keep his ERA from feeling the effects of his skills deterioration. Over his last three starts, his SIERA is a weak 4.44, but he has posted a 1.54 ERA (just four runs allowed in 23.1 innings) thanks to a .203 BABIP and 92.6% LOB% (and to a slightly lesser extent, the suppressed 5.9% HR/FB rate). That low BABIP has come despite a very high Hard% and a low IFFB%. And of course, he has stranded nearly every runner that has reached base.

Duffy pitched 144.2 innings last year and is at 132 already this season. He threw 155.1 innings in 2014 as well, so he shouldn’t be running out of steam just yet. But it sure seems like that’s what’s happening.

I’m not going to predict a collapse. He still possesses good stuff, even with a tick less velocity, and he’s showing no signs of backtracking from his improvement in control. But this is a guy with a 2.73 ERA and over a strikeout an inning whose perceived value may be sky high at the moment, especially in keeper leagues as he’s just 27 years old. If you’re risk averse or just curious, I say now is the time to shop him around and maximize your return.





Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
abpow
9 years ago

“I decided to exclude his absolutely dominant August 1st game against the Rays in which he racked up 16 strikeouts and allowed just one hit. ”

Because it would have completely undermined the article, yet it actually did happen. Let’s see the #s with that start included and let the rest of us draw our own conclusions.

Or, if you’re going to pick and choose, why not throw out his worst start as well over the same period.

abailey
9 years ago
Reply to  abpow

I’d agree that it probably should’ve been included or at least a note given why it was omitted, but an eight inning, one hit, 16 K shutout isn’t particularly predictive. He had a few “meh” starts that you could bicker about which one was his worst, but none were so bad so as to be nuclear (think some of James Shields’ outings this year). If he’d had one of those, I have to imagine that would’ve been tossed out of the sample as well.

descender
9 years ago
Reply to  abailey

You don’t get to pick which starts are predictive and which are not.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  abailey

You can imagine they would be… but they weren’t. That is the issue with this “analysis”

CC AFCMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  abpow

I’m generally not a fan of plucking out one particularly good game since lots of players have those kind of games. In this case, though, the author was very clear up front about what he was doing and why and it doesn’t exactly undermine the underlying premise of the article – that in 8 other starts since 7/2, Duffy’s skills have been trending downward. If you want to dismiss that trend or say it’s not so worrisome because he did have that 16 K start, that’s fine.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Stats are deceiving. They get in the way of the scouting reports and sabermetrics.

BMac
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

I think excluding that start is deceiving. There is evidence that pitchers who throw ‘elite’ games go on to maintain a higher level of excellence in their careers. I remember a study (Bill James?) on pitchers post-no-hitter that uncovered such a trend. The 16 K one-hitter is in the same league as a no-no.
To compound this error, no comparative analysis was done on the quality of opponents in this small sample size. It should also be noted that Duffy is going really long in recent games, while he had been previously around 5 IP per start.
It’s like you started out trying to twist the stats to make an excellent pitcher look bad. Just throw out the best start of his career, take a small sample, cherry pick the stat you want to look at, ignore the calibre of teams in the sample. You can make any pitcher in baseball look bad with this kind of analysis.

igloo
9 years ago
Reply to  abpow

I assumed the August 1st start goes in the August date range.

Siera: 3.29

Swstr%: 15.1% (However, this is greatly influenced by that 16 strikeout start where it is 30.9%)

K%: 29.2% (August 1st K% was 60%)

BB%: 4.4%

FB Velocity: 94.1

BABIP: .192

LOB%: 93.4%

On a personal opinion note, I am inclined to agree with Pod. The August 1st start is a big outlier. There is a trend of Duffy losing velocity and getting more lucky as of late. I think taking it out is more representative of how Duffy has been pitching.

jdbolickMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  abpow

The author made it clear that he was taking that start out while explaining why, and doing so in no way “completely undermined the article.” You’re free to ignore this piece and believe that Duffy will maintain his current levels, but I find Mr. Podhorzer’s argument to be compelling. This is no different than identifying a pitcher who might be undervalued because one terrible outing skewed his overall numbers.

Spa City
9 years ago

Mike – I am in the middle of negotiations to trade Duffy, and I thought I had a chance to sell him at his peak value. Why did you need to choose today, of all days, to post this article?

baltic wolfMember since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

I know you may disagree with me, but I plan to inquire about Duffy in my 16 team keeper league after the season is over. Sure, there’s a velocity loss but if he can maintain a 94 mph fastball for most of next season, I like that. And I especially like, as you pointed out, his control gains have been sustained.

And since I do expect that insanely low BABIP and high strand rate to equalize before this season ends, he might be available. (Then again, it’s a 12 keeper league and most owners keep a ration of 9 batters to 3 pitchers so he may be available in the draft.)

I also like Kauffman Stadium. It normally suppresses HRs, though that doesn’t mean Duffy will be at 6% next year. But when you consider that the ball is almost certainly livelier this year than its been for some time and may not be as lively next year, I could see a HR/FB% under 10%. HRs are always deducted in points leagues.

What about IFFB changes? Does an in-season change portend bad rates for next year?

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  baltic wolf

He has a history of arm trouble as well. I don’t think his value is sky high – you have to factor in the risk.

yorkie27Member since 2025
9 years ago

Mike – where do you see Duffy being ranked going into next season? Top 25 SP, top 100 overall? Not sure if I should try to sell now or wait to the offseason when everyone gets excited about his ranking.

BMac
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

I disagree with the mention of the innings limit for a pitcher of his age. All analysis about limiting innings is based on outcomes for pitchers under 25. There is no evidence that limiting innings after this age is important, and I don’t know of any teams that do it.

sportsfreak2744
9 years ago

The 4.44 SIERA you call out was concerning unless I realized that covers 3 starts. I don’t believe that’s very compelling for such a short stretch. What is concerning though is the BABIP, the LOB% and most importantly the velocity decline.

nottarts21
9 years ago

I think it’s not wise to completely ignore a dominant performance while also not accounting for the fact that 2 of his last 3 starts were against some tough offenses (TOR and DET, who just got JD Martinez back)

bcpkid
9 years ago
Reply to  nottarts21

My thought exactly, and the Chisox are righty-heavy as well. If you’re going to look so-so on paper, TOR and DET are the offenses that can do that to you. His next two starts are MIN (all in) and @BOS (probably sitting him.) That said, the overall point of the article stands, he’s at his peak value right now. But in a redraft league, I’m still inclined to ride him out and manage his tough opponents.

tb3nn3ttMember since 2025
9 years ago

Would you still look to sell in a Scoresheet league, where the playoffs are simulated using 60% April-August stats and 40% September stats? There just isn’t much good pitching in the AL!

ShauncoreMember since 2019
9 years ago

He’s been quite fortunate (lucky?) on home runs too perhaps.

Past 44 IP (since July 22nd):
1.64 ERA
2.80 FIP
4.04 xFIP
5.4 HR/FB%

45 IP before that:
3.20 ERA
3.50 FIP
3.44 xFIP
13.3 HR/FB%

As you noted, the hard contact% is up

http://www.fangraphs.com/graphs.aspx?playerid=3542&legend=1,2,3&statArr=223&split=base&time=daily&ymin=&ymax=&start=2016&end=2016&rtype=single&gt1=10

CasonJolette
9 years ago

Despite the fact I actually own Danny Duffy, I have a couple off topic questions to ask your opinion on.

First off…10 team h2h OBP limited moves league

I hate asking this, but I think it’s time to move on from Justin Upton. He had a nice bounce back July but has been straight garbage otherwise, including a current 1-31 skid and getting benched for three straight days. Available bats: Pederson, Kepler, Belt, Tomas, Judge, Moss. Personally I’m little torn between Kepler and Pederson.

The other player I am thinking of moving on from is Salvador Perez. Being an OBP league, he obviously contributes nothing in that category and right now he’s also not hitting for average or power. Best two available catchers are Russell Martin and Gary Sanchez.

Thanks Mike!

CasonJolette
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Who do you like better between Pederson and Kepler? Kepler has the advantage of batting third while Pederson is batting seventh, but Pederson has been really hot lately and it’s been over two weeks since Kepler last homered. Plus Eno had a good article recently on whether Kepler’s power is sustainable. Thanks Mike!

CasonJolette
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

So true. Thanks!

wobatusMember since 2024
9 years ago

On the other hand, look at Robbie Ray. The opposite is happening. Since June 12th, 12 starts, velocity trending up to about 95, K/9 11.18 bb/9 2.26, 3.06 siera.

Matt
9 years ago

I’m not sure there is a large enough sample size to conclude anything one way or another. Your conclusion rests on the sample size of three August starts, removing the 16 K start which I’m fine with. It could be that he is fading as he pitches deeper into the season, it could be a change of skills, it could be a conscious decision to be more efficient and work deeper in games, it could be a combo of all 3. Having watched these starts, I personally see a pitcher making a conscious decision to be more efficient and work deeper into games, which he is doing. He’s missing bats when he needs to, otherwise he’s relying on an elite defense and some spacious parks behind him.

That isn’t to say he isn’t lucky, of course he’s been lucky. I don’t think any pitcher can do what he has done in August without a substantial amount of luck. But I don’t think that means there is an erosion of skills. Even with a slight decline in velocity, we’re still talking about a lefty sitting at 94 with an 11-12 MPH difference between fastball and a devastating change-up. While his fastball is getting hit more, the whiff rates of his change-up and slider have both increased over the same time period. Again, too small of a sample to conclude one way or another but it is notable.

Duffy’s RoS matchups map out like this: Twins, @ Red Sox, Tigers, @ Twins, A’s, White Sox, @ Tigers, Twins. I’m not sure you’re going to find a pitcher with more favorable RoS matchups and with the upside Duffy has. Long term/dynasty, I’m not convinced his trade value exceeds his actual value. I think it is more likely that people won’t be believers in his one year breakout and if his velo dip is stamina related, why not hang on to him and see if he’s back up in the 95-98 region to open 2017?

Gman777
9 years ago

Enjoyed the article but I have a clarification a couple question. First, Duffy actually pitched 149 innings last year counting AAA and post-season so if KC is being strict he should have about 40 innings left with about 8 starts to go.

My first question is regarding all starting pitchers who exceed a certain innings threshold like 120 innings. Is there an avg velo drop off for them? Knowing that would help define whether he’s experiencing a “normal drop off” or has actually hit a wall.

My last question relates to climate. It’s been one hot-muggy summer in a lot of places this year. If I’m pitching, I want outs as fast as I can get them because I know in 5 innings I’m going to be dragging ass and about 8-10 lbs lighter. Do pitchers see changes in velocity on hot muggy August days vs. cool September temps?

NickGerli
9 years ago

Pretty stupid to simply exclude the 16K game. While a 16K game against the swing happy Rays isn’t a great one game sample, it surely means something. If he had 8K and 0ER that game, would it have been excluded? Probably not.

If you’re going to do anything, normalize the results a bit. But Duffy has started 18 games this year – you can’t just throw his best one out completely.