Rotographs Rankings First Run – First Basemen

Some of this is being repeated from the Primer piece that went up this morning. 

We’re bringing them to you earlier this year, but that also means that they’re far from set in stone so take that into consideration as you peruse them. There are still strong arms on the free agent market, let alone all the moving and shaking that happens once players start reporting to camp.

We’re using Yahoo! eligibility requirements which is 5 starts or 10 appearances. These rankings assume the standard 5×5 categories and a re-draft league.  If we forgot someone, please let us know in the comments and we’ll make sure he’s added for the updates. If you have questions for a specific ranker on something he did, let us know in the comments.

We can also be reached via Twitter:

There will be differences, sharp differences, within the rankings. The rankers have different philosophies when it comes to ranking, some of which you’re no doubt familiar with through previous iterations. Of course the idea that we’d all think the same would be silly because then what would be the point of including multiple rankers?!

Think someone should be higher or lower? Make a case. Let us know why you think that. Like I said, it’s early. Things are going to change.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The chart is sortable and by default it’s sorted by AVG. If a ranker didn’t rank someone that the others did, he was given that ranker’s last rank +1. That would be 43 for Zach, 37 for Mike, 43 for Brad, and 55 for Paul K. Everyone in the top 50 were on the lists of Jeff, Dan, and myself so we don’t have any +1s. They are indicated in red on the chart.

Key:

  • AVG– just the average of the seven ranking sets
  • Adj. AVG– the average minus the high and low rankings
  • SPLIT– the difference between the high and low rankings

First Base – January Edition
PLAYER Jeff Zach Dan Mike Brad Paul S Paul K AVG Adj. AVG Split
1 Paul Goldschmidt 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 0
2 Anthony Rizzo 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2.3 2.2 1
3 Miguel Cabrera 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2.7 2.8 1
4 Jose Abreu 4 5 4 5 6 4 4 4.6 4.4 2
5 Edwin Encarnacion 5 4 5 4 4 6 5 4.7 4.6 2
6 Joey Votto 6 7 7 6 7 5 6 6.3 6.4 2
7 Chris Davis 12 6 13 7 5 9 9 8.7 8.6 8
8 Prince Fielder 7 11 6 10 14 7 8 9.0 8.6 8
9 David Ortiz 9 9 10 9 10 8 10 9.3 9.4 2
10 Freddie Freeman 10 10 8 8 9 13 7 9.3 9.0 6
11 Eric Hosmer 11 8 11 11 12 11 12 10.9 11.2 4
12 Adrian Gonzalez 13 12 12 12 13 10 11 11.9 12.0 3
13 Albert Pujols 8 16 9 13 20 18 13 13.9 13.8 12
14 Buster Posey 19 15 14 14 8 12 16 14.0 14.2 11
15 Brandon Belt 20 18 16 15 11 14 14 15.4 15.4 9
16 Kendrys Morales 15 22 19 17 17 15 22 18.1 18.0 7
17 Carlos Santana 21 19 23 16 15 16 20 18.6 18.4 8
18 Victor Martinez 17 13 15 22 25 27 15 19.1 18.8 14
19 Mark Trumbo 14 14 17 19 35 20 19 19.7 17.8 21
20 Lucas Duda 26 17 22 18 16 23 18 20.0 19.6 10
21 Mark Teixeira 23 21 21 23 19 19 17 20.4 20.6 6
22 Wil Myers 18 23 20 20 38 17 21 22.4 20.4 21
23 Daniel Murphy 16 24 18 24 24 33 23 23.1 22.6 17
24 Justin Turner 25 25 26 25 27 28 25 25.9 25.6 3
25 Adam Lind 28 26 27 26 22 25 28 26.0 26.4 6
26 Mitch Moreland 29 20 25 27 37 26 26 27.1 26.6 17
27 Ryan Zimmerman 36 29 35 21 26 22 34 29.0 29.2 15
28 Brian McCann 31 31 29 30 18 34 30 29.0 30.2 16
29 Chris Carter 24 30 28 29 30 37 27 29.3 28.8 13
30 Byung-ho Park 32 28 30 32 31 24 32 29.9 30.6 8
31 Matt Adams 22 43 24 37 29 36 24 30.7 30.0 21
32 Trevor Plouffe 27 34 31 33 43 29 29 32.3 31.2 16
33 Stephen Piscotty 40 35 36 28 21 31 35 32.3 33.0 19
34 Justin Bour 35 41 34 31 36 21 33 33.0 33.8 20
35 Joe Mauer 33 27 33 34 43 32 31 33.3 32.6 16
36 C.J. Cron 30 38 32 35 33 51 36 36.4 34.8 21
37 Logan Forsythe 34 43 37 37 34 41 39 37.9 37.6 9
38 Mike Napoli 42 39 42 36 32 30 45 38.0 38.2 15
39 Mark Canha 39 33 40 37 43 43 40 39.3 39.8 10
40 Stephen Vogt 47 34 45 37 23 47 43 39.4 41.2 24
41 Adam LaRoche 37 43 38 37 43 45 37 40.0 39.6 8
42 Brandon Moss 50 36 51 37 28 35 49 40.9 41.4 23
43 Pedro Alvarez 41 42 41 37 41 49 38 41.3 40.6 12
44 Luis Valbuena 38 32 39 37 43 60 41 41.4 39.6 28
45 Yonder Alonso 43 40 43 37 43 42 44 41.7 42.2 7
46 Ryan Howard 44 43 47 37 42 46 47 43.7 44.4 10
47 Justin Morneau 48 43 46 37 39 53 42 44.0 43.6 16
48 Yangervis Solarte 51 43 50 37 43 38 55 45.3 45.0 18
49 Gregory Bird 61 43 49 37 43 40 48 45.9 44.6 24
50 Logan Morrison 49 43 54 37 40 44 54 45.9 46.0 17
51 Chris Colabello 54 37 52 37 43 48 50 45.9 46.0 17
52 Ben Paulsen 55 43 56 37 43 39 52 46.4 46.4 19
53 Jon Singleton 46 43 48 37 43 55 53 46.4 46.6 18
54 James Loney 45 43 44 37 43 68 46 46.6 44.2 31
55 Steve Pearce 52 43 53 37 43 58 51 48.1 48.4 21





Paul is the Editor of Rotographs and Content Director for OOTP Perfect Team. Follow Paul on Twitter @sporer and on Twitch at sporer.

48 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Hard Contact
10 years ago

Mack like Goldie, it’s the same story.

ScoKo
10 years ago

Ortiz is not going to have eligibility. 5 starts and 10 games played are not the requirements from season to season but the requirements to gain during the season. You can check… Ortiz started 5 games at 1b in 2014 but did not have 1b entering 2015. I personally hope he doesn’t have it to keep his value down.

ScoKo
10 years ago
Reply to  ScoKo

Well he may have it, didn’t mean to say he won’t. But gaining last year doesn’t mean he keeps it this year.

ScoKo
10 years ago
Reply to  ScoKo

Got ya, obviously tough to do this before registration opens. I’d be surprised if he has 1b eligibility anywhere though.

Jason BMember since 2017
10 years ago
Reply to  ScoKo

“others are loser”

[sic]?

Atreyu Jones
10 years ago
Reply to  ScoKo

He had 1B entering 2015 in Yahoo, and will again entering into 2016.

ScoKo
10 years ago
Reply to  Atreyu Jones

No he didn’t. I’m literally staring at my draft results fromast year as we speak:

ScoKo
10 years ago
Reply to  Atreyu Jones

Check those same results. Is machado listed as 3b only or SS aBd 3b? If it says SS as well then those positions are end of season.

I owned Ortiz in 2 yahoo leagues and I couldn’t play him at 1b until his 5th start. What was his Adp last year? That would prove if he was listed as 1b or utility.

My draft results are offline since we did a live auction.

Atreyu Jones
10 years ago
Reply to  Atreyu Jones

You must be thinking of some other situation.

Here’s Yahoo’s expert rankings of 1B and it includes Ortiz. They use their own site’s criteria when making rankings:

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/fantasy-roto-arcade/fantasy-baseball-rankings–first-base-211845463.html

Chad
10 years ago
Reply to  Atreyu Jones

ScoKo, your league is not using Yahoo’s standard rules for eligibility. Literally everyone else is correct.

Brad JohnsonMember
10 years ago
Reply to  Atreyu Jones

I distinctly remember being grumpy that Ortiz was 1B eligible because it meant I couldn’t sneak him off the board late.

Mr_Hogg
10 years ago
Reply to  Atreyu Jones

I think ScoKo’s probably wrong about this ut it has to be said that sometimes Yahoo retrieves anachronistic objects so for instance when one looks at a past draft the positions (or teams even) are current not as they were

Mr_Hogg
10 years ago
Reply to  Atreyu Jones

… So in Paul’s upload note Kimbrel is listed as with Boston! The listing of Ortiz on the Yahoo expert ranking top 1Bs list is better evidence (tho circumstantial)

dtpollittMember since 2016
10 years ago

FYI the key says AVG twice. Think you mean ADJ. AVG.

NoHayBanda
10 years ago

Thoughts on A.J. Reed? September call up instead of May?

Brad JohnsonMember
10 years ago
Reply to  NoHayBanda

I felt the position was deep enough that we didn’t need to look ahead to prospects yet.

Erik
10 years ago

I understand the uncertainty behind Byung-ho Park but who do you all rank him so low? With an every day job do you not think he could compare to at least Carlos Santana for fantasy purposes?

Jeff ZimmermanFanGraphs Staff
10 years ago
Reply to  Erik

He may be at the Santana level, he could also be at the Pedro Alvarez level. I split the difference.

Brad JohnsonMember
10 years ago
Reply to  Erik

Does he have an every day job? I don’t see it. He’s going to start as a 4 days a week guy in a three position rotation with Mauer, Sano, and Plouffe.

Erik
10 years ago

Why?*

Erik
10 years ago

Would you rather take a chance there then with Lind in Seattle?

Daniel Schwartz
10 years ago
Reply to  Erik

Good question. I’d like to hear others thoughts on this ? I like lind in Seattle.

Bill
10 years ago

Much better than SS. Really no arguements, maybe bump Moreland Up a few spots he hit LHP pretty well last year. Bump Myers a spot or three, I’d rather take a chance on his health than some of the meh people around 20. CJ Cron is interesting as a deeper sleeper along with Logan Morrison.

gbaked
10 years ago

I am interested in peoples thoughts on Hosmer. He seems like a huge breakout candidate to me but the overall fantasy community seems low on him.

Mike PodhorzerFanGraphs Staff
10 years ago
Reply to  gbaked

He hits too many ground balls. Until he starts lifting the ball more often, he’s unlikely to get much better than he already is.

Brad JohnsonMember
10 years ago
Reply to  gbaked

I thought he already did the breakout thing? What more could he possibly do?

gbaked
10 years ago
Reply to  Brad Johnson

More of everything? So you think what he did last year is the best he can do?

Jason B
10 years ago
Reply to  Brad Johnson

To turn your question around, why are you expecting him to do more of everything, and how much more? Like, 300/20/100 or 320/30/120? What specifically have you seen that leads you to believe a breakout is around the corner?

blue fountain
10 years ago
Reply to  gbaked

I don’t see a huge breakout candidate. But in a position that is fairly set overall, I agree he’s one of the more interesting guys. I think we may be watching him pass not just Pujols and Gonzalez, but also Freeman and Ortiz and possibly Fielder. Essentially the best guy not in the top 7. It seems likely to me Freeman and Ortiz both outhomer Hosmer, but I think the average, runs, and RBIs give Hosmer the edge.

Of course, Ortiz will go out and have another 30 HR, 100 RBI season and that will be silly talk.

Alex K
10 years ago

Hanley is playing 1B this year…where would he go on this list?

Owen S
10 years ago

For all the rankers who placed Ortiz 10th or higher (everyone), I suggest you look at the all time leaderboard for 40 year olds. It is dismal, and substantially, substantially worse than the 39 yr old leaderboards. I don’t think Ortiz is elite enough to be one of the handful of productive 40 yr olds in the history of the game.

Plus I freaking hate the guy; yes, it’s possible to have a close call go against you, David.

Peter
10 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

How many years in a row has the “This is the year David Ortiz finally shows his age and falls apart” narrative been played out in the preseason before being obliterated (like a shot from Big Papi over the Green Monster) by another .275/.350/.500 season with 30+ bombs and 100+ rbi’s? If David thinks he can compete at an elite level for one more year, I’m certainly not going to tell him he’s wrong or bet against him.

What I want to know is how Brad has Teixiera/Santana/Morales and McCann??? ahead of Pujols.

Jason B
10 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

Last year was a tale of two seasons for Ortiz; I thought Father Time had caught up with him at last and was near dropping him in late May. Through April and May he was at 222/6/18/15, below fantasy replacement level.

First half: 231/15/43/32 (80 games)
Second half: 325/22/65/41 (66 games)

Probably a top 10-15 fantasy hitter in the second half, with a RBI per game and a HR every three.

Mark
10 years ago

I understand Bird’s ranking being so low, but what percentage is it due to his lack of playing time this upcoming year vs him yet to prove that his cup of coffee last year wasn’t a fluke? As he is no longer rookie eligible I’m going to have to active roster him which obviously isn’t that great this year. Where could you see him falling into this list next year?

Runaway ToasterMember since 2016🏆 MVP
10 years ago
Reply to  Mark

On a similar note, why are most of the rankings low on Teixeira? Is it age-related decline, injury worry, or both?

I ask because every year I seem to sucker myself into thinking he’ll be a good late-round 1B. He actually did OK last year while playing, but it’s been ugly since 2011 other than that.

yougottalovethepain
10 years ago

I see several people questioning whether Ortiz belongs as high on the list as he’s ranked, but the player I feel has no business in the top 10 anymore is Prince Fielder. He was hurt in 2014 but still managed to step into the box 1,583 times in 2013 – 2015. When evaluating a player for a trade or a FA signing, looking back at a player’s production over the past three years is fairly common. It also shows whether the player is still climbing, has plateaued or has begun his decline years. Fielder’s fWAR for 2013-15 totals 3.6. In 2010-2012 his fWAR totaled 12.2. In 2007 – 2009 it was 11.9.

Fielder is paid to hit the long ball which he’s done once every 31.04 PA’s over the past three years. In 2010 – 2012 Fielder managed a HR every 20.96 PA’s. In 2007 – 10 Fielder mashed a HR every 16.11 PA’s. Entering his age 32 season Fielder’s most definitely in decline, as his best seasons are in the rear view mirror. There’s no way I’d include him among the top 10 1B today.

yougottalovethepain
10 years ago

In the 2nd paragraph it should read in 2007-2009 Fielder mashed a HR every 16.11 PA’s.

Anonymous
10 years ago

Pujols, Gonzalez, Ortiz, Encarnacion, Votto, Cabrera, Morales and Martinez are all 32 or older as well. First basemen are old. Deal with it.

GQ
10 years ago

Where do you value Votto in a 6×6 roto with obp and slugging compared to a 5×5 w/ avg?

St. Steven
10 years ago

Can’t figure out why most everyone is so low of Paulsen? I get that the power isn’t good for a 1B, but he’s gonna collect 450+ ab’s and play half his games in coors field.

johnnycuffMember since 2017
10 years ago

Why did Brad break so strongly from the pack on Trumbo? Everyone else is 15-20 while he’s at 35.

martinMember since 2016
10 years ago

i dunno….duda is almost a lock for 30 hr, and good obp (if u r in obp league)
he will bat cleanup and should knock in 90 to 100 rbis…and now with Cespedes, and a little luck with Wright…he could score more Runs….i am bumping him up to 8 to 9 on my list. he is also hitting lefties better…or at least shown that he can do better.
in a good year…maybe even 35 hrs….

Paul KastavaMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  martin

I’m also a big fan of Duda, and would most certainly have ranked him higher in an OBP league. Though when he slumps, it’s usually pretty dire, making him an either super frustrating or a dominant force in a head-to-head league.