More Moore and Saying Yes to Hess: Deep League Wire
Welcome to the first edition of the deep league waiver wire of the 2019 season! In this weekly column, I’ll present to you two players owned in 10% or less of leagues on CBS that deserve your attention in deep leagues. Sometimes, my recommendations are also worthy of considering in shallow leaguers, which is exciting! I’ll share such thoughts in those situations.
Matt Moore | SP DET | CBS 5% Owned
I’m so embarrassed, it was difficult for me to finish typing his name in a recommendation column. The former top prospect has been positively atrocious over the past three seasons, with escalating ERAs that nearly reached 7.00 last year. Furthermore, he’s a member of the Tigers, a team that doesn’t figure to provide him with a whole lot of run support. So why on Earth would I recommend him? It’s certainly not because he threw seven scoreless innings during his first start of the season. That’s meaningless to me.
Instead, I’m interested because of one trend…
| Season | vFA* |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 95.1 |
| 2013 | 93.3 |
| 2014 | 92.8 |
| 2015 | 92.9 |
| 2016 | 93.7 |
| 2017 | 92.3 |
| 2018 | 92.7 |
| 2019 | 93.6 |
When Moore first arrived, he was a flamethrower, averaging about 95 MPH with his fastball. But that didn’t last more than a season, as his velocity immediately dropped nearly two miles per hour, which was followed by another decline into the high 92s. In 2016, his velocity rebounded (at least according to Pitch Info, as his Pitch Type velocity was much lower at 92.8 MPH), but that, too, proved temporary, as it dropped right back down to a career low of 92.3 in 2017, before rebounded marginally last season, despite spending nearly half the season in the bullpen.
All of a sudden this season in his first start, his velocity is back above 93 MPH and given that velocity increases as the season progresses, could result in his highest season velocity since his first full season in 2012. His curve and changeup always remained solid enough in generating whiffs, but if his fastball could return to being a real weapon, his secondary offerings could play up and he’s back to being the strikeout artist we once thought he would become. It’s odd this would all happen suddenly at age 30, but stranger things have happened.
Obviously, it’s just one start, but velocity stabilizes quickly. Yes, I’d still be super nervous to roster him, but in an AL-Only league, any signs of upside are welcome and worth throwing a couple of FAAB units at.
David Hess | SP BAL | 5% Owned
An Orioles pitcher now?! Say hello to David “Say Yes to the Dress” Hess. The 25-year-old won a spot in the Orioles rotation by default, as he certainly didn’t earn it given his 4.88 ERA/5.08 SIERA last season. But so far, in one start at least, he made the Orioles feel good about their decision by tossing six and a third shutout innings. Again, not important, but what is, is the velocity.
Last year, his fastball averaged a mediocre 92.3 MPH. This year over his eight innings, he’s already at 94.1, which is a massive jump for a starter this early in the season. Was he ever at this velocity, saw a recent decline, and now it’s merely rebounded back to what it used to be? I have no idea. But it’s noteworthy because at least now his velocity has jumped above the league average (92.4 MPH).
Over his first two outings, the fastball’s whiffiness has improved, as it has generated a 10% SwStk%, and excellent mark. Unfortunately, his slider has been horrible, so the fastball hasn’t actually led to more whiffs overall so far. But the sample is tiny, so the velocity increase is what we really care most about.
Hess was never a strikeout guy in the minors, except for a small 45 inning sample at Triple-A in 2018 when he posted an acceptable 23.3% mark. The question here is even with the added fastball velocity, is his slider and changeup mix good enough to vault him into respectability. I don’t know that answer, but he’s a far better bet to succeed throwing 94 rather than 92.
I much prefer Moore to Hess, but he remains a dart throw if you have some bench spots available in your AL-Only league.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
Keep an eye on Christian Walker. He had an great xwOBACON last year but too many Ks. Looks like he might’ve gotten his Ks down and his exit velocities have been ridiculous.
Thanks for this info, Mike.
I play in two points leagues. Both of them are keeper leagues, so starters are hard to find on the waiver wire.
Hess is available in both. Wins and losses matter very little in the pt. structures of both leagues.
Would you drop somebody like Trent Thornton, F. Montas or Estrada for him? For the last two, I’m rostering them because of that cool air at night in the Bay area. IIRC, I read somewhere Montas has added a splitter to his arsenal.
In my other league, I have Strahm, Burnes and Chirinos. I really like those guys.
Moore isn’t available in either one.
As usual, thanks for the columns.
btw: even though it’s not a good idea to have the same starters in two leagues, I have Strahm, Montas and Chirinos in both of my leagues.
Hess’s velocity was boosted by pitching in relief his 1st appearance. One good start against a very K prone TOR lineup isnt much to bank on. I’d stay far, far, far away.
His fastball velocity was 93.9 MPH during his start, so it wasn’t just the relief appearance.
How many teams and is it AL-Only? Unless this is an AL-Only league, Hess should be nowhere near your team.
Brooksbaseball has Matt Moore at 93.0 mph for that first start, right in line with last year (92.9). Different data sources than Fangraphs?
That’s strange, as this year’s velocity from Books is showing as much lower than both data source’s velocities on FG and last year’s on Brooks is showing as higher than FG is showing from both sources! So as a result, the Brooks velocity increase this year is like nothing, whereas it’s significant on FG looking at both sources.
I don’t understand why velocities should be different depending on source. Velocity isn’t an opinion!
It may have to do with at what point the velocity is measured. By now I’d think they have it figured out, but a couple years ago there was the issue of measuring at 60′, or 55′ or at actual release, all of which will be different. I think Brooks is usually most accurate and consistent.
Yeah, most definitely, but why would there be 3 different opinions on this?! Pick a distance, standardize it across all data providers, and stick with it. It’s not that hard. And it still doesn’t make sense for the gap between 2018 and 2019 velocity to be so different between Brooks and the other 2 sources.
I own both in my very deep dynasty. Curious to find out if one or both can continue to pitch well over the course of the season.