Mike Podhorzer’s 2026 Tout Wars Champions Draft Recap

Last Thursday night, I was honored to be invited to participate in the inaugural Tout Wars Champions league. The league included competitors with a combined 36 Tout Wars championships. It’s one impressive bunch, to say the least!
Full rule summary:
What’s the first thing that stands out to you? Not only is it a H2H league, but it’s a one-win format, meaning that whether you win all 10 categories or merely edge out your opponent 6-4 for the week, you get the same one win. I may have played a H2H fantasy baseball league once in my life and I know I did once in football. Needless to say, after that first experience, I vowed never to play in such a format again given the significant luck element of the H2H play. Of course, this was an opportunity I couldn’t pass up, so it could have been the silliest format ever created and I still would have accepted the invitation.
Learning about this H2H one-win format, I knew immediately that I was not going to play it straight. Many of us were likely using the same projection sets to begin with, so how much of an edge was any team really going to get coming out of the draft? I had the 12th pick, so I was already at a major disadvantage, which made my optimal strategy even clearer. Let’s see if you can figure it out from my roster first.
| Round | Pick | Ov Pick | Pos | Player |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 12 | SP | Garrett Crochet |
| 2 | 1 | 13 | C | Cal Raleigh |
| 3 | 12 | 36 | SP | Cristopher Sanchez |
| 4 | 1 | 37 | 1B | Matt Olson |
| 5 | 12 | 60 | UT | Rafael Devers |
| 6 | 1 | 61 | SP | Jesus Luzardo |
| 7 | 12 | 84 | OF | Riley Greene |
| 8 | 1 | 85 | SP | Nolan McLean |
| 9 | 12 | 108 | OF | Jo Adell |
| 10 | 1 | 109 | SS | Willy Adames |
| 11 | 12 | 132 | OF | Taylor Ward |
| 12 | 1 | 133 | SP | Shota Imanaga |
| 13 | 12 | 156 | 3B | Munetaka Murakami |
| 14 | 1 | 157 | 1B | Spencer Torkelson |
| 15 | 12 | 180 | OF | Adolis Garcia |
| 16 | 1 | 181 | 1B | Jake Burger |
| 17 | 12 | 204 | SP | Jack Flaherty |
| 18 | 1 | 205 | 2B | Jorge Polanco |
| 19 | 12 | 228 | SP | Ranger Suarez |
| 20 | 1 | 229 | SP | Cody Ponce |
| 21 | 12 | 252 | RP | Joey Cantillo |
| 22 | 1 | 253 | RP | Reid Detmers |
| Pos | Player | Round | Pick | Ov Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | Cal Raleigh | 2 | 1 | 13 |
| 1B | Matt Olson | 4 | 1 | 37 |
| 2B | Jorge Polanco | 18 | 1 | 205 |
| SS | Willy Adames | 10 | 1 | 109 |
| 3B | Munetaka Murakami | 13 | 12 | 156 |
| OF | Riley Greene | 7 | 12 | 84 |
| OF | Jo Adell | 9 | 12 | 108 |
| OF | Taylor Ward | 11 | 12 | 132 |
| UT | Rafael Devers | 5 | 12 | 60 |
| UT | Spencer Torkelson | 14 | 1 | 157 |
| SP | Garrett Crochet | 1 | 12 | 12 |
| SP | Cristopher Sanchez | 3 | 12 | 36 |
| RP | Joey Cantillo | 21 | 12 | 252 |
| RP | Reid Detmers | 22 | 1 | 253 |
| SP | Jesus Luzardo | 6 | 1 | 61 |
| SP | Nolan McLean | 8 | 1 | 85 |
| SP | Shota Imanaga | 12 | 1 | 133 |
| Res | Adolis Garcia | 15 | 12 | 180 |
| Res | Jake Burger | 16 | 1 | 181 |
| Res | Jack Flaherty | 17 | 12 | 204 |
| Res | Ranger Suarez | 19 | 12 | 228 |
| Res | Cody Ponce | 20 | 1 | 229 |
Is it obvious yet?!
The one-win format convinced me the best strategy was to punt, punt some more, and then punt even more. It’s pretty common knowledge that the most correlated hitting categories are HR, RBI, and R. Any type of player can steal a base, so a high or low total doesn’t suggest anything about the rest of his fantasy contributions. Batting average is a ratio, and we already know it fluctuates significantly from year to year thanks to the vagaries of BABIP and other inputs. So if we already know AVG is tough to nail down over a full season, imagine trying to predict a hitter’s average over any random week! Not only is batting average not really correlated with the other stats, given the extreme volatility of the stat on a weekly basis, it seems prudent to just…ignore it.
If you’re counting, that means I was already going into the draft punting two of the five hitting categories. I chose to focus solely on HR, RBI, and R, which I felt was more predictable on a weekly basis and correlates highly so I can essentially get all three when targeting one.
But wait, there’s more! Let’s move on to pitching. The closer landscape this year is a mess. It feels worse than ever before, whether that’s just my perception or reality. Furthermore, closers, and relievers in general, might throw just two to three innings in a week, which barely moves the needle in any category aside from saves. They are also expensive in drafts given the current landscape, but don’t provide the value that justifies the cost. So rather than join the crowd in buying closers, I decided to go punting again.
I didn’t want to punt closers and just draft middle relievers for those 2 RP spots either, because they would contribute almost literally nothing without saves. Luckily, there were a bunch of starting pitchers with RP eligibility, so I knew I had to draft two out of that group. Also luckily, those pitchers were actually potentially good! I didn’t have to settle on some veteran projected for a 4.50 ERA and a poor strikeout rate, but young guys with real upside.
Punting saves meant that I was going all in on my pitching staff, which is never a Podhorzer move. I wanted to own the most starting pitchers and make sure they were high quality as well. The plan is to win strikeouts and wins every single week.
With three category punts, the expectation and hope is I win HR, RBI, and R the vast majority of weeks, if not all, though the site projections suggest I screwed up on drafting R, even with top HR and RBI projections. Then combine that with guaranteed wins in strikeouts and wins. That’s now 5 near lock wins every week. Then I just need to win one of batting average, ERA, or WHIP to win at least 6-4.
My team batting average stinks — my best guy is only forecasted to hit .257! But even the worst batting average team is going to win the category every so often just due to sheer randomness. My ERA and WHIP should be strong as I intentionally went hard on top starting pitchers, which is something I just don’t typically do. It was fun this time though since I was finally able to roster many of the names I’m a fan of.
Early on in the draft, I was watching other teams to see if anyone else was following a similar strategy. Initially, there were two teams I thought it was possible, but eventually proved they were playing it straight. That was a relief, because multiple teams following this strategy would kill it, as the cost of these low batting average, high power guys would skyrocket and I’d have slimmer pickings.
I’m not a fan of Cal Raleigh, so I had to hold my nose taking him as part of my 1-2 punch at picks 12 and 13. The thing is, he fits my strategy perfectly, even if he merely does what he did in 2024. He’s so head and shoulders above the rest of the catchers in the categories I targeted that he was an easy choice at that pick.
I was really, really hoping to draft Eugenio Suárez as my third baseman and fully expected to given how I was valuing players versus traditional valuations and his ADP. Sadly, he was drafted well before his ADP, so I settled on the next guy that perfectly fit into my strategy. Hopefully Munetaka Murakami makes enough contact to actually hit 30ish home runs!
I actually made two big mistakes. In rounds 15-16, I didn’t feel it was necessary to draft my 2B yet and I knew I could wait until the end to fill my 2 RP slots with those starting pitchers, so I decided to start drafting reserves. I guess in the heat of the moment, I forgot that I should be filling my reserves with five starting pitchers to ensure I lock down wins and strikeouts. Instead, I drafted Adolis García and Jake Burger, my fourth first baseman (fifth once Murakami gains eligibility). That was dumb, even though the value suggested they were good picks for my team. While there will be off days for my starters and opportunities to start these two bats, two extra starting pitchers would have been a much better play. There were still some solid names out there I could have drafted at the time, but my brain must have just been screaming “HOME RUNS, HOME RUNS, CHICKS DIG THE LONG BALL!”. I did draft three more starting pitchers on my bench later, so it’s possible I have enough, but we’ll see how it goes.
I don’t have a lot of unique opinions about the players I drafted, though it’s always funny when I draft guys I highlight in red, which is a quick way to remind me not to pay up. That guy is Taylor Ward, who is coming off a power breakout and moving to a significantly worse home run park. However, the projections seem to factor that in well enough, projecting him for barely better than 2024. Plus, he’s slated to hit second in an Orioles lineup that looks like it could be quite exciting. At his price, and given my strategy, I was satisfied with the pick.
The other name I want to mention is Nolan McLean. At the time, there were numerous other pitchers I had valued higher based on projections. I chose to draft him anyway. I think I’m officially drinking the Kool-Aid, which is shocking considering I was so sure he was going to be massively overvalued this year. His Stuff+ ranked fifth among 198 starting pitchers last year with at least 40 innings. FIFTH! That was one point ahead of both Garrett Crochet and Tarik Skubal.
What’s crazy is it’s possible that mark gets even better! His already strong velocity was up in his first spring start and during the WBC, he topped out at 99.2 MPH, 0.8 MPH faster than his hardest pitch thrown all last year. I don’t know how much more upside he has on the already elite 30.3% strikeout rate he posted during his MLB debut last year, but the increased velocity is giving me confidence that he’ll blow past all his projected strikeout rates, which surprisingly top out at just 23.4%. Oh, and he’s an extreme ground ball guy too. At this point, it’s just his control and command that could give some pause, but with the strikeout potential and high GB%, he seems like a legit Cy Young candidate if he gets the innings.
***
All in all, it was a fun draft and the H2H format pitting us against a different competitor each week should be a blast.
Is this team a winner? Would you ever dare punt three categories in this format or is it too risky for your blood?
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

Punt. Punt! PUNT!!!
Seems like a solid strategy given the format. Best of luck, Mike!
This format rewards the manager making the most moves. The Mon/Thu streams will be key to adding enough volume.
Great recap, Mike. And of course, I’m the one who drafted Eugenio Suarez a round earlier. I don’t particularly follow ADP unless there is a clear 2-3+ round gap in values, and there was not with him. Rather, there was a massive drop in value from him to the other third baseman below him at that spot in the draft, signaling that he was incredibly valuable.
I’m curious to see if this 3-category punt strategy works, because it is a lot to punt. Taking a definite zero in 30% of the categories means you have to go 6-1 in the others to win, and do this every week. That might be hard to pull off.
You might be able to convince me that you will have enough volume with amassing more SP to win K & W each week, although you do have two RP slots to fill, and only 5 possible starter slots.
But you won’t convince me that ERA & WHIP are in the bag for you. In fact, the fact that you aren’t throwing more RPs likely puts you behind in those categories.
And as for offense – I think you DO have a leg up by not taking speed and drafting an extra hitter rather than closers, but since you didn’t have a $9 pitching staff, its hard to guarantee this each week. You should win most of those HR/R/RBI categories each week, but it isn’t a guarantee.
Again, the problem always with punting is that you are locking in assured losses to gain an uncertain but larger advantage in the other categories. If it is done with low draft capital to increase those odds enough – it could be worth it.
Look at Brett Sayre – he punted W & K in favor of SV, ERA & WHIP. But he did use a large amount of draft capital to acquire the closers. Did he get enough offense to make this strategy work? I’m not sure that he did. His strategy might have been better if didn’t load up on elite closers, and drafted 2 more high valued offensive player, and pivoted to cheaper MRs or half chance closers later.
I suppose we will have to see how this all plays out. Best of luck to you in the league, unless you are playing against me …
I agree with pretty much all of your comments on the strat and am quite curious (and excited) to see how it will play out.
Truthfully, Ws and Ks feel like the only “locks” in terms of weekly cat wins, because you can win those with volume. ERA/WHIP is reallllly tricky to bank on, as you touched on, but it’s especially hard to predict early in the season. Later though, when we have a much clearer idea of pitching talent and team talent, IMO it is much more playable.
When talking about low avg guys I couldn’t help but think that low avg = prone to slumps which = stretches of not hitting which = poor R/HR/RBI numbers. Far from a lock.
However I guess that’s the game with this strategy! Simply hoping that there are enough power bats on your team to mitigate the slumps and so long as you win R/HR/RBI a majority of weeks… paired with consistent W/K wins… then hoping to eek out one of AVG/ERA/WHIP…
Still seems like a lotta chips have to fall in place, but regardless I’m very excited to watch someone go down the super-punt hole.
Having played H2H like this for a very long time, I’m not confident it’ll work out for you but I hope it does. Wins are very hit or miss so to speak to the point that volume can’t always ensure you claim the category – perhaps daily lineups will help. If I’m facing you, I’ll get one save and then stream in as many starters as I can to compete with you in other areas. OR I’ll do my own punting, concede W and Ks, and only throw my best matchups to claim ERA, WHIP, and SVs. In our league, historically, the teams going reliever heavy far outperform the teams going all starters.
Regarding AVG, yes it is tougher to count on, but it’s not wholly unpredictable. And a team with low AVG can often mean streaky performances in the counting stats. It seems to me you’re counting on winning all the categories you’ve built the team around, but the randomness of the weekly format won’t treat that too well. Plus, come playoff time, you’re easier to gameplan against and you’ll have a harder time targeting/adjusting to where your opponent is lacking if you don’t have a base there to begin with.
Personally, I don’t punt more than a category and I try to be at least reasonably competitive everywhere. But you’re more of an expert than me and I’ll be watching with interest to see what I can learn. Hope you provide more updates throughout the season.
“But you’re more of an expert than me” — definitely not in H2H!
I’m eager to see how the strategy unfolds. I don’t think any of us really play in H2H leagues or the 1 win format, so we’re basically all newbies. But will be fun to see how others change their gameplan when facing me. They can’t just get their 1 save and then stream because the free agent starting pitchers aren’t very good. So they are risking their ratios for that strategy.
And the problem with all relievers is we have 2 SP spots that need to be filled. So unless you can find relievers qualifying as SPs, you’ll still need to fill those slots. Maybe pick up a guy who won’t pitch? I don’t know.
I think you are vastly over estimating how tough a task winning R/RBI/HR is every week. In my own H2H league I’ve simulated weekly distributions and the answer seemed to be that it was never worth it to punt a category, as everything is too random. But this is in a 10 score league, not a winner takes all.
One problem with your strategy: in a daily league you will need to have bench bats to get as many games played as possible and contribute to your counting stats. But then you will also have to spot start to win Ws and Ks every week, as your opponents should be using all 7 moves each week on extra spit starters.
Gonna be tough, but good luck.
Don’t forget that we only get $100 in FAAB, so with every team competing to pick up those pitchers to stream, teams will run out of money if they are making use of all 7 adds a week. So the streaming might not be as hard as other leagues with no FAAB. Also, the streamers risk ruining ratios and since they weren’t good enough to be drafted, might not offer much of a chance at a win, with middling strikeouts.
I think you nailed the landing.