Corey Klubot Activate!
Entering the season, some fantasy owners thought Corey Kluber could turn in a good year – I bet a lot of them frequent these pages. He was coming off a below average 3.85 ERA, but FIP, xFIP, and SIERA all estimated a figure closer to 3.25. Given a decent strikeout rate of 8.31 K/9 and solid 2.02 BB/9, he made for a tidy mid-late draft target. His average cost was $5 (I generally paid about $8).
Now we know that the Klubot was a lot better than “good.” After all, he earned a great nickname like Klubot. Generally, you don’t earn a cool moniker with mediocre performance (unless it rhymes, i.e. Big Game Games). His 18 wins, 269 strikeouts (10.27 K/9), 2.44 ERA, and 1.09 WHIP ranked him as the fourth best fantasy pitcher, worth $28. Talk about profit.
Let’s talk about who Kluber is as a pitcher and what we should expect in 2015. Dominant strikeout and walk numbers carried him to a 2.44 ERA, 2.35 FIP, and 2.57 xFIP. He’s supported by a 11.9 percent swinging strike rate. He was homer prone over the 2012-13 period, but turned it around last year. We can probably expect a league average HR/FB ratio next year. His ground ball rate is above average at 48 percent. So far, it’s all good news.
He shows substantial splits – righties posted a .246 wOBA (.304 BABIP) compared to a .304 wOBA from lefties (.327 BABIP). The difference can be attributed to his sinker. Check out his pitch usage.

Got that? He throws a lot of sinkers, especially early count sinkers. Now here’s the rub – left-handed hitters batted .335 with a .541 slugging percentage and 5.5 percent swinging strike rate against the pitch. The Klubot has a flaw, but it’s a really easy one to fix. He probably just needs to replace some sinkers with cutters against opposite-handed hitters.
It’s clear why Kluber likes the sinker. Against right-handed hitters, he was able to notch a lot of quick outs. Fellow righties hit .292 against the sinker, which isn’t fantastic but also came with a 61 percent ground ball rate. If the batter didn’t swing against the sinker, it set up his excellent secondary stuff. Prepare to gaze upon dominance.


I’ve highlighted the whiff rate columns to show just how filthy Kluber becomes post-sinker. I love the general strategy here. He dares hitters to try to loft the sinker early in the count, knowing they’re in trouble if they fail. His command and control further punish patient hitters.
Steamer doesn’t see a repeat, projecting 13 wins, 197 strikeouts, a 3.21 ERA, and a 1.13 WHIP. That’s a $13 pitcher. However, I think Kluber could continue to grow in 2015. As we discovered, there is the potential for an adjustment against left-handed hitters, and they comprised over half of batters faced (510 LHH against 441 RHH). While some regression can be expected in his strikeout and home run rates, I doubt it will be enough to support an ERA over 3.00.
My hope for draft day is to find owners hesitant to include Kluber in the second tier of fantasy aces (i.e. everyone after Clayton Kershaw). He has just the one breakout season to his name, and there is the matter of seeing him bounce back from a career high 235.2 inning workload. Despite my general avoidance of pricey pitchers, I’ll be owning a lot of shares of Kluber if his price tag settles in around $22. I love when an elite player shows signs of further improvement.
You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam
Is there any room for improvement with his .316 BABIP? The defense won’t be dramatically different, though Ramirez/Lindor at SS for a whole year is going to be better than Cabrera for half a year and then Ramirez. It’d be even better if it was Lindor and Ramirez up the middle instead of Kipnis.
SSS obviously, but his first half BABIP was .326 and second half was .302. Can we attribute any of that to Ramirez? Ramirez’s playing time mostly came in August and September, when Kluber’s BABIP was actually the worst (.326 and .340).
So maybe it’s nothing doing?
I think so long as he continues to seek early count contact, his BABIP will be a touch on the high side. Probably at least .300. And over a season, there’s very little practical difference between .316 and .300. It’s just 1.6% more hits, all of which would probably be singles through the infield.
Makes sense. Thanks!
Until Lindor is up. Lindor will stop everything.
When you say his steamer projection sees him as a $13 pitcher, is that compared against stats of all pitchers in the 2014 season, or compared against all steamer projections? Because Steamer only projects 3 full-time SPs to have an ERA under 3.00 next year, so Kluber’s 3.21 is actually still one of the better ERA’s in the league. (Side not, I’m not sure why steamer is always so pessimistic with everyone’s ERA).
Good question. If he is seeing how much Kluber’s 2014 Steamer projections would have been worth in 2013, that is the wrong way to go about it.
A better way would be to see where Kluber’s projection ranks among other projections (somewhere 7th-12th, I would guess), and then estimate the dollar value of the Xth best starting pitcher in any given year.
If I’m trying to create a value sheet, I might do it they way you suggest. However, I’m just trying to estimate what the numbers projected by Steamer are likely to be worth at the end of next season. In that case, using 2014 numbers is “good enough” so long as the run environment is held constant.
So to answer the question, I just compared using 2014 end of season numbers and Sanders’ values.
As for Steamer projecting only three starters at under 3.00, that sounds right to me. I’ll use an example to illustrate.
Let’s say we have 30 pitchers with an equal chance to finish anywhere from a 2.90 to a 3.20 ERA. We would project all 30 pitchers to have a 3.05 ERA even though we expect 10 of them to finish under 3.00. We can’t know which ones will overperform or underperform the projection. Obviously, in reality it’s a lot more complicated, but that’s why you only see a few guys projected at under 3.00.
I can see why a projection system would regress essentially everyone back to the mean, simply because that is where everyone is more likely to move (although I’d wish a projection system would give me more than that, because I can also easily regress everyone’s values back to the mean; I’m more interested in seeing which highs and lows look more sustainable due to numbers that I might not even be looking at very much).
That aside, I still think you would need to compare him to the steamer projections because the standard deviation will be much smaller, presumably, in the projected numbers, so therefore his 3.21 ERA will carry a lot more weight then it will in 2014 numbers where the standard deviation is much higher and therefore 3.21 seems more mediocre than top-10-pitcher good.
Cool Brag time: I’ll be keeping the Klubot at $6 this year. And. It. Is. Glorious.
Wait, who’s “Big Game Games” and how’d he/she get such a cool nickname?