Brad Johnson’s 10 Bold Predictions
‘Bout that time, eh chaps? After travelling most of the way across the country over the last three days, I’ve prepared a special concoction of face melting boldness for this lovely Tuesday. Here at RotoGraphs, it is customary to list 10 such bold picks; also Eno ordered me to do so.
1. Erik Johnson will be the second best starting pitcher for the White Sox
Johnson has good stuff and an excellent track record of command and control in the minors. In his short audition last season, he produced a 3.25 ERA that was much better than his 5.40 FIP. That bad FIP was the result of a low strikeout rate and high-ish walk rate. His minor league numbers suggest that he should strike out over 20 percent of batters while walking around eight percent. That would give him a sub-4.00 FIP and ensure that he’s at least a mixed league relevant stream starter, if not worthy of outright ownership.
This prediction smelled even bolder to me until I realized that he just needs to outperform Jose Quintana, John Danks, and Andre Rienzo. It’s a bold prediction but not outlandishly so.
2. Carlos Ruiz will be a top 15 fantasy catcher
I would have liked to go bolder than top 15, but I can’t possibly project more than 450 plate appearances for Ruiz. His career high is just 472 plate appearances and a more responsible projection is around 390. Ruiz is back on Adderall – this time with the league’s blessing. I assume he won’t have the many layers of rust that he dealt with last season after returning from his suspension. Maybe he won’t ever hit .325/.394/.540 like he did in 2012, but a .280/.350/.430 line would be tasty in any two catcher league. That’s only about 10 percent better than the numbers he put up in last season’s second half. Essentially, I’m banking on better production due to drugs and no suspension.
3. Jimmy Rollins will post 40 or more home runs plus steals (HR+SB)
Rollins is not getting much love in fantasy drafts and with good reason. He’s a 35-year-old shortstop who hit just six home runs last season while batting .252. He’s always popped out quite a bit, which hurts his ability to generate a solid batting average, and the Phillies lineup has declined enough as a whole that he’s not a good source of runs or RBI. The only thing he has going for him are stolen bases, but that category can easily disappear with a minor injury.
Aside from one season where a high ankle sprain sent him to the disabled list, Rollins has been a good bet to eclipse 650 plate appearances. His HR/FB ratio last season was just 3.1 percent while his career rate is 7.7 percent. Between 650 plate appearances and some power regression, Rollins could easily swat about 12-15 home runs and make up the difference in stolen bases. To me, the boldest part of this projection is asking for 650 plate appearances from an aging shortstop.
4. Brian McCann will exceed 600 plate appearances, slug 30 or more home runs, and drive in at least 100 runs
In case you’ve missed it, I love McCann in Yankee stadium. To my eyes, he’s the best hitter in that lineup and should bat third or fourth on a daily basis. On the days he doesn’t catch, he should slide right into the designated hitter role. Of course, this projection is all kinds of bold. I’m asking for sustained health, career best levels of production, and I’m also relying on several Yankees to decline. In particular, if Mark Teixeira, Carlos Beltran, and Alfonso Soriano all play well, then it will be almost impossible for McCann to hit these numbers. They’ll simply take too many of the designated hitter days away from McCann and may bump him back in the lineup too.
5. Justin Ruggiano will accrue over 40 HR+SB
I’ve already stated on the record that 50 HR+SB are possible from Ruggiano with a 650 plate appearance season. Granted, I don’t really think 650 plate appearances is possible, but 500 could happen (there’s a fine line between bold and ludicrous). The assumption is that Ruggiano will platoon – probably with Ryan Sweeney. There’s also talk of trading Nate Schierholtz to make room for Ryan Kalish, but such a trade almost certainly means more playing time for Ruggiano.
Ruggiano also benefits from escaping Miami. He’ll bat in the middle of the lineup in a stadium where home runs happen. The Cubs also have an incentive to let him accrue as many plate appearances as possible so as to inflate his mid-season trade value. A trade would actually be bad news for this projection, which is part of the reason why I didn’t try to stretch to 50 HR+SB.
6. Sergio Santos will record 15 saves
Remember this guy? He was briefly a nearly-excellent closer for the White Sox. Chicago swapped him over to Toronto where he promptly landed on the disabled list. Santos returned for 29 appearances last season, showing a huge whiff rate and vastly improved walk rate. He struck out over 30 percent of batters faced and walked just over four percent. That’s elite production. It might not be bold to expect regression, but I’m too responsible to accept those crazy rates at face value. A walk rate of 10 percent would still be the second best rate of his career. I do think he can continue to strike out over a batter per inning – especially if he’s walking more batters.
I tried to keep a delicate balance between bold and possible with this pick. Santos needs to leapfrog Steve Delabar to be second in line for saves. That shouldn’t be impossible, but it’s not something to poo-poo either. If the Jays trade Casey Janssen mid-season, then Santos will have just enough time to post 15 saves. It’s more likely that the Jays don’t trade Janssen, in which case he’ll either have to land on the disabled list of implode for Santos to get a chance.
7. Justin Verlander will be the best pitcher on the Tigers
With all due respect to Max Scherzer and Anibal Sanchez, I fully expect regression to benefit Verlander and chip away at 2013’s two Detroit upstarts. Based on our ZiPS/Steamer hybrid, this does not appear to be very bold since Verlander is projected to have the best FIP and WAR on the staff. However, fantasy owners almost unanimously agree that Scherzer should be drafted first. Verlander’s fastball velocity bounced back in the second half of the season after some mechanical tinkering. His results improved as a result. I haven’t managed to draft Verlander yet, but I’m pretty bullish about a return to elite production.
8. None of 2013’s breakout rookie starters post a sub-3.00 ERA
Not Jose Fernandez, not Gerrit Cole, not Michael Wacha, not Danny Salazar, not Sonny Gray, not Julio Teheran. Last season was a rich one for excellent young starters. In addition to the six I listed, Tony Cingrani, Alex Wood, Chris Archer, Wily Peralta, and Zack Wheeler could be seen as having a (lesser) shot at a sub-3.00 ERA. Let it be known that I’m disqualifying Shelby Miller and Hyun-Jin Ryu from the competition – Miller because his breakout was in 2012 and Ryu because he was an established import.
Individually, we should probably expect each pitcher to post an ERA over 3.00, but several of these guys project to hug the line. If you’re familiar with Texas Hold’Em, you’ll know that a pocket pair beats two over cards about 55 percent of the time (translation: if I hold a pair of 2’s and you have an ace and a king, I’ll win 55 percent). With this projection, I feel like I’m betting on my pocket pair to hold up 10 hands in a row. That’s pretty bold.
9. Yordano Ventura breaks camp with the team and quickly establishes himself as the second best Royals starter
While I’d love to get extra bold and predict him to outperform James Shields too, I’d be betting on injury. I do think Ventura has all the skill necessary to be nearly as good as Shields – at least until the inevitable velocity decline starts to take effect. Ventura isn’t a polished pitcher, and his slight frame elicits worry about his durability, so I don’t advise dynasty owners to look too far down the road. For the purposes of 2014, I expect major league hitters to have some difficulty with his heat.
10. Thomas La Stella ousts Dan Uggla by May 20th
I’m going to go ahead and one-up my colleague J.P. Breen on this one. There are two moving parts here. La Stella needs to continue posting strong numbers. So far, he’s been solid in camp (so has Uggla). The other moving part is that Uggla needs to continue posting ugly offensive numbers and/or make some very noisy, perhaps game losing plays in the field. I honestly expect the situation to resolve one way or another by the end of April, but I built in 20 days of buffer because…well…I can.
The Braves rotation has been bit by the injury bug, with Kris Medlen and Brandon Beachy going from rotation members to very uncertain over the last few days. Beachy isn’t a surprise although he could return. The outlook is worse for Medlen. He’s believed to have ligament damage. Losing two pitchers probably forces guys like Freddy Garcia or David Hale into action.
I’m sure the club understands that they need every marginal advantage to defeat the Nationals, which is why they are looking into acquiring Ervin Santana. It should also cause them to consider the offensive and defensive advantages offered by La Stella. Were it not for Uggla’s contract, I have little doubt that the veteran would be traded to make room for La Stella on the opening day roster. Projection systems expect La Stella to outperform Uggla in every major facet of the game. Uggla’s only obvious advantage is power, yet La Stella still projects to have the better wOBA of the two players.
For the record, I’ve talked about La Stella taking over for Uggla in other posts, so this was on my radar well before Breen’s post.
You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam
Wow more like Brad Johnsons 10 Not Bold Predictions
I agree. Why do the bold predictions appear conservative?
Ok, what probability do you define as bold?
I set my threshold for predictions as such. If an event has a less than 20% chance of happening based on my perception of fantasy draft behavior and written expert opinions, then it qualifies as bold. I then tried to pick 10 events that I believe have some possibility of happening.
Are you accounting for decline or injury risk? If any of the above players gets injured, then the prediction is lost. For pitchers that’s generally a 30-40% chance based on Jeff Zimmerman’s research. That’s ONLY including injuries that result in a DL stint.
This level of bold is bold enough for me, although some of them are more interesting than others. To me, bold doesn’t mean impossible, it means unlikely but having an argument as to why it is possible. Saying “Bryce Harper will hit 85 HR” I suppose could be bold to some, but it wouldn’t be interesting, informative or entertaining, despite being “bold”.
These are def bold enough for me. These idiots chime in and say this on every single post.
Maybe the other people in the competition were too bold. But looking at the Verlander, I don’t think that is that controversial. Yes it could be Scherzer or Sanchez, but I’m sure I could find some other baseball writers who would say the same thing. I would define bold as something no other writer would predict (except in a bold prediction article)
for me, bold has to have a wow factor in it. Like Jacoby Ellsbury will lead the Yankees in home runs this season.
Well Ray, I spent a minute trying to come up with one and failed. I’m sure if I took more time I could…I’m just not any good at predicting things that almost certainly won’t happen, although your Ellsbury pick was a good one.
Projecting that Justin Verlander, one of the best pitchers in baseball, will be the best pitcher on his team is not bold. Some of your predictions were bold, but I felt that to be egregious.
They are bold enough for me (especially #3 and #4).
Agree that the JRoll prediction was super bold, and that the Verlander one was super un-bold. Slightly less bold, but seeing as how you (the author) took the over 40 HR+SB for Rollins, I will take the under 20 combined.
I think most of them are bold, but Uggla already lost his job last year to replacement level players. Losing it again to an actual prospect (well at least sort of one) isn’t terribly bold. If someone did a bold prediction saying he would keep the job all year, that would be bold.
Someone says this every time. You’re that guy. Congratulations.
if i was a Braves fan, May 20th would be a happier day than my birthday
I like including some deeper sleeper picks here in Ventura, Johnson and La Stella.
Cue the “not bold enough” chants.
How about this? Billy Hamilton steals… 1 million bases while Everth Cabrera earns the title “Number 2.”
Adderall doesn’t make you a better hitter.
Of course not. It can help with concentration and off-field routine, which can manifest as improved hitting. Steroids also don’t help hitting.
then why the heck do so many baseball players do it? For fun?
For basically the same reasons he said Adderall does not directly improve hitting. Steroids allow you train longer and harder, recover faster and strengthen at an unnatural rate. They do not however, put the bat on the ball for you. I’m not saying steroids do not help performance; but saying that they make you hit better is like saying Red Bull makes you smarter.
my comment was in response to momc. My point is players do what they do for a reason: to be better than they were before
Sure it can, helps with anxiety, helps you stay loose in pressure situations. There’s a reason tons of NFL players and other athletes are getting caught with it.
amphetamines can boost concentration, focus, and energy level.
This is a bold prediction: Paul Goldschmidt ends up a top 10 player
This is an italic prediction: If I crack the roster, I’m not gonna like the pizza in Chicago
Pretty sure Goldy is being drafted top 5, or at least 1st round, everywhere. What exactly is bold about saying he’ll be top 10?
Shelby Miller’s breakout season was in 2012? You mean when he had an ERA of 4.75 in Triple A and pitched 14 innings in the Majors? That sure is a weird “breakout” season.
Sarcasm: productive and polite.
This is exactly what I thought. Miller had one start in 2012, which was the last game of the season. More backups played in that game than regulars because the outcome of the game could not affect the playoff status of the Cardinals.
Yah that did not make any sense
“translation: if I hold a pair of 2′s and you have an ace and a king, I’ll win 55 percent”
I’d be happy to offer you 23:27 on that.
Jose Fernandez is going to absolutely take a big dump on #8
Probably. He’s the only one that actually projects to a sub-3.00 ERA. But pitchers with good ERA projections finish above 3.00 all the time, it only takes one bad outing in some cases.
felix got roughed up near the end. he was dominate all season though. hes a good example.
Seriously you all need to stop talking about La Stella until after my draft.
not really so bold, but i enjoyed reading nonetheless
O consider 9 out of the 10 to have less than a 25 percent chance of happening so defo bold but not silly in my opinion. Using my own projections I consider the Verlander on to be 50 to 55 percent in the positive so I would see that as the exception. Of course these are all personal opinion but im expecting Verlander to really bounce back along with slight regression from Sanchez and Max.
Yea I guess Verlander isn’t very bold, but I’ve NEVER seen him drafted before Scherzer and I have seen Sanchez drafted before him. That tells me that fantasy owners think it’s a low percentage outcome.
it only takes one person in each draft to distort what people actually think of a certain player.
A 30 year old catcher switching leagues and coming off an injury will post career highs in PAs, HRs, and RBIs?
#CrazyBold
I think some of the “not bold/flashy” sentiment might be in response to most of these predictions only being relevant in deeper leagues. I’m in a 10-team mixed dynasty league (that’s right, I’m not ashamed), so 15 saves, a top-15 catcher, a pitcher out-performing Jose Quintana, another beating Jason Vargas, and LaStella-anything are irrelevant to me. A lot of these predictions impact who owners will take in the later rounds, not the first five, so that might be the disconnect here.
And I agree, #8 is very bold.
ruggiano, sweeney, and schierholtz are the same player.
The poker analogy is not quite accurate. 22 vs. AK suited (a different suit than either 2s) is just about a dead heat 49 vs 49.
22 vs. AK offsuit is about 52 to 47.
http://www.cardplayer.com/poker-tools/odds-calculator/texas-holdem
I like them. Maybe past years were bolder. Over the shoulder and holder!!! Anyway, Good job.
A few are nuts (Rollins….god awful last year), but totally agree with you on B-Mac! Love him this year, that park is perfect for him. Why are nearly all his projections from sites giving him around 450ABs? I can’t understand it, this guy is going to DH when not catching and hit every day.
Justin Verlander who has consistently in his career been the Tigers Ace, but just so happens had a down year last year, being picked as the best pitcher on his team strikes me as not only a not bold prediction, but a likely outcome as well. That’s like saying, I project Starlin Castro to be the Cubs best hitter even though he wasn’t last year.
Not very bold, and not a very interesting prediction. I always thought that people benefited from these predictions by hearing about something new or an intriguing player that we don’t know much about. Not some ex-Ace reclaiming his throne after losing it for one year.
Except for the fact that there’s no way Starlin Castro will be the Cubs’ best hitter, barring major injuries. Rizzo and Ruggiano should easily out perform him.
Ruggiano outperforming Castro…
That is laughable, even with Castro’s recent struggles. Castro’s ability alone should carry him as the best Cub hitter, now if he can get his mental approach down.
Why is it laughable? The ZiPS/Steamer hybrid expects Ruggiano to out-wOBA Castro by about 10 points. That’s not counting that Ruggiano’s production is substantially more valuable in fantasy than real life while Castro’s doesn’t differ between the real and fantasy platforms.
Projections also expect Schierholtz, Castillo, and Sweeney to out-wOBA Castro.
Also, every projection I’ve seen has everyone in that outfield splitting time, so if Ruggiano has a hot start and gets a full season for the final 5 months or so his numbers could be even better.
Good point Brad Johnson, I just still view Castro’s swing that stays in the zone so long and his pure ability besides his mental lapses as being “All-star” level talent. The kid is still young, and has a lot of issues that presented themselves last year, but with a new direction (coach) and a couple seasons under his belt, he should outperform his projections.
Schierholtz shouldn’t be on the Cubs by the all star break so i’ll discount him, I do like Castillo to possibly outperform him, and Sweeney won’t get enough at bats throughout the year to do it.
And I’m not saying that Castro WILL be bad, just that it’s not laughable to say Ruggiano might outperform him – especially in a 5×5 setting where he’s almost certain to outperform simply through HR+SB production.
Thanks Brad. I enjoy your writing.
Your Ventura prediction inspired me.
Danny Duffy will be the most valuable starter on KC. Including Shields.
I’m even drinking my own cool aid and starting to believe it!
Boom.