Author Archive: Jeff Zimmerman

Fixing My Fantasy Weakness: Hitter Evaluation

I was recently asked the following question by Werthless.

Jeff, what are you trying to accomplish here? Are you trying to estimate the volatility in an individual player’s projection? That’s an interesting question, and directly related to the risk of the player. Are you trying to do better than Steamer at predicting performance? That’s a big endeavor. Are you trying to predict injuries? Might be better to do that directly. Are you trying to better estimate number of plate appearances by estimating job security? Might be better to do that directly.

Then, you can combine the models to perhaps better quantify a player’s risk of meeting preseason performance objectives. You can apply your model onto a different year’s data to see how well your predictions match reality (ie. Do the higher risk players actually underperform more often than lower risk players).

I do have a plan I’m implementing but it wasn’t known to my readers. Sorry. I want to understand which hitter traits to concentrate on. If they don’t exist, I created some.

For a few season’s now, my hitters have steadily outperformed my pitchers. In my three main leagues, here are the pitching-hitting splits from this past season.
Read the rest of this entry »


Overperformance Metric: Who’s Most Likely to Breakout

Breakouts and busts. If there was a set procedure for finding both, it would have been found years ago and incorporated into projections. For now, all we have is the overall chances of either happening. Over the past few weeks, I’ve been trying to put a simple value on these chances. I’ve completed the underperforming calculations and will now finish the overperforming metric. Additionally, I will compare both metrics to get an overall idea of the projection’s volatility.

In my last article, I found the breakout thresholds for plate appearances (222 PA) and wOBA (.040) and won’t change these values. Besides these two values, I determined who had both thresholds crossed and when both were partially achieved. The overperformance needed to increase near to the threshold values.

Read the rest of this entry »


Setting Guidelines For an Overperformance Metric

About a week ago, I finished creating some simple stats for the chance a hitter underperforms. Now it’s time to find the overperformers. These are the potential breakout guys every owner hopes to hit on and help carry their team to a championship.

To start with, a breakout needs to have some set baseline values. I went to Twitter to help find a baseline value to use. I’ll start with a playing time boost.

Read the rest of this entry »


When Plate Discipline Sticks

A few days ago, Jake Leech asked me if Zack Cozart’s 2017 improved plate discipline would stick into 2018.

https://twitter.com/Stroke_19/status/931525718667943936

Cozart saw quite a bit of improvement with his K%-BB% dropping by 6% points.

Note: I like using K%-B% to get an overall value for a hitters plate discipline. Earlier this year, I investigated what early season stats point to a true breakout. K%-BB%, along with launch angle (FB%), were the two key factors to focus on.

Zach Cozart’s Plate Disciple
Season BB% K% K%-BB%
2016 7.3% 16.5% 9.2%
2017 12.2% 15.4% 3.2%
2018 (Steamer) 8.8% 15.6% 6.8%

The Steamer projection has his K%-BB% regressing closer to his 2016 values than the ones from 2017. This is how projections work with previous season stats having some weight along with some regression.

Read the rest of this entry »


Shohei Ohtani Projection and Comparables

A few days ago, Travis Sawchik ask me to help find some comps for the Shohei Ohtani using a 2016 Davenport translation. The list of potential hitters with similar 2018 Steamer projections was impressive (Charlie Blackmon, George Springer, Mookie Betts, Carlos Correa, Yasiel Puig, and Aaron Judge). Additionally, I found pitchers who had similar 2018 projections to his 2016 translation but the list wasn’t as impressive (Jimmy Nelson, James Paxton, Jon Gray, Luis Castillo, Luke Weaver). Thanks to Dan “The Man” Szymborski, a 2018 projection now exists and results will be a little disappointing.

First, from what I heard from most fantasy websites, Ohtani’s will be two separate draftable players. Ohtani the pitcher and Ohtani the hitter. No site, that I know of, has yet to combine the two. If they did, they will likely have to count all the hitting stats accumulated by all pitchers. I hope this doesn’t ever happen.

Read the rest of this entry »


2017 Disabled List Information

I’ve finally compiled the 2017 Disabled List (DL) information. The main change from the last few seasons is the transition from the 15-day DL to 10-day DL and the subsequent increase in DL trips. With the total trips up, the number of days lost is down which makes it tough to draw any major conclusions. It’s time to dive into the numbers.

First off, I collected the information from MLB.com’s transaction list. I like to use this list because it is easy to go back and check. I waded through it and it wasn’t pretty. It took me twice as long to compile the data compared to previous seasons. I would just like to give a big thank you to ProSportsTransactions.com for having most of the missing data.

With my venting out of the way, here is how the days missed for pitchers and hitters compare over the previous 4 seasons.

Days Lost to the Disabled List
Season Hitters Pitchers
2013 11996 18455
2014 10016 16295
2015 10491 18442
2016 12797 22139
2017 12268 19565

Read the rest of this entry »


Underperformance Metric: Who’s At Risk For Missing Expectations

A few weeks ago, I began the process of determining an underperformance metric. In the article, I laid out the groundwork determining the drop off in plate appearances (PA) and production (wOBA). With these thresholds, I created several metrics, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. I’m not setting the values into stone yet but I’m getting closer to a solution. I’ve found a few value I like better than others.

In the original article, I found fantasy owners considered a drop in 220 PA from 600 PA (37% drop) and of 0.035 wOBA from .350 wOBA (10%) to be the thresholds. I didn’t mess with these two values. Besides the pair, I wanted to know when both occurred. Additionally, from a discussion in the comments, I found when either PA or wOBA thresholds where met and when both dropped close to, but not over, the thresholds. This value (called Minor Drop) I found to provide the most overall value.

Read the rest of this entry »


Missing Colorado

Unless league rules require it or an owner plays in an NL West-only league, owners don’t use their starters in Colorado. This stance may be a little extreme but the league’s aces should be the only started used in Colorado. Pitching in Colorado adds one run to pitcher’s ERA. Owners know this but visiting team must send out a starter to get sacrificed. I’m going to go over some of the pitchers affected the most by being the sacrificial lamb.

This past season, I owned Jeff Samardzija in a couple of leagues. His 4.42 ERA was just above league average (4.36 ERA). The effect on my team wasn’t that much though. There is no way I was going to start him in Coors and I missed out on his 1.94 WHIP and 11.91 ERA over 11.1 IP. With the starts removed, his ERA dropped to 3.98. While not a great ERA, it represented the true effect it had on my team.

Read the rest of this entry »


Auction Calculator Results: Starting Pitcher Tiers

The Auction Calculator is now loaded with the 2017 end-of-season data along with some 2018 projections. I’m sure the preceding comment will be sufficient to keep many readers busy for a while. I’m glad some came back. While its output can lead down several different discussion paths, I’m going to analyze what I consider to be the third starting pitcher tier. I feel many 2018 leagues will be won or lost by navigating this minefield.

So far this offseason, fantasy owners have placed four starters (Kluber, Kershaw, Sale, and Scherzer) in the top tier, After those four, I believe there are a dozen or so pitchers who would make acceptable aces, especially if they can be doubled up with another pitcher from this tier.

Read the rest of this entry »


Max Fried: 2018 Deep Sleeper

This was supposed to be a quick paragraph on Max Fried but it turned into a borderline Quick Look. I was doing an article on pitchers who saw their ERA balloon because of starts at Coors. His non-Colorado ERA dropped stood at 3.09 vs 3.81 which made him seem like a borderline ace. I kept digging and found additional encouraging information. Here are some of my thoughts on my first 2018 deeper sleeper.

First, here’s how industry sources graded him including his pERA grades from his short MLB stint.

Max Fried Prospect Grades
Season Source Fastball Curve Change Control
2018 BA 92-93 mph (55) Plus (60) Fringe Avg (45) Below Avg (40)
2017 pERA (MLB) 71 56 55 42
2017 FanGraphs 60 60 55 50
2017 MLB 60 60 50 45
2014 MLB 60 65 50 50
2013 MLB 60 60 60 60

Some definite disparities exist. I will examine each pitch with a video from his September 9th start against the Marlins.

Read the rest of this entry »