AL Starting Pitcher Z-Contact% Improvers

What do we do to analyze players this early in the season? Focus on the underlying metrics that stabilize quickest and try to spot early changes. While our sample size stabilization points don’t include any advanced metrics, I would bet that the plate discipline metrics, including Z-Contact%, would sit on the low end in terms of how many plate appearances or batters faced they require to reach the calculated stabilization points. So let’s dive into the American League starting pitchers that have improved their Z-Contact% most from last year. Is there anything more illustrative of the quality of a pitcher’s stuff than making a batter miss a pitch in the strike zone?

AL SP Z-Contact% Improvers
Name 2017 K% 2016 K% 2017 Z-Contact% 2016 Z-Contact% Z-Contact% Diff
Jason Vargas 28.0% 23.4% 74.6% 84.3% -9.7%
Chris Sale 36.7% 25.7% 74.3% 83.2% -8.9%
James Paxton 29.3% 22.9% 77.9% 85.4% -7.5%
Ian Kennedy 25.3% 22.5% 77.1% 84.5% -7.4%
Matt Andriese 20.3% 20.7% 82.8% 89.3% -6.5%
Tyler Skaggs 25.0% 22.8% 81.3% 87.7% -6.4%
James Shields 23.2% 16.4% 83.1% 89.0% -5.9%
CC Sabathia 14.9% 19.8% 81.0% 86.7% -5.7%
Marco Estrada 22.4% 22.8% 77.0% 82.5% -5.5%
Rick Porcello 22.8% 21.2% 83.2% 88.4% -5.2%
Group Average 24.8% 21.8% 79.2% 86.1% -6.9%

Wowzers, Jason Vargas! The comparison to last year is kinda silly, considering he threw just 12 innings, facing 47 batters. However, last season was his lowest Z-Contact% to begin with, so this improvement is even larger if looking at his historical rates. How has the 34-year old suddenly become a strikeout machine?! He’s not suddenly throwing any harder and his pitch mix has remained the same. His changeup has always been fantastic, though this year its SwStk% is all the way up at an absurd 30.8%. The big driver is that his four-seamer is suddenly inducing whiffs, when it’s been ohhhh so bad in the past.

My initial inclination would be to guess that he’s now throwing the pitch higher in the zone. High fastballs generate more whiffs than low fastballs. That was indeed the case during his short time last year. But, not so this season so far. In fact, his vertical location is the lowest in the zone it’s ever been! So without an explanation I could dig up, this looks like a complete fluke, as there’s no reason his changeup should also improve from top notch to historically good.

So much for Chris Sale’s strikeout rate dip last year. This improvement looks better because of last season’s highest Z-Contact% since 2012, so it appears he’s back to normal. And hey, his velocity has rebounded too! He’ll battle for second best fantasy pitcher honors once again.

While I’d like to see the ground balls return to James Paxton’s profile, I don’t think anyone could complain. His fastball velocity hasn’t quite been maintained from last year, but it’s still above his pre-2016 days. Getting back to his ground ball rate, his fastball is generating a low-teen SwStk%, nearly double his mark last year. It’s time yet again to investigate the vertical location of the pitch. Unfortunately, no dice once again. He’s throwing it a bit higher than last year, but it’s still low in the zone. I highly doubt he could maintain his fastball SwStk%, but his secondary pitches remain super strong, so he should stick in the low-to-mid-20% strikeout rate range.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Ian Kennedy has essentially maintained his career best velocity from last year, but now his changeup has been even more insane than Vargas’. What’s going on in Kansas City?! Are naked girls being unleashed in the outfield every time a Royals pitcher throw a changeup, thereby distracted the batter from making contact?

Matt Andriese is one of the few pitchers on the list whose Z-Contact% has significantly improved, yet his strikeout rate has barely budged. His scouting grades are meh, he was never an exciting prospect, and his minor league numbers were mediocre. But with a good defense behind him and a friendly home park, he’s a respectable stash in even shallow mixed leagues.

Tyler Skaggs hasn’t maintained his increased velocity from last year after returning from Tommy John surgery, but it’s still well above his pre-2014 days and all three of his pitches have generated a SwStk% in the double digits. There are some red flags here such as a fly ball rate that has jumped above 40%, but with an ERA over 5.00 and a sub-4.00 SIERA, he should post much better results the rest of the way.

Seriously, who has taken over James Shields‘ body? I can’t for the life of me recognize who this masked man is anymore from his statistical profile. A career best Z-Contact%, career worst F-Strike% and walk rate, a hilariously high 58.1% (!!!!!) fly ball rate, and his signature changeup being thrown only about 10% of the time, half the frequency of last year? Good luck trying to project his performance moving forward, but there’s little here that’s inspiring.

The pitch to contact CC Sabathia has officially arrived! Now sporting just a 14.9% strikeout rate! Odd, he’s inducing whiffs like normal and has posted the second lowest Z-Contact% of his entire career. So where the heck are the strikeouts?! His xK% is better at 17.4%, so this looks like some bad sequencing early on.

Marco Estrada is inducing whiffs more than ever before, so as a reward, his strikeout rate has…declined. Oddly, he hasn’t induced a popup yet, as he’s typically been a master of, but has offset the lack of easy outs with a crazy low line drive rate.

We all figured that Rick Porcello would disappoint compared to his Cy Young campaign last year, but probably didn’t envision a 7.00+ ERA after his first three starts. Guess what? His skills are just as good, if not better, than last year. The Z-Contact% sits at a career best, which has boosted his SwStk% above 10% for the first time, all on the heels of an amazing slider. That pitch has always induced below average whiffs for the pitch type, so I’m not sure what he’s doing differently whether the pitch has improved or it’s a small sample fluke. Whatever the answer, his .385 BABIP and 20.8% HR/FB are sure to plummet toward the league average, so don’t panic Porcello owners.





Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
TWTW
9 years ago

Jason Vargas is not a fluke. Have you actually watched him pitch or just stared at his fangraphs page? He’s got a Benjamin Button arm; he needed to blow out his elbow to reach his strike-throwing potential. http://twtwsports.blogspot.com/2017/04/royal-rematch-giants-return-to-kansas.html

TWTW
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

stats can’t tell the whole story, or really any of the story; kind of like the crappy film adaptation of Moneyball. He looks like a changed man on the mound. Smooth delivery, confidence, deception of the batters. I would definitely actually watch the man pitch before calling him a fluke, Mr. Podhorzer.

NickGerli
9 years ago
Reply to  TWTW

Obvious troll job.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Didn’t you feel ignorant typing that? Your perspective couldn’t be more wrong. There are people that claim that they don’t need any of the stats because they can see everything from watching the games. As with everything, the problem is extremists – brilliance is somewhere in between.

Steve
9 years ago

[on Jason Vargas] “…and his pitch mix has remained the same.”

No it hasn’t. He dramatically cut his 4-seam usage and nearly doubled his 2-seam usage. His 3 years on the Royals before this season he was throwing 41% 4-seam and 13% 2-seam — this year he is throwing 29% 4-seam and 24% 2-seam.
(Source: Fangraphs player page, Pitchf/x Pitch Type section)

NickGerli
9 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Does doubling your two seam usage usually result in way more swinging strikes? I don’t think so.

On that note: is there a way to see plate discipline and batted ball stats by pitch type?

The lowest zone contact rate in the league last year was Scherzer at 79%. Then Duffy at 81.3%, Price at 81.6% and Fernandez and 81.8%. Doesn’t seem like Vargas’ 74% rate is sustainable, especially with his high 80s velocity.

Steve
9 years ago
Reply to  NickGerli

Why don’t you think so? It depends on how good the pitch is and the pitcher… and last time Vargas threw 100+ IP in 2014 his 2-seamer was more effective than the 4-seamer and got a better percentage of wiffs… but that’s irrelevant because I was simply pointing out that his pitch mix did change.

As for trying to find plate discipline and batted ball stats by pitch type, my best guess would be for you to check out baseballsavant.com which holds all the statcast info, it won’t be as neatly organized as you see things on fangraphs but you can run a query to pull the data you want.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Steve

It’s his change-up driving the K rate, so unless you think altering his 2-seam/4-seam mix is radically–and I mean RADICALLY–improving the whiff rate on his change-up, throwing more 2-seamers doesn’t explain much.

Jonathan Sher
9 years ago

While you would bet that the plate discipline metrics, including Z-Contact%, would sit on the low end in terms of how many plate appearances or batters faced they require to reach the calculated stabilization points, you have provided no evidence to support your belief, and looking at the small sample of pitchers you selected, and seeing how they performed last year, the evidence doesn’t clearly support your contention.

Excluding Vargas because ha barely pitches last year, that leaves you with 9 pitchers. So for 2016 I compared the Z-Contact% for each of those pitchers for the months of April with the Z-Contact% for each of those pitchers for the full season. I did so even though the full month of April os a larger sample size than what you have chosen because that is what is easily available on the Fangraphs’ leaderboards. For Paxton, I used the month of June, while for Skaggs, I used the month of July, since those months were the first they had more than a single start.

Of the nine pitchers, three had a sizeable gap between April and full-season Z-Contact%:

Kennedy: 79.5% April; 84.5% full season
Estrada: 82.5% April; 90.6% full season
Porcello: 88.4% April; 84.4% full season

The average gap for those three pitchers was 5.7% even though the sample size I took was roughy 25% larger using the full month, which is nearly as large as the gap for the 10 pitchers you selected because they featured the largest drop this year.

As well, two of the pitchers had a gap of 2.7% (Sabathia) and 2.4% (Andriese). In his last full season in 2014, Vargas had a gap of 2.7%.

That leave only four of nine pitchers whose April numbers more closely matched their season numbers, which suggested to me that your assumption about stabilization for just less than three weeks of data may be incorrect. At this point in the season, many starting pitchers have only three starts, and which lineups they faced may skew their Z-Contact%, as their is a 5% swing in that stat among MLB teams if we exclude Tampa, which is so far an outlier (the swing is 9% if we include Tampa). Sale and Estrada, for example, who have the lowest Z-Contact% among your group, each has a start against Tampa.

HossMember since 2018
9 years ago

It looks like there are a few things that have happened to Vargas that are all interesting and probably all contributing to the step-up in his skills. FWIW, I think this is somewhat unsustainable, but probably not a fluke.

1. He dramatically lowered his release point post-TJ: http://www.brooksbaseball.net/velo.php?player=450306&b_hand=-1&gFilt=&pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&time=year&minmax=ci&var=z0&s_type=2&startDate=03/30/2007&endDate=04/20/2017

2. He switched to a knucklecurve from a traditional curveball right before he got hurt and likely improved it during his TJ recovery: http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=8044&position=P#pfxpitchtype

This knucklecurve moves much more than his old curve:

Horizontal movement: http://www.brooksbaseball.net/velo.php?player=450306&b_hand=-1&gFilt=&pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&time=year&minmax=ci&var=pfx_x&s_type=2&startDate=03/30/2007&endDate=04/20/2017

Vertical movement: http://www.brooksbaseball.net/velo.php?player=450306&b_hand=-1&gFilt=&pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&time=year&minmax=ci&var=pfx_z&s_type=2&startDate=03/30/2007&endDate=04/20/2017

And while it doesn’t get swings and misses, it generates weak contact and flyballs (if that’s a fluke or real, idk): http://www.brooksbaseball.net/outcome.php?player=450306&b_hand=-1&gFilt=&pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&time=year&minmax=ci&var=fb&s_type=2&startDate=03/30/2007&endDate=04/20/2017

The outcomes from this new pitch are WAY better than pre-TJ according to pitch values: http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=8044&position=P#pitchvalues

3. Perhaps because of #1 and/or #2, his changeup has become much better

More swings and misses: http://www.brooksbaseball.net/outcome.php?player=450306&b_hand=-1&gFilt=&pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&time=year&minmax=ci&var=whiff&s_type=2&startDate=03/30/2007&endDate=04/20/2017

More groundballs: http://www.brooksbaseball.net/outcome.php?player=450306&b_hand=-1&gFilt=&pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&time=year&minmax=ci&var=gb&s_type=2&startDate=03/30/2007&endDate=04/20/2017

He’s not just getting completely lucky, he’s evolved the way he pitches.

O'KieboomerMember since 2021
9 years ago

Nice.