2014 Pod Projections: Masahiro Tanaka
They’re baaaaaack! What better way to open Pod Projections season than with the pitcher the Yankees just made a very rich man, Masahiro Tanaka. This is the third season I have been publishing my projections and once again, my methods have improved and incorporate more data than ever before. Of course, since my process is completely manual, that just means it takes even longer to project each individual player.
I originally published an introduction to my pitcher forecasting process in 2012 when I first shared my Pod Projections. I then decided to share my methods with the world when I released my eBook Projecting X. But, I’m doing things slightly differently now, even versus Projecting X methods. The biggest difference is that I’m projecting Strike%, along with Looking/Swinging/Foul strike rates for pitchers. This data is available at Baseball-Reference and gets punched into my xK% (I use a slightly improved version) and xBB% formulas. I don’t blindly follow what these formulas spit out, but the xK% produced a very high R-squared, so I generally follow that more closely than the xBB%, which is good, but not good enough.
Okay, enough babbling, let’s get to the projections! As usual, I will explain each metric I manually project and then finish with a table that includes the full projected line with stats that are calculated, such as ERA.
IP: 190
Tanaka has averaged 203.2 innings over his last three years. But Hisashi Iwakuma, Yu Darvish and Hiroki Kuroda all failed to reach the 200 innings plateau in their first year. Does that automatically mean that Tanaka will fail as well? Of course not. But it would be sensible to expect a sub-200 innings total given that history. The fact that Tanaka is also an unknown quantity, at least in Major League Baseball, adds that slight risk that he’s a bust Kei Igawa style and poor performance is the reason he misses the plateau.
K%: 21.1%
Based on scouting reports, the best comps for Tanaka are Hiroki Kuroda and Hisashi Iwakuma. But Kuroda brings better velocity, which is why he makes for a slightly better comparable. These pitchers feature a high rate of splitters and complement the pitch with a slider and a low 90s fastball. They also possess excellent control.
As alluded to in the intro, I now begin by projecting Strike% and the various strike type rates. So I’ll look to my Kuroda and Iwakuma projections to assist with Tanaka. The slider and splitter are both swing and miss type offerings, so we would expect the pair to typically post a low rate of looking strikes and higher swinging strikes. This is exactly the case, and I just realized my projections for each in those two metrics are virtually identical.
Tanaka’s career Japanese league K% is 23.3%, but it has declined each season since peaking in 2011. But that year seems like the outlier, so he has been pretty consistent outside of that season and a down 2010. Kuroda’s K% has been about the same here as in Japan, while Iwakuma’s jumped last season. Darvish’s also spiked last year, but it was similar over his first season.
My xK% spat out a 21.1% strikeout rate, which is slightly lower than his 22.3% mark he posted in 2013. That seems reasonable and therefore doesn’t require an adjustment.
BB%: 5.4%
Tanaka’s walk rates in recent years have been minuscule, sitting below 5% for three straight seasons. He owns a career 5.2% mark as well. Historically, Japanese league pitchers have experienced different changes to their walk rates when coming to the States. Some have seen their walk rates jump, others have seen it stay the same. So it’s hard to figure exactly how good Tanaka’s control could be, but he posted the lowest walk rate in Japan of the group of recent imports.
My xBB% formula spit out a 6.4% mark, which feels a touch too high. I am projecting both Kuroda and Iwakuma for rates between 5.5% and 6.0%, and by all accounts and stats, Tanaka has better control. But since he’s still never thrown a pitch at the MLB level, it’s important not to get too carried away and expect close to his Japanese mark. So slightly lower than the aforementioned pair it is.
GB%/LD%/FB%: 48%/20%/32%
Both Kuroda and Iwakuma are ground ball pitchers, but not of the extreme variety. I projected the two for a high 40% ground ball rate and low 30% fly ball rate. Unfortunately, I haven’t found batted ball distributions for Tanaka, but figure he should perform similarly to the pair.
HR/FB%: 10.5%
Since 2008, the average starting pitcher HR/FB rate has ranged between 9.6% and 11.8%. Yankee Stadium is a pretty darn good place for power, as its home run park factor ranked tied for fourth highest last season. In a better environment, I would have figured a 10% mark, but his new home has increased my projection to 10.5%.
BABIP: .300
Tanaka’s career BABIP is exactly .300 and it has ranged from a low of .271 in 2013 up to .324 in his first year as an 18 year old. Yankees pitchers posted the seventh highest BABIP in baseball last year at .302 while the Major League average was .294 and the American League average sat at .296. There doesn’t appear to be any obvious deception in Tanaka’s delivery, so with no clear BABIP suppression skills and a group of defenders that are collectively mediocre, the wheel has landed on a .300 BABIP.
My full projected line is below:
| IP | W | ERA | WHIP | K | K/9 | BB/9 | GB%/LD%/FB% | BABIP | HR/FB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 190 | 12 | 3.46 | 1.19 | 165 | 7.8 | 2.0 | 48%/20%/32% | 0.300 | 10.5% |
It’s important to note that my wins projections are based on the Pythagorean win formula and take into account a team’s runs scored projection. Unfortunately, I have no runs scored projections yet, so I’m only using 2013 actual runs scored. If the Yankees offense is better than last year, Tanaka’s win projection would rise to 13 or 14.
As I mentioned On Twitter, Tanaka should be a very good pitcher…in real baseball. But without an elite strikeout rate, he’s likely to disappoint many fantasy owners who believe he’s now a top 10 or 15 starter. In fact, plugging his projections into my valuation spreadsheet preparing for 2013 auctions yields a $10.70 value. That would tie him with A.J. Burnett at 29th among starting pitchers in Zach Sanders’ end of season rankings.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
My guess is the Yankees offense projects to be better than last season.
Yes, of course. They scored about 4 runs a game last year. Increasing to 4.5 increases win projection to 13 and 4.75 up to 14.
Pod, how would you go about valuing Tanaka in dynasty leagues? Do you think there’s more risk with him than other pitchers, due workload he dealt with in Japan?
There’s definitely risk due to the unknown factor and pitchers are risky to bet on long term to begin with. For Tanaka specifically, he already possesses excellent control so upside due to improving it doesn’t exist like for Darvish. This is obviously total speculation, but it seems to me that he is what he is and there’s not a whole lot of room for growth in the future. Best bet is increasing strikeout rate, but that’s hard.
What are the odds? There’s about 150 SPs playing in the majors right now and Tanakas best comps are 2 other Japanese guys.Amazing!
Take a deep breath, Larry.
That is most likely due to the split finger, which is more popular in Japan. Last year only 4 pitcher threw a Splitter and a slider more that 15% each and two of those are Kuroda and Iwakuma.
Mike – My only complaint is the Walk rate. I think he may struggle for bit in his first season, like Darvish and Iwakuma. I will take the over on your projection.
Very possible and perhaps the xBB% will end up being closer.
Why do you say that Jay-Z? He was a control artist in japan, miniscule walk rates. I think he may strug with HR rates, in the yanks bandbox and cuz he’s kindof a pitch to contact picher..
Two things stand out to me. One is, his strikeout rate is declining in Japan. No clue what to attribute that to, but it happened. The other is, I can’t imagine his walk rate doing anything less than doubling, with that short porch looming large.
Yankee Stadium’s BB park factor has been 101 the last couple of years, which is barely higher than a neutral park.
I don’t understand your comment about his walk rate. The consensus about Tanaka is that he is a cerebral control pitcher who makes in-game adjustments better than anyone in Nippon Baseball. When scouts talk about his strengths, one thinks of Tom Seaver and Greg Maddux, rather than a pure power pitcher like Yu Darvish. Tanaka has the reputation for being able to pitch effectively even when he doesn’t have his best stuff. Darvish has not established that reputation yet.
Greg Maddux had a substantially lower walk rate when he pitched in Coors Field than when he pitched in Turner Field. His home-run rate in Coors Field was almost two times higher than in Turner Field. Maddux walked fewer batters in Coors Field because a walk plus a home run leads to a crooked inning. Walks issued in a hitter’s ball park are far more dangerous than walks issued in a neutral or pitcher’s park.
I have not heard any concerns by scouts that Tanaka has poor command or control, and certainly his numbers in NPB belie that notion. If Tanaka has the command and control that he has demonstrated, he isn’t going to walk more batters in a home-run friendly ball park. That is completely counter-intuitive to the art of pitching.
If Tanaka’s walk rate “doubles” like you predict, it will be due to differences in MLB’s strike zone or the patience/ability of MLB hitters compared to their counterparts in NPB. It will have nothing to do with Yankee Stadium.
The issue is 100% mechanical. Nothing to do with the park.
“Tanaka does the little things well, such as maintaining a stable glove position and showing an ability to track toward the target after foot strike, but the combination of inconsistent momentum, wavering balance, and drifting posture is a bad omen for Tanaka’s chances of sustaining the walk rates that have distinguished his statistical record in Japan. He has demonstrated the capacity to overcome these obstacles in the past, but because of his mechanical inconsistencies, he might very well struggle to find the same success and make adjustments against patient, powerful major-league hitters.”
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=22480
From looking at Tanaka’s numbers the big thing that sticks out to me is the HR/9 of around 0.3. This would have been far and away better than anyone in MLB. Is the park in Japan have deflating park factors that might translate to much higher rates at Yankee stadium. It would appear that League HR/9 in Japan are much lower than MLB too.
2013 Japan was the 2001 MLB of homerun years. That HR/9 rate is especially amazing given this fact.
I am wondering if there has been any thought or research done on the effect of a smaller Japanese baseball and how that may/may not change the way a Japanese import(s) pitches change, based on the laws of physics. From wikipedia:
The Nippon league uses a smaller baseball, strike zone, and playing field. The Japanese baseball is wound more tightly and is harder than an American baseball. The strike zone is narrower “inside” than away from the batter.
I know success stories like Darvish and Kuroda, but what about Irabu and Igawa. Just a thought….I know nothing about physics, so perhaps someone might be able to enlighten me.
The age old question – who’s drafted first in your opinion, Tanaka or Abreu?
As you know, Hyun-Jin Ryu from S.Korea marked 3.00ERA in his rookie season. I think Tanaka is much better than him
Casey McGehee, who played on Tanaka’s team in Japan, mentioned in an interview with Mike Lupica that the declining K% in NPB might be due to their hitters’ approach. He said these Japanese hitters, in general, value contact over power so they would slap at Tanaka’s offerings and just try to put the ball in play. So his K% suffered.
Hi Mike,
You mention that you use a “slightly improved version” of xK%. Do you plan to post this in another article? I’ve been using this formula:
xK% = -0.61 + (L/Str * 1.1538) + (S/Str * 1.4696) + (F/Str * 0.9417)
Can’t wait for the xHR/FB article!
I hadn’t planned on it because it was only marginally better, but better nonetheless. The difference is that it incorporates Str% as well. Coefficients are as follows (too lazy to put into equation!):
Intercept -0.77952953
Str% 0.288156581
L/Str 1.169468689
S/Str 1.46735731
F/Str 0.882353754
Adjusted R-squared of 0.913 vs 0.892 for the previous version.
I’m pretty much in agreement for everything but the walk rate. I think he will average that over the 2nd half but while he adjusts to the MLB zone he will probably have a 3-4 bb/9
Great article with japan statistical comparisons. One thing though. Tanaka has better japan numbers than Kurdoda and his splitter is way better than kurodas. It’s the best in the game.
Do your projections update?
He already has 6 wins and I think is on pace to surpass 200 IP
They are all done manually, so I do not update them during the season. Obviously, he’s surpassed even the most optimistic of expectations.