10 Top 100 Fades

Spring is the time for optimism. That’s why you see a lot more articles about breakouts and sleepers than busts. It’s easier to see the good in a player and how things can go right. But not today. It’s time to journey over to the dark side.

The truth of it is that many flops have some sort of injury component tied to them. The obvious ones are where they miss a ton of time and don’t really perform once they return. But then there’s ones like Brian Dozier’s 2018. We didn’t learn until late in 2018 that played most of the season with a deep bone bruise that undoubtedly played a role in his 90 wRC+, a six-year low. Sometimes a player just falls back and fails to meet expectations, though.

I’ve identified 10 players within the top 100 that I’m fading. Cost plays a major role here as I could see myself buying some of them if they became available several rounds later. In addition to their draft cost, I’m going to focus on their skills profile for reasons why I’m fading them and not just lean on potential injury.

For this exercise I’m using the FantasyPros aggregate ADP data instead of just NFBC. I love the NFBC data and playing in those leagues, but I fully acknowledge that it’s a different market and thus only using that data for something like this might not have as much practical value for those in home leagues, especially if your league doesn’t push pitching like the NFBC. You can find the ADP data I’m using here.

Javier Baez – 18th ADP

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The obvious pick on everyone’s fade list. There’s more to a player than just his strikeout and walk rates, but there just isn’t a lot of success for guys fanning 25%+ of the time and walks at a 5% or lower clip. Baez’s 2018 doing that was easily the best such season in the 2000s (min. 400) and only five of the 23 were north of a 100 wRC+. His power and speed will prevent a full scale cratering, but I just don’t see a plausible scenario where he puts up another top 20 season with these skills.

Corey Kluber – 23rd

His brilliant breaking ball that Doug Thorburn affectionately calls the “Slydra” (a multi-headed slider) will protect his floor, but a consistently bad fastball lost some velo and started to become a home run issue. His HR/9 has slowly trickled up each of the last four years, reaching 1.1 last year. What I see here is a guy who will still have bouts of excellence, but a handful of blowups will push his ERA up into the mid-3.00s similar to what we saw back in 2015.  As a long-time superfan of Kluber, it pains to have any negativity toward him, but I consistently find myself bypassing him in the second round of drafts.

Walker Buehler – 38th

Pardon the backpat, but I kinda saw this one coming. Buehler isn’t quite a top 10 SP right now, sitting 12th as of this writing. I love the talent and think Buehler will be quite good this year as I have him ranked 16th, but I’m just not willing to pay the full toll here. Will the Dodgers manage his innings after the big spike from 98 to 177? Will said spike have a negative impact on the innings he does pitch?

I can’t seem to locate the research, but I seem to remember reading that big IP spikes didn’t usually catch up to a pitcher until the third (so 2020 in this case). If anyone recalls that, link it in the comments please. At any rate, Buehler isn’t necessary a 0 shares guy because if he goes closer to his max pick, I can get him as the 16th/17th SP off the board, but as the 11th/12th, I’m going elsewhere right now.

Patrick Corbin – 47th

It was just such an obvious career year in 2018 that it certainly doesn’t like he can get any better so it’s maintain or dip and I’m betting on the latter. Plus, I’m not a huge fan of pitchers in year 1 of a mega deal. It’s probably just natural regression of coming off a huge year that earned the deal in the first place, but I want to watch the transition period from afar and decide whether or not to buy back in the following season. The projections put him as a mid-3.00s ERA with a low-1.20s WHIP, both of which I can see, but then finishing top 20 hinges upon his netting a third straight 180+ IP season – a rarity in today’s game. Just six pitchers did it from 2016-18 after eight from 2015-17 and 15 from 2014-16.

Eugenio Suarez – 51st

Another career year that’s just being accepted as the player’s new level with little scrutiny. After a strong 2017 and useful 2016, I don’t doubt that Suarez is a solid player, but I’m betting on peel back from a .283/.366/.526 season with 34 HR and 104 RBI. Shave 10 HR, 15 RBI, and 12-15 points of AVG for my projection. More importantly, the positional depth has me bypassing him easily for the likes of Matt Carpenter, Justin Turner, Josh Donaldson, Travis Shaw, Matt Chapman, Max Muncy, and Mike Moustakas. Hell, I like Rafael Devers for a breakout this year and would rather nab him 90 picks later. I just can’t see the case for Suarez.

Gleyber Torres – 60th

This one is mostly positional depth with a little sophomore slump concern sprinkled on top. I won’t deny how strong Torres was in his 484 PA rookie season, but it was unprecedented power for the 22-year old and so I’m more inclined to bet on another 24 homers spread out over a full season as opposed to extrapolating or adding onto what he did in 2018. This is definitely my least confident one in terms of betting against the profile, so I’ll focus on the fact that I’ll either already have my shortstop by this point or just wait and get Corey Seager for a similar profile, Jonathan Villar or Jose Peraza for a speed-focused profile, or Paul DeJong for a more power-focused profile.

Marcell Ozuna – 73rd

We know Ozuna’s bum shoulder plagued his 2018 and limited him to 23 homers as he had surgery in the offseason to repair it. By the way, can we just acknowledge that he still hit .280 with those 23 HRs despite being hurt for much of the season? At any rate, I was ready to buy in on Ozuna this draft season expecting that his 2018 fall off would generate a nice discount and yet he’s not even two full rounds (in 15-teamers) cheaper than his ADP from a year ago when he was going in the early-50s. I’d rather bet on the other high-20s HR/.280+ AVG guys going around him who aren’t returning from surgery like Yasiel Puig, Mitch Haniger, Nicholas Castellanos, and Eddie Rosario.

Miguel Andujar – 77th

A lot of my points from the Suarez portion would apply here. I also wonder if his playing time is fully locked in given how horrible he is at third base. Obviously if he’s performing at a 128 wRC+, he’s going to play, but what if he’s more in the 112-115 range? Do they take the terrible hot corner defense every day for that kind of offense? I’m not so sure. Just too many other 3B options.

Craig Kimbrel – 81st

Signing late is one thing, but Opening Day is next week. And while relievers don’t need a ton of time to get ready, this is just a hassle I want no part of this year. Plus, what if he goes somewhere and isn’t the unquestioned closer? The latest rumor is Milwaukee and we’ve already seen them have no issues rotating several capable guys into the ninth inning depending on matchup. Now, none of them are Craig freakin’ Kimbrel, but is he even Craig freakin’ Kimbrel anymore? His strikeout rate dropped 11 points and his walk rate more than doubled to 13% and that’s before we even talk about the wobbly playoff outings. The relief group is unsettled and lacks depth, but Kimbrel’s situation is part of the problem, not a solution at pick 81.

German Marquez – 87th

Shocking, I know.

You can check out the pieces here and here for more thoughts on why I’m passing here.





Paul is the Editor of Rotographs and Content Director for OOTP Perfect Team. Follow Paul on Twitter @sporer and on Twitch at sporer.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
RonnieDobbs
7 years ago

Most of these guys are on my list of targets! All except Gleyber and Kimbrel to be exact. I think they all have enough skepticism baked into their ADPs. As for Buehler’s innings spike, he has tossed quite a few innings before TJ so maybe that helps. I think you usually are talking about a kid that has never done it before when you look at an innings spike. Sure these guys might disappoint but many will.

cavebirdMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

FWIW, I am the opposite of RonnieDobbs. Absolutely none of them are on my target or secondary target lists. For once at least, I agree with you on pretty much everything you said.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

Looking at Buehler- here is his innings
2013 63
2014 102
2015 88
2016 5
2017 98
2018 177

so where in the hell are all these innings before TJ?

caponehollywood
7 years ago

Won’t Gleybar be 2b eligible? That’s where I’m drafting him considering just how putrid the field is there.. and if Andujar hits they will get him in the lineup. Especially considering the early injuries the Yankees have had to field. I see nothing in his batted ball profile that suggests he would take a significant step back…

Though 3b is about the deepest it’s been in many years so while he’s someone I’m not necessarily targeting at that spot, if he fell another round I’d bet on him to improve.

TrueandCorrect
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

ssshhhhh. haha

FrodoBeck
7 years ago

I don’t know if it’s a result of reading most of your posts this offseason but I found myself nodding along with every player on the list.

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  FrodoBeck

I have only read a post or two of Paul’s this offseason and did the same.

srriley84
7 years ago

So you’re shorting the Yankee infield. Are you betting on LeMahieu?

RunRickeyRun
7 years ago

With you on everyone except Marquez…and even himi, I am really only grabbing him in the 90 to 110 range.

docgooden85Member since 2018
7 years ago

I have a hard time understanding the perception of Suarez as some sort of impostor. He’s 27, with a ~.500 (.496) SLG and ~.360 WOBA over the past 2 years (over 1200 PAs), a 41% hard hit last year, and playing in a top 2 park for HRs, not to mention a stalwart in the lineup every day between Votto and Puig (ish). Maybe he’s just a very good player whose regression floor is protected by his great situation? Isn’t that the most logical conclusion?

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

Obviously he is a useful player. I just don’t see why Suarez would be a guy whose in the “fade” category. I agree with a few of the other ones. I do have a few shares of Baez, simply because he was either a keeper, or fell to a place I felt I had to draft him (29) , and I mostly agree. Def out on Kimbrel, even though it looks almost certain he becomes the closer for the Brewers. My question with that is, will they continue to use guys in the right leverage spots? Like, will other guys get saves too?

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

I’m with you on this one too. It’s not necessarily that Suarez is overrated, it’s that there are so many underrated 3B available in the next few rounds after him. I’ve been particularly surprised at how late Shaw and Moustakas have been going.

I think what people are really disagreeing with you on here is projecting Suarez for only .270/24/90 when he has posted elite batted ball numbers, plays in a very hitter-friendly park, and has an improved lineup around him.

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  johansantana17

I agree, sort of. I have a few too many shares of Suarez, so maybe I am being defensive. Your projection for him seems like the type of numbers he’d put up in San Fran, not in the 2nd best ballpark in baseball with one of mlbs best offenses surrounding him. To me it is closer to .270 30 floor, and counting stats will be what they are.

To me, I agree. I love Matt Chapman. I cannot think of one guy in the entire MLB outside of two players who could put up 8 WAR this year and not surprise me at all more than Chapman. His ballpark hurts him quite a bit, but when I really look at it, I should wait for him, or gamble on Donaldson, or get Moosetacos or Shaw.

Here is the issue I have with the time of the draft that Suarez comes around. Everyone has a different evaluation of players, but that point in the draft I feel like I either have to reach (Villar, Puig, Dahl) or grab a pitcher in a class I don’t like (Kershaw, Flaherty, Clevinger) or grab a solid outfielder like Pham or Cain. There is always the option of paying up for a closer, but I have always thought that line of thinking is horrible. I have 3 more NFBC mains coming up this weekend, and the way my picks most likely line up in 2 of my drafts I have a good chance at getting Story at 13, 14, 15, 16, which is usually my go to, but I am thinking I am going to try and target a Yankee power hitter early w one of the picks, and go with Segura around this pick who seems to be underrated year in and year out.

hebrewMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  johansantana17

correct – this is the real argument as to why Paul is wrong here. There’s nothing to indicate that Suarez isn’t continuing to improve as he enters his prime. For all his batted ball statistics, he’s shown gradual improvement every year he’s been in the majors.

kjrouse01
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

Going to have to disagree with you on Suarez. He was out from April 8 – April 26 last year with a broken thumb so his numbers could have looked even better. Add a couple of more HRs and RBIs and we could be talking about 35-36 HRs with 110RBIs. I think projecting him for a 24/85 season is being shortsighted. He’s gotten better each of the last two years. He’s just now entering his prime. Add an improved Reds lineup to that this year and his numbers from last year are looking very repeatable. Especially considering he’s batting cleanup.

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago

100% agree on all the pitchers. It seems that pretty much every pitcher after deGrom and Scherzer and before ~ pick 200 is being overdrafted.

thestatbook
7 years ago

Marquez is a head scratcher for me. I think it’s interesting a guy who plays half his games at Coors would make the list in the first place.

I tend to avoid Rockies pitchers for the obvious reasons.

Nasty Nate
7 years ago

I agree that Kimbrel is a “fade” at 81 ADP or even in the 90’s where he presumably now is. But I think it is all but certain he will be the anointed closer wherever he signs.

Anyone have an estimate about how many days in between him signing and him pitching in a real game?

shakeappealMember since 2020
7 years ago

This sustained, savage takedown of the sweet boy German Marquez will not stand.

Pepper Martin
7 years ago

Weird to hear you say to skip Gleyber Torres and “wait on” Corey Seager — Corey Seager has gone in the top 20 in both of the drafts I’ve done so far this year.

RoyMember since 2016
7 years ago

But what about that catcher you mentioned before on your rankings? I believe his name was something like “Meno Sarif”? I’d definitely fade that guy. 🙂

Kevbot034
7 years ago

You call Gleyber as a mediocre pick for positional strength and list a bunch of SS. Do you like him any better at 2B?

TrueandCorrect
7 years ago

Glyber Torres and Miguel Andujar were both rookies last year, 21 and 23 yrs. old, respectively.

I’ve been a Yankees fan for 65 years (I’m 71), and watch practically every Yankee game for the past 15 years. I keep seeing their names appear on fade lists, and 2019 busts, with ADP’s too high by 2-5 rounds.

Without either of these young studs, the Yankees certainly don’t make the playoffs last year, and will, along with Judge and Stanton, comprise the heart of the Yankees this year and for the next 10 years.

I think the sky’s the limit for both of these guys, and Andujar will be challenging for a batting title some day soon.

Keep fading, and I’ll keep buying.

I’m also in on Corbin, Buehler, and Ozuna. Love Goldy in front of Ozuna; Corbin did break out last year, but what I saw in 2017 had me drafting him last year. Has sensational stuff. Home/road splits non existent last year (.603/.611 O.P.S.)

Why is Kimberly on the Brewers a bad thing. 333 saves at30 yrs. of age. At least I won’t have to reach for him now. Brewers will have plenty of save opps to go around, with Kimbrel (and I’m assuming the Brewers want a World Championship and sign him), will have the large bulk of them.

Enjoy your articles.

pvalent
7 years ago

Disagree on Kimbrel simply because of the Corey Knebel news — he’s got a UCL injury and Jeffress is injured so it’s looking more and more like Kimbrel will be closing for Milwaukee.

Agree on all the pitchers though, disagree with Andujar that guy is a stud and he’s not being overdrafted like Torress is (for some reason)