With The First Pick, You Select…
There’s a debate going around Twitter. If you want some cheap likes and retweets, try dropping this poll:
Who would you pick first overall?
Ronald Acuna
Other
The emerging narrative relates to Trout’s declining speed. These alternatives, possibly including Cody Bellinger, Trea Turner, and a few others, can deliver those much needed swipes without necessitating a later dip into the Mallex Smith pool of despair. Depending on how you run your calculations, a stolen base is roughly 150 to 300 percent more valuable than a home run. A 40/40 threat like Yelich and Acuna is worth his weight in gold.
Still, we’ve been here before. In recent seasons, Mookie Betts, Jose Altuve, and Mookie Betts again have challenged Trout for the draft crown. Each and every time, the alternative to Trout has been the wrong choice. Interestingly, Trout played more like a fringe Top-10 player in the latter portion of the 2010s. Where we failed as an industry was with accurately identifying the players who would outperform him. Perhaps we’re a little better at this now. Or perhaps many contrarian fantasy owners are about to experience déjà vu all over again.
Consider this: Cody Bellinger is just a year removed from a forgettable season. Yelich was good-not-great as recently as mid-2018. Treat Urner runs hot and cold due to his gritty playing style. He played through broken fingers last season. Acuna is young enough that we can’t rule out a junior slump. If he were to hit .265 with 28 home runs and 19 stolen bases, nobody would be surprised. At least not in retrospect.
To the best of my knowledge, Mike Trout has never slumped. Sure, if you slice the data small enough, you’ll find 0-for-12 and 2-for-25 spans peppered throughout his career. But on the whole, he’s never vanished in a way that has been distinctly detrimental to his fantasy owners.
One common fantasy truism suggests that drafts aren’t won in the first round. By extension, it’s considered proper to manage for floor rather than ceiling. This advice is all well and good except for one thing – there’s no evidence we, as people, have any ability to predict who has a high floor among apparently elite players. The reason is obvious enough. Among very good players, the factors that contribute to “floor” are largely unpredictable.
Every year, a few studs turn into busts. Sometimes, it’s the specter of injury that steals our first round dreams. Or the hoary grasp of regression. Or our so-called stud simply plays to his 30th percentile projection (we’re looking at you Betts).
Rarely are we flat out wrong about a player we placed in the first round pool. Something happens to make them underperform enough to become a bust. Since early picks carry so much scrutiny, I’d hazard we (i.e. fantasy touts) are exceptionally cautious as a collective. We missed Acuna and Yelich as the alternative to Trout in 2019 because of the many incentives to be conservative. It’s only “reasonable” or “safe” to pick anti-Trouts who have outperformed him in the last season.
All of which brings us back to the poll. While I’ll likely never have to make this call in the wild*, I’m picking Trout first overall without a moment’s hesitation.
*My only redraft leagues this year will use KDS to determine draft order. I plan to prioritize the second half of the round.
For one, the Angels lineup is finally moving in a positive direction. Trout has been hugely productive without a supporting cast. Usually, players improve when surrounded by superior talent. We can tentatively expect a small increase in plate appearances, runs, and RBI if nothing else.
A larger consideration is observing recent experiences with Trout alternatives. Nobody in the league offers a more stable statistical profile. Everybody has warts if you squint hard enough. For Trout, he seems to break down later in the season due to overuse. That’s a gamble I’m willing to take. It’s a gamble I can actuarily wrap my head around. There’s no real risk of surprise regression or a new scouting report finding an exploit. Trout is Trout. And, per my reckoning, his injury risk is comparable to all the other elites. If I have to be mindful to select an extra Ramon Laureano-type later in the draft, so be it.
To be clear, not picking Trout is not wrong. There are many right answers in the first round. In addition to those named above, Gerrit Cole, Francisco Lindor, Juan Soto, and Trevor Story are all legitimate candidates for that #1 seed. While I personally think selecting a non-Trout is trying too hard to be clever, there are countless arguments in favor of the many alternatives. And, if this is finally the year when the Altuve or Betts du jour rewards their owners for eschewing Trout, it certainly won’t come as a shock.
You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam
All in on Vlad Guerrero Jr.
Where’s Dusty Colorado with the Wander Javier pick?
I may very well rename my dog Treat Urner… But I’m not a Nats fan 😉
I wish my mother had chosen to name me Treat Urner, 59 years ago.
We are still a few years away from me not taking Trout #1. As you noted, he’s just so consistently great and even though he generally finishes behind a couple guys every year, it’s just impossible to guess which guy it’s going to be this year.
Using OPS as a proxy:
Since May 1, 2012 when he took over CF full-time, Trout has had 3 months with an OPS under .800 :
– April 2013: .766 OPS with 15 R, 2 HR, 16 RBI and 4 SB, so still a very good month.
– August 2015: .689 OPS with 6 R, 1 HR, 7 RBI and 0 SB. I remember this month – he hurt his hand right at the end of July on a diving attempt to make a catch. He never admitted it was hurting him, but everyone assumed he was playing through some pain.
– June 2017: He missed the entire month with a thumb injury
He also had 2 months where he played fewer than 10 games and didn’t contribute much – September 2019 and August 2018
By contrast, he has had 26 full months with an OPS over 1.000 (not counting September 2019 where he only started 5 games) and another 9 months between .900-.999. That’s 35 of 47 months.
But on top of the high floor, I just can’t shake the feeling that he still has a mammoth .330, 50+ HR, 290 R + RBI and 30 SB career year tucked away that will pop up one of the next few years.
BTW, Trout meets the 10 year qualification for the HOF with the 1st game he plays this year. . . . .
A point towards that “still has a mammoth season” coming point, last year Trout had his best xwOBA of his career by 23 points despite on the surface having a slightly worse season than 2018. If he maintains that form and can get back to the 150 game range I definitely think it’s doable. I’m just unsure about the steals ever rebounding that much since I could see him making a tradeoff of being less active on the basepaths to increase the change of getting back to 150+ games.
This, plus the Angels lineup look better now IMO so the counting stats will remain strong. Give me the highest floor in the first rounds.
Now that you touched on kds, what is your preference this year and why?
I probably want one of the last three picks, but I’ll dive into the game theory later. Might be optimal to pick like 13, 15, 14, 10, 13, 12.
It’s always both a tough call and extremely unimportant.
Doing my first kds 15 team set up and am finding I’m just wishing I was in the middle to better keep pace with the runs in the draft and not feel a need to reach for a guy I like.
Cody Bellinger is probably the only player I would consider drafting before Trout.
Why the hate? Remember this prediction when he wrecks your league
I’m still trying to wrap my head around Yelich, world-destroyer. His offensive performance since mid-2018 is really remarkable, to put it lightly. Fantasy-wise (and especially in an OBP context) he’s been superhuman. I would think that another season at this level of performance would cement his status going forward.
That said, I would still go with Trout in 2020, with the expectation that I will feel differently this time next year.
i think theres a strong case for both yelich and acuna over trout. the declining steals really, really hurt as do the injuries. Its likely he runs even less next year to avoid getting hurt. That being said, if he went 50/10 with 120 runs and rbis…
you take trout because his average season is 95% as good as the career bests of anyone else. Thats the reason hes usually not the #1 fatnasty player in most formats, but hes usually #2 or #3 every year.
So you pick the lock over possibly getting a guy with his career year
Might be time for Fantasy Baseball to evolve and move away from SB
That’s what points leagues are for.
Yup, play FGpts if you want to simulate reality. Or OOTP even. SB are a perfect roto stat because they’re so challenging to manage.
Treat Urner is an excellent typo
It’s weird how many people came to me saying I had a funny typo. I’ve been slinging this one for ages.
https://fantasy.fangraphs.com/the-daily-grind-the-missing-link/
seems like Grey Albright @Razzball has been using that even longer
Yawwwnn. I guess everyone loves to argue about who should go number 1 in fantasy drafts and I get it, articles about it probably attract a lot of eyeballs to help Fangraphs pay the bills, but you can win your championship no matter which stud you pick up in round 1. Fantasy championships are won and lost in rounds, oh, 8 to 23, not round 1.
I’ll get there. I like to start a story at the beginning.
Yep, with fantasy drafts for any sport, the adage I adhere to is: “You can’t win it in the 1st round, but you can lose it.”
also seems like there are usually guys taken in rounds 3-5 that perform close to (or at) the level of a first rounder. those guys are very valuable. i took rendon in that range last year and he was essentially a first round pick performance wise.
Acuna appears to have passed him based on early NFBC/Fantrax ADP.
To realize how great Trout is, realize how different an article entitled: “Who Might Outperform Mike Trout?”. Huge difference listing who might outperform him and who would I choose to outperform him. For me, only Yellie even gives me a moment’s pause, but I’m a homer