What’s With Beckett?

The Boston Red Sox hold a 17-16 record and a -11 run differential entering play Tuesday. To get back into playoff contention, the Sox face a steep climb up baseball’s version of Mount Kilimanjaro, the AL East. With the Yankees and Rays playing superbly, Boston currently has a seven percent chance of making the playoffs according to coolstandings.com and a 15 percent shot according to Baseball Prospectus.

Much attention has been paid to the disappointing start of Josh Beckett. After inking a four-year, $68 million contract extension in early April, Beckett has been bombed for a 7.46 ERA over his first seven starts. What gives?

Let’s start with the obvious: he hasn’t been that bad. While Beckett’s ERA makes him look like he should be mopping up for Billy Ray “Rojo” Johnson, he has been subject to terrible luck on balls put in play and has stranded far fewer base runners than usual. Beckett’s BABIP is .365 (.303 career), and his left on base rate is 56.9 percent (71.5 percent career).

While the 30-year-old (this Saturday) has undoubtedly gotten some bad breaks, he also hasn’t been his usual dominant self, either. In 41 innings, Beckett has 7.46 K/9 (lowest since 2006) and 3.51 BB/9 (highest since ’06). His 4.35 xFIP is a run higher than his 2009 mark, and is also his highest since the righty’s first year in Beantown back in 2006.

Beckett’s 8.6 percent swinging strike rate is right in line with his marks in recent years. His 82 percent contact rate is just slightly higher than his 80-81 percent figures from 2006-2009. The big change lies in Beckett’s percentage of pitches thrown within the strike zone: his Zone%, in the 52-54 percent range from ’06-09, was consistently above the 48-51 percent MLB average. This year, however, Beckett has located 47.8 percent of his pitches within the zone (the MLB average thus far is 48 percent).

The main culprits for Beckett’s so-so control and slightly elevated contact rate appear to be his two-seam fastball and his curveball. In 2009, he threw his two-seamer for a strike 64.5 percent (57.2 MLB average), with a 10 percent whiff rate (5% MLB average). This year, his two-seamer has been thrown for a strike 58.1 percent, with a 7.5 percent whiff rate. Beckett’s curve got strikes 59.6 percent in ’09 (58% MLB average), with batters whiffing 11.5 percent (11.6% MLB average). In 2010, the hammer’s strike percentage is 54.3, and its whiff percentage is 9.4. Beckett is throwing fewer curves this season (18.8%, compared to 25.5% in 2009), mixing in more cutters and changeups.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

It’s true, Beckett hasn’t been great to begin 2010. But I don’t see any reason for outright panic. After years of fantastic pitching, he has gone though a stretch during which he has been merely average. Beckett’s not suddenly getting battered. Rather, he’s having some difficulty placing his two-seam fastball and signature curve and has subsequently issued more free passes than usual. This looks like a good time to pry Beckett from a frustrated owner: ZiPS projects 8.3 K/9, 2.1 BB/9 and a 3.37 FIP for the rest of the season, and I see little reason to think he’s more than a mechanical adjustment away from resuming his role as Red Sox co-ace.





A recent graduate of Duquesne University, David Golebiewski is a contributing writer for Fangraphs, The Pittsburgh Sports Report and Baseball Analytics. His work for Inside Edge Scouting Services has appeared on ESPN.com and Yahoo.com, and he was a fantasy baseball columnist for Rotoworld from 2009-2010. He recently contributed an article on Mike Stanton's slugging to The Hardball Times Annual 2012. Contact David at david.golebiewski@gmail.com and check out his work at Journalist For Hire.

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Jim
16 years ago

Do you think Chase Headley for Beckett at this point is a fair swap? Especially given Beckett’s recent back “tweak”…

hamandcheeseMember since 2025
16 years ago

Did you read the article?

Hodgie
16 years ago

“he has been subject to terrible luck on balls put in play”

I never understand this generalization based on BABIP. Perhaps he has been a bit unlucky, however perhaps the higher than normal BABIP rate so far can also be attributed to what is pointed out later in the article, namely poorer control and less effective curves and 2-seam fastballs which might partially account for the highest LD% of his career to date.

He may not be 7.46 ERA bad, but the only thing terrible so far is his performance.

Sweet Lou
16 years ago

An owner in my league wants to get rid of Beckett badly. Hes a yank fan to begin with so he’ll probably take anything i throw at him. he wants a pitcher and a bat. I’m ready to sell high on Penny or C.J. Wilson. Which one is going to fall farther as they regress?

Gary
16 years ago
Reply to  Sweet Lou

My opinion is that CJ Wilson will not pitch anything close to 200 innings, so I’d trade him if you’re in a league where you’re not on pace to exceed your projected innings by a significant amount. Penny’s probably a slightly worse pitcher but has a lot better chance to post a ton of productive innings. Either way, spinning one of those and a decent hitter into Beckett’s a pretty nice move

Lou
16 years ago
Reply to  Gary

thanks. I was more concerned with how the ball flies out of Arlington in the summer months but thats a good point too. Wilson has never recorded more than 75 innings in a season. Perfect time to sell on him.

Lou
16 years ago
Reply to  Gary

I was offered Beckett and Sandoval for Bobby Abreu and CJ Wilson. Great deal, i know. But I’m already set at 1B and 3B with Wright, Ian Stewart, and Pujols, and I’m weak as it is in the OF. H2H lg. any suggestions?

Slick
16 years ago

It’s obvious what is wrong with Beckett and it doesn’t take any numbers to figure it out. He has just sucked so far. Like most athletes, some bad performances get between your ears and your confidance suffers.

Lou
16 years ago

great analysis Slick