What To Expect From Gary Sanchez In 2017

We have been blessed with many outstanding rookie seasons throughout the history of baseball, especially in recent decades. Ichiro Suzuki crossed the Pacific and instantly turned into a super star. Mike Trout, well, he did Mike Trout things. We’ve seen Mike Piazza, Britt Burns, and Troy Tulowitzki all put up 7 WAR rookie campaigns. Each of these stories are amazing in their own right, but they are all about guys with truly phenomenal rookie seasons. Emphasis on season. Gary Sanchez, well, he was just a little bit different.

Gary Sanchez put up similar power numbers to a lot of those guys I just mentioned, he hit 20 home runs and 12 doubles, not too shabby for a rookie.  That isn’t the story here, of course.  No, he did this all in less than half a season, 229 plate appearances.  Closer to a third of a season, really, and in that time he put up over 3 WAR and made a strong case for the league ROY (and MVP, which lead to many silly arguments).

Wait a sec, I think I skimmed over that a little too quickly: Twenty home runs in 229 plate appearances?!  That is crazy, simply crazy, and it makes analyzing his potential all that more difficult going into 2017.  Is he a 40 home run guy?  Is he a 20 home run guy? He hit 11 home runs in the month of August, how can anyone suggest he *only* has 20 home run power? Eleven in a month?

Even if you cut that by 2/3 you’re still talking about 25 home runs on the season. How about that batting average, though? He hit .282 in AAA and .299 in the majors. Clearly, if you have a catcher who can hit 25-40 home runs while also batting .280-.300, he’s probably going to wind up being one of the most valuable guys in fantasy baseball.  On the flip side, that seems impossibly optimistic, so where could he land in real life? Well, I have gone through his contemporary comps and I think I’ve settled on a realistic outlook.

Sanchez posted these extreme power numbers while riding impressive Exit Velocities. Just how impressive? Well, I’ve created a few comps using rolling averages over the course of the past two seasons. These averages only count balls in play that have a measured exit velocity.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

While the labels are a bit different from chart to chart, they are all on the same horizontal scale in all cases, and in the three overlays they are also on the same vertical scale, which represents frequency. Obviously, Gary Sanchez has far fewer plate appearances, so his frequencies are a bit dwarfed by the others here.  The height of the the bars isn’t particularly important, though.  We’re more interested in the general pattern that emerges, and the maximum velocities he can sustain over these 20 BIP windows.

Each player has a different peak exit velocity, and while these four guys seem pretty similar, keep in mind the vast majority of players have much lower exit velocities.  Even great hitters like Buster Posey just about max out around 93 mph, meaning only a tiny fraction of the bars to right of the 93 marker in these charts (8% in Posey’s case).  I mean, just look at the charts.  Look at where that 93 marker is.  Keep that in mind, these guys are elite.  Stanton appears to be on another level, though, and isn’t necessarily a great comp for Sanchez.  I threw him in just to show a bit of perspective.  There are always bigger fish. (Stanton’s numbers go off the chart, these max out at 105mph, but he keeps on going up through 106 and beyond, these are 20 BIP averages!).

To my eyes, he appears to match up closely with Cespedes in terms of these exit velocity numbers. You’ll see that each of these guys have bi or tri-modal distributions. I’m not sure exactly what causes this, but I have a feeling it may be increases in line drive rates. The third, mode, perhaps, may be the result of an uptick in ground balls. Gary Sanchez hasn’t had enough time to truly differentiate these modes, but perhaps you can see the beginnings of his second peak around 91mph, which is very similar to Cespedes.

Comparables to Gary Sanchez
Ground Balls Line Drives Fly Balls
Player GB% LD% FB% EV Vert Spray EV Vert Spray EV Vert Spray
Nelson Cruz 47.4% 21.6% 21.6% 93.6 -10.9 -12.9 100.4 17.5 -4.5 96.2 34.5 7.6
Khris Davis 45.4% 20.5% 24.1% 88.4 -9.9 -14.1 100.4 18.4 -3.7 95.6 35.0 11.7
Keon Broxton 51.3% 22.2% 21.4% 93.1 -8.5 -6.3 100.1 16.6 -4.4 94.1 36.8 6.4
Giancarlo Stanton 43.8% 23.5% 21.3% 96.4 -11.7 -10.6 98.5 17.4 -3.2 92.9 37.0 7.0
Gary Sanchez 50.7% 23.3% 17.8% 91.8 -14.4 -20.6 97.2 17.7 -3.9 97.1 32.5 -9.0
Yoenis Cespedes 40.1% 24.4% 25.2% 91.6 -8.4 -11.1 96.6 17.2 -4.2 92.7 36.7 2.5
SOURCE: xStats.org
Vert = Vertical Angle
Spray = Horizontal Angle. -45 = Left Field Line| 0 = Center Field|45 = Right Field Line
GB = < 10°
LD= 10 to 25°
FB = 25-50°

This table is a bit more detailed, and you can sort the columns to play around with the data a little.  These are just a few guys who seem to be most closely related to Sanchez in terms of these batted ball stats. Cespedes and Cruz appear to be the closest matches, with similar vertical and horizontal angles along with similar exit velocities to Gary Sanchez. You’ll see Sanchez has the lowest fly ball rate of the bunch, which is probably a result of sample size. As expressed in the histograms above, you’ll expect at least one more mode along the distribution of hits, it will almost certainly be below the current maximum, and probably somewhere close to 91 to 93 mph. His fly ball exit velocity, which is currently sitting around 97mph, will almost certainly drop and converge on this lower number.

So, what exactly will that mean, in the long run?  Well, balls hit between 87 and 93 mph have a batting average of .252 and a slugging of .323. Cespedes and Cruz had 52 and 55 percent of their rolling averages in this exit velocity range, whereas Gary Sanchez had 30 percent.  I went back and selected a random sampling of balls hit by Cespedes in this velocity range over the past two years, 105 in all, to bring Gary Sanchez up into that similar range, so he would have the same proportion of low and high exit velocity balls as Cruz and Cespedes.

Gary Sanchez 2017
xAVG xSLG xOBA H x1B x2B x3B xHR
.254 .468 .346 84.9 49.1 17.4 1.1 17.3

Doing all of this brings Sanchez’s stats way down, obviously. It is probably more reasonable, though.  This comes out to, approximately, 340 plate appearances, so perhaps 2/3 of a full season.  With 500 plate appearances you might expect

Gary Sanchez 500 PA
xH x1B x2B x3B xHR xAVG xSLG xOBA
112.4 65.0 23.0 1.4 22.9 .254 .468 .346

 

All of this amounts to a back of the envelope calculation. However, it isn’t very far off from his ZiPS projection.

Gary Sanchez ZiPS
PA R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS ISO BABIP AVG OBP SLG wOBA
499 66 116 24 1 27 82 5 1 .235 .283 .255 .313 .490 .342

Each of these systems pose similar batting averages, but they differ on slugging, particularly home run power. Which is more accurate?  I’m not sure.  In 2016, xStats gave him 17 xHR, and he hit 20.  Perhaps that is a weakness in the system or improperly tuned park factors.  Perhaps he got lucky on a few balls that left the park. Either way, that difference may bridge the gap between the power numbers.





Andrew Perpetua is the creator of CitiFieldHR.com and xStats.org, and plays around with Statcast data for fun. Follow him on Twitter @AndrewPerpetua.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
kenai kings
9 years ago

From video I’ve seen of his HR’s he looks like a low ball hitter. So, of course, I expect him to be challenged up in the zone. Did he show any ability to adjust over time last season?

NickGerli
9 years ago

What’s the basis of expecting 500 PA across a full season? Injuries?

Sanchez was called up around August 1st, and only missed four of the Yankees 56 games from that point on. That comes out to about 150 games in a 162 game season. Assuming 4.25 PA per game results in 640 PA.

I guess one main difference is that Sanchez only caught 36 games last year due to McCann’s presence, so he’ll probably be logging more time behind the plate this year, which might necessitate more rest or increase chances of injury.

Even so, the Yanks have a fluid DH spot this year, so I’d expect Sanchez’s off days to be there rather than on the bench.

NickGerli
9 years ago

Catchers generally have lower PA figures due to more off days and perhaps more injuries than other positions, so I suspect that has something to do with it.

Most catchers aren’t good enough hitters to fill the DH spot, which is why they ride pine. I think Sanchez might be a different case, since a lot of his off days will be as a DH rather than strictly on the bench.

stonepie
9 years ago
Reply to  NickGerli

he’s capable of DH’ing but the yankees just signed holliday. Plus, they tend to rotate the old folks throughout the spot as well

NickGerli
9 years ago
Reply to  stonepie

I suspect Holliday will end up playing a decent amount of outfield.

Jon
9 years ago

Anecdotally, I feel like a significant percentage of his HR did just clear the wall, so I suspect there was some luck in play here. I’ll see if I can find a chart.

Also: “made a strong case for the league MVP” – you mean ROY, don’t you?

Graves
9 years ago

I traded Gary and Amed Rosario for David Dahl and Tyler Glasnow. Thoughts?

Jon L.Member since 2016
9 years ago

Britt Burns? I think you mean someone else.

Jon L.Member since 2016
9 years ago

Wow, you really did mean Britt Burns!

“We’ve seen Mike Piazza, Britt Burns, and Troy Tulowitzki all put up 7 WAR rookie campaigns.” But I don’t think the average reader on this site remembers 1980, let alone Britt Burns..

A bit of trivia: Burns’ bWAR in just his first and last full seasons was greater than that of Cy Young, Lefty Grove, or Greg Maddux in their first and last full seasons.

kenai kings
9 years ago

Anyone remember Joe Charboneau.

Ryan BrockMember since 2016
9 years ago

It doesn’t seem super reasonable to expect his flyball velo must regress toward his GB exit velos. Did you consider the possible effect of swing path? I haven’t examined each of these guys to know the potential differences, but Sanchez swings with an uppercut path through the zone. Depending on each player’s swing path, wouldn’t you expect there to be different “ideal angles” for exit velo, and therefore different distributions of GB/LD/FB velo? Apologies if this is somehow accounted for and I’m just missing it..!

Ryan BrockMember since 2016
9 years ago

The modes are really strange! Not sure I understand where that’s coming from. But yes, I think any claim that begins with “he probably won’t hit the ball 100mph every time” is overall pretty reasonable…

CJ03
9 years ago

For Sanchez the standout stat is his 40% HR/FB rate in 2016. That doesn’t look anywhere near sustainable. What was his xHR/FB for 2016?

CaseyHebardMember since 2018
9 years ago

threw*