The Whiffiest Pitches Around

As I sat and wandered the databases, the thoughts running through my head were the same being pondered by every other reasonable baseball fan. Is there a bookcase in Rob Manfred’s office that if you pull on the correct book will spin around to reveal a panel of giant levers that controls which baseballs are currently being used? And if so, will “waterlogged” stay pulled, or could it be flipped to “happy fun ball” at any given moment? If that’s the case, we might as well prepare by looking at the pitches getting the most air so far in 2022.

Here are the top-10 SwStr% for each pitch type (min = 75). Also included are CSW%, Whiff%, and oSwing% for 2021 and 2022. All five splitfingers that qualify were included but really this has all just been a reason to talk about how Kevin Gausman has basically lapped the field.

 

2022 SwStr% Leaders by Pitch Type
Player type 2021 n 2022 n 2021 Use 2022 Use 2021 Sw Str% 2022 Sw Str% 2021 CSW 2022 CSW 2021 Wf% 2022 Wf% 2021 oSw% 2022 oSw%
Kevin Gausman FS 1061 151 35 35 25.6 38.4 32.3 41.7 45.9 51.8 42.5 69.0
Tony Gonsolin FS 215 76 22 26 19.1 19.7 31.2 26.3 41.4 29.4 25.6 45.9
Frankie Montas FS 678 141 22 31 26.7 16.3 32.7 22.7 51.4 28.8 41.3 42.0
Alex Cobb FS 584 83 37 45 20.9 15.7 26.4 24.1 35.1 29.5 48.8 41.1
Tyler Mahle FS 509 106 16 26 16.9 15.1 25.3 22.6 32.0 28.1 35.6 43.1
Shane McClanahan CH 157 79 8 19 19.1 27.8 22.9 44.3 44.8 57.9 27.4 37.3
Nick Martinez CH 80 23 26.3 32.5 45.7 45.1
Kyle Hendricks CH 780 121 28 29 14.5 25.6 20.1 30.6 24.1 44.9 44.1 34.7
Devin Williams CH 634 92 64 52 24.9 25.0 40.1 41.3 47.2 53.5 41.7 36.4
Pablo López CH 543 125 33 36 18.8 24.0 27.6 32.8 31.3 46.9 45.7 44.6
Carlos Carrasco CH 219 81 25 25 16.9 23.5 23.7 27.2 31.9 37.3 37.5 42.6
Ian Anderson CH 684 117 31 34 18.7 23.1 27.9 29.1 34.9 39.7 33.6 41.3
Sandy Alcantara CH 728 109 24 23 18.0 22.9 28.7 33.0 30.8 41.7 41.7 38.7
Wil Crowe CH 393 95 18 33 19.8 22.1 31.8 37.9 36.6 40.4 38.8 41.2
Merrill Kelly 켈리 CH 424 95 18 22 15.1 18.9 21.5 30.5 27.4 32.7 34.9 44.4
Corbin Burnes CUKC 474 94 18 19 20.0 27.7 41.1 38.3 50.3 51.0 34.8 47.5
Kyle Wright CUKC 19 121 14 34 15.8 21.5 31.6 40.5 42.9 40.6 25.0 40.0
Drew Smyly CUKC 897 139 42 48 18.8 20.9 32.8 31.7 38.8 34.5 34.6 46.1
Shane McClanahan CUKC 321 111 16 27 19.3 20.7 42.7 40.5 41.9 45.1 41.2 32.2
Josiah Gray CUKC 304 122 25 28 21.1 19.7 38.8 37.7 47.8 48.0 35.4 33.3
Aaron Nola CUKC 801 107 27 26 18.7 19.6 40.0 42.1 36.2 38.9 39.4 41.8
Jesús Luzardo CUKC 493 151 29 44 22.1 18.5 35.1 39.1 42.4 42.4 39.1 37.5
Shane Bieber CUKC 487 84 31 19 20.3 16.7 38.8 23.8 41.8 29.8 37.8 37.3
Matt Moore CUKC 192 85 15 44 5.7 16.5 24.0 31.8 15.7 37.8 22.4 35.2
Nathan Eovaldi CUKC 549 101 19 23 16.6 15.8 40.6 30.7 39.9 32.7 32.2 30.2
Walker Buehler FC 514 106 16 23 16.3 19.8 29.6 33.0 29.3 32.8 33.8 47.3
Collin McHugh FC 321 85 33 53 16.5 17.6 37.7 36.5 31.7 33.3 30.5 34.2
Zach Thompson FC 419 86 35 29 11.0 17.4 29.6 32.6 21.3 38.5 30.8 30.0
Justin Bruihl FC 148 75 58 71 8.1 17.3 27.0 29.3 15.8 31.7 11.8 22.9
Drew Rasmussen FC 95 32 16.8 35.8 31.4 18.5
Merrill Kelly FC 333 94 14 22 9.3 16.0 23.4 24.5 16.5 27.8 28.6 43.6
Corbin Burnes FC 1356 281 52 57 16.8 15.7 36.7 38.1 32.1 34.4 35.7 27.7
Aaron Civale FC 476 90 25 31 10.3 15.6 29.2 36.7 20.1 30.4 34.5 26.8
Nestor Cortes FC 360 127 24 38 13.1 15.0 27.8 33.9 22.6 26.0 37.4 43.1
Chris Bassitt FC 436 76 18 20 11.5 14.5 27.3 27.6 22.9 24.4 20.5 23.1
Rafael Montero FF 311 90 36 59 12.5 25.6 27.3 37.8 26.9 45.1 20.3 20.5
David Bednar FF 521 91 56 65 16.7 23.1 30.3 38.5 27.9 42.0 34.6 28.9
Eric Lauer FF 858 134 44 36 13.1 22.4 29.3 36.6 26.5 43.5 24.6 27.9
Keegan Akin FF 1011 95 57 53 10.6 20.0 28.1 44.2 20.0 35.2 24.9 28.0
Kutter Crawford FF 26 78 46 47 11.5 19.2 30.8 39.7 20.0 38.5 33.3 23.3
Erik Swanson FF 338 87 60 53 15.4 18.4 29.0 35.6 27.2 33.3 29.2 34.2
Drew Smith FF 343 78 56 50 10.8 17.9 26.5 26.9 20.7 34.1 31.0 30.2
Cristian Javier FF 1065 112 59 51 13.1 17.9 26.5 27.7 26.4 33.3 23.7 23.2
Eli Morgan FF 687 85 49 57 9.3 17.6 29.1 37.6 18.6 37.5 26.5 29.3
Spencer Strider FF 30 143 79 69 10.0 17.5 13.3 30.1 15.8 32.5 23.1 25.4
Jeurys Familia SIFT 601 82 59 59 11.5 22.0 32.6 34.1 23.5 41.9 29.9 41.5
Michael Lorenzen SIFT 47 124 10 34 4.3 16.9 31.9 29.8 11.8 28.8 14.3 39.3
Jordan Montgomery SIFT 564 84 22 29 5.5 16.7 28.4 35.7 11.7 29.2 28.4 38.7
Steven Matz SIFT 1328 162 52 49 8.5 15.4 30.5 32.7 18.7 29.8 19.2 22.2
Josh Hader SIFT 629 95 65 66 21.0 14.7 35.9 29.5 40.4 32.6 26.8 18.8
Clay Holmes SIFT 662 124 59 86 9.2 14.5 32.6 30.6 21.6 26.5 21.3 28.8
Jorge López SIFT 777 88 36 47 5.8 13.6 25.4 37.5 13.4 25.0 19.9 24.0
Garrett Whitlock SIFT 614 136 53 60 11.6 12.5 32.7 34.6 21.8 26.6 25.9 16.0
Kyle Gibson SIFT 980 185 34 42 7.4 11.9 28.0 29.7 17.7 25.9 21.9 23.5
Josh Fleming SIFT 745 152 46 50 10.5 11.8 28.5 35.5 20.6 24.0 36.7 29.0
Edwin Díaz SL 378 77 38 52 27.0 39.0 41.0 44.2 47.9 57.7 42.8 57.1
Andrew Heaney SL 75 48 30.7 37.3 51.1 52.0
Max Scherzer SL 542 85 19 18 26.8 28.2 40.4 42.4 48.0 46.2 38.8 50.0
Carlos Rodón SL 604 103 27 27 18.5 27.2 32.0 36.9 40.6 53.8 33.4 41.4
Víctor Arano SL 107 56 27.1 41.1 50.9 44.8
Chad Kuhl SL 662 122 46 39 17.4 27.0 33.1 42.6 33.5 53.2 32.6 35.8
Kyle Gibson SL 462 100 16 23 22.1 27.0 33.8 35.0 43.0 49.1 40.1 43.1
Andrés Muñoz SL 5 104 29 64 0.0 26.9 20.0 41.3 0.0 49.1 25.0 50.0
Griffin Jax SL 428 76 31 49 17.1 25.0 34.3 42.1 36.0 51.4 36.6 41.2
Shane Bieber SL 398 140 26 32 25.1 24.3 36.4 32.9 45.5 41.0 39.1 48.2

 

Kevin Gausman, splitfinger

There are a few reasons Gausman has a 2.27 ERA (0.50 FIP) over his first five starts but the splitfinger begins and ends the conversation. And boy, does it end things with batters, as he has a 33.6% K% in 2022, with 30 of his 41 strikeouts ending with the splitter.

Gausman’s 38.4% SwStr% trails only Edwin Díaz’s slider for all pitch types, while a 96.0% oSwing% leads the pack. But the splitty isn’t just getting whiffs, as it also has a 69.2% GB% that’s in the top-25 among all pitches. Combining the above, 50.3% of his 151 splitters in 2022 have resulted in either a groundball or a whiff. For context, only one other pitch is even over 40%.

I mean, seriously, what are you supposed to do with this?

Animated GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

The answer, if you’re Marcus Semien, is to pretend like you didn’t totally almost fall.

There was some trepidation on what a move to the AL East might do his ratios but Gausman has been gangbusters so far and is doing it with a pitch that gets a bevy of whiffs and grounders – something that would serve him well if Mr. Manfred gets to lever-flipping.

Jhoan Duran, splitfinger

Let’s briefly talk about a pitch that didn’t qualify for the list but has resulted in a similar whiff or grounder profile as Gausman, just in a much smaller sample. Because while Jhoan Duran has only thrown his splitter 43 times, so far it has a 32.6% SwStr% and 72.7% GB%, giving him a 50% rate for groundballs or whiffs that barely trails Gausman.

9-9 (mph) splits are notoriously hard to pick up:

Animated GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

Pairing the filth above with a four-seamer that can reach 102 mph, many consider his ascent to Minnesota’s closer to be an inevitability. While Duran doesn’t have the job yet, if (when) he gets it, the sub-20% rostered rates will quickly disappear.

Andrés Muñoz, slider

He’s been a personal favorite for a while, as I’ve gone from deeming Muñoz the future closer in San Diego, then as the future closer in Seattle, to shaking my head at a blown UCL, to shaking my fist at Seattle for disrespectfully keeping so many other potential closers around to clutter up the bullpen. Didn’t they know they had Andrés Muñoz coming?

Muñoz may be part of a committee now but his skills might force the issue sooner rather than later. And if so, it’ll be on the strength of one of the game’s dirtiest sliders. The slider has a 26.9% SwStr% and Of his 15 strikeouts (44.1% K%), 13 have finished with a whiff against it.

It can even twist Wander in a pretzel:

Animated GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

His spot as the future closer might not be as ordained as Duran but Muñoz has the same level of elite stuff that deserves to be pitching in the ninth. A close watch should be kept on Seattle’s end-game approach because the more things weight to his side, the more a sub-10% rostered rate will rise. Seattle’s only save chance in the past week went to Drew Steckenrider, who ultimately blew it.

Nick Martinez, changeup

A 4.12 ERA from Martinez doesn’t seem impressive but only one of his four starts has gone poorly, allowing four earned runs on three homers in a loss to Atlanta. He’s allowed two or fewer runs in his other three starts, including against formidable opponents in the Dodgers and Giants.

Martinez has succeeded with a wicked changeup that has so far garnered a 26.3% SwStr% that is second only to Kyle Hendricks. The changeup was far different from the last time Martinez pitched in the majors in 2017, averaging 86 mph with average depth but significant horizontal movement (+3.4 inches vs average). Now the change of pace averages 80 mph, still getting 13% more break compared to average changeups but now has averaged 37.5 inches of drop, +2.7 inches better than average.

Here’s Trea Turner getting finished off by one for his second at-bat in a row:

Animated GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

The problem is that the Padres rotation is crowded when healthy, with only Yu Darvish, Joe Musgrove, and Sean Manaea guaranteed spots. And once Blake Snell and Mike Clevinger return, not to mention MacKenzie Gore, things look even more locked out for Martinez. However, things like “Blake Snell and Mike Clevinger are healthy” tend to be more ephemeral concepts so perhaps there will still be plenty of chances in store for Martinez.

At less than 5% rostered on Yahoo, Martinez will be easy to find if he stays in the rotation but for right now he’s slated for at least one more turn, scheduled to face the Marlins on Thursday. However, be aware that a matchup with Miami might not be the cakewalk it’s been in the past. Facing RHP in 2022, the Marlins have a .331 wOBA (4th), .336 xwOBA (t-9th), with a 23.5% K% (13th). They’ve also done well in the short sample against changeups from RHP (n=198), posting a .345 wOBA (4th). Counterpoint: who knows they’ll actually be fielding in three days because much like the Spanish Inquisition, no one expects a Miami fire-sale.

Josiah Gray, curveball

Like a Murphy Lee diss track, Josiah Gray and his curveball are right back to doing what they did over 70.2 IP in 2021, posting a 19.7% SwStr% that’s right around a 21.1% SwStr% in 2021, with a 48.0% Whiff% that’s virtually identical.

It’s rightly been his ideal finishing maneuver too, as 15 of Gray’s 31 strikeouts have ended with that handsome devil, hook:

Animated GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

More strikeouts are just more hop-skips away because while Gray’s success starts with the four-seamer, the development of his secondaries is what will take him to the next, and more consistent, level. He’d posted two good and two bad starts (4.05 ERA, 1.45 WHIP) heading into a tough matchup on Sunday with the Giants but passed with flying colors, allowing just one hit over six scoreless frames. Four walks and three strikeouts isn’t an ideal ratio but San Francisco has also been a top-10 offense versus RHP and it’s hard to complain about six shutout innings.

Gray now sits with a 3.12 ERA (3.93 FIP) over his first five starts, with a 28.7 K% but a 13.0% BB% will still need to be tamed if a 1.31 WHIP is going to stop being a liability. He’s only rostered around 50% on Yahoo (< 35% on ESPN) so he’ll certainly be around in a lot of leagues heading into another tough matchup with the Angels, who’ve posted a .349 wOBA (2nd) vs RHP. After that, he’ll face Houston at home before going on the road to Miami. Not exactly an easy row to hoe in the short-term but Gray has the strikeout skills to garner long-term success if he can reign in the walks.





2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
airforce21one
1 year ago

Gausman’s 38.4% SwStr% trails only Edwin Díaz’s slider for all pitch types, while a 96.0% oSwing% leads the pack.”

Where do I find the oSwing% of 96%? I see a 69.0 for Gausman.

Another Old Guymember
1 year ago
Reply to  airforce21one

Great article. I suspect airforce21one that Nicklaus did a simple numerical reversal of the 69% oSwing% for Gausman while typing the article. I wish I had a nickel for the number of times I have done that in my life. (I could take my wife out to a top shelf dinner for about a month, I suspect.) 🙂