The Sleeper and the Bust Episode: 553 – RankCast Fireyside Chat w/Nick Pollack

by
May 20, 2018

5/21/18

The latest episode of “The Sleeper and the Bust” is brought to you by Out of the Park Baseball 19, the best baseball strategy game ever made – available NOW on PC, Mac, and Linux platforms! Go to ootpdevelopments.com to order now and save 10% with the code SLEEPER19!

Follow us on Twitter

GET THE SLEEPER & THE BUST T-SHIRT FROM ROTOWEAR!

Biggest Ranking Disputes

Nick Higher:

Paul Higher:

Final Thoughts

—

As usual, don’t hesitate to tweet us or comment with fantasy questions.

You can subscribe to the podcast on iTunes or via the feed. Please rate & review the show in iTunes letting us know what you think!

Approximately 93 minutes of joyous analysis.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS





 

Paul is the Editor of Rotographs and Content Director for OOTP Perfect Team. Follow Paul on Twitter @sporer and on Twitch at sporer.

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Moeliciousmember
5 years ago

Great podcast. Nick Pollack is a smart guy. I have to agree with Nick that the purchase price for pitchers is irrelevant – it’s a sunk cost. Also agree with Nick on Tyson Ross – all his periphs are much worse than the Tyson Ross in his prime. So instead of a 3.00 ERA 9 K/9 guy I am expecting a 3.75+ ERA, 8 K/9 player going forward. Still useful, but not a must start for me against top ten offenses (like Washington this week).

7
Adammember
5 years ago
Reply to  Moelicious

I must say its Nick’s pick and choosing of metrics that has made me stop listening to the Pitcherlist podcast. I know the podcast was in good humour as it should be it clearly hit a bit of nerve….

2
Paul Sporermember
5 years ago
Reply to  Moelicious

So you have the same outlook on your early round SP v. a waiver find like Ross? You just treat every SP the same after they’re on your roster? I call BS. I don’t buy it at all. What you paid absolutely plays a role in how your view and manage that player and my point is that if it starts to get hairy with Ross, it’s waaaayyy easier to move on than if Carlos Martinez or Jose Berrios start putting up 3 IP/6 ER duds.

-1
Moeliciousmember
5 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

I agree it is easier to cut waiver wire guys than early round picks but I don’t understand why the acquisition cost should be reflected in the rankings. If you are discussing what players will do rest of season why does the cost matter?

6
Paul Sporermember
5 years ago
Reply to  Moelicious

Nick’s pushback was the meltdown scenario for Ross and I’m saying that not *super*-relevant bc you’re likely to hit the ejector seat much sooner on a guy like him. So if you’re going to factor in the meltdown aspect of Ross into a ranking, my contention is that it should be mitigated or even outright canceled out by his cost because most fantasy managers won’t see the bottom with Ross because we’re not going to wait around and let him sink the ratios.

-5
Aaron
5 years ago
Reply to  Paul Sporer

Paul, love your work. I agree with NBH and Nick though. I’m not sure why the price you pay and a pitcher’s rank are being conflated? I mean, I hear your argument, but I don’t think I agree. At best, it feels like a tiebreaker. Sure, maybe lower cost means you’re more likely to extract the best from someone (*maybe*). But otherwise, rankings should be a thought exercise in who the better pitcher will be going forward, no? Why is cost a material variable though, aside from the fact that cost will often positively correlate with upside/value?

3
Paul Sporermember
5 years ago
Reply to  Aaron

I’m not saying you rank ppl *according* to cost, but if your primary problem w/some like Ross is that he flops, I’m saying it’ll never get to a full flop bc he’ll be cut before too much damage bc of what he cost and I just don’t believe that anyone plays this game w/out consideration to what a player cost them, whether it’s statistically “right” or not.

-2