The Change — Creating Pitcher Tiers
Before I try to do this in a (slightly) more scientific way, let me say that you can easily create tiers via the sniff test. Take a look at the pitching pool and try to assign groups labels, like ‘ace’ and ‘front of the rotation’ and ‘mid-rotation’. It’s what we do when we are trying to talk about prospect pitchers and where they might slot in later, it should come fairly naturally, and it will help you make sense of your specific player pool. It’s a worthy exercise no matter how rigorous the background work was.
Now let’s try to apply a more reasoned approach to the matter.
If you were to graph tiers, what would they look like? If the y axis was auction value, and the x axis is a pitchers’ rank, then you’d be looking for a straight horizontal line. That’s a group of pitchers with the same auction value but a different rank — a group of pitchers separated by cents, not dollars.
So I made that graph, using our auction calculator and regular 12-team mixed settings.
I looked for big vertical gaps between markers, and put my tiers in there. For the most part, the slope before the tier is horizontal, and then there’s a little vertical moment, and then there’s another horizontal part. It’s not necessarily precise, but it’s backed by the idea that the slope of the line changes in these places, and notifies of a gap in value.
The nice thing is that this approach produces about five tiers for mixed leagues, and that lines up well with how we think of major league rotations. Of course, there’s the Human Caveat, Clayton Kershaw. He’s so far above and beyond the rest of the pack that he’s one of those single-tier players. Let’s not draw a line for him and him alone, though. That’s not, by definition, a tier. There are no other players that are comparable that can live in his tier with him.
Another nice thing is that you see — even if you quibble with where exactly I put my lines (the $10 line should be a bit further right, maybe) — that we have the $30 pitcher, the $20 pitcher, the $10 pitcher, the $5 pitcher, and the $1s. If you’re making a plan and want a pitcher from each tier, there are your budgets for each of those slots.
A major part of the tier system is finding comparable players. Let me update my rankings from last week with tiers that generally follow the plan from above.
| Eno Sarris | Player | RG RK | Diff% | Tier |
| 1 | Clayton Kershaw | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| 2 | Max Scherzer | 2 | 100 | 1 |
| 3 | Chris Sale | 3 | 100 | 1 |
| 4 | David Price | 4 | 100 | 1 |
| 5 | Jake Arrieta | 5 | 100 | 1 |
| 6 | Jacob deGrom | 11 | 183 | 1 |
| 7 | Madison Bumgarner | 8 | 114 | 1 |
| 8 | Zack Greinke | 12 | 150 | 1 |
| 9 | Matt Harvey | 9 | 100 | 1 |
| 10 | Stephen Strasburg | 10 | 100 | 1 |
| 11 | Jose Fernandez | 6 | 55 | 1 |
| 12 | Corey Kluber | 7 | 58 | 1 |
| 13 | Chris Archer | 17 | 131 | 1 |
| 14 | Carlos Carrasco | 14 | 100 | 1 |
| 15 | Gerrit Cole | 16 | 107 | 1 |
| 16 | Noah Syndergaard | 19 | 119 | 1 |
| 17 | Felix Hernandez | 13 | 76 | 1 |
| 18 | Danny Salazar | 24 | 133 | 2 |
| 19 | Johnny Cueto | 20 | 105 | 2 |
| 20 | Jon Lester | 18 | 90 | 2 |
| 21 | Dallas Keuchel | 15 | 71 | 2 |
| 22 | Sonny Gray | 27 | 123 | 2 |
| 23 | Masahiro Tanaka | 23 | 100 | 2 |
| 24 | Cole Hamels | 22 | 92 | 2 |
| 25 | Adam Wainwright | 26 | 104 | 2 |
| 26 | Michael Wacha | 36 | 138 | 2 |
| 27 | Tyson Ross | 21 | 78 | 2 |
| 28 | Michael Pineda | 29 | 104 | 3 |
| 29 | Francisco Liriano | 25 | 86 | 3 |
| 30 | Garrett Richards | 28 | 93 | 3 |
| 31 | Jeff Samardzija | 30 | 97 | 3 |
| 32 | Yordano Ventura | 40 | 125 | 3 |
| 33 | Marcus Stroman | 31 | 94 | 3 |
| 34 | Raisel Iglesias | 43 | 126 | 3 |
| 35 | Yu Darvish | 38 | 109 | 3 |
| 36 | Carlos Martinez | 37 | 103 | 3 |
| 37 | Drew Smyly | 50 | 135 | 3 |
| 38 | Jose Quintana | 33 | 87 | 3 |
| 39 | James Shields | 39 | 100 | 3 |
| 40 | Lance McCullers | 48 | 120 | 3 |
| 41 | Steven Matz | 56 | 137 | 3 |
| 42 | Luis Severino | 54 | 129 | 3 |
| 43 | John Lackey | 47 | 109 | 3 |
| 44 | Taijuan Walker | 42 | 95 | 3 |
| 45 | Wei-Yin Chen | 44 | 98 | 3 |
| 46 | Patrick Corbin | 49 | 107 | 3 |
| 47 | Hisashi Iwakuma | 32 | 68 | 3 |
| 48 | Justin Verlander | 41 | 85 | 3 |
| 49 | Carlos Rodon | 60 | 122 | 4 |
| 50 | Jake Odorizzi | 34 | 68 | 4 |
| 51 | Collin McHugh | 46 | 90 | 4 |
| 52 | Scott Kazmir | 35 | 67 | 4 |
| 53 | Jordan Zimmermann | 45 | 85 | 4 |
| 54 | Mike Fiers | 59 | 109 | 4 |
| 55 | Kevin Gausman | 66 | 120 | 4 |
| 56 | Jaime Garcia | 69 | 123 | 4 |
| 57 | Shelby Miller | 62 | 109 | 4 |
| 58 | Anthony DeSclafani | 68 | 117 | 4 |
| 59 | Eduardo Rodriguez | 74 | 125 | 4 |
| 60 | Jason Hammel | 61 | 102 | 4 |
| 61 | Gio Gonzalez | 51 | 84 | 4 |
| 62 | Kenta Maeda | 76 | 123 | 4 |
| 63 | Aaron Nola | 63 | 100 | 4 |
| 64 | Julio Teheran | 55 | 86 | 4 |
| 65 | Anibal Sanchez | 64 | 98 | 4 |
| 66 | Joe Ross | 71 | 108 | 4 |
| 67 | Andrew Cashner | 52 | 78 | 4 |
| 68 | Ian Kennedy | 58 | 85 | 4 |
| 69 | Nathan Eovaldi | 78 | 113 | 4 |
| 70 | Kyle Hendricks | 57 | 81 | 5 |
| 71 | Hyun-Jin Ryu | 75 | 106 | 5 |
| 72 | Clay Buchholz | 53 | 74 | 5 |
| 73 | Rich Hill | 65 | 89 | 5 |
| 74 | Rick Porcello | 70 | 95 | 5 |
| 75 | Andrew Heaney | 77 | 103 | 5 |
| 76 | Alex Wood | 85 | 112 | 5 |
| 77 | Nate Karns | 86 | 112 | 5 |
| 78 | Jerad Eickhoff | 105 | 135 | 5 |
| 79 | John Lamb | 99 | 125 | 5 |
| 80 | Brett Anderson | 67 | 84 | 5 |
| 81 | Jimmy Nelson | 72 | 89 | 5 |
| 82 | Mike Leake | 80 | 98 | 5 |
| 83 | Jake Peavy | 88 | 106 | 5 |
| 84 | Jesse Hahn | 87 | 104 | 5 |
| 85 | Hector Santiago | 101 | 119 | 5 |
| 86 | Trevor Bauer | 91 | 106 | 5 |
| 88 | Derek Holland | 73 | 83 | 5 |
| 88 | Marco Estrada | 79 | 90 | 5 |
| 89 | Kris Medlen | 102 | 115 | 5 |
| 90 | Rubby de la Rosa | 97 | 108 | 5 |
| 91 | Phil Hughes | 81 | 89 | 5 |
| 92 | Erasmo Ramirez | 92 | 100 | 5 |
| 93 | Chase Anderson | 134 | 144 | 5 |
| 94 | CC Sabathia | 121 | 129 | 5 |
| 95 | Robbie Ray | 83 | 87 | 5 |
| 96 | Edinson Volquez | 94 | 98 | 5 |
| 97 | Kyle Gibson | 103 | 106 | 5 |
| 98 | Matt Moore | 90 | 92 | 5 |
| 99 | Ervin Santana | 98 | 99 | 5 |
| 100 | Drew Hutchison | 118 | 118 | 5 |
Tiers for 12-team mixed leagues.
If Noah Syndergaard or Felix Hernandez are my aces, I’m fine with that. If I waited till the end of each tier and came out of the 12-teamer draft with Noah Syndergaard, Michael Wacha, Justin Verlander, Joe Ross, and Jerad Eickhoff as my staff — all players that I’m relatively high on versus the crowd — I’d do the happy dance and go ogle my strong starting lineup, most likely.
My tiers don’t perfectly line up with the graph. I see more aces, for one. I see the fewest true number twos, which makes sense to me intuitively — a number two is good enough to have the track record and the stats to sit at the top of your rotation, but not good enough to be an ace. That’s rare. I might not own a ton of twos. And if you look at the graph, there’s as good an argument for moving the $10 line left as there is to moving it right. Maybe there are really only ones, threes, and fives, generally speaking.
But my tiers agree with the ranks in a very important place: 50. Around the 50th-ranked pitcher, there’s a lurch downward in the values. As much as I like Carlos Rodon, I can’t yet put him in with the threes, who are either veterans with established track records or young pitchers that haven’t struggled as much as Rodon so far. Your Lackeys and Severinos.
And, really, I think there’s no such thing as a number four. That four/five grouping melds together, and I’ll probably be finishing up my bullpen and getting some bench/utility hitters with upside instead of trying to get the best fours and fives. As much as I love Carlos Rodon and Anthony DeSclafani — and you know I love the latter — I love Aaron Nola and Andrew Heaney and Jaerad Eickhoff about as much. At least enough to go zigging while the rest of the league is zagging.
So there you have it. Not really scientific in the end, but at least a slightly more rigorous undertaking. On my ranks, since I don’t project each player, I couldn’t find the tiers by science. But I could look at the general population for trends, and apply those to my own ranks. Which is something I suggest that each of you do going into the draft. You’ll find a road map to the draft in your tiers.
With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

Eno, in a keeper league I’m in I have one from the top tier, but won’t be able to draft anyone else in that tier. Would you go after two #2’s or just wait and pick up as many #3’s with high upside that you can? Trying to formulate a strategy.
Keep up the good work!
I think you hit the threes hard and then have a couple 4/5s at the end. I like the threes.
I find you can make tiers much more without our own biases at the other positions, but with SP, there’s just not enough clean breaks so it does become a more subjective exercise….one where auctions are likely won and lost.
Good advice here. I utilized the same 5 tier approach. I let the model driven dollar values serve as the starting point for guiding the tiers, than subjectively move players around based on qualitative factors (injury risk, reliability of my baseline forecast given a players limited track record, or any other non-quantifiable factor for that matter).
Kershaw should probably be in his own tier.
“Of course, there’s the Human Caveat, Clayton Kershaw. He’s so far above and beyond the rest of the pack that he’s one of those single-tier players. Let’s not draw a line for him and him alone, though. That’s not, by definition, a tier. There are no other players that are comparable that can live in his tier with him.”
Eno, I know that you like to anchor your fantasy staffs with 2 #2s with #1 potential (aka all #2s), but does your strategy change at all in auction drafts?
I’m preparing for a few Yahoo drafts and it looks like I’m going to be allocating $50 to 7 of those number 3s. Add in ~$25 for closers and I’m looking at a 71/29 split. I’m toying with the idea of adding a Syndegaard/Carrasco type for $18-20 in lieu of one of the #3s, which would give me a more conventional 66/34 split, but…I don’t wanna.
I guess the main reason is the difference between the low #1s and high #1s (not counting your top 5) is about $5. and If I go for an ace I might as well spend the extra $5 for, say, DeGrom over Syndegaard.
16 tm, keep 5, points H2H. I tend to like to keep position players, but the way my values fell I threw back Miguel ($50) and Encarnacion ($49) to keep some more value priced starters.
We cap starts at 10 per week to reduce churning, so while pitchers do not outscore hitters, they tend to carry more marginal value due to the starts they produce being more valuable and more consistent.
With me keeping Carrasco ($7), Archer ($13), Salazar ($9), I’m in pretty good shape with my starters to start my auction. I tend to go with the stars-and-scrubs approach due to my setup not really punishing teams for fishing for replacement level guys who will provide average production. One approach I’m contemplating is using some of my surplus value with my rotation on Kershaw, who won’t be kept, and will probably cost ~$60 at auction. Those four starters would allow me to then add three-to-four #5 types for a couple of dollars each, have $97 wrapped up in my starters, and a clear advantage each week with the starts from my studs.
Downside is it puts a lot of pressure on hitting on 1B/UT types to make up points I’m losing my opponents at those spots. I’m keeping Betts for $17, Bogaerts for $9 as well.
Too risky to go tier 1/tier 5 with my pitching?