The Change: Alex Wood’s Bond Between Stuff & Command

Is there a more perplexing pitcher this year than Alex Wood has been so far? His pitches are all there, in the same quantities, at the same velocities, and with the same shapes… and the results — when it comes to balls and strikes at least — are nowhere to be found. Even my favorite pitch type peripherals are all out of whack.

How does a pitcher with the same stuff fail so miserably?

Check out how little his stuff has actually changed. I mean, these are the same pitches.

Pitch X-Mov Y-Mov Velocity
14 FA 9.0 6.9 89.8
15 FA 10.0 6.7 89.6
14 CH 10.7 2.1 82.8
15 CH 11.6 2.0 82.7
14 CB -3.2 -5.1 79.1
15 CB -5.0 -3.6 78.4

Well, okay, the curve has changed a bit. By PITCHf/x. If you look at Brooks Baseball’s cleaned-up values, the curve is about the same. And no mention of changing his grip on the pitch or anything.

So, his pitches look like they are about the same. The results have not been.

Pitch 14 Whiff 15 Whiff 14 GB 15 GB
FA 6.0% 2.6% 45% 55%
CH 14.0% 8.3% 41% 50%
CB 15.3% 8.8% 62% 57%

He’s getting some more grounders, but it’s not enough to offset or explain the lack of whiffs.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Well, maybe the grounder rate difference is important. Look at his average height on the sinker, and it looks like Wood is throwing the ball lower in the zone.

Brooksbaseball-Chart-9

That holds up with all of his pitches included, too. To the heat maps:

Wood14Wood15

So Alex Wood is throwing all of the same pitches at mostly the same velocities, with mostly the same shape, and somehow throwing a little further down in the zone has robbed him of his ability to get whiffs? We’re not all the way there yet.

I mean, after all, Wood always had this coming. He had a 55% ground-ball rate in the minor leagues, 49% in his rookie year, and then was down to 46% last year. The three pitches he features — the curve, the sinker, and the change — are all great ground-ball pitches. And Wood managed to get these grounders alongside whiffs, in the past. So a focus on grounders isn’t robbing Wood of his strikeouts.

Except maybe in a roundabout way. Take a look at what happened when I asked a few of my favorite Braves fan friends about Wood’s early season. The short version: Ben Duronio and Joe Lucia thought I should take a look at his command.

We showed that the pitches were mostly the same by movement, but not by whiffs, but we didn’t show one aspect of the pitches that had also changed. See how often his pitches have been in the zone last year and this year.

Pitch 14 Zone% 15 Zone%
FA 56.00% 51.60%
KC 43.50% 42.70%
CH 40.20% 36.10%

It’s amazing to see concretely how Wood’s command is stealing opportunities for whiffs from him. Last year, 7.8% of Wood’s overall pitches came in a three ball count. This year, that percentage is up to 9.4%. He’s throwing the sinker in 78% of the three-ball counts this year, too. So he’s becoming more predictable, and he’s getting into situations where he can’t go to any of his three pitches at will.

That’s how command can hurt your ability to get whiffs, beyond the ability to actually place the curve and change in the right place to get whiffs. You need to be able to get into the right counts to use your dangerous offspeed pitches. It’s not just about the shape and velocity of the pitch, it’s about the predictability of its use, the location it’s thrown to, and the context of the at-bat.

Wood’s become slightly more predictable because of his focus on the bottom of the zone. He’s throwing too many pitches outside of the zone, and that’s hurting his ability to be unpredictable. The good news is, he’s had blips like this before (see below), his pitches are still all about the same, and his command isn’t Defcon 1 (Aka Allen Webster) bad. He should come out of this.

Brooksbaseball-Chart-8





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
centerfield_ballhawk
10 years ago

Eno,
In your most recent pitcher rankings you had Wood at fifteen and McHugh out of your top forty. How would those rankings change, if at all, today?