The Argument Against Oneil Cruz

Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

Oneil Cruz is probably a superstar in the making, but we should be unsure as to whether or not he can justify his mid-70s ADP, due to his low contact rate, low launch angle, mixed with playing most of his games in PNC Park.

Cruz’ career 92.1-mph exit velocity is electric and a large contributor to his .445 xwoBACON. When he makes contact, he straight-up mashes. But when is a big word, when we speak of his contact.

Yes, it’s a strikeout league, but Cruz’ 35% strikeout rate in 2022 was way above the MLB 22% average. And striking the ball hard doesn’t always yield great results.

Cruz’ 8.3-degree launch angle was well below the MLB 12% rate in 2022. Sure, he had a 16% barrel rate despite this low average launch angle, but his 49% groundball rate is a bit scary. And this wasn’t a result of MLB pitchers pitching him better than MiLB pitching, as he had a 51% groundball rate in Triple-A before getting called up.

This is a player who can mash 30 home runs, but could also slice a crap-ton of 100-mph grounders straight to fielders. These could bust up his ability to run out infield singles.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

He does have speed, but the old, tired adage rings true here: you can’t steal first base. We can’t deny that this guy generates a ton of outs.

Cruz is a StatCast darling when it comes to batted balls, but he lands a whole lot less often than we want him to. And batted balls aren’t the whole story, bringing us back to how the strikeouts and launch angle cap our results. Cruz’ 162-game average has been 33 home runs, which is awesome, but his expected stats are very much not awesome.

A .233 real-life batting average is a bit disheartening, but his .450 slugging percentage keeps us up for chasing that 35-home run ceiling. But Cruz’s .223 expected batting average and .410 expected slugging percentage indicate he’s greatly overperformed. And that’s for the neutral field. Cruz has to play half of his games in PNC Park, where home runs go to die.

According to EV Analytics, PNC is generally neutral for hitting, but is the sixth-worst ballpark for power. We’ll need a lot of wind games in Wrigley Field and scorching heat days in Busch Stadium with legendary performances to take advantage of the excellent hitting condition of the Great American Ball Park and the good conditions of whatever they’re calling the park in Milwaukee. 81 games in PNC is huge for depressing power.

Not to mention, that Pirates lineup — woof! Cruz definitely has a capped ceiling for runs scored and runs batted in no matter where he hits in this batting order.

There’s no guarantee that a hitter can’t ascend above a ballpark. But this is where we have to draw attention to Cruz’ early ADP. He’s got Dansby Swanson and Corey Seager right with him and he’s ahead of Tim Anderson and Xander Bogaerts; while way ahead of Willy Adames, Jeremy Peña, and Carlos Correa. The moral of the story is probably: shortstop is frickin’ stacked. No longer is a middle infielder hitting 25 home runs a unicorn. Seager (33), Adames (31), Jose Altuve (28), Francisco Lindor and Marcus Semien (26), and Swanson (25) did just that. Ten slugged at least .450. 18 slugged at least .410.

The idea of not pouncing on Lindor at his ADP to wait for Swanson/Cruz/Seager is fine, but how do we justify Cruz over those two? And if waiting for the mid-range of the position is what we’re doing, why not spend that pick in the mid-70s on more upside and wait even further for a whole mess of guys?

Cruz is a great talent, who’s gonna hit a mess of big home runs that break the highlight reels. In dynasty and keeper leagues, he’s very valuable, especially in deeper leagues. The talent is worth a big flyer. In redraft, though, there are just so many guys at the position who are so much more than “just a guy” guys.





Alex Sonty is a professional DFS and poker player, while contributing to RotoGrinders and FanGraphs, as well as serving as a part-time political science professor in Chicago, IL. He’s been playing fantasy sports since 1996 and entered the DFS realm in 2014, currently playing high-stakes MLB and NFL cash games and GPPs. He is a Chicago Tribune and SB Nation alum, while holding a J.D./M.A. and L.L.M. from DePaul University.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
WebsMember since 2020
3 years ago

Cruz had a weird season, as if he were two different players.

Before August 16: .195/.242/.397, 5.9% BB rate, 37.1% K rate, 6 SB, 4 CS

After August 16: .274/.349/.510. 9.7% BB rate, 32.6% K rate, 5 SB, 0 CS

Brad JohnsonMember
3 years ago
Reply to  Alex Sonty

Or even just any slugger. He has a classic volatile masher profile.

JohnThackerMember since 2025
3 years ago
Reply to  Alex Sonty

Not completely weird for a young player to improve after adjusting to the bigs, either, though. Julio Rodriguez had a rough first month, thanks partially to a lot of questionable called third strikes – something that, as noted below, Cruz also faced.

A lot depends on how much you think that Cruz turned a corner in the last few months versus random, and I’m fine with people arguing either way.

weekendatbidens
3 years ago
Reply to  Webs

contact quality improved. notice his BABIP jumped way up. Better pitch recognition on breaking balls and barreling up. Standard evolution for prospects graduating. In the groove Cruz just flashing his value.

Gains came from pitch recognition after seeing a lot of pitches. Pitchers will now have to readjust to him. Similar to how Dalbec in ’21 (2nd half = fire) figured it out (unfortunately it didn’t extend because bad habits are exploitable to pitchers). Cruz needs to keep improving his eye, and that should help maintain his contact quality, then he needs to work on situational hitting to improve his K% to something manageable so he doesn’t need a wicked high BABIP to hit for average.

DanMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Webs

Watching him every day you could see him adjusting his approach later in the year; taking more pitches, going the other way, waiting for his pitch, etc.

70 ADP is high, but if you don’t draft him your face might look like Degrom’s after facing Cruz.
https://www.mlb.com/video/oneil-cruz-homers-17-on-a-line-drive-to-center-field-zack-collins-scores

esenatorMember since 2020
3 years ago

The Oneil Cruz stat that I just don’t understand, and that I think will go a long way towards whether or not he’s successful next year: among players with 350 PA last year, Cruz had the 10th highest called strike rate. He also had the 11th lowest rate of pitches seen in the zone. To me, that means umpires are giving the pitcher the wrong zone against him, and that’s something that might get fixed as they get more familiarity with his giant frame.

There were only 5 players in the top / bottom 50 in those categories last year: Cruz, Soto, Paredes, Rutschman, and Yuli Gurriel. Cruz was the only one of them with a K rate over 18%, so I truly think there’s going to be some improvement solely on the umps getting better

WhiskiMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  esenator

Yeah pitchers were tough against Oneil Cruz this year.

Among players with minimum 250PA…
11th worst Out of Zone %
27th worst Edge % (pitchers painted the corners)
17th worst First Strike %

Baseball Savant chart

ScamNewton
3 years ago
Reply to  esenator

It’s because he’s tall. They still don’t call Judge properly so don’t hold your breath until we get robo umps.

Sean McFeeMember since 2022
3 years ago

A fast guy who hits a lot of hard ground balls may find his BABIP improving with the departure of the shift.

Lunch AngleMember since 2016
3 years ago

Taking Oneil that early is a big bet on his developing into a better hitter than he has been. It’s a bet that I can understand given his age and experience and the awesome upside he poses if it does happen, but yeah I agree it’s a pretty risky bet.

kozy21
3 years ago

35 homer ceiling? He was on a 30+homer, 100+ RBI pace as a 23 year old rookie. If he continues making adjustments (like he did in August and September) and just gets that average up to at least .250, I’d say 35 homers is his floor. He should consistently hit 40+. I hope he has at least 5 of those seasons with the Pirates.

pmart1995Member since 2016
3 years ago

I was surprised Cruz’s platoon splits didn’t get mention here. He was .265/.324/.513 against righties, but just .158/.225/.307 against lefties.

Even more dramatic are the K%/BB% platoons. Versus righties, he was 8.0% BB/26.8% K. Totally reasonable for a guy with a 99th percentile wOBACON profile; wouldn’t preclude an MVP-caliber season. But against lefties he was 7.2% BB/53.2% K. That’s 59 strikeouts in 111 PA against lefties!!

I’m interested in a scout’s prognosis on this. Is he a platoon guy? Or is this a sign that he could ascend to the next level if he just got better against lefties? (Maybe easier said than done. At one time I was pretty bought-in on Jake Lamb…)

mgwalker
3 years ago

Shouldn’t the ballpark factor take the split into account? From L-R, PNC park is 325, 389, 399, 375, 320, with the 410-ft ‘nook’ in left-center.

If he keeps the low angle and speed, I look forward to seeing a revival of the triple at PNC park over the next few years.

Last edited 3 years ago by mgwalker
MustBunique
3 years ago

Have you dug into the K’s though? The swinging strike rate is relatively low. He is looking and learning. Lots of promise from that perspective relative to overall K rate.