Six Starting Pitcher Targets According to SIERA
When the calendar flips to June, it typically signifies the time to deeply evaluate my team, strengths, and weaknesses, and identify trade targets and players I should seek to trade. So let’s discuss six starting pitchers whose SIERA marks are significantly below their actual ERA marks, suggesting vastly improved results over the rest of the season…if they maintain their current skills. This last piece is important as SIERA isn’t a projection. Rather, it’s backwards looking at does a far superior job of evaluating a pitcher’s skill than ERA. You could surely use it as a projection, as it does a much better job than ERA, but that’s now what it’s designed for.
You first have to ask yourself if the underlying skills driving SIERA (strikeout and walk rate, along with batted ball profile) are sustainable over the rest of the season. SIERA is useless if you don’t expect the pitcher’s skills to remain stable. So for this exercise, we have to make the assumption that the skills will indeed be maintained over the rest of the season. If that does happen, all of these pitchers should enjoy dramatically better ERA marks over the rest of the way.
| Name | K% | BB% | BABIP | HR/FB | LOB% | ERA | SIERA | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Carrasco | 28.7% | 4.0% | 0.353 | 20.0% | 73.8% | 4.98 | 3.33 | 1.65 |
| Chris Sale | 34.3% | 6.6% | 0.291 | 16.4% | 67.1% | 4.35 | 3.05 | 1.30 |
| Gerrit Cole | 37.4% | 6.5% | 0.294 | 21.9% | 70.0% | 3.94 | 2.73 | 1.21 |
| Eduardo Rodriguez | 25.5% | 7.0% | 0.346 | 13.1% | 67.6% | 4.88 | 3.90 | 0.98 |
| Noah Syndergaard | 23.6% | 5.8% | 0.323 | 12.5% | 64.5% | 4.83 | 3.96 | 0.87 |
| Zack Wheeler | 26.7% | 7.4% | 0.320 | 12.9% | 68.3% | 4.68 | 3.81 | 0.87 |
I left Carlos Carrasco in the table as he ranked as the second biggest SIERA underperformer among qualified starters. His skills are as strong as always, but has gotten BABIP’d to death and has been bitten by the long ball. Unfortunately, he was just placed on the IL yesterday after being diagnosed with a blood condition. We don’t know yet exactly what that condition is or how long he might be out for. So at this point, he really only makes sense trading for him in a keeper league if he’s at a good price (unlikely) or if you’re giving up little of value.
For all the concerns about Chris Sale’s velocity (which were definitely legit) and early season struggles, his skills have remained pretty darn elite. Not quite peak Sale, but at a level where you should buy him with full confidence. Right now, it’s the home run ball (a career high HR/FB rate) and a career low LOB% that’s kept his ERA above 4.00. It won’t stay there for much longer.
Last season, Gerrit Cole went from solid enough pitcher with seemingly untapped upside to dominant ace. Looking solely at ERA, you might think that last year was a bit of a fluke and he’s right back to that high-3.00 ERA he had been. You would be wrong. Cole’s strikeout rate and SwStk% have taken another step up, but like the two above him, he has been crushed by the long ball. He might never come cheaper again than right now.
Eduardo Rodriguez is displaying similar skills as past years (with a career best SwStk% to boot), but career worsts in all three luck metrics have pushed his ERA to near 5.00. Since he’s likely to come cheapest of the six on this list, he’s an excellent target.
Whether it’s injury or a perpetually inflated BABIP, Noah Syndergaard always seems to find a way to disappoint his fantasy owners. This year, he’s managed to make it into June without injury, but his strikeout rate sits at a career low, driven by a career worst SwStk%, and his HR/FB rate has jumped back into double digits after spending his last two full seasons in the high single digits. For some reason, he has thrown his four-seamer more at the expense of his slider, which is clearly behind his drop in strikeout rate since that slider has yielded the highest SwStk% of all his pitches over his career. There are some red flags here for sure, but he’s not going to continue underperforming his SIERA by nearly a full run and for his career, his ERA and SIERA are nearly identical. This isn’t a serial SIERA underperformer despite the high BABIP marks.
Zack Wheeler’s skills are as strong as ever, with a career high strikeout rate driven by a career best SwStk% mark. And his fastball velocity is at a career best, jumping even higher after setting a career high last year. Expectations may have been inflated, because last year’s ERA was deceptive and led to lots of misplaced hype, thanks to a suppressed BABIP and even more suppressed HR/FB rate that was not going to be repeated. But still, this is a solid skill set and there’s no reason to believe he’s going to continue to underperform his SIERA by nearly a run.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
damn, comments on all of them except Wheeler?
Man, I never fail to make silly mistakes like this. I have added his blurb.
thanks!!! i have Wheeler in a keeper league, so I’m glad for some insight into his performance.
Any hope for C.Archer, M. Perez, or J. Gray?
Ughhhh, don’t get me started on Archer! I just don’t know anymore. He hasn’t pitched well, so it’s not just bad luck.
Any hope for M. Perez? His ERA stands at 3.72 versus a 4.78 SIERA! There’s still substantial downside here. The added velocity has boosted his strikeout rate, but his control has taken a hit and his GB% sits at a career low.
Not sure what you’re expecting from Gray, whose ERA stands at 4.11. Can you really expect much better for a Rockies starter? Obviously it could be done, but the odds aren’t with you.
Archer hasn’t been good in 4 years.
I think the question with Sale is he normally starts strongly and then fades 2nd half of the season. For those that think he’s been underused this year so far- brought along slowly- he’s thru this point of the season thrown 1265 pitches thru 77.1 innings. Last season thru now he had thrown 1299 pitches thru 81 innings. So very little difference.
He’s also struggled against good offenses this year…..
vs top 10 offenses by wRC+- 26 er in 36.1 IP 6.44 ERA(you say the 1st start vs Seattle should be taken out 7 ER in 3 ip. that’s fine- still 19 er in 33.1 IP- or a 5.13 ERA vs good teams
vs bottom 10 offenses by wRC+ 10 er in 33 ip 2.73 ERA(and this includes start vs Toronto early where he gave up 5 er in only 4 IP. You take that out and he’s got a 1.55 ERA vs bad teams.)
looking at his remaining schedule prior to the break- he’s on track to start 3 of 5 times vs Baltimore, and Toronto twice. And 12th worse team White Sox. Only start that is challenging is vs Rangers(#11).
I don’t know if the number of pitches necessarily tells the whole story, though.
IF IF IF the team’s public narrative is true, and there has been a deliberate attempt to “dial him down” in the early part of the season, then in addition to throwing slightly fewer pitches so far, the pitches he has thrown have put less stress on his arm due to being less than full effort. Presumably that could show some benefit later in the season.
Of course if you do not buy that narrative and think it’s just cover, it could portend potential arm issues down the road (but that’s basically par for the course when it comes to Sale, anyway).
Good luck trading for Chris Sale after last night. The Sale price now might be the same as it was during the off season. No discounts here.
Have to remember that Sale had a lot of health questions in the off season given the way the last 3-4 months went last season.
Sale will still get his K’s because that slider is nasty, but if his fastball is at 94 he’s going to give up his fair share of homers. His HR rate on 4-seamers skyrockets when <=94 MPH. When he's 96+ HRs are almost non-existent. It's a big difference – about 5.6x higher when sorted into equal sized buckets based on total game average 4-seam velo.