Selling Danny Duffy
As you may recall, I jumped onto the Danny Duffy bandwagon rather early on, diving into his ability to sustain his relief velocity as a starter through his fifth start of the season. Since those first five starts, he has continued to pitch spectacularly, posting a 2.43 ERA (3.43 SIERA) and 21.5% K-BB%. But the good times eventually come to an end. And I think Duffy’s value has peaked and is in danger of experiencing a sharp decline.
Let’s break up his performance as a starter into several different periods. Though this might be a controversial decision, I decided to exclude his absolutely dominant August 1st game against the Rays in which he racked up 16 strikeouts and allowed just one hit. The game was such an outlier for all his underlying peripherals that it would have distorted his overall line during the time period. So out it went.
As a result, I broke up Duffy’s starts into three periods — before his velocity loss and then after his velocity loss, with the Rays game separating the post-velocity loss period into two (five games and then three games started).
Let’s look at the process first:
Date Range | GS | FB% | FBv | SL% | SLv | CH% | CHv | LD% | GB% | FB% | IFFB% |
5/15 – 6/27 | 9 | 60.7% | 95.4 | 22.0% | 84.5 | 17.3% | 85.6 | 19.0% | 29.3% | 51.7% | 11.7% |
7/2 – 7/27 | 5 | 58.0% | 94.4 | 15.9% | 83.2 | 16.2% | 84.4 | 18.1% | 44.7% | 37.2% | 11.4% |
8/6 – 8/16 | 3 | 61.3% | 94.0 | 23.5% | 82.8 | 15.2% | 84.5 | 19.7% | 28.8% | 51.5% | 2.9% |
Immediately, we see the loss of velocity. The most exciting thing about Duffy was that he had managed to sustain the vast majority of his fastball velocity as a reliever while starting. But that all changed in his 10th start as his velocity dropped and hasn’t recovered. This chart is ugly:

Sure, we didn’t expect him to maintain his velocity as a reliever. But initially, at least over his first nine starts, he did. And that’s what made him so exciting. You see that for the most part, aside from the odd middle period, he’s been an extreme fly ball pitcher. If any pitcher ever hopes to succeed as an extreme fly baller, then doing so in Kansas City is the best possible place to do so. Unfortunately, his ability to induce pop-ups vanished over his last three starts. The sample size is tiny, of course, so perhaps this is just a fluke and not a sign of impending doom.
But hey, he’s still pitching well, right? Let’s check in on the rest of his metrics:
Date Range | GS | Hard% | SwStk% | K% | BB% | BABIP | LOB% | HR/FB | ERA | SIERA |
5/15 – 6/27 | 9 | 37.5% | 14.5% | 30.2% | 5.7% | 0.264 | 89.7% | 16.7% | 3.33 | 3.19 |
7/2 – 7/27 | 5 | 34.7% | 8.4% | 22.3% | 4.3% | 0.302 | 75.9% | 5.7% | 3.18 | 3.69 |
8/6 – 8/16 | 3 | 37.9% | 9.3% | 19.5% | 4.6% | 0.203 | 92.6% | 5.9% | 1.54 | 4.44 |
For a pitcher who throws in the mid-to-high 90s and has posted a high strikeout rate, it’s pretty crazy to see those inflated Hard% marks over each period. But let’s move off that metric and focus on a more telling one — SwStk%. Duffy was absurd over his first nine starts, making batters swing and miss at an elite clip. Since his velocity has declined, he has been just ordinary and his strikeout rate has plummeted. The one sliver of good news is that he has been able to sustain his significant control gains throughout.
To the far right, you will notice that his SIERA has been on the rise. However, he’s relying on some magic to keep his ERA from feeling the effects of his skills deterioration. Over his last three starts, his SIERA is a weak 4.44, but he has posted a 1.54 ERA (just four runs allowed in 23.1 innings) thanks to a .203 BABIP and 92.6% LOB% (and to a slightly lesser extent, the suppressed 5.9% HR/FB rate). That low BABIP has come despite a very high Hard% and a low IFFB%. And of course, he has stranded nearly every runner that has reached base.
Duffy pitched 144.2 innings last year and is at 132 already this season. He threw 155.1 innings in 2014 as well, so he shouldn’t be running out of steam just yet. But it sure seems like that’s what’s happening.
I’m not going to predict a collapse. He still possesses good stuff, even with a tick less velocity, and he’s showing no signs of backtracking from his improvement in control. But this is a guy with a 2.73 ERA and over a strikeout an inning whose perceived value may be sky high at the moment, especially in keeper leagues as he’s just 27 years old. If you’re risk averse or just curious, I say now is the time to shop him around and maximize your return.
Mike Podhorzer is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
“I decided to exclude his absolutely dominant August 1st game against the Rays in which he racked up 16 strikeouts and allowed just one hit. ”
Because it would have completely undermined the article, yet it actually did happen. Let’s see the #s with that start included and let the rest of us draw our own conclusions.
Or, if you’re going to pick and choose, why not throw out his worst start as well over the same period.
I’d agree that it probably should’ve been included or at least a note given why it was omitted, but an eight inning, one hit, 16 K shutout isn’t particularly predictive. He had a few “meh” starts that you could bicker about which one was his worst, but none were so bad so as to be nuclear (think some of James Shields’ outings this year). If he’d had one of those, I have to imagine that would’ve been tossed out of the sample as well.
You don’t get to pick which starts are predictive and which are not.
You can imagine they would be… but they weren’t. That is the issue with this “analysis”
I’m generally not a fan of plucking out one particularly good game since lots of players have those kind of games. In this case, though, the author was very clear up front about what he was doing and why and it doesn’t exactly undermine the underlying premise of the article – that in 8 other starts since 7/2, Duffy’s skills have been trending downward. If you want to dismiss that trend or say it’s not so worrisome because he did have that 16 K start, that’s fine.
Essentially, every start over the last 2 time periods, except the Rays start, had similar SwStk% marks, way down from his first nine starts. Only that one start in the middle was elite. It threw him everything. His strikeout rate over the second time period including the Rays start was about 25%. Still a drop from the first nine starts, but not as severe. And it’s deceiving.
Stats are deceiving. They get in the way of the scouting reports and sabermetrics.
I think excluding that start is deceiving. There is evidence that pitchers who throw ‘elite’ games go on to maintain a higher level of excellence in their careers. I remember a study (Bill James?) on pitchers post-no-hitter that uncovered such a trend. The 16 K one-hitter is in the same league as a no-no.
To compound this error, no comparative analysis was done on the quality of opponents in this small sample size. It should also be noted that Duffy is going really long in recent games, while he had been previously around 5 IP per start.
It’s like you started out trying to twist the stats to make an excellent pitcher look bad. Just throw out the best start of his career, take a small sample, cherry pick the stat you want to look at, ignore the calibre of teams in the sample. You can make any pitcher in baseball look bad with this kind of analysis.
I assumed the August 1st start goes in the August date range.
Siera: 3.29
Swstr%: 15.1% (However, this is greatly influenced by that 16 strikeout start where it is 30.9%)
K%: 29.2% (August 1st K% was 60%)
BB%: 4.4%
FB Velocity: 94.1
BABIP: .192
LOB%: 93.4%
On a personal opinion note, I am inclined to agree with Pod. The August 1st start is a big outlier. There is a trend of Duffy losing velocity and getting more lucky as of late. I think taking it out is more representative of how Duffy has been pitching.
The author made it clear that he was taking that start out while explaining why, and doing so in no way “completely undermined the article.” You’re free to ignore this piece and believe that Duffy will maintain his current levels, but I find Mr. Podhorzer’s argument to be compelling. This is no different than identifying a pitcher who might be undervalued because one terrible outing skewed his overall numbers.