Roster Trending: Drop It Like It’s Hot
Yesterday, I analyzed the five players most added in CBS leagues. Was the juice worth the squeeze? For the most part, no. Are fantasy owners also dropping players too hastily? It follows that if fantasy owners love to chase the hot player du jour, they also get too trigger happy when jettisoning players from their rosters. Let’s discuss the five most dropped non-injured players in CBS leagues. Are fantasy owners justified for their decisions and if these players are now available in your league, should you pounce?
Ricky Nolasco – 64% owned this week, 48% next week
Nolasco has made two starts so far with his new American League employer and allowed five runs in each. Although his fastball velocity is actually up from last year, it hasn’t translated into strikeouts or swings and misses. And what happened to his control? Obviously, a tiny sample, but he’s walked more batters than he’s struck out! That’s very unlike Nolasco. Of course, it was really just the result of his second start, as his control was fine in his first.
To hold Nolasco, you have to believe that last year’s neutral fortune for a change will continue, as he has had a history of underperforming his peripherals. On a bad Twins team and now in the American League, I’d side with the droppers, though I probably wouldn’t have drafted him in the first place. Actually, I shied away from him in all my auctions despite the bidding stopping short of my value.
Jorge de la Rosa – 42%, 30%
De la Rosa lucked his way into a sub-4.00 ERA last year, which likely inflated his ownership heading into the season. So naturally after two poor starts, fantasy owners are questioning their decision to put more stock in his ERA than his SIERA. The funny thing is that his velocity is way up to pre-2012 levels. That’s when he was a strikeout pitcher with a slight ground ball tilt. So although the results have been poor so far, I would actually bump his value up a bit now. I wouldn’t consider him in shallow mixed leagues, but he should be a relatively cheap buy low in NL-Only leagues.
Colby Rasmus – 55%, 45%
I guess two hits in 26 plate appearances is just too much for many fantasy owners to take. When combined with the huge uptick in strikeout rate Rasmus experienced last year, the contact trend looks troubling. But c’mon people, it’s been 23 at-bats. Although it’s quite humorous to look at that .087 batting average and .366 OPS, we know what he’s going to deliver. You’ll get a weak batting average, unless he gets some serious help from the BABIP fairy, and a decent home run total given his high fly ball and above average HR/FB rates. If you drafted him, this first week shouldn’t change your opinion whatsoever. He’s not my cup of tea, but if he was yours, he should still be yours.
Phil Hughes – 57%, 47%
Upon his move into the more pitcher friendly Target Field, the hope was that Hughes curbs his home run problem. With good control and an above average strikeout rate to go along with his extreme fly ball tendency, he’s almost like the new Scott Baker. The latter had some fantasy relevant seasons, but Hughes has struggled to strand runners at a respectable clip. If everything falls right, he could potentially post a sub-4.00 ERA. But, he’s merely an AL-Only starter as the risk for a blow up is far too great to trot him out in mixed leagues.
Brandon McCarthy – 36%, 27%
The results haven’t been there in two starts, but the velocity on his sinker has reached a career high and he peaked at 95.4 mph with the pitch. You have to go all the way back to 2007 to find the last time he breached the 94 mph mark with any pitch. So far, the sinker has generated a SwStk% of 5.7%, up from his career average of just 3.8%. That’s pretty significant given how frequently he throws it.
Unfortunately, none of his other pitches are any good in generating swings and misses. But you kinda figured that given his low strikeout rate. He already possesses sterling control and that sinker should induces lots of grounders. The bump in velocity could potentially get his strikeout rate back into the 6.0 range. He’s another cheap buy low option in NL-Only leagues, but doesn’t have enough strikeout rate upside to consider in mixed.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
I’d stay away from all these guys, no matter how deep a league you’re in. The Twins made some awful investments…yikes.
I probably wouldn’t pick up these guys, maybe Nolasco in a pinch or a bigger league or Rasmus when he starts a patented hot streak.
My pickups (so far) on my teams this year include:
Justin Upton
Matt Cain
Billy Hamilton
Jedd Gyorko
Aaron Hill
So people do worry a lot early on.
None of my teams are in top half of their leagues so far, but I will keep adding cast-offs of the teams chasing the flavor of the day.
Do you play in a league with toddlers?
Toddlers in a four-team NL-only league perhaps?
is that a 4 team league or a 6?
Or maybe it’s the fabled one-teamer.
There is no such thing as a valid league where Justin Upton is dropped the 1st week. Quit the league. Stop wasting time.
how come I never get those players–all I got so far are a couple of lawries, one gardner and one Soriano–a couple of klubers, too…a headley and a seager…and a gyorko…people hate gyorko…and fwiw I am only in 6 leagues–oh I did get a fister–kinda like finding a silver certificate when I was pumping gas as a teenager
On Rasmus: “He’s not my cup of tea, but if he was yours, he should still be yours.”
That sort of thinking always cracks me up. “I think he sucks, but you should keep him”.
Outside of his name, Rasmus is the just like all these other late-round OF’s that owners should feel free to rotate through. Nobody bought him at auction because they liked him. Nobody likes Rasmus. He was bought because he was cheap.
He’s not the sort of player you hang to when there’s a better use of the roster spot though.
How do i subscribe to your newsletter?
Most leagues have unlimited moves. Most owners simply make their last draft picks high upside players that can be dumped at ANY speed. So I see these players dropped for any pitcher that has a good match-up or any hitter that can fill in on an off-day for their starter in hopes of gaining any counting stats and (fingers crossed) not losing on BA or SLG or OBP. Changes in ownership are an automatic in these leagues.
I’m actually a fan of Rasmus in his Toronto setting. I think he’ll one day turn into Encarnacion or Bautista lite. The homers will get into the 30’s but we may never see a BA >250. Maybe on a good day.
Ps. Mike is definitely in a league I want to be in.
What do you make of Papelbon’s early-season velocity troubles?
http://www.fangraphs.com/pitchfxo.aspx?playerid=5975&position=P&pitch=FA
It cracks me up how quickly people will drop a hitter for getting 4 hits in his first 20 ABs instead of 6.
This has been something that I’ve wondered for a while now as I play in deep leagues. At which point would an AL/NL only player have relevance in a deeper mixed league?
I like your question. I’ve also thought about that. Most of my mixers are 14, 16 and even one 20 team league.
The way I interpret it is when a player is relevant in an AL/NL only league then he is also relevant in a 20 team mixer, probably/maybe in a 16 and sketchy in a 14. It helps if the 14 & 16 have large roster sizes (25 or more).
But in the end all that really matters to me is if the player improves my team so I take it from there.
Anyone have thoughts on Nick Markakis?
He got dropped in my super deep league (basically everyone on FA is owned <5% of all leagues) and I picked him up because my OF talent is terrible.. I'm really not sure why the guy dropped him but I appreciate it none the less.
No power but he bats right now at the top of the order so a decent batting average and runs scored can be expected. One of the few Orioles who will take a walk, so he’s useful in OBP leagues.
Another thing that makes Nick attractive in very deep leagues is his durability. Apart from his injury-marred 2012 season, Nick is usually good for at least 150 games, so you don’t have to go scouring the waiver wire for some scrub OF with a .170 BA.
The problem with not ditching guys too early is that if you wait until you’re really, truly, certain a player on your roster is a flaming pile of garbage, you’ve probably missed your chance to trade him and/or pick him up for someone better.
A few years ago, when Halladay was being drafted in the 1st/2nd round, I drafted him. He started having bad starts, and his mph had dropped. I waited until he had a good start, the experts proclaimed optimism that he had righted the ship, and I sold him for $.80 on the dollar. Halladay made two more craptacular starts, then was out for the rest of the season.
If I had waited until is as totally and completely sure he was toast, I never would have gotten anything. Sometimes, striking first and dropping/trading players who have started badly is the correct move.
In 2012, I had this character for the Diamondbacks named Paul Goldschmidt. He was a right-handed first baseman who never showed up on top prospect lists and was promoted to the show from AA the season before. He had a crappy April and Gibson seemed intent on starting Lyle Overbay over him so I dropped him. Sometimes dropping the players you kept/drafted isn’t a good idea, assuming you used some type of process/strategy/analysis when forming your team.
PS: The player I dropped him for was Allen Craig so it wasn’t an overall disaster.
Any thoughts on Melky Cabrera? He is off to a nice start and was largely undrafted, are we buying him being closer to what he was in 2011 and 2012?
You can’t possibly know anything after one week of games. He could be closer to 2011 and 2012 or not. We’ll need a larger sample and perhaps an explanation to determine.