Revisiting the Chris Taylor vs. Brad Miller Debate
Shortstop has been a difficult position for most fantasy owners this season. As of earlier today, after Hanley Ramirez the top four in Yahoo!’s actual production ranks have been Adeiny Hechavarria, Zack Cozart, Marcus Semien, and Brandon Crawford. While I am very fond of Semien and think Crawford has made notable improvements, this is not exactly the glowing age for fantasy shortstops.
Prior to the start of the season, one player I was keeping a close eye on was Chris Taylor. Being stuck in a position battle with Brad Miller made him a questionable target, but I had confidence that he would beat him out in what the Mariners were calling a true competition at shortstop – with the loser heading down to triple-A Tacoma to continue to get plate appearances. Unfortunately, Taylor broke his wrist in spring training and Miller was given the starting spot by default.
Now, Taylor has been hitting very well at triple-A and the Mariners are reportedly calling him back up to the bigs. This is not the ideal situation for adding Taylor, as Miller is still on the major league roster as well and essentially performing as expected – with a .250/.301/.382 line compared to ZiPS projection of .249/.308/.382. Even so, the Mariners are pretty starved for offense and Taylor may force himself into the lineup as a speed and batting average booster.
In triple-A thus far, Taylor has hit two homers and stolen six bases. He performed well in the majors last year and has shown very good bat control throughout his professional career as he continually posts extraordinary BABIP’s at each level. While that is certainly a reason to be cautionary around Taylor, it gives me a bit more confidence that his 103 wRC+ from last season is entirely due to the small sample of 151 plate appearances.
As mentioned earlier, Miller has not exactly been bad, he just has not been good either. He has been slightly above replacement level overall. Conversely, in last year’s 41 games played, Taylor was a 1.2 win player. Miller possess more power than Taylor but is less as good in terms of on base skills. While offense is offense, the Mariners are 26th in on base percentage and could use the type of player like Taylor to provide a spark to their offense.
Having already liked Taylor over Miller, so far this year Miller has been exactly as projected and Taylor looks to have made some strides at triple-A. Comparatively, he has a lower strikeout rate and a higher walk rate this year, which is the only noticeable difference between his 346 plate appearances last year as this year.
I wish there were more to point to in terms of Taylor’s short stint in the minors this year and Miller’s performance so far, but the question comes down to how much you need a shortstop or middle infielder, what qualities you are looking for from the middle infielder, and whether you think Taylor is the superior option to Miller. If the M’s do give Taylor the job, getting the type of production you hoped to receive from Elvis Andrus is a realistic expectation, and if you need production from shortstop quickly and desperately, picking up Taylor now is advisable.
Ben has been at RotoGraphs since 2012 and focuses most of his fantasy baseball attention toward dynasty and keeper leagues.
Like most people, I’m dying at MIer. I would love a player that could steal 30 bases prorated over a full season. Would you put him in the Wilmer, Solarte,Giavotella category if he starts playing full time or would he be ranked better?
Dilson Herrera or Taylor as the better add for speculative MI help?
Herrera, he will have the job until Wright comes back. Both are iffy though.
Taylor, without a doubt. Wright should be back in the near future, which makes Herrera nothing more than a short term flier. Taylor, meanwhile, has a chance to take over the starting SS gig and keep it for the remainder of the season. Unfortunately for Herrera, it will take either a Daniel Murphy trade or an injury to another infielder for him to secure long term value.
Nice job by ZIPs on that Miller projection.
Interesting take on Taylor. I feel like the Babips give me the opposite conclusion that you are reaching, specifically that Taylor has “very good bat control.”
While he has had high babips, it’s really only stretched out for 1.5 full seasons worth of ABs in the minors and less than half a season in the majors. I think it’s not unreasonable to conclude that those numbers are not an accurate reflection on true talent. On top of that, he has had relatively high strikeout rates for a player with very little power. I think the steamer line of around 20% K rate and .317 babip looks about right and that would make him a pretty similar hitter to Miller but with less power.
Maybe still a better real life because of the defense, so maybe he still takes the job, but I think probably a lesser fantasy player.
I see another AAA SS from the Mariners with. .373 BABIP. That would be Miller himself in 2013!
The PCL has a reputation for inflating offense.
I have heard some rave reviews about Millers defence this year so I doubt there is a serious movement to get him replaced, at least in the real world.
I also doubt many major league clubs would give up on the potential of a power hitting SS that fast. The current regime seems to really love power hitters, so I really can’t see this Taylor love fest as likely to have any basis in reality.
Tacoma actually has the lowest park factor in the PCL for hits at 91 and is near the bottom for runs, 2B and HR as well. While you should definitely take numbers put up in Colorado Springs and Reno with a grain of salt, the “PCL inflates offense” line isn’t applicable to every team.
isn’t this not really the debate though? Miller struggles defensively which gives Taylor a leg up, but what they absolutely need to kill is Miller’s PAs against LHP (-22 wRC+, 2 for 21 with a 1b, 2B and BB). Against RHP he’s got a 133, career 107. LoMo is at 69, Ackley is 79 (versus RHP). Miller should be getting his RHP platoon ABs, they just need to find them at 1B, LF, maybe even CF if Jackson is hurt and Miller could handle it (don’t know, obviously not a good SS but maybe athletic enough).
Oh, looky there, I do need someone to fill in for my SS-eligible Hanley, don’t I? Welcome to the club Chris, and may there be an unreasonably-high babip-fueled brand of worthiness in your near future!
#perfectlytimedarticle
“is less as good”?