Reliever Rankings: RotoGraphs Consensus

Consensus Ranks: OF, C, 1B, 2B, 3B, SS, and RP and SP.

Tiered Ranks: C, 1B, 2B, SS, 3B, NL OF, AL SP, NL SP, Holds.

The main hullabaloo will probably be about the relievers-turned-starters. There’s a bit of a damned-if-you-do damned-if-you-don’t thing going on. If you don’t rank the reliever/starters because they won’t be traditional relievers getting saves, then those pitchers will fall out of the player ranking universe for the most part. Most of them don’t have ‘starter’ eligibility. Add to that the difficulty of projecting a dominant reliever into a new role, and, well, you get a difficult situation. So that’s what happened with Matt Moore, Chris Sale, Daniel Bard, Neftali Feliz and Cory Luebke.

As for the traditional relievers, there’s a lot of agreement. Well, Zimmerman thinks the magic will run out for Mariano Rivera this year, Podhorzer hates Heath Bell, half of us thought J.J. Putz would stay healthy and half of us thought he’d crap out again, Zimmerman put Kenley Jansen right into the closer’s role while the rest of us were more cautious, and Carlos Marmol inspired some differing opinions.

The relievers!

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Eno Sarris Mike Podhorzer Jeff Zimmerman Zach Sanders FanGraphs FantasyPros Icon
Player Name Eno
Sarris
Mike
Podhorzer
Jeff
Zimmerman
Zach
Sanders
Staff
Consensus
FantasyPros
All Experts
Craig Kimbrel 1 1 1 1 1 view
Jonathan Papelbon 2 5 2 8 2 view
Mariano Rivera 3 3 17 3 3 view
John Axford 7 4 6 9 3 view
Joel Hanrahan 9 8 8 4 4 view
Drew Storen 8 16 9 5 5 view
Ryan Madson 10 6 15 10 6 view
Rafael Betancourt 12 19 4 11 7 view
Heath Bell 11 17 13 6 8 view
Sergio Santos 13 11 10 16 9 view
J.J. Putz 18 7 19 7 10 view
Brian Wilson 16 14 11 17 11 view
Joakim Soria 15 10 12 23 12 view
Carlos Marmol 25 15 3 19 13 view
Cory Luebke 5 9 2 14 view
Jason Motte 20 22 16 12 15 view
Jordan Walden 14 23 21 13 16 view
Jose Valverde 21 21 18 15 17 view
Huston Street 19 18 20 18 17 view
Kenley Jansen 22 26 7 24 18 view
Matt Moore 4 2 28 19 view
Andrew Bailey 17 12 27 29 19 view
Neftali Feliz 26 34 5 21 20 view
Brandon League 24 25 24 14 21 view
Joe Nathan 23 20 23 31 22 view
Kyle Farnsworth 28 28 25 20 23 view
Chris Sale 6 24 27 24 view
Matt Thornton 32 13 14 56 25 view
Jim Johnson 29 31 26 36 26 view
Tyler Clippard 30 50 22 22 27 view
Mike Adams 31 29 38 32 28 view
Vinnie Pestano 38 33 34 26 29 view
Daniel Bard 27 27 37 30 view
Addison Reed 33 36 50 25 31 view
Jonny Venters 34 32 47 35 32 view
Grant Balfour 41 38 36 33 32 view
Chris Perez 37 35 29 59 33 view
Sergio Romo 44 46 30 34 34 view
Matt Capps 36 39 33 84 35 view
Frank Francisco 35 30 44 36 view
Javy Guerra 40 41 51 42 37 view
Koji Uehara 49 37 38 38 view
Sean Marshall 47 35 43 39 view
David Robertson 48 28 51 40 view
Alfredo Aceves 32 45 41 view
Fernando Salas 49 41 39 42 view
Felipe Paulino 30 43 view
Glen Perkins 40 41 43 view
Chris Resop 31 99 44 view
David Hernandez 39 44 53 45 view
Francisco Rodriguez 43 40 45 view
Rex Brothers 48 37 46 view
Fautino De Los Santos 42 44 90 47 view
Greg Holland 46 46 48 48 view
Carlos Villanueva 39 96 49 view
Sam LeCure 40 75 50 view
Wilton Lopez 42 59 79 51 view
Mark Melancon 42 69 51 view
Brian Fuentes 43 52 64 52 view
Joaquin Benoit 43 52 52 view
Andrew Cashner 45 50 53 view
David Carpenter 45 92 54 view
Antonio Bastardo 45 54 54 view
Aroldis Chapman 46 55 view
Kerry Wood 47 83 56 view
Matt Belisle 57 47 56 view
Edward Mujica 49 49 56 view
Nick Masset 48 87 57 view
Scott Downs 50 65 58 view

Fantasy Baseball Rankings powered by FantasyPros





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Aaron
14 years ago

You guys didn’t spend much time with this. Luebke and Moore are SP’s and I don’t see Brett Myers.

Thoughts?

Alex
14 years ago
Reply to  Aaron

Relievers turned starters is explained in the second graph.

But, you’re right. No Brett Myers listed here.

juan pierres mustache
14 years ago
Reply to  Aaron

this was pretty much explained in the opening…moore and luebke are currently RP or dual-eligibility in most formats, and myers only qualifies as an SP to start the season. it looks like everyone except jeff was strictly going by current eligibility in their rankings. the one ranking that confuses me is zach putting matt moore at 28–i can understand not ranking him among RPs, but it’s hard to see how he’s not top 5 at an absolute minimum on this list if you are going to rank him.

Alex
14 years ago

Oh, duh! It totally slipped my mind that Myers is not yet RP eligible.

Steve
14 years ago

Frank Francisco is the Mets closers and btw…..he’s pretty good. Was unfairly removed quickly from the closer role in Texas in favor of Feliz two years ago. He’s been a little unlucky at times, but still has good stuff. I don’t see any competition for that job.

He’s ranked 36th, and was unranked by one voter? Gimme a break.

EarlSweatshirt
14 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Agreed, Francisco is way too low. Decent job security due to lack of options, and he’s better than a lot of the guys ahead of him. Matt Capps? Really?

Aaron
14 years ago

Yea im an idiot about the Moore and Leubke comment, I didn’t read the first few grafs, I went straight to the list.

Kevin
14 years ago

I think Zimmerman was ranking on something other than baseball ability.

Kevin
14 years ago

Ha! I like the comments. As if these guys who write 5-10 articles about fantasy baseball a week 365 days a year don’t know that Matt Moore and Cory Luebke are starting pitchers.

BoKnows
14 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

Look at Mariano’s ranking and explain how much they “know” again?

philosofool
14 years ago

I can’t believe you guys let me see your pictures.

James Gentile
14 years ago
Reply to  philosofool

yeah, biiiiiiig mistake.

Big Baby
14 years ago

I don’t know why this would be the year Mo gets old. Its his last year, he’ll probably throw like he’s 25 again, not give up a run, and walk off into the sunset as cherubs sing a heart melting rendition of “Enter Sandman.”

wily moMember since 2020
14 years ago

i have read the second paragraph, and i still think putting SPs like moore and luebke in these rankings is dumb. i understand the eligibility thing. but they’ll get SP eligibility after a few minutes, and nobody’s actually debating whether to draft matt moore or sergio santos. i mean maybe they are, but not as similar commodities.

it just makes the rankings harder to look at and think about. it’s distracting without being useful.

they wouldn’t fall out of the ranking universe if you just made an executive decision to put them in the SP rankings. you can make a note of the fact that they’ll be dual eligible or RP-only for the first couple weeks. but you could do it. the police wouldn’t come. it’s your website. you can do whatever you want.

wily moMember since 2020
14 years ago
Reply to  wily mo

for the record i feel the same way about putting napoli and santana in the 1B rankings. yes, they’re eligible there, but… who cares

wily moMember since 2020
14 years ago
Reply to  wily mo

and finally let me just say that i feel like the fact that luebke somehow wound up ranked higher than moore kind of proves my point here. what do those rankings even mean? nothing. literally nothing at all. they convey zero useful information, literally.

chris weinmann
14 years ago
Reply to  wily mo

I completely agree with you. Rank starting pitchers with starters and relievers with relievers. And you’re right about Napoli, too. Who cares? The positional eligibility might theoretically come in handy, but no one in their right mind would draft him to play 1B. This is supposed to help people with their drafts, right?

23113223123
14 years ago
Reply to  wily mo

srsly zach sanders got luebke @ 2 and moore @ 28

chris weinmann
14 years ago

I read the opening paragraphs, and I still think it’s ridiculous to put guys like Sale and Bard and Luebke onto this list (or leave them out of the list of SPs). When I draft, I’m drafting for the season, not for the first week of eligibility. They’re going to be starters, not relievers, and that’s where they should be ranked.

wily moMember since 2020
14 years ago
Reply to  chris weinmann

it is very difficult to see why anyone, anywhere would not agree with this

chris weinmann
14 years ago
Reply to  wily mo

My specific problem is that in the next few days (we draft over about a month-long period), I’m going to be faced with the decision whether to draft all three of those guys. I’d really like hear how people think they’re going to be. As to Luebke, I think we have a decent idea. As to Bard and Sale, I really don’t know. I’d love some guidance on that.

Bryan
14 years ago

is this ranking based on Saves and holds too? (I am sure the saves mean they are more valuable) or Ks, WHIP, ERA, BAA? Because in my league we put holds and saves together and added the BAA category. I like the “hold” aspect of fantasy because you can manage actually manage your bullpen more realistically and not just throw a crappy closer in because he might get saves. I would rather have a better setup man than a shitty closer.

Mike PodhorzerFanGraphs Staff
14 years ago
Reply to  Bryan

No, these rankings, and all others, are based on the standard 5×5 categories.

Mike PodhorzerFanGraphs Staff
14 years ago

Just to respond to the comments and putting Sale, Moore, etc on this list…

the problem is that Yahoo ONLY gives them RP eligibility. They are not SP eligibile right now and so the tool at FantasyPros will not allow us to rank them with the starters. They either get ranked as RPs or don’t get ranked at all. So, pick your poison!

taprat
14 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

I guess if you’re beholden to the tool at FantasyPros, that’s the way it goes. I do think it’s basically worthless to do it this way. Maybe when you do the Starter rankings, you could let us know in the intro what you think of those guys.

dave_fantasypros
14 years ago
Reply to  taprat

Eno did a good job of explaining the exclusions in his intro. We’re definitely looking at ways to make things more flexible in the future and this feedback is very helpful.

I think it’s a little harsh to call the rankings worthless though. The expert’s opinions about the relative value of the players listed in the rankings are still valid. Yank out Luebke, Moore, and Sale, and Eno still likes Riviera over Axford. That’s easy to see in the rankings.

It would definitely be cool to know where these expected starters would be drafted among the SP’s. There are also some interesting draft strategy questions that come up given how sites like Yahoo work off of current eligibility, not expected eligibility.

taprat
14 years ago
Reply to  taprat

I wasn’t saying the rankings themselves are worthless. Just worthless as they relate to Bard, Luebke and Sale. Sorry for the miscommunication there.

Rafael Soriano
14 years ago

Ummm, guys? I get hurt for one year and I’m no longer a relevant player on a team that should win 90+ games? Especially with Mr. Robertson’s mysterious foot injury!?

Let’s not forget, the only reason he was the 8th inning guy was because I let him be last yer – he’s just returning the favor this time around!

jordy
14 years ago

LOL at Rivera as the 17th ranked RP. Honestly just stupid.

Steve
14 years ago
Reply to  jordy

Seriously. completely ridiculous

Eric
14 years ago

Why are Mr. Zimmerman’s picks are so far out of line? Or, stated another way, why was Frankie Frank not worthy of his list, but Nick Masset made the cut?

Jeff ZimmermanFanGraphs Staff
14 years ago

I based my ranking 100% off of projections. I will go more in detail later, but will give a quick summary here.

The problem with Relievers is the Saves category. I thought The Fans would have a better idea of who would be closers vice using projections based on the previous year’s numbers. I may have to change my values to some like 50% Fans, 10% for each of the other 5 systems. For example, here are 3 pitchers I seem to have off (I don’t even consider Wins in my formula):

Name: Saves (Fans),WHIP(average),Ks(average),ERA(average)
Marmol: 44,1.33,96.0,3.31
Betancourt: 36,1.04,69.5,2.87
Rivera: 36,1.03,52.8,2.61

Marmol’s Save value. from the Fans, and Ks are off the charts.

With Betancourt, his stats work out to almost be the same as Rivera’s, but with more K’s.

On Fancisco, I for some reason did not run the numbers on him. I will update him soon.

BoKnows
14 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Zimmerman

How do guys get into your rankings without “running the numbers” on them?

Completely irresponsible nonsense. Your list is pure crap.

rickeycanstillplay
14 years ago
Reply to  BoKnows

You don’t have to read the free information.

23113223123
14 years ago

the guy got luebke ranked so high yet moore @28… lol at that.

zach sanders is a tool.

dcracker
14 years ago

Put Jonny Venters on the list of people ranked too low. In his case, WAY too low.

Zac
14 years ago

I can only assume that this whole series is a paid tie-in with FantasyPros, because otherwise I don’t know why you even bother continuing it given all the hate that has come from it.

jimbo
14 years ago

As much as I don’t like the hatin, seems this year fangraphs is going quantity over quality. So much to read through, not so much value. Love the stats and tools still!

Jason
14 years ago

Perhaps job security is being undervalued by some here. I imagine guys like Betancourt and Santos are going to be on a much shorter leash than Bell and Wilson. Bell and Wilson seem like locks to stay in the role and get ~40 saves if they are healthy, but Betancourt and Santos could be yanked at any time after a few blown saves.

With the limited innings that RPs give us, I’m not interested in putting also those saves at risk for better ratios.

Ryan
14 years ago
Reply to  Jason

Even if Wilson is healthy I don’t see him getting 40+ saves. I don’t think the Giants are going to give him a huge workload this season and risk injury. Plus, there is just no reason to give Wilson a huge amount of innings this year with how loaded the Giants’ pen is right now. Romo and Casilla are both studs and more than capable of taking on the mantle of closer. Affeldt and Lopez are even capable as well.

I mean, the first sign of any sort of soreness for Wilson and I could see the Giants shutting him down for a week, maybe even throwing him on the DL just to be safe.

Ryan
14 years ago

I know this is for fantasy baseball but even then how can anyone put Rivera 17th? That’s just asinine. Last year, Rivera was fourth among relievers and the season before that he “had a down year” and dropped to 7 due to the fact he had a low season K total. Rivera is a lock for 60+IP, 35+ saves (Probably a lot more this season due to the Yankees improved rotation), a whip below 1.00 (He’s average for the past four seasons is 0.82) and a below 2.00 ERA (1.71 ERA for past four seasons). It’s not like Rivera’s skills are declining, either. His cutter averaged 91.6MPH last season, up from the previous two seasons where he averaged 91.3 and 91.1MPH. Barring injury, which also isn’t likely since Rivera has only pitched under 60 innings once in his career, which was all the way back in 2002 when he threw 46 innings, Rivera is basically a lock to be a top five reliever in fantasy.