Projections-Fueled Top 60 Prospects, Midseason Update
We’re getting close to 50% completion of the 2024 season, so I thought the time was right for a midseason update to my projections-based prospect ranks. You can find more methodological detail, along with the preseason lists here (bats) and here (arms).
The peak projections for arms and bats are based on historical performance in recent years across the minors and majors. They account for aging, league difficulty, league scoring environment, park effects, recency, and regression. Aging curves are leveraged to show how a prospect projects at their peak. The projections assume a neutral American League park in 2024. The projections do not capture everything: they ignore, for instance, defense, scouting reports, position, or high school, college, or foreign league performance. They also ignore Statcast data, for now.
The projections ignore these factors for convenience, not because they are unimportant–you should still account for them in your analyses. In particular, I’d like to add xwOBA, barrel rate, and swing speed into the hitter projections, and StuffPlus or velocity into the pitcher projections (my projections at The Athletic do account for Stuff+), as all of these variables have a demonstrated track record of predictive power. The projections have a good track record of forecast accuracy. In my internal checks, they have performed at least comparably to other popular FanGraphs projection systems in terms of accuracy in projecting the 2024 rookie class to date.
First, the top 30 prospect bats by peak projected MLB wRC+ (updated through the games of 6/13) are pictured below. They are ranked by wRC+ as a comprehensive measure of hitting skill. I also show peak projections for other statistics to give readers an idea of how they might project for fantasy purposes.

Lazaro Montes has been skyrocketing up industry lists with his domination of the California League; he checks the boxes as the game’s next uber prospect. The rest of the top ten consists of names that have made good on considerable hype entering the year, including Caminero and Basallo. In the preseason, Ballesteros was the most surprising name in the top ten for me, although perhaps he should not have been so surprising, given he made the FanGraphs Top 100 as well. He has exceeded any reasonable expectation in 2024, with a 154 wRC+ while being one of the youngest hitters in Double-A (note, he just received a promotion to Triple-A).
The rest of the top 30 consists of a mix of highly ranked names entering the year, as well as a smattering of 2024’s biggest breakouts: Luke Keaschall, Michael Arroyo, Tre’ Morgan, C.J. Kayfus, Kevin McGonigle, Josue Briceño, Ralphy Velazquez, Ben Rice, and Jeral Perez. 13 of the top 15 names were featured on the more scouting-based FanGraphs preseason top 100, an affirming source of triangulation.
Next, the top 30 prospect arms by peak projected MLB ERA (updated through the games of 6/13) are pictured below. The projections assume a pitcher faces 20 batters per game, to place pitchers on the same scale, and give pitchers who go deeper into games a bonus (and vice-versa).

Even ignoring aging, my current (as opposed to peak) projection for Skenes was more bullish than any other popular system before he debuted. He has rewarded their faith and now projects as the second-best pitcher in the game at peak, behind only (healthy) Jacob deGrom. Wilkinson has been lights out across the lower minors, with a 2.35 xFIP in High-A and a 1.51 xFIP in Class A. He lacks premium velocity, however, with a fastball typically sitting 90-91 MPH, so my projections are probably somewhat too bullish on him. He deserves to be taken seriously as a prospect regardless.
Despite a good peak projection stemming from a strong track record, DL Hall has battled velocity concerns as a starter. His ability to stick as a starter is up in the air, and looking less plausible relative to in the preseason. Sean Sullivan was dominant in the ACC in college and has continued to dominate professional hitters. He looks like the best Rockies pitching prospect in a long time–Dollander notwithstanding–although it is admittedly not the highest bar. Roupp and Festa both have strong stuff (per Stuff+, for instance) and would look even better in a version of these projections that captures stuff (Roupp has been out since late May with an undisclosed injury, however, which feels ominous).
Five of the top 10 names were featured on the FanGraphs preseason top 100. A projections-based approach seems to lead to more divergence from traditional lists with arms than with bats, but both approaches converge on the tippy-top-tier names to a solid extent.
May I solicit your opinions on Lawlar and Kjerstad?
Lawlar is at 112 peak wrc+ projection, with 20 homers and 25 steals. Kjerstad is at a 103 wrc+ with 19 homers, up to 111 with 26 homers if you only consider his performance this year. I feel like he’s a guy who’d gain somewhat from accounting for his strong statcast data.
good stuff! how is Matt Shaw looking?
He has been cold in June but still looks pretty good with a peak projection of 19 homers, 21 SB, and a 108 wRC+. Thanks!
No Crews?
And Nolan McLean is higher than Tidwell and Sproat..??
crews has been fairly human in the minors but if college performance was captured crews would be in there surely. sproat isn’t far behind mclean but tidwell lags them both given his aaa struggles.
Interesting, as McLean has struggled with the HR ball since being promoted to AA, but yeah, Tidwell has looked absolutely dreadful since moving up to AAA. I doubt he’ll ever throw enough strikes to remain a starter, long-term. And McLean doesn’t miss a ton of bats. I’ll take Sproat over both, but as a Mets fan, I know better than to believe in the organization. They’ll screw something up, or they’ll get screwed by injury, or both, plus something else bad will happen. Doom and gloom all day, baby. That’s why I root for them: they’re expensive disappointments, just like me.
Jackson Jobe?
He came close and would likely make it in the version of these that includes stuff+. Wrote more about his exclusion in the preseason list article
Would obviously help if hadn’t missed the first two months of the season as well. Scanty new data to consume.
Montes seems like the real deal. Who in the MLB right now would you compare him to?
this peak projection feels devers-ish…agreed!
Thanks Jordan, this is awesome. I know he’s graduated, but curious how Jordan Walker would stack up against this group of hitters?
the walker peak projection looks good still: 121 wRC+, 20 HR/600, 11 SB/600. Thanks 🙂
What about Carson Williams? He had that super strong start, I thought I’d see him here
Have him at 113 wRC+, 26 HR/600, 17 SB/600 9% BB 30% K. More fantasy friendly than some of the names that made it for sure.
Interested in where Agustin Ramirez is falling for you. He’s crushing Double-A at an appropriate age. Positional questions abound, but one could make a case that his ceiling with the bat is higher than org-mate Ben Rice’s.
Have him projected at a 112 wRC+ at peak, with 24 HR and 13 SB per 600 pa. He’s looking good!
The SB success is nuts. So the projection is actually buying that? Very interesting.
Thanks for the great work. This is has been fun to follow.
Curious about Deyvison De Los Santos. Didn’t hit much as a 20-year-old in AA in 2023 (88 wRC+), but crushed it to start this year (203 wRC+ in 162 PA) and is hitting well in AAA as a 21-year-old (144 wRC+ in 99 PA).
Peak projection: 6% BB 25 K% 24 HR 4 SB 108 wRC+. Not too shabby
If his K rate normalizes at or around this new level, that would have to portend a future increase in subsequent analyses. I’m buying.
Love the concept here. It does seem that your system likes soft-tossing K artists. Do you use velo an input and if not, why not?
No velo or stuff here because of data limitations, as explained in the text. The projections like good age-relative-to-league performance, particularly in terms of K%, BB%, and groundballs. The version I publish on the athletic adds in stuff though and that should help penalize the soft tossers somewhat. Thanks!
Can you provide a link to that?
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5513570/2024/05/23/fantasy-baseball-starting-pitcher-rankings-eno-sarris/
That’s an exciting projection for Samuel Zavala! What are scouts seeing (or not seeing) that keeps him from being ranked as a top 100 prospect?
Scouting complaints tend to revolve around his swing, or strikeout issues, but the K% is at least accounted for here. He’s a guy projections-based approaches tend to like (not Just mine, also see BA e.g.) given impressive age-relative-to-league performance