Platoon Hitter Projections
In my previous article, I found that left-handed platoon hitters who start games with the handedness advantage can expect to have that handedness advantage in 84.9 percent of their plate appearances in those games. Right-handed platoon hitters maintain their handedness advantage in 52.6 percent of their plate appearances in those games. Those percentages imply that relying on vs. left-handed pitcher and vs. right-handed pitcher split statistics to project the performance of platoon hitters in their starts with the platoon advantage overestimates their production in those starts. I wanted to see if I could do better based on my research, and so I created a (Marcel-) simple projection system.
Here’s how the system works. From 2004-2014, I identified every platoon hitter each season based on the thresholds of having at least 89 percent of total plate appearances come against opposite-handed pitchers for left-handed hitters and 45 percent for right-handed hitters. Next, I calculated those platoon hitters’ hits per plate appearance, doubles per plate appearance, triples per plate appearance, home runs per plate appearance, strikeouts per plate appearance, walks per plate appearance, and hit by pitches per plate appearance in those seasons and the two preceding seasons. I then weighted those three seasons using the Marcel weights of 5 for the most recent season, 4 for the year prior, and 3 for two years prior. That’s the projection.
I wanted to test whether those projections would beat similar projections based on vs. left-handed pitcher and vs. right-handed pitcher split stats—which does not account for the fact that platoon hitters are sometimes left in the game after the starter is pulled to face a same-handed reliever—and so I ran correlations of both split stat projections and my weighted split stat projections to predict actual hits per plate appearance, doubles per plate appearance, etc., in the following season. For each test, I required a minimum of 50 plate appearances in the predicted season, which created a sample of 495 total batters.
First, here are the correlations of the split stat projections.

| N | H | 2B | 3B | HR | K | BB | HBP | |
| LHB | 227 | 0.268 | 0.215 | 0.361 | 0.510 | 0.746 | 0.504 | 0.574 |
| RHB | 268 | 0.279 | 0.135 | 0.139 | 0.403 | 0.696 | 0.446 | 0.486 |
| All | 495 | 0.289 | 0.164 | 0.252 | 0.443 | 0.715 | 0.480 | 0.514 |
Next, here are the correlations of the weighted split stat projections.
| N | H | 2B | 3B | HR | K | BB | HBP | |
| LHB | 227 | 0.269 | 0.223 | 0.362 | 0.507 | 0.749 | 0.506 | 0.606 |
| RHB | 268 | 0.286 | 0.095 | 0.159 | 0.471 | 0.721 | 0.511 | 0.527 |
| All | 495 | 0.292 | 0.146 | 0.274 | 0.487 | 0.734 | 0.540 | 0.556 |
Finally, so you don’t have to scroll back and forth, here is the difference between the two.
| N | H | 2B | 3B | HR | K | BB | HBP | |
| LHB | 227 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.001 | -0.003 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.033 |
| RHB | 268 | 0.007 | -0.040 | 0.020 | 0.068 | 0.024 | 0.065 | 0.042 |
| All | 495 | 0.003 | -0.018 | 0.022 | 0.044 | 0.020 | 0.060 | 0.042 |
The weighted split stat projections were not universally better. They lost on doubles for right-handed hitters and on home runs for left-handed hitters. But, overall, the weightings improved the projections in 12 of 14 tested stats (split by batter handedness).
Now that I’m confident that the weighted split projections are worthwhile, I’ve created 2016 projections for the platoon hitters from 2015. Because per-plate appearance statistics can be sort of hard to interpret, I’ve scaled everyone’s numbers to 600 plate appearances. They won’t actually get 600 plate appearances; it’s just to give you an idea of the quality of the player you can expect to have in his starts against opposite-handed starting pitchers.
| Hitter | Bats | H | 2B | 3B | HR | K | BB | HBP | BAVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| Franklin Gutierrez | R | 154.2 | 32.7 | 0.0 | 45.2 | 171.8 | 36.6 | 6.4 | .277 | .329 | .579 | .908 |
| Kiké Hernandez | R | 167.9 | 37.5 | 8.8 | 18.3 | 113.3 | 43.2 | 5.2 | .304 | .361 | .504 | .864 |
| David Peralta | L | 167.7 | 27.2 | 13.1 | 18.4 | 115.1 | 43.3 | 3.2 | .303 | .357 | .499 | .856 |
| Steve Pearce | R | 135.6 | 32.7 | 1.2 | 28.6 | 114.6 | 54.7 | 10.1 | .253 | .334 | .479 | .813 |
| Danny Valencia | R | 158.7 | 37.9 | 2.0 | 21.3 | 120.8 | 40.3 | 2.1 | .285 | .335 | .474 | .810 |
| Michael Conforto | L | 143.3 | 39.8 | 0.0 | 25.6 | 120.6 | 51.6 | 2.8 | .263 | .330 | .477 | .806 |
| Ben Paulsen | L | 155.7 | 32.0 | 5.7 | 21.3 | 158.8 | 36.3 | 4.0 | .278 | .327 | .470 | .796 |
| Scott Van Slyke | R | 135.7 | 32.4 | 0.8 | 21.4 | 154.8 | 65.3 | 8.9 | .258 | .350 | .445 | .795 |
| Justin Bour | L | 145.1 | 26.2 | 0.0 | 28.0 | 135.9 | 48.3 | 2.3 | .264 | .326 | .464 | .790 |
| Andre Ethier | L | 146.5 | 29.7 | 7.4 | 13.7 | 105.1 | 58.5 | 7.2 | .274 | .354 | .434 | .788 |
| Clint Robinson | L | 147.1 | 25.2 | 1.6 | 15.9 | 90.1 | 63.6 | 7.9 | .278 | .364 | .422 | .787 |
| Wilin Rosario | R | 161.4 | 35.8 | 0.8 | 23.1 | 115.8 | 28.1 | 0.8 | .283 | .317 | .469 | .786 |
| Darin Ruf | R | 133.1 | 26.1 | 0.0 | 26.1 | 151.5 | 53.7 | 13.9 | .250 | .335 | .446 | .781 |
| Matt Adams | L | 157.5 | 33.5 | 2.9 | 19.9 | 127.5 | 32.7 | 1.7 | .278 | .320 | .454 | .773 |
| John Jaso | L | 139.4 | 35.0 | 2.1 | 12.2 | 108.9 | 69.6 | 7.8 | .267 | .361 | .412 | .773 |
| Chris Coghlan | L | 139.6 | 32.8 | 7.3 | 14.6 | 113.3 | 61.0 | 3.7 | .261 | .341 | .431 | .772 |
| Seth Smith | L | 133.6 | 38.7 | 4.8 | 14.2 | 121.2 | 67.7 | 4.8 | .253 | .344 | .426 | .769 |
| Chris Carter | R | 112.5 | 22.8 | 0.7 | 33.1 | 198.1 | 71.9 | 5.7 | .215 | .317 | .452 | .768 |
| Pedro Alvarez | L | 127.8 | 20.8 | 1.0 | 31.6 | 163.1 | 56.1 | 3.1 | .236 | .312 | .454 | .766 |
| Ryan Raburn | R | 133.1 | 32.2 | 1.6 | 22.2 | 146.0 | 53.9 | 7.3 | .247 | .324 | .436 | .760 |
| Derek Dietrich | L | 126.1 | 26.5 | 6.3 | 20.3 | 132.2 | 42.6 | 26.1 | .237 | .325 | .425 | .750 |
| Rajai Davis | R | 153.7 | 31.2 | 9.4 | 12.3 | 111.2 | 33.4 | 5.2 | .274 | .321 | .429 | .749 |
| Jake Smolinski | R | 130.1 | 23.9 | 5.3 | 20.3 | 126.5 | 52.2 | 10.4 | .242 | .321 | .420 | .741 |
| Carl Crawford | L | 160.0 | 30.2 | 4.8 | 11.0 | 97.1 | 30.5 | 4.9 | .283 | .326 | .412 | .738 |
| Joey Butler | R | 151.2 | 27.0 | 0.0 | 17.1 | 181.5 | 37.7 | 5.1 | .271 | .323 | .412 | .735 |
| Brandon Guyer | R | 138.5 | 31.9 | 2.7 | 10.0 | 99.2 | 36.6 | 31.7 | .260 | .345 | .387 | .732 |
| Ryan Howard | L | 129.7 | 29.2 | 1.7 | 23.6 | 163.5 | 47.3 | 5.0 | .237 | .303 | .426 | .729 |
| Chris Young | R | 123.9 | 33.0 | 2.1 | 20.6 | 124.3 | 57.5 | 5.3 | .231 | .311 | .415 | .726 |
| Alejandro De Aza | L | 140.4 | 26.7 | 7.8 | 12.1 | 133.8 | 46.8 | 6.7 | .257 | .323 | .401 | .724 |
| Tyler Collins | L | 148.5 | 29.4 | 7.3 | 11.7 | 117.8 | 33.6 | 2.4 | .263 | .308 | .404 | .711 |
| Kelly Johnson | L | 131.7 | 21.6 | 2.0 | 21.5 | 144.5 | 49.4 | 2.5 | .240 | .306 | .405 | .711 |
| Miguel Montero | L | 126.7 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 17.0 | 129.5 | 66.7 | 7.4 | .241 | .335 | .376 | .711 |
| Shane Victorino | R | 145.4 | 23.4 | 3.9 | 11.2 | 88.6 | 34.8 | 16.0 | .265 | .327 | .383 | .710 |
| Paulo Orlando | R | 145.3 | 32.6 | 13.8 | 15.7 | 116.6 | 13.1 | 3.8 | .249 | .270 | .434 | .704 |
| Scooter Gennett | L | 155.1 | 31.2 | 5.1 | 10.5 | 100.8 | 22.5 | 3.4 | .270 | .302 | .397 | .699 |
| Conor Gillaspie | L | 141.4 | 31.1 | 5.0 | 11.3 | 101.2 | 41.4 | 2.6 | .254 | .309 | .389 | .698 |
| Nolan Reimold | R | 124.9 | 19.6 | 2.0 | 19.4 | 172.5 | 59.7 | 3.0 | .232 | .313 | .385 | .698 |
| A.J. Ellis | R | 111.5 | 23.8 | 0.3 | 14.5 | 98.1 | 89.7 | 3.9 | .220 | .342 | .354 | .696 |
| Travis Snider | L | 130.4 | 26.3 | 3.4 | 14.3 | 136.4 | 55.5 | 2.9 | .241 | .315 | .381 | .696 |
| Tim Beckham | R | 123.5 | 18.4 | 10.7 | 23.8 | 181.4 | 34.0 | 7.7 | .221 | .275 | .420 | .695 |
| David Murphy | L | 141.3 | 30.8 | 1.4 | 13.9 | 76.5 | 40.8 | 1.8 | .253 | .306 | .389 | .695 |
| Jake Lamb | L | 138.9 | 21.7 | 7.0 | 11.1 | 153.1 | 49.3 | 1.2 | .253 | .316 | .378 | .694 |
| JR Murphy | R | 149.3 | 30.4 | 2.2 | 9.6 | 153.6 | 36.8 | 2.5 | .266 | .314 | .380 | .694 |
| Dustin Ackley | L | 134.6 | 28.0 | 4.5 | 16.2 | 97.8 | 41.6 | 2.3 | .242 | .298 | .396 | .693 |
| Josh Phegley | R | 135.6 | 33.2 | 1.2 | 22.0 | 121.9 | 26.4 | 3.5 | .238 | .276 | .416 | .692 |
| Will Venable | L | 133.6 | 20.8 | 5.4 | 14.5 | 141.6 | 46.0 | 3.6 | .243 | .306 | .379 | .685 |
| Alex Avila | L | 109.6 | 22.8 | 0.5 | 15.2 | 184.9 | 88.3 | 1.7 | .215 | .333 | .351 | .684 |
| Jonny Gomes | R | 118.0 | 20.9 | 0.0 | 15.8 | 167.2 | 68.2 | 9.3 | .226 | .326 | .356 | .682 |
| Chris Denorfia | R | 140.3 | 24.4 | 4.0 | 8.7 | 117.7 | 46.2 | 0.9 | .254 | .312 | .360 | .672 |
| Grady Sizemore | L | 134.1 | 32.4 | 3.2 | 10.0 | 119.9 | 46.5 | 1.9 | .243 | .304 | .368 | .672 |
| Ike Davis | L | 114.0 | 29.9 | 0.0 | 12.4 | 126.1 | 78.0 | 0.6 | .219 | .321 | .347 | .668 |
| David DeJesus | L | 125.4 | 27.5 | 3.7 | 10.6 | 100.5 | 48.8 | 11.2 | .232 | .309 | .356 | .665 |
| Matt Joyce | L | 112.5 | 26.6 | 1.5 | 14.2 | 135.9 | 68.0 | 5.3 | .214 | .310 | .351 | .661 |
| Ezequiel Carrera | L | 143.5 | 25.6 | 1.9 | 6.7 | 134.4 | 32.1 | 9.1 | .257 | .308 | .345 | .653 |
| Gordon Beckham | R | 128.6 | 28.7 | 0.3 | 11.5 | 96.7 | 37.9 | 7.9 | .232 | .291 | .347 | .638 |
| Jeff Francoeur | R | 133.5 | 26.0 | 2.0 | 15.4 | 138.7 | 25.2 | 2.0 | .233 | .268 | .366 | .634 |
| Skip Schumaker | L | 133.8 | 33.7 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 106.1 | 46.6 | 3.3 | .243 | .306 | .322 | .628 |
| Jake Marisnick | R | 127.8 | 21.7 | 4.7 | 13.5 | 164.7 | 26.8 | 7.6 | .226 | .270 | .353 | .623 |
| Melvin Upton Jr. | R | 110.8 | 23.1 | 3.3 | 10.2 | 176.7 | 66.5 | 2.2 | .208 | .299 | .322 | .621 |
| Mike Aviles | R | 133.3 | 22.4 | 0.5 | 10.2 | 71.2 | 28.7 | 2.4 | .234 | .274 | .330 | .604 |
| Clint Barmes | R | 125.1 | 33.6 | 0.8 | 7.9 | 140.4 | 29.0 | 10.0 | .223 | .274 | .328 | .601 |
| Shane Robinson | R | 125.2 | 15.0 | 6.7 | 2.1 | 79.9 | 52.8 | 1.5 | .229 | .299 | .293 | .592 |
| Alexi Amarista | L | 123.6 | 17.9 | 5.1 | 6.3 | 89.2 | 37.6 | 1.9 | .221 | .272 | .304 | .576 |
| Hernan Perez | R | 135.9 | 30.3 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 130.7 | 12.0 | 0.0 | .231 | .246 | .317 | .564 |
Franklin Gutierrez has had insane home run per flyball luck over the last two seasons, but regression would not change the fact that he has been an incredible source of power in his limited plate appearances. Among the platoon options, he is the best projected power source in his platoon starts in 2015. Chris Carter, Pedro Alvarez, Justin Bour, and Steve Pearce are the other platoon hitters projected to hit 28 or more home runs per 600 plate appearances in their platoon starts.
David Peralta has likely graduated from his platoon role. Ender Inciarte is no longer in Arizona, and Peralta was nearly a 4-win player last season. That eliminates one of the premiere batting average platoon options, but there are several others. Kike Hernandez is projected to hit .304 in his starts versus lefties, assuming he can get on the field behind Corey Seager and the rest of that loaded Dodgers lineup. Ditto for Carl Crawford and his projected .283 average. Some of the good options who should regularly see the field this year include Danny Valencia (.285)—who looks like the primary Athletics starter at third base following the Brett Lawrie trade—Ben Paulsen—who should share first base duties with Mark Reynolds in Colorado—Clint Robinson (.278), Matt Adams (.278), and Scooter Gennett (.270).
Scott Spratt is a fantasy sports writer for FanGraphs and Pro Football Focus. He is a Sloan Sports Conference Research Paper Competition and FSWA award winner. Feel free to ask him questions on Twitter – @Scott_Spratt
Thanks. This is a great article.
However, I do find that my shallowish mixed league with daily lineups and bench spots, guys that I use as a platoon are often not actually platooned in real life. E.G. Gerardo Parra, who is not in the table above and will probably be a full-time starter this year, is someone I will target to start against righties, especially at home.
loved the article, but I have to say I am wondering if one year sample is good enough to bet on? I think I would be better inclined to see if at least a two year sample would hold up…and which guys would survive. Still a real fun article, and certainly if I see these guys continue, I will most likely be a late comer, but will find some gold nuggets from here…ty
Martin
My only wish is that the chart was sortable
Copying it and pasting into excel would get you almost all the way there.
I’m curious, did someone like Adam Lind (one of my favorite fantasy players to platoon) get left off this list because he sees too many same-handed pitchers? It would be great to see another list of guys who aren’t strictly platooned but should be, especially for daily players or leagues with daily line-up changes. Just because his manager doesn’t sit Lind versus lefties, it doesn’t mean I can’t.
This is exactly what I was thinking. I think a great article would be each teams guys that ‘should’ be platooned that aren’t, with possible platoon partners to fix it. For instance, as a Twins fan it is my belief that Plouffe should not be in the lineup vs RHP’s and that Rosario should not be in the lineup vs LHP’s. Lineups could be shuffled by guys changing positions too, not just platoon partners.
It always seemed to me that the Twins really don’t take much advantage of platooning, but they seem behind the times by a bit on most things, like shifting, and striking guys out.
Yep.
Scrolled to the bottom looking for him and thoughti must have missed him so I went through it again.
It’s a great point. I was focused on hitters who were actually platooned by managers here because I previously found that those types of hitters have a different expectation for staying in the game to face same-handed relievers in later innings, but I think I can come up with a formula to account for that to apply to all hitters rather than relying on a strict cutoff. Thanks.
This is an interesting group of players to pull from for DFS. Specifically those guys with OPS >= 0.760.
Hey Scott,
What exactly do you mean by:
“I wanted to test whether those projections would beat similar projections based on vs. left-handed pitcher and vs. right-handed pitcher split stats—which does not account for the fact that platoon hitters are sometimes left in the game after the starter is pulled to face a same-handed reliever—[…]”
What projections exactly are you talking about? And how did you go about it? Did you use some vs.LHP and vs.RHP projections and then multiply them with the actual number of PA vs each LHP and RHP in the season under test?
Or did you not distinguish between the PA based on the handedness of the pitcher, just assuming that the LHP/RHP mix would be the same?
Wondering the same thing. There are essentially three variables to consider:
1) A player’s true skill
2) A player’s true platoon skill
3) How long a player expects to stay in the game when an opposite-handed pitcher is the starter
These are three very different things, and I have no idea how they were each projected to create the author’s final table. #1 is pretty straightforward (use Steamer, etc.). #2 takes forever to stabilize, so using a last 3 years calc. is going to be way too aggressive. #3 is largely dependent upon team depth and manager tendencies, some of which may be completely different than in past seasons.
True.
For #2 you can use the harmonic mean regression method I used at THT: http://www.hardballtimes.com/platooning-the-meaning-of-mean-part-1/
Also, when considering #3, one has to take into account stuff like the pitcher handedness in the division, for example.
I created two sets of projections that were the same in most respects (used three years of data to predict the next following the 5-4-3 weighting), but for one, I strictly used actual results vs. LHPs (for RHBs) and vs. RHPs (for LHBs). For the other, I used a weighting of actual results vs. LHPs and vs. RHPs based on the expected platoon rates in games that hitters start with the platoon adv. over the starter. The idea was to test only that weighting.
This is nice work, but I’m pretty sure Rudy Gamble and the guys over at Razxball have had this data for a couple of years.
I’m not sure how you can say you’re confident the weighted splits are better. The difference for lefties seem trivial. Did you run any kind of difference of means test?