Pitcher xBABIP Values

by
August 6, 2014

A couple of weeks ago, I released an updated list of hitters and their xBABIP values. After it was released I got a request for the pitcher xBABIP values. The xBABIP values are generated by using the hard hit batted ball data from Inside Edge. I have gone ahead and run the values and listed them below with some comments on a couple starting pitchers.

A few notes on the data. First, I have not tested it with pitchers to see if the data correlates better season-to-season than regular BABIP. I just applied the hitter’s formula to pitchers. Additionally, I used the league average Speed Score in the equation instead of adjusting it for each batter.

Yu Darvish (.321 BABIP, .320 xBABIP) – His xBABIP is the second highest among all pitchers with over 100 IP. Even though both values are high, it just doesn’t matter since Darvish is so good other wise. He is still striking out more than one batter per inning (11.2 K/9) and has dropped his walk rate to a career low (2.9 BB/9).

Alex Cobb (.288 BABIP, .264 xBABIP) – Cobb as the lowest xBABIP among all starters (min 100 IP). Being 2nd in GB% (58%) is probably the leading cause for the low value. Other high groundball pitchers have low xBABIP values like Dallas Keuchel, Sonny Gray and Clayton Kershaw.





 

Jeff, one of the authors of the fantasy baseball guide,The Process, writes for RotoGraphs, The Hardball Times, Rotowire, Baseball America, and BaseballHQ. He has been nominated for two SABR Analytics Research Award for Contemporary Analysis and won it in 2013 in tandem with Bill Petti. He has won four FSWA Awards including on for his Mining the News series. He's won Tout Wars three times, LABR twice, and got his first NFBC Main Event win in 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jeffwzimmerman.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dolemite
9 years ago

I love this series of articles for finding value in fantasy leagues.

These xBABIP figures are team defense independent right?
So not only does Cobb have the lowest xBABIP, but he also plays for a team with a very good infield defense. Shouldn’t that skew his xBABIP even lower theoretically?

0
Jeff Zimmermanmember
9 years ago
Reply to  Dolemite

Did you you mean BABIP at the end, not xBABIP when you said:

“Shouldn’t that skew his xBABIP even lower theoretically?”

Just making sure before I answer the question.

0
Dolemite
9 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Zimmerman

“Cobb as the lowest xBABIP among all starters (min 100 IP).”

I am asking that since BABIP is defensively independent, Though we expect him to have a BABIP of .264 (his xBABIP), couldn’t we “expect” his true BABIP to be even lower than his xBABIP (sort of a x(xBabip) if you will)….

0
Dolemite
9 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Zimmerman

“Shouldn’t that skew his xBABIP even lower theoretically?”
Yes, I meant BABIP not xBABIP you are correct, sorry

0
Jeff Zimmermanmember
9 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Zimmerman

You are right with your assumption that a good defensive team should be able to turn more batted balls into outs lowering his BABIP even more.

Let me think on this one.

0
Dolemite
9 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Zimmerman

Thanks a lot
I am almost looking at it like a UZR adjusted BABIP…
Like compute BABIP then skew it to reflect the teams defensive prowess.

0