More Shocking Home Run Totals

Yesterday, I discussed five players whose early season home run totals have like totally shocked the world. Clearly, I missed a couple of obvious names and some of you commented reminding me of such. So let’s get to the rest of those shocking hitters sitting on home run totals we never expected at this point in the season.

Robinson Cano | 18 long balls

Last year through 281 plate appearances, Cano had socked a puny two home runs. Over the rest of the season, he knocked 19 over the wall, hitting one just about every 20 at-bats. He’s already just three away from his entire 2015 season total and on pace to shatter his career high home run mark of 33 set in 2012. The first method to his madness is that his fly ball rate is at a career high. He has never been a big fly ball guy, but he had sat below 30% for the past three years. Second, and more obvious, is his HR/FB rate has jumped to above 20% for just the second time, though it’s still short of his high set in 2012. The thing is, his batted ball distance is almost identical to last year and barely above his career average. If he can sustain the career best fly ball rate, that’s definitely going to help him reach the 30 homer mark for just the second time, but that HR/FB rate is going to decline, potentially back into the mid-teens.

Mookie Betts | 14 taters

Woah, since when was Betts and elite power hitter?? Wait, has Mike Trout inhabited Betts’ body?! Betts has more home runs and more steals than Trout. He’s just four shy of his 2015 home run total, which was a level I thought he would stabilize at for a while. Betts’ strikeout rate is just a tick worse than last year and he’s actually hitting fewer fly balls. So the entirety of his home run surge has come from a spike in HR/FB rate. In fact, that mark has just about doubled. Sure enough, his batted ball distance has jumped about 15 feet, validating most of the power increase. I’m not sure he can maintain that distance, but if he does, his HR/FB rate is a bit more sustainable at this batted ball distance level than Cano’s is. That said, I’d still expect a bit of regression. I don’t think he’s going to reach 30 homers.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Neil Walker | 13 bombs

Not surprisingly, Walker has slowed down a bit, as he has yet to go deep in June, spanning 10 straight games. He now sits just three homers short of his total from last year and just once in his career has he exceeded 20 home runs. It appears that he may be selling out for power as both his strikeout rate and SwStk% are at career highs, while his fly ball rate has surged into the mid-40% range, up from the mid-to-high 30% range the last three seasons. But his batted ball distance is identical to last year! Which is just weird. However, his pull rate on his fly balls has jumped above 30% for the first time, so that’s definitely part of the explanation. It’s clear he has changed his approach, but who knows how long it will last. Given his pedestrian batted ball distance, I wouldn’t count on a high teens HR/FB rate lasting, even given the additional pulled fly balls.

Eugenio Suarez | 13 big flies

Suarez’s 2015 homers – 13
Suarez’s 2016 homers – 13

And this year’s has come in 147 fewer at-bats. He’s striking out even more than last year and hitting about the same rate of fly balls. So, that can only mean one thing — more of his fly balls are leaving the yard! And indeed that’s been the case, as a hefty 22% of his fly balls have hopped over the fence. He actually sits back-to-back with Cano on the batted ball distance leaderboard, but it’s simply not an impressive enough figure to expect Suarez to maintain such a lofty HR/FB rate. It’s worth noting that he’s boosted his distance by 17 feet and the home park certainly helps (where he owns a 25% HR/FB rate this year), but his away mark is still an inflated 17.9%. I don’t think I’m going out on a limb to expect some regression going forward, but I think he could continue with a mid-teen HR/FB rate.

Leonys Martin | 10 dingers

Perhaps the biggest surprise on today’s list? Martin has literally doubled his home run output from last year in 131 fewer at-bats. He hit only eight home runs in his first full season in 2013, seven in 2014, and then five in essentially half a season last year. He looks to be taking the Neil Walker path, as his strikeout rate has risen thanks to an increased SwStk%, while he’s hitting far more fly balls. But still, his homers are up because of that HR/FB rate, a mark that has nearly tripled from last year. His batted ball distance is up 12 feet, which is a positive, but at nearly 288 feet, ranking 115th on the leaderboard, it doesn’t come close to justifying a 20% HR/FB rate. Then again, his pulled fly ball rate has surged, a la Walker, which could push that HR/FB rate higher than his distance alone would suggest. Let’s say he’ll continue with a low-to-mid teen HR/FB rate over the rest of the season. It’s still well above what we expected from his power.





Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Chicago Mark
10 years ago

Good stuff Mike. Enjoy the writes.

igloo
10 years ago

For what it’s worth, Betts has the most Just Enough HR (10) and Lucky (4). I think Betts may have found a sweet spot where he likes pitches that he can hit HR off.

scotman144Member since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  igloo

Betts has mastered the Fenway Big Fly on inside pitches.

What’s encouraging and could help keep his elevated HR/FB afloat is the power the other way he is displaying this year. He’s got a laser shot to dead center in Fenway which is a man’s man’s HR as well as two to RF that came in Fenway and Baltimore iirc. If you check out his spray chart there are a ton of liners and flies out to deep RCF/RF that are right around that “just enough” territory. He should never see a hittable pitch inside again if the league is smart but I wouldn’t bet against more of those deep liners/flies going into the bullpen at fenway as the year goes on and he adjusts to seeing more and more outside pitches.

OddBall Herrera
10 years ago
Reply to  igloo

Betts is looking like 2011 Jacoby Ellsbury to me, he’s going to have this ridiculous power season where he hits 25 but I don’t think that’s what he really is based on his track record

redsoxu571
10 years ago

Ellsbury was never a player with incredible bat speed. He was somehow driving the ball in 2011, and that is where the power came from. I remember he muscling a ball over the Green Monster that year at the closest part to CF, which is a HUGE home run, and that’s when I realized he was on a crazy run. The strength didn’t carry over, and that was that.

Betts isn’t about strength and neither are his home runs this year, but rather he is just turning on inside pitches better than most and is especially good at turning those specific pitches into homers.

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  igloo

Betts hits his HRs when pitchers make mistakes on the inner half, because he has crazy good bat speed on those pitches. He clobbers those, and I doubt he has much power to straight away or the opposite field (though I’m open to analysis there).

igloo, for what it’s worth, Fenway Park is completely untrustworthy when it comes to labels such as “Just Enough” HRs. I don’t know the methodology there, but I suspect he has had many baseballs “land” at 360 or so feet that would have gone a LOT farther in a regular ballpark.

CRowan
10 years ago

Wil Myers – I’m enjoying watching him have success. Is his power to be expected given good health or is there something you see that is pointing to this slowing down.

Goms
10 years ago

You should write one more about the guys who have shockingly low home run totals.

CasonJolette
10 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Justin Upton 🙁

igloo
10 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

I just did the same. My line of reasoning: “he can’t be this bad, right?” Time will tell.

kmd6vr22
10 years ago

Great stuff, Mike. I always enjoy reading your thoughtful work, especially re: your xHR projections. I’d be interested in a deeper look at Cano’s HR/FB. Based purely on my own perception, a lot of his HRs this year have been line drives that he absolutely smoked. I’d be interested see if the statcast data generaly support that observation. My assumption would be that hard hit balls at a low launch angle (relative to more typical homeruns) would be slightly more sustainable than lazy pop-ups that barely get out. After writing that, I can see how that assumption could be totally wrong. Would love to see more analysis on the topic.