Michael Brantley Flies Under the Radar

In his second full season with the Indians, Michael Brantley quietly earned the 34th most fantasy value among outfielders. Who would have predicted that Brantley would earn nearly identical value to Yoenis Cespedes? It may not have been obvious after a quick glance at his stat line, but Brantley does a little bit of everything at least decently, without standing out in any one category. That type of contribution package is typically undervalued in fantasy leagues, which is why it may surprise some to learn how valuable he actually was.

Though he hit a couple more homers driven by a bump in his HR/FB rate, his ISO has been nearly identical over the past three seasons. But, his average batted ball distance has been on the rise and sat just a bit below the league average this year. He has never shown any real power potential though and he hits too few fly balls to expect much better in the future. Even another spike into the low teens will barely boost his fantasy value.

Aside from the slight uptick in home run power, the real difference from a fantasy perspective came from his stolen base total. After totals in the low teens the previous two years, he was successful a little more often and swiped 17 bases this year. But, he attempted the exact same number of steals as he had in 2012. So it wasn’t a matter of him running more frequently, just succeeding more often.

The odd thing is that he was a serious burner in the minor leagues, and stole bases at a pretty good clip as well. He stole as many as 50 bases back in 2009 between Triple-A and the majors and succeeded on 85% of his attempts. But so far in the majors, he has only been successful on 70% of his attempts. His triples totals and Spd scores suggest that he was never such a speedster to begin with. Maybe he was just a smart base runner with the weaker defense in the minors, but that clearly has not translated to the majors and he doesn’t have the speed to make up for the better defense. So expecting any further stolen base upside would probably be foolish.

One of Brantley’s best skills is his ability to make contact. He sported the 5th lowest SwStk% and 5th highest Contact% this season, though his strikeout rate was a bit less impressive, coming in at the 14th lowest. Even with just a league average BABIP and below average HR/FB rates, he makes such excellent contact that he has been able to post a batting average above .280 two seasons in a row. His batted ball mix looks good, as he hits an above average rate of line drives, significantly more ground balls than fly balls and avoids the pop-up. As such, his xBABIP marks have hovered around .320 the last two years. While he seemingly has limited upside in the home run and stolen base department, he’s a nice dark horse candidate to bat .300.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The one concern involves his opposing pitcher handedness splits. The left-handed Brantley owns just a .284 career wOBA versus southpaws. That mark has been slightly higher the last two years at close to .300, but that’s still not good enough to make the platoon chatter go away. Though he posted a positive UZR/150 in left field in 2012, he was in the negative this season and has also posted negative marks every year he has played center field. So if he’s not contributing defensively and performing poorly at the plate versus lefties, you have to wonder if he’ll continue getting starts against them.

With limited upside outside of batting average and the risk that he loses playing time against left-handed pitchers, Brantley is a pretty good bet to fall significantly in next season’s final outfield rankings. Since he’s likely to still come rather cheaply at drafts, he might not necessarily be a true bust candidate, but he’s pretty close to being worthless again in 12-team mixed leagues.





Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
David LaurilaMember
12 years ago

I think “a nice dark horse candidate to bat .300.” is selling Brantley short. I wrote in April he has the talent to contend for a batting title, and while many may disagree, I feel the potential is there for .325.

FeslenR
12 years ago

With the David Murphy signing, I wonder what happens to Brantley and Stubbs?

BritDawg
12 years ago
Reply to  FeslenR

Stubbs will likely be traded, leaving Murphy to platoon with Raburn in RF. I don’t see any of this having much affect on Brantley in LF, except that he would now have to cover CF when Bourn has a day off.

Bill
12 years ago

He’s settled into a .280/10/15 area, which isn’t bad. If he bats first or second more (15R in 25gm out of 1 spot) then we could see his runs spike to the 90-100 range. Realistically the indians lineup should be bourne, brantley, kipnis, santana, swisher, etc. Murphy is no challenge, not to Brantley, maybe to stubbs. If he hits 5th though it’ll be tough for him as he’s not really an RBI man. I think there is some upside though.

mattb2485
12 years ago
Reply to  Bill

Wouldn’t mind seeing him hit 3rd and/or 5th more this year. 1st or 2nd seem unlikely with Kipnis and Swisher around.

Ken
12 years ago

I’m probably missing something here, but how does his being the 34th ranked OF reconcile with the statement that “he’s pretty close to being worthless again in 12-team mixed leagues”?

Jim Rouse
12 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Your last sentence says “he might not necessarily be a true bust candidate, but he’s pretty close to being worthless again in 12-team mixed leagues.” That reads as worthless in 2014. If that’s not what you meant, you may want to rewrite that last paragraph. He came in at #92 overall in 5 x 5 CBS leagues, so that is nowhere near worthless. After what seemed a fairly positive piece on the guy, it ends on a really sour note. I had to re-read it to be sure that’s what you really wrote. It didn’t make sense to me.

Bbboston
12 years ago

Guy clearly has ability to hit for average and somewhat reliably steal bases…. Now he’s hitting ripe age of 27, after a small uptick on power. What’s not to like? Also, Franconia believes he’s a “clutch” hitter, so he’s hitting somewhere at the top of the order. Again, what’s not to like. My only concern would be a platoon, but right now I don’t see that happening.