Matt Olson Hit Two Doubles And Other First Baseman Facts

Matt Olson did many things with his 216 plate appearances in 2017. For example, he hit 24 home runs. Wow. Mr. Olson also hit two doubles. I’m not sure which total is more insane. Let’s do what we do best on internet blogs – convert a tiny factoid into 750 words.

The Olson Twins

I’ll be honest, I don’t really know how to parse the past with the current juiced ball environment. Typically, a good power hitter will post roughly as many home runs and non-home run extra base hits (i.e. doubles and triples). I’ve selected one at random, Brian Dozier.

Dozier XBH
Year 2B 3B HR
2013 33 4 18
2014 33 1 23
2015 39 4 28
2016 35 5 42
2017 30 4 34

If you figure that maybe Olson’s power doesn’t really compare to Dozier, you can feel free to repeat this exercise with Giancarlo Stanton, Nelson Cruz, or Aaron Judge. They’re certainly more extreme with their outcomes, but you’ll still find quite a few doubles. In fact, Olson’s minor league performances typically included more doubles than home runs. Last year bucked that trend, supplying hope that perhaps he can be more like Stanton than Dozier.

Looking at historical precedents, we should not expect Olson to maintain his 24 home runs to two doubles pace. Regression is coming. He’s not going to hit 70 home runs and six doubles. That doesn’t mean Olson can’t be a 50 home run threat, but we should definitely temper expectations. Steamer has him hitting 24 doubles, one triple, and 33 home runs in 616 plate appearances. That sounds more… sane.

However, a little back of the envelope math promises plenty of upside. Over a healthy 650 plate appearance campaign, I project about 38 home runs on the strength of a 28 percent strikeout rate, 10 percent walk rate, 47 percent fly ball rate, and 20 percent HR/FB ratio.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The Bird is the… oh never mind

Last spring, Greg Bird dropped bombs before promptly dropping a turd during the month of April. He looked exceptionally exploitable, batting .100/.250/.200 with a 30.6 percent strikeout rate before injuries waylaid him. Upon his return in late August, Bird delivered for the masses – eight home runs and a .253/.316/.575 slash in 98 plate appearances. He trimmed his strikeout rate to 20.4 percent over the span.

Bird was a player I hyped continuously last winter. His mix of power and an over-50 percent fly ball rate promises a ton of production at homer friendly Yankee Stadium. I did overlook one weakness of extreme fly ball hitters. Bird posted normal-looking BABIPs his entire career. Last year, he cratered to a .194 BABIP. Even if you focus on his post-injury numbers, he managed only a .230 BABIP. Science tells us to expect regression – the good kind – but we also know that his profile usually fits this low BABIP approach. I’m projecting somewhere around a .250 BABIP. Sorry batting average.

The good news is that so long as pitchers don’t find a new hole to exploit, he’ll be quite valuable. Let’s just toss a few numbers on the table – 650 plate appearances > 423 balls in play > 213 fly balls > 32 home runs. I’ve assumed a 25 percent strikeout rate, 10 percent walk rate, 50 percent fly ball rate, and 15 percent HR/FB ratio to arrive at a 32 home run projection over a 650 plate appearance season. Steamer has 31 bombs with a 22 percent strikeout rate.

Yonder I Wander

We made a big deal about Yonder Alonso’s 2017 breakout. A shift in launch angle led to a .275/.372/.562 batting line with 20 home runs through the All Star Break. Alas, he regressed hard in the second half, popping just eight home runs in 223 plate appearances to go with a merely solid .254/.354/.420 slash. Who is the real Yonder?

The player himself acknowledged during the season (in articles google is hiding from me) that his mechanics were affected by old bad habits. Presumably, he’ll spend the offseason doing the same things that led to his surprising power surge. He’ll also benefit from a new home stadium. Progressive Field has a reputation as a pitcher’s park, but it’s extremely friendly to left-handed power – not like the Coliseum or Safeco Field.

If you’re worried about reaching for a guy like Olson or Bird, you should be happy to find Alonso in the later rounds or in the sub-$5 bucket. Even if his second half self is the new reality, we’re looking at a hair over 20 home runs with a fairly high OBP. That should keep in him in an important lineup role for a potent Indians offense, leading to plenty of run support. For those of you in daily lineup leagues, it’s also easy to plop him on the bench versus left-handed pitchers.





You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Ryan BrockMember since 2025
8 years ago

I love this format. It’s great to be able to read a take on a player, but it’s way, way better to have some projection attached to your feelings in the final sentence or two.

Incidentally, I agree on all three guys here, I’ll take each of them comfortably ahead of their current NFBC ADP. Bird might be the biggest target – even if you include some health-related playing time uncertainty, say 580 PA, I have him for 33 HR, 82R, 92RBI, .255 AVG.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago

I saw that 2B stat the other day for Olson and it is incredible. I am not very optimistic about Olson in 2018, largely because of it – and his milb track record. It is generally not a good thing when a young player’s 2B don’t exceed HR significantly as it means that a guy is already selling out for HR or getting lucky. Young players should be learning how to hit if they hope to have a future. Anyone can sell out for HR – it is not something that I ever want to see a young guy doing as there is generally no coming back from that path. It is a trick best left to those trying to hang on to an MLB career. There are players who regularly hit more HR than 2B, but these are veterans or special power hitters – they are exceptions. Ultimately you have to decide if the player, like Olson, really has other-worldly power or if they did something that they will never repeat. Look at fluky power seasons and you will find a list of odd XBH/HR ratios I imagine. The juiced ball era certainly will change things, but it will take some time to see what it really means.

cdarcyMember since 2016
8 years ago

Your home run projections for Olson and Bird don’t take walks into account.

Alan
8 years ago

I did a quick analysis of the top 50 home run hitters from 2016 to see how those with more homers than doubles and triples did in 2017.

The leader among the top 50 home run hitters in 2016 in HR – (2B+3B) is Jedd Gyorko at 20. Next are Mark Trumbo and Todd Frazier at 19, C Davis at 17, K Davis at 16, N Cruz at 15, C Carter and E Gattis at 13, Grandal and Pujols at 12, and Napoli at 11 round out those with a score above 10.

Without getting in to the details, these guys did not generally set the world on fire in 2017. Being slow doesn’t help, and some park effects may not either. Filtering out the oldest and slowest, you get several guys who either lost or were on the verge of losing their job the next season. This is not a good list to be on.

Looking at the 4 to 10 range, you get Adam Jones, EE, Brandon Moss, Miguel Cabrera, Cespedes, and Braun. Fewer extreme “old and slow” players, but also mostly players who disappointed in 2017.

Ryan BrockMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  Alan

Why filter out the slow players? There were only three players (min. 200 PA) slower than Olson by SPD score last year – W.Ramos, Duda, Tulo. Dude is slow.

Alan
8 years ago
Reply to  Ryan Brock

Being very slow (or playing hurt, or smashing balls off a short LF wall) would amplify the statistic I was looking at. If that is the main reason why a player has this statistical result, then it is a symptom and not really a signal about his hitting moving forward.

It may well be that the main reason Olsen has such an extreme result is he is very slow, and that his teammate being on this list may point to a park effect or a risk-averse coach. One could dig into the batted ball distribution, outfield assists, etc. to diagnose any one player in detail. I posted this to suggest that such research may be warranted before investing in anyone on this leaderboard considering they almost all disappointed the next year.

This Guy
8 years ago

Safeco Field is actually very friendly to LH power since the team made some recent changes. Last year it boosted homeruns to right field by 8%.