Matt Carpenter, Surprise Fantasy MVP
Raise your hand if you expected Matt Carpenter to lead all of baseball with 126 runs scored (and not just lead, but trounce the next highest total by 17!) and tie for the lead in total hits recorded. Mrs. Carpenter, put your hand down. That’s what I thought, none of you. According to Zach Sanders’ end of season dollar value calculator, Carpenter earned nearly $26, ranking 19th overall. On the value leaderboard, he rated as the second most profitable hitter and ninth most profitable player behind a slew of starting pitchers. By any method you choose, it’s clear that nobody expected this.
Heading into the regular season, Carpenter wasn’t even guaranteed full-time at-bats. He was making the transition to second base after primarily playing third base last season. While his offense would certainly play better at second, questions about his defense remained. So Daniel Descalso figured to get plenty of time at second as well, unless Carpenter’s offense and defense impressed enough to garner the lion’s share. That must have been motivation enough, as he did exactly that.
His -2.0 UZR/150 at second base was perfectly adequate even if he had just replicated his .355 wOBA from 2012. But that wasn’t enough for him. While he posted an identical 10% walk rate, which was well above the 7.9% league average, he significantly cut down on his strikeouts. That was the result of a much improved contact rate as his SwStk% dropped and his Contact% jumped. This improvement was one of the main reasons his wOBA increased to .381. His Triple-A strikeout rate suggests that he had those skills hidden away all along.
His batted ball profile also lends itself to a high BABIP. He was a line-drive machine, ranking sixth in baseball in LD% among qualified hitters. He also avoided the pop-up, hitting an infield fly ball just once all season long. Hitting line drives and rarely popping out is the recipe for a high BABIP, supporting his .359 mark. It allowed him to hit for average, as his .318 mark ranked ninth in baseball. That was also the highest mark posted by a second baseman.
Typically you want either power or speed from your second baseman. It is rare to get both, but unfortunately, Carpenter didn’t really contribute in either. With just 11 home runs and a 6.1% HR/FB ratio, he was not a home run threat and he swiped just 3 bases in 6 attempts. His lack of power and speed make it even more amazing that he managed to produce such strong fantasy value.
While a higher stolen base output is unlikely, there is some hope for more pop in 2014. His batted ball distance of 272 feet wasn’t impressive and did fall below the league average. But he led baseball with 55 doubles and that could sometimes be a sign of an impending power surge. In the one study I have read, it did find that a high doubles total does not mean that some of those doubles will turn into home runs the following year. This was in the aggregate of course, so this won’t necessarily be the case for every individual player. With just a 6.1% HR/FB ratio, there appears to be ample room for power upside. Even a HR/FB rate spike to 9%, which still remains below the league average, would have resulted in 16 home runs, a total that would have made him more than a two category contributor.
Looking ahead to 2014, I can’t help but feel that he is almost guaranteed to be overvalued. A lot of his value was generated from his league leading 126 runs scored, which cannot be projected to be repeated. While his high OBP atop a strong lineup will absolutely make him a strong contender to again pass the century mark in runs scored, I would think about 105 would be a more reasonable estimate, if not still a bit optimistic. You can’t expect the Cardinals to hit well over .300 with runners in scoring position again! I do think he could hit .300 again, but if the power doesn’t improve, is he really any different than a peak-form Placido Polanco? He was basically an empty batting average, contributing a little bit of power and speed. Carpenter is dangerously close to that level. I would much prefer to gamble on a Rickie Weeks rebound or pay the going rate for a Jean Segura than put all my eggs in the batting average and runs scored basket with Carpenter.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
Maybe I’m missing something since this is for fantasy purposes, but I don’t get the Polanco comparison at all. Polanco never walked all that much (career rate 5.4%) whereas Carpenter has always walked a lot in his pro career. Polanco topped out at .159 ISO in 2003 which was almost exactly league average (NL) at the time and was never a power hitter. Carpenter has topped .160 both last year and this year, when offense is down compared to Polanco’s peak; the NL average was only .137 this year. Carpenter isn’t a big power hitter but I daresay he’s more powerful than Polanco ever was. Polanco never hit an especially large amount of line drives whereas Carpenter hits a lot relative to the league. Polanco as a hitter was dependent on BABIP but I think it would be unfair to write off Carpenter as being that kind of player.
All your comments are correct, but it’s the fantasy aspect and 5×5 contributions. Also, Polanco hit 14 and 17 HRs in just about 500 ABs in back to back seasons.
This is why I prefer my league’s OBP/SLG format to AVG/HR. Carpenter is the perfect player to illustrate it. In traditional fantasy, he needs to score a bajillion runs and have a high BABIP so he can accumulate tons of value in AVG and R. But in my league, his walk rate and his doubles actually count, and so I can be confident he’ll produce next year even with BABIP and R regression.
He did get some hype before the season and was worth the roll of the dice.
Question for you: a h2h-points league I’m in gives +1 for BB, -1 for K, and only +1 for a SB….armed with that knowledge alone, what would be your favorite singular metric for valuing guys? (or 3 favorite…)
Points leagues are super easy to value players for. Find a good set of projections (or create your own with my book, Projecting X!), then just subtract the first replacement total from each position and voila, you have Points Above Replacement Player. Sort by that and you’re done.
Thanks—What’s your standard way of creating the replacement level? Is it based on % owned, or avg number of points? (I now feel dumb. thanks.)
It’s just points. Catchers are easiest to illustrate with. If you start 12 catchers, subtract the projected point total of the 13th catcher from every single catcher for your adjusted point total. This then automatically factors in position scarcity and allows you to directly compare a catcher with a first baseman.
I never really got why conventional fantasy baseball does the whole category thing. No other fantasy sports do, for good reason I think.
I’m in a H2H points league and Carpenter was unbelievable…just like he was in real life. Who cares that he doesn’t steal or hit for lots of power. He was objectively one of the most valuable players in all of baseball, and a top 5 NL hitter in points leagues. Points leagues capture true player value better than contributing across categories. Isn’t playing fantasy supposed to mimic real baseball?
Ah well…
Totally agree. After starting as a pure roto guy, I developed a points league scoring model with a buddy and like it way more. You really get a better sense of who’s actually good in real life, whereas in roto, you just chase stats.
199 hits for Carp is a monster number…dude is as close as you get to automatic for 717 PAs, but in my roto league he wasn’t above average.
In your roto league Carpenter wasn’t above average? In a standard Yahoo 5×5 he finished as the 12th best hitter and 20th ranked player overall – and he was 1B/2B/3B/OF eligible. He was a borderline first-round value in standard 5x5s.
i’ll go one step further. given the popularity of fantasy baseball, i’d wager that the standard 5×5 roto categories are as responsible as “mainstream media traditonalists” for the continued reliance on flawed stats like rbi, wins, and saves to measure player value. I see reliance on these categories as the “paragon” of what fantasy baseball should be as actively damaging to viewing baseball from an analytical pov.
the irony is that the fantasy players are usually the most analytic and saber-friendly even though the leagues use the traditional stats. I would argue that H2H leagues are silly and require too much luck in the format of facing one team each week
i don’t think it’s a flaw of the roto format. it’s a flaw of the categories used. Fangraphs points is roto format and it’s also proof that you can construct a roster that could finish in the bottom half of standard 5×5 and compete when you look at wOBA and FIP. 5×5 cats just aren’t the right way to measure the very things that fantasy baseball is supposed to show: individual player’s talent. the ‘luck’ aspect of h2h leagues could be seen as a flaw, or as a way to make fantasy baseball more like real baseball.
And I disagree that fantasy players are necessarily more analytic than the mainstream. Fantasy is mainstream now. Most of the owners in most of the leagues I’ve been in disagree with me on the fundamental value of RBIs or Wins. I see the same arguments there that I see when I go out to a bar.
I’m just glad the team that had Carpenter didn’t make it out of the first round of the playoffs (Sorry Rich…)
I think the argument you need answer is why Carp and not Chris Davis. Davis went undrafted in every league I’m in and finished Top-5 in every format.
A guy who went .270/75/33/85 last season went undrafed in all of your leagues? Time to find some new leagues.
I traded for him and was really happy with what he got. His high OBP and decent enough slugging (from the doubles) basically allowed me to sneak Pedro Alvarez into the line-up and eat off his power without getting killed by all of the outs he made.
His multi-position eligibility also really helped out a lot. Between him and Ben Zobrist, I was able to weather Anthony Rizzo’s terrible play and Everth Cabrera’s suspension much better than I should I have while looking for their long-term alternatives.
No, I didn’t expect a season this good either, but I did expect him to play fulltime once the 2B experiment was a go, and Jose Oquendo was raving about Carpenter in March. But even without that, Carpenter had enough offensive value to be a player that no team can afford to sit. Like Allen Craig in 2012 and Matt Adams next year. The Cardinals keep coming up with them.
His value wasn’t so much tied in specific stats, but in his ridiculous position flexibility (1B, 2B, 3B, OF in yahoo), which is why I had picked him up. But he was a beast regardless, ending up as my second most valuable offensive player on my team (H2H points league); he was actually 8th best overall in my league. Pretty good for someone who was just sitting on the waiver wire at the beginning of the year.
So here’s a question – with him finishing as a top-20 player in a standard 5×5 keeper – even if he does regress some, is he a surefire keeper over guys like Puig, Myers, or Segura? I can only keep two of the four.
I assume absolutely not, but what are your keeper rules? Just keep your two best players and you lose your first 2 picks? Keep him at the round you drafted him the season before?
Keep players one round above where they were taken – but I added all four as FAs after the draft, so they would all be last-round keepers. So they’re all the same round keepers, but can only keep two of them.
How many years can you keep them for? Puig is the obvious top guy. Second would be between Myers and Segura. The longer the keeper period, the more I lean toward Myers.
Thanks Mike. They can be kept for a max of three years.
I’d see if I could pull off a trade first, but given Myers’ upside, I’d give him a slight nod over Segura.