Manager Influence on Stolen Bases
Earlier this month, I asked our readers for any aspects of the fantasy game which are missing. Okra stepped up and said:
“I feel like we still do a poor job of predicting stole bases. I think we could better utilize the new Sprint Speed data and speed scores to predict SBs. Taking it one step further would be to try and quantify each managers propensity for SB attempts.”
This statement is 100% true. We really don’t know which measurable factors fantasy owners should focus on when looking for stolen base breakouts. I’ve gone ahead and dived into the topic of just the manager influence with positive results.
Truthfully, this topic is a mess. With players, managers, and front offices changing all the time, it’s tough to know where to begin. For now, I’m starting with an initial shallow breakdown of the managers. The biggest issue surrounding the entire topic are each team’s different speed talent levels. Dee Gordon stole 60 bases with the Marlins (RIP). Now, he’ll be stealing bases with the Mariners. Miami’s total stolen bases will drop and the Mariners will rise but how will Gordon’s stats change. I needed a baseline to compare each team.
Here’s my first attempt. It’s heavy on the math and clunky. If anyone notices a way to improve it, please let me know. First, I needed a metric to show stolen base attempt percentage (SBA%) and I went with: (SB+CS)/(1B + HBP +BB)
Now, I’ve seen but can’t find an article at Tom Tango’s new or old website which was a better representation of stolen base opportunities. My Google skills must be subpar at my advanced age. I’d probably use this unknown equation in future attempts but the above one will work for now.
To show each player’s speed, I used the Speed Score available here at FanGraphs as a proxy. While not close to perfect, it provides some context for a hitter’s speed. I know Sprint Speed is available at Baseball Savant but I’m just looking for a basic model for now. Additionally, Sprint Speed is missing one component, acceleration. It may take one player three steps to get up to speed while another may peak at the same speed when reaching first base.
To start with, here is a graph comparing Speed Score to SBA% for hitters with a minimum 200 PA from 2015 to 2017. I used these seasons because I want the option to examine Sprint Speed at some future point and teams are now becoming more attuned to the SBA% needed for positive results:

r of .814
The best-fit equation will be used to find the league average SBA% with a known Speed Score.
Now, the sample size and math get a little fuzzy.
With the above equation, I found the median (some extremely high values messed up the average values) SBA% and Speed Score for each manager (Note: I will continue to state the manger’s influence but the influence could be from other sources like the front office or another coach.) over the past three seasons. With these values, I matched up the seasons when the manager had his job in back-to-back seasons. With these matched seasons, I adjusted SBA% based on the team’s median Speed Score. I ended up with an R of .66 (r-squared of .43).
This finding is a BIG deal. With the R at .66, two-thirds of a manager’s adjusted stolen base rate can be predicted from the previous season’s value with the other one-third being the league average value. Manager stolen base tendencies are highly predictive but do their SBA% vary enough to matter.
Starting with managers’ team Speed Scores, I found the normal SBA% and its ratio to the actual value. Here the 2017 results:

Note: I had values leaning to the positive end and adjusted the values for a 1.0 average ratio. I’m guessing the logarithmic equation is causing the differences. I will try to correct later.
It is quite the difference. Here is an example. Assume a player with a Speed Score of 6 and 200 opportunities (160 1B + 30 BB + 10 HBP). Plugging in his Speed Score for an average team, he ends up with a .073 SBA% or a projected 14.6 SB (.073*200). Now, using the two extreme values, his stolen bases would drop to 8.0 (SBA% .040) with Baltimore’s Buck Showalter or jump to 22.8 with the .114 SBA% from Orange County’s Mike Scioscia.
A difference of 15 stolen bases is again a BIG deal.
Note: One item I’ve noticed is that some players seem to have their own go tendencies independent of the team tendencies. Go figure. It’s another variable to consider. Remember, I just dove in and hope to understand more as I continue to research the topic.
With the preceding information, here are the 2018 projected (very Beta version) manager adjustments with new managers getting a 1.00 value.
| Team | Manager | 2017 SBA% Multiplier | 2018 adjustment w/ regression |
|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Angels | Mike Scioscia | 1.56 | 1.36 |
| Milwaukee Brewers | Craig Counsell | 1.42 | 1.26 |
| Seattle Mariners | Scott Servais | 1.28 | 1.18 |
| Cincinnati Reds | Bryan Price | 1.21 | 1.13 |
| Texas Rangers | Jeff Banister | 1.21 | 1.13 |
| San Francisco Giants | Bruce Bochy | 1.18 | 1.11 |
| Tampa Bay Rays | Kevin Cash | 1.15 | 1.09 |
| San Diego Padres | Andy Green | 1.12 | 1.07 |
| Oakland Athletics | Bob Melvin | 1.12 | 1.07 |
| Houston Astros | A.J. Hinch | 1.08 | 1.04 |
| Kansas City Royals | Ned Yost | 1.03 | 1.01 |
| Cleveland Indians | Terry Francona | 1.02 | 1.00 |
| Toronto Blue Jays | John Gibbons | 1.02 | 1.00 |
| Washington Nationals | Dave Martinez | – | 1.00 |
| Boston Red Sox | Alex Cora | – | 1.00 |
| Detroit Tigers | Ron Gardenhire | – | 1.00 |
| New York Yankees | Aaron Boone | – | 1.00 |
| New York Mets | Mickey Callaway | – | 1.00 |
| Philadelphia Phillies | Gabe Kapler | – | 1.00 |
| Chicago White Sox | Rick Renteria | 0.99 | 0.98 |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | Torey Lovullo | 0.97 | 0.97 |
| Miami Marlins | Don Mattingly | 0.93 | 0.94 |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | Clint Hurdle | 0.92 | 0.93 |
| Minnesota Twins | Paul Molitor | 0.90 | 0.92 |
| Los Angeles Dodgers | Dave Roberts | 0.90 | 0.92 |
| St. Louis Cardinals | Mike Matheny | 0.88 | 0.91 |
| Colorado Rockies | Bud Black | 0.81 | 0.87 |
| Atlanta Braves | Brian Snitker | 0.81 | 0.87 |
| Chicago Cubs | Joe Maddon | 0.75 | 0.82 |
| Baltimore Orioles | Buck Showalter | 0.55 | 0.69 |
An interesting note is on Dee Gordon going to the Mariners. On average, Mattingly limited the number of stolen bases in Miami while Scott Servais lets his players run a little more. While projections have his stolen bases regressing from 60 to 43, the drop may not be as much as projected.
In summary, here are the two main points so far.
- Managers have their own stolen base attempt tendencies with the previous season getting two-thirds the weight and the rest being the league average.
- Managers have extreme tendencies when it comes to allowing stolen base attempts.
I found a little more useful information than I expected. While I expected there to be some differences with the managers, I didn’t expect the year-to-year numbers to be as sticky. It’s a start but the topic needs to be examined further. For my next step, I determine if the prior success rate is needed for a manager to keep sending a runner. I tried to include these values here but the process was too messy. Until then, let me know what you think or how the process can be improved.
Jeff, one of the authors of the fantasy baseball guide,The Process, writes for RotoGraphs, The Hardball Times, Rotowire, Baseball America, and BaseballHQ. He has been nominated for two SABR Analytics Research Award for Contemporary Analysis and won it in 2013 in tandem with Bill Petti. He has won four FSWA Awards including on for his Mining the News series. He's won Tout Wars three times, LABR twice, and got his first NFBC Main Event win in 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jeffwzimmerman.
Perhaps I missed a detail, but can’t a lot of this be tied to managers managing the same players in Year 1 and 1+X? And also the profile of player those managers like. I think less of this is about how often the runners get a red/green light and more about who specifically is on the rosters.
This is great, Jeff. Manager Influence on Steals was something I looked at a bit when I was with BP using a kind of WOWY method, but it wound up being kind of noisy and I didn’t love what I came up with. There’s got to be something to it, though, and I think having raw speed data could be the missing piece to really identifying it.
I guess my question is the same as Brad’s, though. How are you accounting for, say, Bryan Price having Billy Hamilton every year. Or Craig Counsell not having Jonathan Villar one year but having him the next. I’d almost think you want to look at the actual SBA% compared to the Speed Score-predicted SBA% or something like that to try to isolate the manager’s effect. And then look at year-to-year for that to see how much regression you need. What we really want is manager impact independent of the personnel he’s given, right?
One other thought: IIRC Speed Score has 2/5 of its components made up of SB data. Do you strip that part of the equation out or leave it in?
Left SB numbers in Speed Score for now. An issue I know but needed to find a process and clean up from there.
As for different players, set the managers to the same level:
“With these matched seasons, I adjusted SBA% based on the team’s median Speed Score.”
I adjusted Y2 values to Y1 values depending on team speed score.
I’ve dug some more and the top guys cause the system to start breaking. The system works better 30 SB or fewer guys.
Okay cool. I think I follow but not sure I understand the exact machination. How are you adjusting Y2?
(I remember finding some issues with the really fast guys too)
Totaly making up numbers but here is this process for the adjustment.
Y1
4.0 Speed Score
.08 SBA%
Y2
5.0 Speed Score (SS)
.10 SBA%
Kept Y1 SBA% the same and adjusted Y2 to it.
Find league SBA% for 5.0 SS. Is .061
Find league SBA% for 4.0 SS. Is .049
Difference is 0.012 (.061-.049)
Then I adjusted Y2 to .088 (.10-.012).
I compared .08 to .088
This is important to control for a change in the league environment, but I’m still not following how it controls for the quality/speed of the players on a given manager’s team.
On average teams with an average speed score of 5 have an SBA% 1.2% points higher than one with an average speed score of 4. I’m assuming the league-wide difference will apply to individual teams also.
raw speed data: https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/sprint_speed_leaderboard
Interesting stuff as always, Jeff. Question: so you are starting w/ a Speed Score neutral projection for hitters. By stripping out actual SBA rate, aren’t you removing some signals like: 1) Does this player have a ‘skill’ at stealing? and 2) Does this player have a self-imposed or team-imposed red light because of health – e.g., Bryce Harper.
Re: #1, i remember Bernie Williams as a fast player in his youth who had no SB skill whatsoever. there are also fast guys like Adam Eaton that, for whatever reason, never became high SB guys.
I would think a combo of speed score + SB proclivity would be the better baseline….but, of course, that muddies the test.
Another example would seem to be Tim Anderson. Universal disappointment in SBs. High speed score. Two years under two managers. I’d be wary to blame Renteria for his lack of SBs (though Moncada’s surprisingly low SB total makes me wonder if it’s an organizational mandate).
Besides stealing being a “skill”, isn’t raw speed a skill that should be considered here too?
https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/sprint_speed_leaderboard
Tim Anderson a lowly 50th on this leaderboard. Whereas Amed Rosario ranked very highly – maybe he’s a guy with big SB upside.
I mentioned Sprint Speed and incorporating it at some point.
Bernie was the first guy to come to mind for me too. I think that was because it took him a little bit to get going, but once he did he could fly (slow acceleration).
There are so many holes that can be shot into this process. The variables are so many.
One solution I’ve thought of is matching players into pairs from different teams and comparing the results.
I tried to look at this myself a lot in the past 2 seasons, and I think there’s a few factors missing. Here are some of the factors that could affect a true SBO:
1 – LHP or RHP on the mound (team’s might be less inclined to steal 2nd on a LHP)
2 – # of outs in the inning (SB happen less frequently with 2 outs)
3 – Skill of the opposing catcher (Everyone ran on Miguel Montero in 2017)
4 – Runner on 2nd with 3rd open (TB stole 3rd Base for 19.6% of their total SBA)
5 – What inning (team’s tend to run less in the 9th inning)
6 – Score of the game (team’s run less with a sizable lead)
7 – Fielder’s Indifference moments (so frustrating in fantasy)
So while attempting to quantify these factors into the exercise, it becomes very difficult to pinpoint a true SBO. If you could somehow account for all of those instances, per player, per team, you might get a rounder number for the process.
For now, I go with what Baseball Reference has with SBO (Plate appearances through which a runner was on first or second with the next base open.). It obviously doesn’t factor in double steals, so it’s far from perfect too. https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/2017-baserunning-batting.shtml
**Missed your bit about other coaches & front office influence
Also, it’s worth mentioning that the First Base Coach has a lot of impact on stolen bases, ie Dave McKay. Since joining the Dbacks in 2014, McKay greatly increased the team’s baserunning while serving under 3 different managers (Gibson, Hale, Lovullo).
“Alex Cora” is not especially helpful for a Red Sox fan. My gut sense is that Terry Francona and John Farrell were fairly similar in calling for steals* which could reflect an organizational philosophy.
*Farrell’s Red Sox in 2017 were wildly aggressive in trying to take the extra base, but that’s a different story.
I worked on this a little as well and I tried to look at it from a different angle. I came up with a SBA% for each player using a regression based on the speed data from Baseball Savant. The idea for this is to give us a rough estimate of the SBA% for each player independent of the team. No it’s not perfect and doesn’t take into account reaction time, acceleration and all that stuff but it does give a R Squared of 0.45 which is pretty good based on speed alone.
After that I did the difference between actual SBA% and predicted SBA% for each player and then summed all those values by team. Obviously by doing a sum, the values themselves don’t mean much other than to compare between teams (although this last part can be easily fixed with a little more time). Here is what I got:
Angels 0.80
Brewers 0.64
Rangers 0.38
Mariners 0.29
Nationals 0.21
Blue Jays 0.19
Diamondbacks 0.18
Reds 0.16
Red Sox 0.08
Astros 0.05
Orioles 0.00
Tigers -0.01
Braves -0.06
Giants -0.06
Pirates -0.10
Cardinals -0.12
Rays -0.13
Dodgers -0.14
Indians -0.16
Athletics -0.17
Rockies -0.18
Mets -0.21
Cubs -0.24
Royals -0.26
Padres -0.28
Yankees -0.28
Phillies -0.29
Twins -0.32
White Sox -0.37
Marlins -0.43
What this tells us is that a player with say x speed will run much more if he was with the Angels than if he was with the Marlins.
A lot more time would be needed on this from someone with more knowledge than I have but personally that’s the way I’d look at this and at first glance the results seem to make sense.