How Much Can Nick Castellanos Improve?
Were you to look at the dashboard stats on the player page of Nick Castellanos, you might be very concerned about his batting average next year. He hit just .259 despite a robust .326 BABIP because he struck out too much (24.2% K%). Because BABIP is less within the control of the player than strikeout rate is, it’s fair to be concerned that Castellanos’ BABIP could fall and his batting average along with it unless accompanied by a surprising drop in strikeout rate. But BABIP isn’t completely out of a hitter’s control, and Castellanos might have more control over his.
The reason is that Castellanos was one of the best hitters in baseball this year in terms of squaring the ball up. Among 146 qualified hitters, Castellanos had the second highest line drive rate (28.5%) and the 12th lowest infield fly ball percentage (2.1%). There were only four other qualified hitters with a line drive rate higher than 25% and an IFFB% lower than 3%. All four of those hitters had a BABIP between .342 and .351. You could pretty easily make the argument that Castellanos’ BABIP was actually unlucky.
The four guys similar to Castellanos are Freddie Freeman, Joe Mauer, Matt Kemp and Chris Johnson. Going back to 2012, those guys all have a .340 BABIP or higher over the last three years. That makes me think Castellanos can maintain the better-than-average BABIP going forward. If that’s true, the floor is set on his batting average, and there is upside if a) his BABIP rises as seems possible and/or b) he cuts down the strikeouts.
Whether his BABIP is above average or way above average is probably impossible to predict, but nothing jumps out to indicate that his strikeout rate may fall. His strikeout rate didn’t get better as the year went along according to his monthly splits. And if you split his year in half, it doesn’t appear that he improved his plate discipline or made more contact in the second half of the year. As a crude way of way explaining that without having to post four images from BrooksBaseball.net, Castellanos’ strikeout rate was about 4% higher post-All Star break.
The best hope for an improving strikeout rate is simply his age. As Jeff Zimmerman showed us at the beginning of the year (picture below), young hitters see a decline in strikeouts until age 25 on average.
If that holds true for Castellanos and his BABIP rises, Castellanos could easily hit .285 or higher as have all players similar to him mentioned above since 2012. With an extra 25+ points of batting average, Castellanos probably would have finished the year as the 15th best third baseman as opposed to 20th and being almost exactly average for the position according to Zach Sanders’ end-of-season valuations.
The problem is that it’s hard to see Castellanos having upside in any other categories. He might be able to hit more than 11 home runs. But probably not too many more. Assuming his HR/FB rate rose from 7.5% to the league average of 9.5%, he’d hit 14 home runs in the same number of plate appearances if all his other rate stats stayed the same. But if we’re going to cite Zimmerman’s research on aging curves to be hopeful that Castellanos strikes out less, we can’t expect his power production to grow too much.
The only other hope for upside with Castellanos is that he moves up in the batting order. He hit 6-7-8 almost exclusively in 2014, and only scored 50 runs and drove in 66 runs from that position. Were to he hit higher in the order, it wouldn’t be unreasonable for him to do what Pablo Sandoval did this year: .279, 16 HR, 68 R, 73 RBI. That would make him a top 10 player at the position. But a move up the lineup doesn’t seem likely, so he’s probably a top 15 type 3B with an outside shot to crack the top 12.
You can find more of Brett's work on TheFantasyFix.com or follow him on Twitter @TheRealTAL.


You say his power won’t grow, if at all past 14 homers then you say it wouldn’t be unreasonable to project 16 from him. Makes no sense.
Let me clarify. First, I never said he couldn’t hit more than 14 homers. I said that’s what he would have hit with a league average HR/FB rate this year. I also didn’t rule out that his HR/FB could be abnormally high in a season and allow him to top 14.
Second, I should have said “something like what Pablo Sandoval did.” When I was referring to Sandoval-like production, I was referring to the totality of his production. With a slightly higher batting average and a homer or two less, he could be as valuable a fantasy player as Sandoval. I didn’t mean he’d produce the exact same line in all categories.
Lets write an article for stats-minded people and include mostly opinions.
Were the opinions not based on stats?
Isn’t the point to look at the stats and the player and try to gauge his value?
I’ve always kind of seen this guy as another Chris Johnson: a decent band-aid off the waiver wire to get you through a few games when needed.
Agreed.
Why was he such a top prospect, ranked #11 overall by MLB prior to 2013? The consensus back then seemed to be that he was a pure hitter, with developing power. I realize he did not live up to those expectations this year, and generally agree with your analysis, but he was barely 22. Seems a little premature to write him off as Chris Johnson already.
Plus to plus-plus hit tool and plus raw power.
Nick Castellanos is going to improve his hitting, that should be a given. His low walk rate, though, like several Tigers present and past needs improvement.
The thing for me is, will he improve on his fielding at third base? Switched back and forth from LF, RF, and back to 3rd. slow first step, worse fielding numbers than Cabrera at third. I can’t help but think, we are looking at a young 20’s DH with Nick.
Man, almost exactly my thoughts. He was brutal at 3B, looks more like a LFer long term. But you can see the swing is there, and this was his rookie season, .280-.300 and 15+ HRs looks possible, maybe more if he learns to pull the ball in the air. He showed some opposite field pop but Comerica is not friendly to that for a RH batter unless you are Miguel Cabrera or JD Martinez. His biggest flaws are low walks and horrible defense.
Should we trade Aroldis Chapman for him, though?
I’m no Tigers fan, but the guy seemed to hold his own at the plate as a 22 yo this year. I think a fantasy owner can squint and see .275 – 15 – 75 co,ing soon.
I agree completely that his D needs to improve for him to stick at 3B; otherwise I think LF/DH is in his future, and he’s awfully young and not good enough of a hitter to be thinking about DH at this point.
Jeez, I coulda done that….and he’s called Nick the Stick?