Chris Davis, Swallowed By the Shift

You likely spent a late first round or early second round pick for him, paid $30+ to secure his services or were giddy about protecting him at a low cost in your keeper league. And then he made your heart sink. Chris Davis ranked 20th among first basemen and amazingly was outearned by the likes of teammate Steve Pearce and power-starved James Loney. This was not the follow-up we expected.

We always knew that Davis possessed mammoth power and so his dazzling 2013 performance wasn’t really out of the realm of possibility. In fact, nothing in his underlying stats were out of the ordinary. While he did bump up his HR/FB rate by a somewhat meaningful amount, his power outburst was driven more by a fly ball rate surge. A career high FB%, combined with a career high HR/FB rate was all it took to eclipse the 50-homer plateau. While we had to assume some level of regression, especially since there was no telling how much of that fly ball rate increase he would sustain, no one could have predicted the decline he eventually endured.

But, it wasn’t his power that led to his wOBA plummeting by more than 100 points. Well, yes it did play a role. His ISO fell from .348 to .209, but he still posted a HR/FB rate above 20%, while his batted ball distance flirted with the 300 foot level (though that did represent about an 11 foot decline from 2013). His doubles rate is where you’ll see the most evidence of a loss in power — his at bats per double skyrocketed from 13.9 to 28.1. So it wasn’t simply a matter of switching the split between doubles and homers, but severely less power overall. Again though, that wasn’t the biggest driver of his hugely disappointing season from a fantasy perspective.

Instead, the problem stemmed from his batting average. A .196 mark over 450 at-bats is a fantasy killer. His strikeout rate jumped to the second highest mark of his career, which provided some of the explanation. But the rest of it could be explained by his BABIP. Generally a strong BABIPer and coming off two straight seasons with marks in the mid-.330 range, Davis posted a measly .242 mark this year, nearly 100 points below the last two years.

In recent years, the defensive shift has been in vogue. And we’ve talked about it a lot on here and attempted to account for it when formulating an xBABIP metric. Since Davis is a lefty, the immediate reaction is that he must be facing lots of shifts. Well, let’s first check out his spray chart to determine if it would make sense for defenses to employ one on him:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Chris Davis Spray Chart

We find that blob of black dots between first and second base that represents grounders to Davis’ pull side. So yup, it would certainly appear that he makes for a strong shift candidate. He uses the whole field when hitting balls into the outfield, but the grounder is typically pulled.

But if teams have always known this, haven’t they always shifted him? And if they have always shifted him, how has he managed to post such strong BABIP marks? Excellent questions inquisitive one!

Armed with the data from SQL wizard Jeff Zimmerman, check out the shift numbers since 2012:

Season At-Bats Balls in Play Shift Count % Shifted Shift BABIP No Shift BABIP
2012 515 346 110 31.8% 0.364 0.323
2013 584 385 199 51.7% 0.302 0.431
2014 450 277 230 83.0% 0.230 0.353

In his first real full season in 2012, teams had the right idea about shifting him, doing so for about 32% of his balls in play. But it didn’t matter, as he managed to post a higher BABIP when shifted than when not! Teams looked past the small sample results and given his propensity to pull ground balls, decided to shift significantly more in 2013. His shift BABIP fell, but it still remained respectable at around the league average.

But this year, teams went bananas with the shift, doing so 83% of the time! Perhaps with two years of data in their back pockets, teams learned precisely where to station their fielders, as Davis’ BABIP into the shift plunged to just .230. His BABIP without the shift remained well above average, but it didn’t matter since he rarely faced a straight up defense. Since his overall batted ball distribution remained excellent, as he continued to hit lots of line drives and avoid the pop-up, the shift was his worst enemy. Unfortunately, without more detailed data about where his balls went when shifted, it’s difficult to determine how much of the low BABIP was bad luck and how much was directly the result of the shift. I would speculate though that since his shift BABIP dropped so significantly, there is seemingly some element of bad luck involved. How much is anyone’s guess.

It’s clear in the era of the shift that Davis will continue to face it. It would be easy to assume his BABIP should rebound some next year, but it’s impossible to know by how much. The Steamer projections have no knowledge of defensive shifts and therefore look to Davis’ career BABIP of .320 and project a .307 mark next season. Will it rebound that high? Or does Davis remain under .300 unless he makes some adjustments that force teams to shift him less often? Whatever the case, a scary low batting average is always a risk when dealing with a player who strikes out nearly a third of the time.

Heading into next year, it will be interesting to see how fantasy owners value him in drafts. Does his value drop far enough that he’ll now cost similarly to what he did coming off his solid 2012 campaign? Since his fly ball rate finished in between his 2013 and previous season marks, then he could easily post a high-30 homer season. This of course assumes his strikeout rate gets back to about 30%, rather than the 33% mark he posted this season. It might come with a .240 average though, which remains the downside risk. Depending on your league, he could end up a good value or not.

**I have ignored Davis’ positive amphetamine test as anything I say would be pure speculation, so there’s little reason to discuss it





Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jon L.Member since 2016
11 years ago

Great data! I noticed his 2014 BABIPs against the shift and not against the shift fell by virtually the same amount. It’s a small sample for the latter – fewer than 50 balls in play – but suggests he may have been hitting the ball with less authority.

Stuck in a slump
11 years ago

I swapped underperforming 1B at the deadline this year, trading Butler for Davis. While Davis’ average was brutal, his power helped make up for the vaccuum left behind by injured superstars and Moss’ hip induced slump. With him gaining 3B eligibility for next year I’m hoping that the gamble will pay off. For some reason Steamer has him projected for 1 PA next year, but the triple slash looks about right, the K’s seem right, and the BB% a little low. I’ll happily take that line with 30-35 HR’s from a guy who can play both IF corners. The bonus of not having to worry about Butler losing 1B eligibility at any point definitely makes me happy. That constant threat of Hosmer performing well and being healthy to play 160 games at 1B was always in the back of my mind.

Alas
11 years ago

Did they shift the thirdbaseman to over the right-field wall?

Patrick
11 years ago

I would think that Chris Davis’s value would be in the same neighborhood as Chris Carter.

redlegs44
11 years ago

Why is there a green mark, indicating a single, in foul territory on the first base side.

JR Ewing
11 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

The MLB scorer was off his Adderral that day.

santorumforpresident
11 years ago

I’d like to see the play that resulted in that single in the bottom right hand side of the spray chart.

Travis L
11 years ago

Wow, fantastic article! Really goes into the components of his struggles.

And kudos to you for your asterisk. That’s a sensible way of dealing with it, which is a rarity w/r/t P.E.D.s.

MustBunique
11 years ago

Hey Mike and/or Jeff, are you going to post the 2014 data for all players vs the shift? That would be very helpful. Great stuff, as always.

MustBunique
11 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Nice! Thanks Mike. That will be awesome.

Sorbil
11 years ago

Is the shift count coming only from batted balls rather than from all AB? If not, then the remainder of the table is way off because it assumes it is.

Sorbil
11 years ago
Reply to  Mike Podhorzer

Seems reasonable, but the numbers still don’t seem to add up (tho 2014 is reasonably close). If you take the weighted average of shifted and non-shifted BABIP each year I would think it should match the player’s actual BABIP for that season. Using 2013 as an example, shift and non-shift are roughly even % which would suggest his total BABIP should be about half way between the two, which would be a number around .360ish. Has actual BABIP for 13 was .336. The number of BIP looks right. 2012 is also off when computed this way, tho not by as much, and 14 is closer but still not right.

Regarding the central point, the impact of the shift, I concur but believe it is being exaggerated. His FB BABIP was much higher in 13 than in 12 (.205 vs. .112) despite many more shifts in 13. In 14 it fell even below 2012 levels to only .087. Not sure how much shift impacts FB BABIP, but think this would be more likely not due to shift. He hits as many FB as GB. His LD BABIP went from .79 to .765 to .59. Shift can definitely take away LD hits, and perhaps, as you suggest the shift was being executed better in 2014, but again I suspect this fall is largely not due to shift. His GB BABIP fell from .226 to .181 to .144, and reasonably much of this could be attributed to the shift.

If we use 2012 as a baseline, the increased shifting might be costing him 10-20+ points of average. He lost more from the drop in HR.

Not trying to be overly critical – articles such as these are a great way to kickstart discussions on matters of wide interest, such as impact of shifts and the collapse of C. Davis.